United States - MLS Next ProData current as of 23 July 2026

Minnesota United II vs Tacoma Defiance: match statistics

Minnesota United II vs Tacoma Defiance: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Minnesota United II play Tacoma Defiance in MLS Next Pro (United States). The match date is 29 June 2026 at 02:00. Final score: 2:2.

Current form

Minnesota United II: 1-1-3, 0.80 points/match. Tacoma Defiance: 3-1-1, 2.00 points/match.

Goal statistics

Minnesota United II scores 1.40 and concedes 1.60 goals per match. Tacoma Defiance scores 1.21 and concedes 1.37. League average: 3.23 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Minnesota United II 50%, Tacoma Defiance 42%. Over 2.5: Minnesota United II 55%, Tacoma Defiance 53%. League level: BTTS 61%, Over 2.5 65%.

xG, shots and style

Minnesota United II has higher xG: 1.58 vs 1.36. Minnesota United II: 13.5 shots per match, Tacoma Defiance: 11.7.

Match halves

Minnesota United II: half-time lead 30%, second-half goals 0.75. Tacoma Defiance: half-time lead 16%, second-half goals 0.79.

Goals by minute

Minnesota United II: 61-75 (7 goals). Tacoma Defiance: 46-60 (9 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

MLS Next Pro: 3.23 goals per match, BTTS 61%, Over 2.5 65%.

Head-to-head

2 H2H matches: 0-2-0. Average goals 2.00, BTTS 100%.

Match description

The favorites are the hosts Minnesota United II: at home they average 1.75 goals per match and have an average xG of 1.93, while Tacoma Defiance score only 0.83 goals on average in away matches with an xG of 1.24. Minnesota generates significantly more high-quality chances — averaging 15.75 shots and 6.38 on target per home match versus 11 shots and just 2.5 on target for Tacoma — which is also reflected in the higher conversion rate (11% vs 8%). Defensively the hosts concede 1.38 goals at home and keep 38% clean sheets, whereas the visitors concede 2.00 goals on average away, have a -7 goal difference on the road and only 17% clean sheets; additionally Tacoma fail to score in 50% of away matches (vs 25% for the hosts). Trends are mixed: Tacoma have won 4 of their last 5 matches overall and average 2.4 points per match in their last 5, but their away statistics (67% away losses) indicate problems on the road, while Minnesota have 3 wins in their last 5 and 1.8 points per match. Considering the home advantage in xG, shot volume, lower average goals conceded and lower share of home matches without a goal, I assess the probabilities as: home win 65%, draw 20%, away win 15%.

Half-by-half

1 : 1
1st half
1 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

51Possession (%)49
Minnesota United IITacoma Defiance
11Shots15
Minnesota United IITacoma Defiance
5Shots on target7
Minnesota United IITacoma Defiance
1.35xG1.91
Minnesota United IITacoma Defiance
4Corners5
Minnesota United IITacoma Defiance
42Dangerous attacks65
Minnesota United IITacoma Defiance
8Fouls14
Minnesota United IITacoma Defiance
0Cards1
Minnesota United IITacoma Defiance

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Minnesota United IITacoma Defiance
1.4Goals scored / match1.21
Minnesota United IITacoma Defiance
1.6Goals conceded / match1.37
Minnesota United IITacoma Defiance
Minnesota United IITacoma Defiance
48%Average possession45%
Minnesota United IITacoma Defiance
4.35Shots on target / match3.95
Minnesota United IITacoma Defiance
Minnesota United IITacoma Defiance

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

13.5Shots per match11.68
Minnesota United IITacoma Defiance
4.35Shots on target3.95
Minnesota United IITacoma Defiance
10.4%Shot conversion10.4%
Minnesota United IITacoma Defiance
48%Possession45%
Minnesota United IITacoma Defiance
1.58xG for1.36
Minnesota United IITacoma Defiance
1.54xG against1.54
Minnesota United IITacoma Defiance

Shooting quality

Minnesota United II: BalancedTacoma Defiance: Balanced
Minnesota United IITacoma Defiance
Accuracy (shots on target)32%34%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.320.31

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Tacoma Defiance is 150% better for: last-5 form.

