United States - MLS Next ProData current as of September 07, 2026

Minnesota United II vs Tacoma Defiance: match statistics

Minnesota United II vs Tacoma Defiance: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

Minnesota United II played against Tacoma Defiance in MLS Next Pro (United States). The game was played on June 29, 2026. Final score: 2:2.

Recent form

Minnesota United II has 3 wins, 0 draws and 2 losses over its last five games, averaging 1.80 points per game. Tacoma Defiance has 4 wins, 0 draws and 1 loss, with 2.40 points per game.

Scoring records

Minnesota United II scores 1.44 goals per game and allows 1.44. Tacoma Defiance scores 1.07 and allows 1.33. Games in this league average 3.25 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 50% of Minnesota United II's games and 40% of Tacoma Defiance's. The Over 2.5 rates are 50% and 53%, compared with league averages of 62% for BTTS and 65% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

Minnesota United II has the higher season xG average, 1.68 to 1.37 per game. Minnesota United II takes 14.4 shots per game, while Tacoma Defiance takes 11.8.

First-half and second-half trends

Minnesota United II leads at halftime in 38% of its games and scores 0.75 goals per game after halftime. Tacoma Defiance leads at halftime in 13% and scores 0.73 after halftime.

When the teams score

Minnesota United II's most productive scoring window is minutes 16-30 (5 goals). For Tacoma Defiance, it is minutes 46-60 (7 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

MLS Next Pro games average 3.25 goals. Both teams score in 62% of games, and 65% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

Before this game, 2 previous meetings were available. The record was 0 home wins, 2 draws and 0 away wins. Those games averaged 2.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

The favorites are the hosts Minnesota United II: at home they average 1.75 goals per match and have an average xG of 1.93, while Tacoma Defiance score only 0.83 goals on average in away matches with an xG of 1.24. Minnesota generates significantly more high-quality chances — averaging 15.75 shots and 6.38 on target per home match versus 11 shots and just 2.5 on target for Tacoma — which is also reflected in the higher conversion rate (11% vs 8%). Defensively the hosts concede 1.38 goals at home and keep 38% clean sheets, whereas the visitors concede 2.00 goals on average away, have a -7 goal difference on the road and only 17% clean sheets; additionally Tacoma fail to score in 50% of away matches (vs 25% for the hosts). Trends are mixed: Tacoma have won 4 of their last 5 matches overall and average 2.4 points per match in their last 5, but their away statistics (67% away losses) indicate problems on the road, while Minnesota have 3 wins in their last 5 and 1.8 points per match. Considering the home advantage in xG, shot volume, lower average goals conceded and lower share of home matches without a goal, I assess the probabilities as: home win 65%, draw 20%, away win 15%.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

MLS Next Pro has BTTS at 62%, a strong indicator that matches in this competition often end with goals from both sides. Minnesota United II registers BTTS in 44% of matches this season, produces xG 1.45, scores 1.22 goals per game, averages 12.33 shots with 4.67 on target, and has 23 goals for and 23 against, indicating real attacking potential. Tacoma Defiance has a seasonal BTTS of 33%, records xG 1.24, but only averages 0.83 goals scored and 2.00 conceded per game with 2.5 shots on target and 16 goals scored, pointing to vulnerability in the away defense. In the last 5 matches Minnesota has 60% BTTS with an average of 2.4 scored and 1.8 conceded, while Tacoma has 20% BTTS with 1.2 scored and 0.4 conceded on average, so the hosts recently both score and concede more often. Considering the league-wide 62%, the higher xG for both sides (1.45 vs 1.24) and the seasonal fragility of the away defense (2.00 conceded), I favor the 'BTTS - Yes' scenario 60% to 40% for 'No'.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

The xG-based model gives a total expected goals of 2.90: the home side has xG 1.45 and the opponent’s average xG conceded is 1.62, translating to about 1.54 goals for Minnesota United II; the away side has xG 1.24 against the home conceded xG 1.48, yielding 1.36 for Tacoma Defiance. From a Poisson distribution with mean 2.90 the probability of over 1.5 goals is roughly 79%, over 2.5 about 55%, and over 3.5 about 33%. Additionally, Minnesota averages 2.4 goals in their last 5 matches (12 goals in the last 5), averages 12.33 shots and 4.67 shots on target with a 10% conversion rate; Tacoma scores 0.83 goals this season but concedes 2.0 per match and 83% of their games feature over 1.5 goals. Considering the expected total of 2.90, the clear attacking advantage of the home side and the league average of 3.24 goals per game, the strongest signal is to play the over at the 1.5 line (over 1.5).

