Midtjylland vs AGF: match statistics
Midtjylland vs AGF: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Midtjylland played against AGF in Superliga (Denmark). The game was played on April 20, 2026. Final score: 2:1.
Recent form
Midtjylland has 1 win, 3 draws and 1 loss over its last five games, averaging 1.20 points per game. AGF has 2 wins, 3 draws and 0 losses, with 1.80 points per game.
Scoring records
Midtjylland scores 2.42 goals per game and allows 1.08. AGF scores 1.92 and allows 1.00. Games in this league average 3.11 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 62% of Midtjylland's games and 73% of AGF's. The Over 2.5 rates are 62% and 54%, compared with league averages of 61% for BTTS and 61% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
AGF has the higher season xG average, 1.89 to 1.69 per game. Midtjylland takes 14.5 shots per game, while AGF takes 16.2.
First-half and second-half trends
Midtjylland leads at halftime in 35% of its games and scores 1.42 goals per game after halftime. AGF leads at halftime in 62% and scores 1.00 after halftime.
When the teams score
Midtjylland's most productive scoring window is minutes 76-90+ (14 goals). For AGF, it is minutes 61-75 (11 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Superliga games average 3.11 goals. Both teams score in 61% of games, and 61% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, 2 previous meetings were available. The record was 0 home wins, 2 draws and 0 away wins. Those games averaged 1.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
I back the home win. Midtjylland have scored 63 goals this season versus 50 for AGF, and at home they average 2.77 goals per game with an xG of 1.83, while AGF average 2.08 goals away with an xG of 1.53. The hosts register 6.62 on-target shots at home and maintain 57% possession, whereas the visitors have 4.85 on-target shots and 49% possession, translating into a higher volume and quality of chances for Midtjylland. Defensively AGF are slightly favoured (1.15 goals conceded away vs 1.31 conceded by Midtjylland at home), but Midtjylland keep more clean sheets at home (23% vs 8%) and have superior conversion (18% vs 15%). Considering the xG advantage, shot volume and efficiency differential, I assess the probabilities as: Home 55%, Draw 25%, Away 20%.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
The main indicators favor Goal/Goal: AGF has BTTS at 92% this season, Midtjylland 54%, and in the last 5 matches both teams registered BTTS at 80%. Average goals scored and conceded confirm this — Midtjylland scores 1.77 and concedes 0.85 on average, AGF scores 2.08 and concedes 1.15, so both sides regularly participate in goal exchanges. In chance quality Midtjylland generates xG 2.24 per match versus xG against AGF 1.48, while AGF has xG 1.53 against Midtjylland’s defensive xG against 1.06; although the home side has more shots on target (6.69 vs 4.85), the visitors convert better (15% vs 9%). The opposing risk stems from Midtjylland keeping a clean sheet in 46% of matches, while AGF only in 8%, but AGF failed to score in 0% of the season’s matches and Midtjylland failed to score in just 15%, which still favors the both teams to score scenario. Based on these data (notably AGF’s 92% BTTS, 80% BTTS in the last 5 matches and xG advantage 2.24 vs 1.48) I recommend BTTS = Yes with a probability of 75% versus 25% for No.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
xG and goals-per-game analysis indicates high scoring potential: Midtjylland generates xG 2.24 and averages 1.77 goals per match, while AGF has xG 1.53 and averages 2.08 goals. Accounting for defensive quality (Midtjylland concedes xG 1.06, AGF 1.48) I expect approximately 1.86 goals for the home side and 1.30 for the visitors, totaling 3.16 expected goals. Seasonal metrics confirm this picture — Over 1.5 occurs in 62% of Midtjylland’s matches and 100% of AGF’s, and both teams scored in 54% and 92% of matches respectively. Based on this the model assigns roughly 82% probability to Over 1.5, 61% to Over 2.5 and 39% to Over 3.5, so the strongest play is on Over 1.5.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
I back 1/1 (Midtjylland leads at the break and wins the match). Midtjylland holds a clear advantage in xG and chances: xG is 2.24 versus 1.53 for AGF, with an average of 19.0 shots compared to 13.46 and 6.69 vs 4.85 shots on target, indicating the home side’s control of the game. By half-time the hosts score on average 0.85 goals and lead at the break in 62% of matches (8 times), while conceding only 0.31 first-half goals on average and keeping a first-half clean sheet in 69% of games, which supports Midtjylland leading after 45 minutes. Over the full match Midtjylland averages 1.77 goals scored and 0.85 conceded seasonally versus AGF’s 2.08 scored and 1.15 conceded, so although AGF scores more on average, the hosts’ superiority in xG and shots points to their eventual victory. At the same time AGF has a high rate of both teams scoring (92% of its matches), so I allow for scenarios with goals at both ends (X/1, X/X), but 1/1 is the strongest signal.
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Midtjylland | AGF | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 41% | 36% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.40 | 0.33 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
AGF is 50% better for: last-5 form.
1.2 pts / game - Midtjylland · 1.8 pts / game - AGF
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Midtjylland is 26% better for: goals scored per game.
2.42 goals / game - Midtjylland · 1.92 goals / game - AGF
AGF is 8% better for: goals allowed per game.
1.08 goals / game - Midtjylland · 1 goals / game - AGF
Midtjylland scores in 85% of games (22 of 26 meczów), while AGF keeps a clean sheet in 27% (7 of 26 meczów).
AGF scores in 92% of games (24 of 26 meczów), while Midtjylland keeps a clean sheet in 31% (8 of 26 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Midtjylland
Over / Under - AGF
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
AGF is 34% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.58 pts / game - Midtjylland · 2.12 pts / game - AGF
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Midtjylland - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 35% of games and wins 54%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.3 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
AGF - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 62% of games and wins 62%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.2 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.40 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.2 | 0.8 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.0 | 1.0 |
| Average goals per game | 0.2 | 1.8 |
| 1 goal | 20% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 100% | 20% |
| No goal | 80% | 40% |
| Goal difference | +1 | -1 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.20 | 1.80 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.4 | 0.8 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.4 | 0.4 |
| Average goals per game | 0.8 | 1.2 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 60% |
| No goal | 80% | 40% |
| Goal difference | 0 | +2 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (14 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (11). Late-goal balance (76-90): +3 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (11 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Midtjylland
AGF
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Superliga).
Teams vs league
| Midtjylland | Liga | AGF | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▲ 3.50 | 3.11 | ▼ 2.92 |
| Both teams scored | • 62% | 61% | ▲ 73% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | • 62% | 61% | ▼ 54% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 31% | 22% | ▲ 27% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 58% | 74% | ▲ 77% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 88% | 78% | ▼ 69% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Record from Midtjylland's perspective: 0 wins, 2 draws and 0 losses against AGF. Games average 1.00 goals, and both teams scored in 50% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Midtjylland vs AGF?
The Superliga match finished Midtjylland 2:1 AGF. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Midtjylland and AGF?
In the last 2 head-to-head matches Midtjylland won 0, AGF won 0 and 2 ended level. These games averaged 1.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Midtjylland vs AGF?
Midtjylland score 2.42 goals per game on average and AGF 1.92. The Superliga average is 3.11 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 61% of games. Both teams score in 62% of Midtjylland's matches and 73% of AGF's.
What form are Midtjylland and AGF in?
Over the last 5 games Midtjylland have a 1-3-1 record (1.20 points per game) and AGF 2-3-0 (1.80 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Midtjylland vs AGF?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.


