Minnesota United II vs Tacoma Defiance: match statistics
Minnesota United II vs Tacoma Defiance: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Minnesota United II played against Tacoma Defiance in MLS Next Pro (United States). The game was played on June 29, 2026. Final score: 2:2.
Recent form
Minnesota United II has 3 wins, 0 draws and 2 losses over its last five games, averaging 1.80 points per game. Tacoma Defiance has 4 wins, 0 draws and 1 loss, with 2.40 points per game.
Scoring records
Minnesota United II scores 1.44 goals per game and allows 1.44. Tacoma Defiance scores 1.07 and allows 1.33. Games in this league average 3.25 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 50% of Minnesota United II's games and 40% of Tacoma Defiance's. The Over 2.5 rates are 50% and 53%, compared with league averages of 62% for BTTS and 65% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Minnesota United II has the higher season xG average, 1.68 to 1.37 per game. Minnesota United II takes 14.4 shots per game, while Tacoma Defiance takes 11.8.
First-half and second-half trends
Minnesota United II leads at halftime in 38% of its games and scores 0.75 goals per game after halftime. Tacoma Defiance leads at halftime in 13% and scores 0.73 after halftime.
When the teams score
Minnesota United II's most productive scoring window is minutes 16-30 (5 goals). For Tacoma Defiance, it is minutes 46-60 (7 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
MLS Next Pro games average 3.25 goals. Both teams score in 62% of games, and 65% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, 2 previous meetings were available. The record was 0 home wins, 2 draws and 0 away wins. Those games averaged 2.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
The favorites are the hosts Minnesota United II: at home they average 1.75 goals per match and have an average xG of 1.93, while Tacoma Defiance score only 0.83 goals on average in away matches with an xG of 1.24. Minnesota generates significantly more high-quality chances — averaging 15.75 shots and 6.38 on target per home match versus 11 shots and just 2.5 on target for Tacoma — which is also reflected in the higher conversion rate (11% vs 8%). Defensively the hosts concede 1.38 goals at home and keep 38% clean sheets, whereas the visitors concede 2.00 goals on average away, have a -7 goal difference on the road and only 17% clean sheets; additionally Tacoma fail to score in 50% of away matches (vs 25% for the hosts). Trends are mixed: Tacoma have won 4 of their last 5 matches overall and average 2.4 points per match in their last 5, but their away statistics (67% away losses) indicate problems on the road, while Minnesota have 3 wins in their last 5 and 1.8 points per match. Considering the home advantage in xG, shot volume, lower average goals conceded and lower share of home matches without a goal, I assess the probabilities as: home win 65%, draw 20%, away win 15%.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
MLS Next Pro has BTTS at 62%, a strong indicator that matches in this competition often end with goals from both sides. Minnesota United II registers BTTS in 44% of matches this season, produces xG 1.45, scores 1.22 goals per game, averages 12.33 shots with 4.67 on target, and has 23 goals for and 23 against, indicating real attacking potential. Tacoma Defiance has a seasonal BTTS of 33%, records xG 1.24, but only averages 0.83 goals scored and 2.00 conceded per game with 2.5 shots on target and 16 goals scored, pointing to vulnerability in the away defense. In the last 5 matches Minnesota has 60% BTTS with an average of 2.4 scored and 1.8 conceded, while Tacoma has 20% BTTS with 1.2 scored and 0.4 conceded on average, so the hosts recently both score and concede more often. Considering the league-wide 62%, the higher xG for both sides (1.45 vs 1.24) and the seasonal fragility of the away defense (2.00 conceded), I favor the 'BTTS - Yes' scenario 60% to 40% for 'No'.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
The xG-based model gives a total expected goals of 2.90: the home side has xG 1.45 and the opponent’s average xG conceded is 1.62, translating to about 1.54 goals for Minnesota United II; the away side has xG 1.24 against the home conceded xG 1.48, yielding 1.36 for Tacoma Defiance. From a Poisson distribution with mean 2.90 the probability of over 1.5 goals is roughly 79%, over 2.5 about 55%, and over 3.5 about 33%. Additionally, Minnesota averages 2.4 goals in their last 5 matches (12 goals in the last 5), averages 12.33 shots and 4.67 shots on target with a 10% conversion rate; Tacoma scores 0.83 goals this season but concedes 2.0 per match and 83% of their games feature over 1.5 goals. Considering the expected total of 2.90, the clear attacking advantage of the home side and the league average of 3.24 goals per game, the strongest signal is to play the over at the 1.5 line (over 1.5).