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

The home side hold a clear offensive edge: they score on average 1.22 goals per match versus 0.83 for the visitors, record higher xG (1.45 vs 1.24) and average 4.67 shots on target per game compared to 2.5 for their opponents. First halves are generally low-scoring — the hosts average 0.44 goals by the break, the visitors 0.17, with mean first-half goals of 0.89 for the home team and 0.83 for the away team; a draw at half-time occurs in 44% of the hosts’ matches (the visitors’ data show 67% draws at the break). After the break the home team more frequently takes the initiative: in second halves the hosts average 0.78 goals, and their average points per match is 1.56 versus 0.67 for the visitors, which increases the likelihood of a win after 90 minutes. Additionally, the away team concedes on average 2.0 goals per match and has a lower clean sheet percentage (17% vs 33% for the hosts), so the most probable scenario is a draw at half-time and a home win at full-time (X/1).

View first-half and second-half statistics

Stats by half

1 : 1
First half
1 : 1
Second half

Game stats

51Possession (%)49
Minnesota United IITacoma Defiance
11Shots15
Minnesota United IITacoma Defiance
5Shots on target7
Minnesota United IITacoma Defiance
1.35xG1.91
Minnesota United IITacoma Defiance
4Corners5
Minnesota United IITacoma Defiance
42Dangerous attacks65
Minnesota United IITacoma Defiance
8Fouls14
Minnesota United IITacoma Defiance
0Cards1
Minnesota United IITacoma Defiance

Pre-game profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

Minnesota United IITacoma Defiance
1.44Goals scored / game1.07
Minnesota United IITacoma Defiance
1.44Goals allowed / game1.33
Minnesota United IITacoma Defiance
Minnesota United IITacoma Defiance
48%Average possession45%
Minnesota United IITacoma Defiance
4.5Shots on target / game3.8
Minnesota United IITacoma Defiance
Minnesota United IITacoma Defiance

Team statswho is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

14.44Shots per game11.8
Minnesota United IITacoma Defiance
4.5Shots on target3.8
Minnesota United IITacoma Defiance
10%Shot conversion9%
Minnesota United IITacoma Defiance
48%Possession45%
Minnesota United IITacoma Defiance
1.68xG for1.37
Minnesota United IITacoma Defiance
1.39xG against1.54
Minnesota United IITacoma Defiance

Shooting quality

Minnesota United II: AttackingTacoma Defiance: Balanced
Minnesota United IITacoma Defiance
Accuracy (shots on target)31%32%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.320.28

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

Tacoma Defiance is 33% better for: last-5 form.

1.8 pts / game - Minnesota United II · 2.4 pts / game - Tacoma Defiance

Minnesota United II
WWLWL
Season result split
44% W13% R44% P
Season (W-D-L)
7-2-7
1.44 pts / game · goal difference 0
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-0-2
1.80 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
4-2-2
Last 5 at home
3-1-1
DWWLW
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 2.4Goals conceded: 1.8xG: 1.84Opponent xG: 1.69BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%
Tacoma Defiance
WWLWW
Season result split
33% W20% R47% P
Season (W-D-L)
5-3-7
1.20 pts / game · goal difference -4
Last 5 (W-D-L)
4-0-1
2.40 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
1-1-4
Last 5 away
1-1-3
LDLWL
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.2Goals conceded: 0.4xG: 1.27Opponent xG: 1.50BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 20%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Minnesota United II is 35% better for: goals scored per game.

1.44 goals / game - Minnesota United II · 1.07 goals / game - Tacoma Defiance

Tacoma Defiance is 8% better for: goals allowed per game.