0.8 pts / match - Minnesota United II · 2 pts / match - Tacoma Defiance

Minnesota United II
LDLWL
Season result split
40% W15% R45% P
Season (W-D-L)
8-3-9
1.35 pts / match · goal difference -4
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-1-3
0.80 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
4-3-2
Last 5 at home
3-1-1
WWLWD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 2.0xG: 1.12Opponent xG: 2.13BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 60%
Tacoma Defiance
WDLWW
Season result split
37% W21% R42% P
Season (W-D-L)
7-4-8
1.32 pts / match · goal difference -3
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-1-1
2.00 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
3-2-4
Last 5 away
3-1-1
WLDWW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.6Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 1.36Opponent xG: 1.58BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 40%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Minnesota United II is 16% better for: goals scored per match.

1.4 goals / match - Minnesota United II · 1.21 goals / match - Tacoma Defiance

Tacoma Defiance is 17% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.6 goals / match - Minnesota United II · 1.37 goals / match - Tacoma Defiance

Minnesota United II scoring profile: strong

Minnesota United II scores in 65% of matches (13 of 20 matches), while Tacoma Defiance keeps a clean sheet in 26% (5 of 19 matches).

Tacoma Defiance scoring profile: strong

Tacoma Defiance scores in 63% of matches (12 of 19 matches), while Minnesota United II keeps a clean sheet in 20% (4 of 20 matches).

28Goals scored (season)23
Minnesota United IITacoma Defiance
32Goals conceded (season)26
Minnesota United IITacoma Defiance
3Average goals in match2.58
Minnesota United IITacoma Defiance
5Goals scored (last 5)8
Minnesota United IITacoma Defiance
10Goals conceded (last 5)6
Minnesota United IITacoma Defiance

How often they score at least...

65%1 goal63%
Minnesota United IITacoma Defiance
35%2 goals37%
Minnesota United IITacoma Defiance
20%3 goals11%
Minnesota United IITacoma Defiance
15%4 goals11%
Minnesota United IITacoma Defiance

How often they concede at least...

80%1 goal74%
Minnesota United IITacoma Defiance
55%2 goals47%
Minnesota United IITacoma Defiance
20%3 goals11%
Minnesota United IITacoma Defiance
5%4 goals5%
Minnesota United IITacoma Defiance

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

50%
Minnesota United II - BTTSBTTS - percentage of matches where both teams scored.10 of 20 matches
61%
League average

Goal patterns

25%BTTS at half-time21%
Minnesota United IITacoma Defiance
15%BTTS in both halves16%
Minnesota United IITacoma Defiance
30%Scored in both halves21%
Minnesota United IITacoma Defiance

BTTS and goal count

45%Min. 3 goals and BTTS42%
Minnesota United IITacoma Defiance
10%Min. 3 goals without BTTS11%
Minnesota United IITacoma Defiance
40%BTTS - last 540%
Minnesota United IITacoma Defiance

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

Full match - team comparison (Over)

1st half

80%Min. 1 goal before half-time53%
Minnesota United IITacoma Defiance
50%Min. 2 goals before half-time26%
Minnesota United IITacoma Defiance
25%Min. 3 goals before half-time11%
Minnesota United IITacoma Defiance

2nd half

70%Min. 1 goal after half-time84%
Minnesota United IITacoma Defiance
40%Min. 2 goals after half-time58%
Minnesota United IITacoma Defiance
20%Min. 3 goals after half-time21%
Minnesota United IITacoma Defiance

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Minnesota United II is 10% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.15 pts / match - Minnesota United II · 1.05 pts / match - Tacoma Defiance

Minnesota United II - half-time state
30% leading25% draw45% trailing
Tacoma Defiance - half-time state
16% leading58% draw26% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.15Points per match (1st half)1.05
Minnesota United IITacoma Defiance
0.65Goals scored (1st half)0.42
Minnesota United IITacoma Defiance
0.95Goals conceded (1st half)0.53
Minnesota United IITacoma Defiance
1.6Average goals (1st half)0.95
Minnesota United IITacoma Defiance
40%Clean sheet before half-time53%
Minnesota United IITacoma Defiance
55%No goal before half-time74%
Minnesota United IITacoma Defiance

After half-time (2nd half)