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
The home side hold a clear offensive edge: they score on average 1.22 goals per match versus 0.83 for the visitors, record higher xG (1.45 vs 1.24) and average 4.67 shots on target per game compared to 2.5 for their opponents. First halves are generally low-scoring — the hosts average 0.44 goals by the break, the visitors 0.17, with mean first-half goals of 0.89 for the home team and 0.83 for the away team; a draw at half-time occurs in 44% of the hosts’ matches (the visitors’ data show 67% draws at the break). After the break the home team more frequently takes the initiative: in second halves the hosts average 0.78 goals, and their average points per match is 1.56 versus 0.67 for the visitors, which increases the likelihood of a win after 90 minutes. Additionally, the away team concedes on average 2.0 goals per match and has a lower clean sheet percentage (17% vs 33% for the hosts), so the most probable scenario is a draw at half-time and a home win at full-time (X/1).
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Minnesota United II | Tacoma Defiance | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 31% | 32% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.32 | 0.28 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Tacoma Defiance is 33% better for: last-5 form.
1.8 pts / game - Minnesota United II · 2.4 pts / game - Tacoma Defiance
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Minnesota United II is 35% better for: goals scored per game.
1.44 goals / game - Minnesota United II · 1.07 goals / game - Tacoma Defiance
Tacoma Defiance is 8% better for: goals allowed per game.
1.44 goals / game - Minnesota United II · 1.33 goals / game - Tacoma Defiance
Minnesota United II scores in 69% of games (11 of 16 meczów), while Tacoma Defiance keeps a clean sheet in 27% (4 of 15 meczów).
Tacoma Defiance scores in 60% of games (9 of 15 meczów), while Minnesota United II keeps a clean sheet in 25% (4 of 16 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Minnesota United II
Over / Under - Tacoma Defiance
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Minnesota United II is 48% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.38 pts / game - Minnesota United II · 0.93 pts / game - Tacoma Defiance
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Minnesota United II - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 38% of games and wins 44%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
Tacoma Defiance - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 13% of games and wins 33%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.3 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 2.00 | 1.60 |
| Goals scored / game | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Goals allowed / game | 1.0 | 0.8 |
| Average goals per game | 2.2 | 2.0 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 60% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 40% |
| No goal | 20% | 40% |
| Goal difference | +1 | +2 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.00 | 2.20 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.2 | 1.0 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.4 | 0.0 |
| Average goals per game | 0.6 | 1.0 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 100% |
| No goal | 80% | 40% |
| Goal difference | -1 | +5 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (5 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (7 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Minnesota United II
Tacoma Defiance
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (MLS Next Pro).
Teams vs league
| Minnesota United II | Liga | Tacoma Defiance | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▼ 2.88 | 3.25 | ▼ 2.40 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 50% | 62% | ▼ 40% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 50% | 65% | ▼ 53% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 25% | 21% | ▲ 27% |
| Goal before half-time | • 75% | 75% | ▼ 53% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 69% | 84% | ▼ 80% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Record from Minnesota United II's perspective: 0 wins, 2 draws and 0 losses against Tacoma Defiance. Games average 2.00 goals, and both teams scored in 100% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Minnesota United II vs Tacoma Defiance?
The MLS Next Pro match finished Minnesota United II 2:2 Tacoma Defiance. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Minnesota United II and Tacoma Defiance?
In the last 2 head-to-head matches Minnesota United II won 0, Tacoma Defiance won 0 and 2 ended level. These games averaged 2.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Minnesota United II vs Tacoma Defiance?
Minnesota United II score 1.44 goals per game on average and Tacoma Defiance 1.07. The MLS Next Pro average is 3.25 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 65% of games. Both teams score in 50% of Minnesota United II's matches and 40% of Tacoma Defiance's.
What form are Minnesota United II and Tacoma Defiance in?
Over the last 5 games Minnesota United II have a 3-0-2 record (1.80 points per game) and Tacoma Defiance 4-0-1 (2.40 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Minnesota United II vs Tacoma Defiance?
The statistical background for Minnesota United II vs Tacoma Defiance — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.