1.44 goals / game - Minnesota United II · 1.33 goals / game - Tacoma Defiance

Minnesota United II scoring profile: strong

Minnesota United II scores in 69% of games (11 of 16 meczów), while Tacoma Defiance keeps a clean sheet in 27% (4 of 15 meczów).

Tacoma Defiance scoring profile: strong

Tacoma Defiance scores in 60% of games (9 of 15 meczów), while Minnesota United II keeps a clean sheet in 25% (4 of 16 meczów).

23Goals scored (season)16
Minnesota United IITacoma Defiance
23Goals conceded (season)20
Minnesota United IITacoma Defiance
2.88Average goals per game2.4
Minnesota United IITacoma Defiance
12Goals scored (last 5)6
Minnesota United IITacoma Defiance
9Goals conceded (last 5)2
Minnesota United IITacoma Defiance

How often they score at least...

69%1 goal60%
Minnesota United IITacoma Defiance
31%2 goals33%
Minnesota United IITacoma Defiance
19%3 goals7%
Minnesota United IITacoma Defiance
19%4 goals7%
Minnesota United IITacoma Defiance

How often they concede at least...

75%1 goal73%
Minnesota United IITacoma Defiance
50%2 goals40%
Minnesota United IITacoma Defiance
19%3 goals13%
Minnesota United IITacoma Defiance
0%4 goals7%
Minnesota United IITacoma Defiance

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

50%
Minnesota United II - BTTSBTTS - percentage of matches where both teams scored.8 of 16 meczów
62%
League average

Goal patterns

19%BTTS at half-time13%
Minnesota United IITacoma Defiance
13%BTTS in both halves7%
Minnesota United IITacoma Defiance
25%Scored in both halves13%
Minnesota United IITacoma Defiance

BTTS and goal count

44%Min. 3 goals and BTTS40%
Minnesota United IITacoma Defiance
6%Min. 3 goals without BTTS13%
Minnesota United IITacoma Defiance
60%BTTS - last 520%
Minnesota United IITacoma Defiance

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

Full game - team comparison (Over)

1st half

75%Min. 1 goal before half-time53%
Minnesota United IITacoma Defiance
44%Min. 2 goals before half-time20%
Minnesota United IITacoma Defiance
25%Min. 3 goals before half-time7%
Minnesota United IITacoma Defiance

2nd half

69%Min. 1 goal after half-time80%
Minnesota United IITacoma Defiance
31%Min. 2 goals after half-time53%
Minnesota United IITacoma Defiance
25%Min. 3 goals after half-time20%
Minnesota United IITacoma Defiance

Game halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Minnesota United II is 48% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.38 pts / game - Minnesota United II · 0.93 pts / game - Tacoma Defiance

Minnesota United II - half-time state
38% leading25% draw38% trailing
Tacoma Defiance - half-time state
13% leading53% draw33% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.38Points per game (1st half)0.93
Minnesota United IITacoma Defiance
0.69Goals scored (1st half)0.33
Minnesota United IITacoma Defiance
0.81Goals conceded (1st half)0.53
Minnesota United IITacoma Defiance
1.5Average goals (1st half)0.87
Minnesota United IITacoma Defiance
50%Clean sheet before half-time53%
Minnesota United IITacoma Defiance
56%No goal before half-time80%
Minnesota United IITacoma Defiance

After half-time (2nd half)

1.31Points per game (2nd half)1.33
Minnesota United IITacoma Defiance
0.75Goals scored (2nd half)0.73
Minnesota United IITacoma Defiance
0.63Goals conceded (2nd half)0.8
Minnesota United IITacoma Defiance
1.38Average goals (2nd half)1.53
Minnesota United IITacoma Defiance
56%Clean sheet after half-time47%
Minnesota United IITacoma Defiance
50%No goal after half-time47%
Minnesota United IITacoma Defiance

Minnesota United II - second-half results

31% W38% R31% P
22
Half-time points
11
Half-time goals
-2
Goal difference (1st half)
21
Second-half points
+2
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.38
PPG before half-time
Lead holding116%

Leads at halftime in 38% of games and wins 44%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime-0.2

Defense stays consistent across the full game.