1.3Points per match (2nd half)1.42
Minnesota United IITacoma Defiance
0.75Goals scored (2nd half)0.79
Minnesota United IITacoma Defiance
0.65Goals conceded (2nd half)0.84
Minnesota United IITacoma Defiance
1.4Average goals (2nd half)1.63
Minnesota United IITacoma Defiance
55%Clean sheet after half-time42%
Minnesota United IITacoma Defiance
50%No goal after half-time42%
Minnesota United IITacoma Defiance

Minnesota United II - second-half results

30% W40% R30% P
23
Half-time points
13
Half-time goals
-6
Goal difference (1st half)
26
Second-half points
+2
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.15
PPG before half-time
Lead holding133%

Leads at half-time in 30% of matches and wins 40%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.3

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Tacoma Defiance - second-half results

37% W32% R32% P
20
Half-time points
8
Half-time goals
-2
Goal difference (1st half)
27
Second-half points
-1
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.05
PPG before half-time
Lead holding231%

Leads at half-time in 16% of matches and wins 37%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.3

Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Minnesota United II - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.401.00
Goals scored / match0.40.6
Goals conceded / match1.20.8
Average goals in match1.61.4
1 goal80%80%
2 goals60%60%
3 goals20%0%
Clean sheet20%40%
No goal60%60%
Goal difference-4-1
Half-time: 0% leading - 40% draw - 60% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 2
Tacoma Defiance - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.402.00
Goals scored / match0.61.0
Goals conceded / match0.40.8
Average goals in match1.01.8
1 goal40%100%
2 goals40%60%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet60%40%
No goal60%20%
Goal difference+1+1
Half-time: 20% leading - 80% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 20% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 3

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Minnesota United II
ScoredConceded
3
3
0-15
6
4
16-30
4
12
31-45
3
4
46-60
7
5
61-75
5
4
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (7 goli). Concedes most in 31-45 (12). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.

Tacoma Defiance
ScoredConceded
1
4
0-15
3
2
16-30
4
4
31-45
9
2
46-60
2
8
61-75
4
6
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (9 goli). Concedes most in 61-75 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.79
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.4 : 1.4
Estimated goal split
home : away
86%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
46%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-28%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
41%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
13%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 8 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Minnesota United II

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.04
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.24
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+1.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.18
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.06
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
77%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
114%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.55
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
18% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 11% come in the first quarter-hour.
18%

Tacoma Defiance

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.18
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.02
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-0.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.15
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.17
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
86%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
75%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.68
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.4
Late goals
17% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 4% come in the first quarter-hour.
17%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (MLS Next Pro).

Teams vs league

Minnesota United IILigaTacoma Defiance
Average goals in match 3.003.23 2.58
Both teams scored 50%61% 42%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 55%65% 53%
Clean sheets 20%22% 26%
Goal before half-time 80%75% 53%
Goal after half-time 70%84% 84%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.23
Average goals per match
61%
Both teams scored
65%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
22%
Clean sheets
1.82
Home goals / match
1.40
Away goals / match
+30%
Home attack advantage
+23%
Home defence advantage
+20%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
75%
1 goal
42%
2 goals
18%
3 goals
4%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
84%
1 goal
59%
2 goals
27%
3 goals
9%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (2): Minnesota United II 0 - 2 - 0 Tacoma Defiance. Average goals 2.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.

Minnesota United FC II
1 : 1
Tacoma Defiance
Tacoma Defiance
1 : 1
Minnesota United FC II

FAQ

What was the result of Minnesota United II vs Tacoma Defiance?

The MLS Next Pro match finished Minnesota United II 2:2 Tacoma Defiance. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Minnesota United II and Tacoma Defiance?

In the last 2 head-to-head matches Minnesota United II won 0, Tacoma Defiance won 0 and 2 ended level. These games averaged 2.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Minnesota United II vs Tacoma Defiance?

Minnesota United II score 1.40 goals per game on average and Tacoma Defiance 1.21. The MLS Next Pro average is 3.23 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 65% of games. Both teams score in 50% of Minnesota United II's matches and 42% of Tacoma Defiance's.

What form are Minnesota United II and Tacoma Defiance in?

Over the last 5 games Minnesota United II have a 1-1-3 record (0.80 points per game) and Tacoma Defiance 3-1-1 (2.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Minnesota United II vs Tacoma Defiance?

The statistical background for Minnesota United II vs Tacoma Defiance — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.