Tacoma Defiance - second-half results

33% W33% R33% P
14
Half-time points
5
Half-time goals
-3
Goal difference (1st half)
20
Second-half points
-1
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.93
PPG before half-time
Lead holding254%

Leads at halftime in 13% of games and wins 33%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime+0.3

Allows 0.3 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

Minnesota United II - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game2.001.60
Goals scored / game1.21.2
Goals allowed / game1.00.8
Average goals per game2.22.0
1 goal80%80%
2 goals60%40%
3 goals60%40%
Clean sheet40%40%
No goal20%40%
Goal difference+1+2
Half-time: 60% leading - 20% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 40% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 60% - Half-time goals total: 6
Tacoma Defiance - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.002.20
Goals scored / game0.21.0
Goals allowed / game0.40.0
Average goals per game0.61.0
1 goal60%60%
2 goals0%40%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet60%100%
No goal80%40%
Goal difference-1+5
Half-time: 20% leading - 40% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 40% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 1

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

Minnesota United II
ScoredConceded
2
3
0-15
5
3
16-30
4
7
31-45
3
4
46-60
5
3
61-75
4
3
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (5 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.

Tacoma Defiance
ScoredConceded
1
3
0-15
3
1
16-30
1
4
31-45
7
2
46-60
1
5
61-75
3
5
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (7 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

2.64
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
1.4 : 1.3
Estimated goal split
home : away
81%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
45%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-24%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
41%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
12%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 8 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

Minnesota United II

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.29
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.29
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-1.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.24
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
-0.05
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
80%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
100%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
+0.36
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
17% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 9% come in the first quarter-hour.
17%

Tacoma Defiance

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.17
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.09
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+0.4 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.30
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.21
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
74%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
73%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
+1.20
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.4
Late goals
19% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 6% come in the first quarter-hour.
19%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (MLS Next Pro).

Teams vs league

Minnesota United IILigaTacoma Defiance
Average goals per game 2.883.25 2.40
Both teams scored 50%62% 40%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 50%65% 53%
Clean sheets 25%21% 27%
Goal before half-time 75%75% 53%
Goal after half-time 69%84% 80%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.25
Average goals per game
62%
Both teams scored
65%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
21%
Clean sheets
1.81
Home goals / game
1.44
Away goals / game
+26%
Home attack advantage
+20%
Home defensive advantage
+16%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
75%
1 goal
41%
2 goals
19%
3 goals
5%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
84%
1 goal
59%
2 goals
28%
3 goals
9%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Minnesota United IIGoalTroy Putt
  2. Tacoma DefianceGoalMark BronnikAssist: Charles Gaffney
  3. Tacoma DefianceYellow cardMitchell Emert
  4. Tacoma DefianceGoalEdson Carli
  5. Tacoma DefianceSubstitutionOn: Omar HassanOff: Charles Gaffney
  6. Tacoma DefianceSubstitutionOn: Brayden SmithOff: Edson Carli
  7. Minnesota United IIAssistJohn Farris

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Record from Minnesota United II's perspective: 0 wins, 2 draws and 0 losses against Tacoma Defiance. Games average 2.00 goals, and both teams scored in 100% of them.

Minnesota United FC II
1 : 1
Tacoma Defiance
Tacoma Defiance
1 : 1
Minnesota United FC II

FAQ

What was the result of Minnesota United II vs Tacoma Defiance?

The MLS Next Pro match finished Minnesota United II 2:2 Tacoma Defiance. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Minnesota United II and Tacoma Defiance?

In the last 2 head-to-head matches Minnesota United II won 0, Tacoma Defiance won 0 and 2 ended level. These games averaged 2.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Minnesota United II vs Tacoma Defiance?

Minnesota United II score 1.44 goals per game on average and Tacoma Defiance 1.07. The MLS Next Pro average is 3.25 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 65% of games. Both teams score in 50% of Minnesota United II's matches and 40% of Tacoma Defiance's.

What form are Minnesota United II and Tacoma Defiance in?

Over the last 5 games Minnesota United II have a 3-0-2 record (1.80 points per game) and Tacoma Defiance 4-0-1 (2.40 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Minnesota United II vs Tacoma Defiance?

The statistical background for Minnesota United II vs Tacoma Defiance — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.