United States - MLSData current as of 17 July 2026

Minnesota United vs Colorado Rapids: match statistics

Minnesota United vs Colorado Rapids: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Minnesota United play Colorado Rapids in MLS (United States). The match date is 14 May 2026 at 02:30. Final score: 0:1.

Current form

Minnesota United: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match. Colorado Rapids: 1-0-4, 0.60 points/match.

Goal statistics

Minnesota United scores 1.20 and concedes 1.47 goals per match. Colorado Rapids scores 1.67 and concedes 1.60. League average: 3.29 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Minnesota United 53%, Colorado Rapids 60%. Over 2.5: Minnesota United 53%, Colorado Rapids 60%. League level: BTTS 61%, Over 2.5 62%.

xG, shots and style

Minnesota United has higher xG: 1.47 vs 1.31. Minnesota United: 13.1 shots per match, Colorado Rapids: 11.1.

Match halves

Minnesota United: half-time lead 20%, second-half goals 0.73. Colorado Rapids: half-time lead 33%, second-half goals 0.93.

Goals by minute

Minnesota United: 61-75 (5 goals). Colorado Rapids: 0-15 (5 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

MLS: 3.29 goals per match, BTTS 61%, Over 2.5 62%.

Head-to-head

No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.

Match description

Minnesota United concede an average of 0.6 goals per game at home and record 60% clean sheets, whereas Colorado Rapids concede 1.86 goals on the road and have only a 14% clean sheet rate. The hosts generate more high-quality chances — 16.4 average shots per game and 4.8 shots on target with an xG of 1.71, while the Rapids average 8.71 shots, only 3.57 on target and an away xG of 1.09. In the last 5 matches Minnesota scored 8 goals and averaged 1.4 points per game in that span, whereas Colorado scored only 3 goals and managed 0.4 points per game, failing to win in that segment of the season. Additionally, the visitors suffer 71% losses on the road and have a negative away goal difference of -5, increasing the risk of a step back away from home. Considering the hosts' superior defense (0.6 vs 1.86 conceded) and advantage in chance creation (xG 1.71 vs 1.09; SOT 4.8 vs 3.57), I predict a Minnesota United win.

Half-by-half

0 : 1
1st half
0 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

55Possession (%)45
Minnesota UnitedColorado Rapids
12Shots5
Minnesota UnitedColorado Rapids
2Shots on target2
Minnesota UnitedColorado Rapids
1.23xG0.7
Minnesota UnitedColorado Rapids
5Corners5
Minnesota UnitedColorado Rapids
45Dangerous attacks33
Minnesota UnitedColorado Rapids
18Fouls24
Minnesota UnitedColorado Rapids
5Cards4
Minnesota UnitedColorado Rapids

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Minnesota UnitedColorado Rapids
1.2Goals scored / match1.67
Minnesota UnitedColorado Rapids
1.47Goals conceded / match1.6
Minnesota UnitedColorado Rapids
Minnesota UnitedColorado Rapids
47%Average possession56%
Minnesota UnitedColorado Rapids
4.4Shots on target / match4.33
Minnesota UnitedColorado Rapids

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

13.13Shots per match11.07
Minnesota UnitedColorado Rapids
4.4Shots on target4.33
Minnesota UnitedColorado Rapids
9.1%Shot conversion15.1%
Minnesota UnitedColorado Rapids
47%Possession56%
Minnesota UnitedColorado Rapids
1.47xG for1.31
Minnesota UnitedColorado Rapids
1.45xG against1.36
Minnesota UnitedColorado Rapids

Shooting quality

Minnesota United: BalancedColorado Rapids: Efficient finishing
Minnesota UnitedColorado Rapids
Accuracy (shots on target)34%39%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.110.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.270.39

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Minnesota United is 67% better for: last-5 form.

1 pts / match - Minnesota United · 0.6 pts / match - Colorado Rapids

Minnesota United
WDLLD
Season result split
40% W27% R33% P
Season (W-D-L)
6-4-5
1.47 pts / match · goal difference -4
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-2-2
1.00 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
2-3-2
Last 5 at home
1-2-2
WLDLD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.4Goals conceded: 1.6xG: 1.50Opponent xG: 1.15BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 60%
Colorado Rapids
LLWLL
Season result split
33% W7% R60% P
Season (W-D-L)
5-1-9
1.07 pts / match · goal difference +1
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-0-4
0.60 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
2-1-6
Last 5 away
1-1-3
DLLWL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.6Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 1.15Opponent xG: 1.14BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 40%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Colorado Rapids is 39% better for: goals scored per match.

1.2 goals / match - Minnesota United · 1.67 goals / match - Colorado Rapids

Minnesota United is 9% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.47 goals / match - Minnesota United · 1.6 goals / match - Colorado Rapids

Minnesota United scoring profile: very strong

Minnesota United scores in 73% of matches (11 of 15 matches), while Colorado Rapids keeps a clean sheet in 20% (3 of 15 matches).

Colorado Rapids scoring profile: very strong

Colorado Rapids scores in 73% of matches (11 of 15 matches), while Minnesota United keeps a clean sheet in 27% (4 of 15 matches).

18Goals scored (season)25
Minnesota UnitedColorado Rapids
22Goals conceded (season)24
Minnesota UnitedColorado Rapids
2.67Average goals in match3.27
Minnesota UnitedColorado Rapids
7Goals scored (last 5)3
Minnesota UnitedColorado Rapids
8Goals conceded (last 5)6
Minnesota UnitedColorado Rapids

How often they score at least...

73%1 goal73%
Minnesota UnitedColorado Rapids
40%2 goals40%
Minnesota UnitedColorado Rapids
7%3 goals20%
Minnesota UnitedColorado Rapids
0%4 goals20%
Minnesota UnitedColorado Rapids

How often they concede at least...

73%1 goal80%
Minnesota UnitedColorado Rapids
40%2 goals53%
Minnesota UnitedColorado Rapids
13%3 goals27%
Minnesota UnitedColorado Rapids
7%4 goals0%
Minnesota UnitedColorado Rapids

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

61%
League average

Goal patterns

27%BTTS at half-time33%
Minnesota UnitedColorado Rapids
7%BTTS in both halves0%
Minnesota UnitedColorado Rapids
13%Scored in both halves27%
Minnesota UnitedColorado Rapids

BTTS and goal count

47%Min. 3 goals and BTTS60%
Minnesota UnitedColorado Rapids
7%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
Minnesota UnitedColorado Rapids
80%BTTS - last 540%
Minnesota UnitedColorado Rapids

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

80%Min. 1 goal before half-time80%
Minnesota UnitedColorado Rapids
33%Min. 2 goals before half-time47%
Minnesota UnitedColorado Rapids
20%Min. 3 goals before half-time27%
Minnesota UnitedColorado Rapids

2nd half

67%Min. 1 goal after half-time73%
Minnesota UnitedColorado Rapids
33%Min. 2 goals after half-time33%
Minnesota UnitedColorado Rapids
20%Min. 3 goals after half-time27%
Minnesota UnitedColorado Rapids

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Colorado Rapids is 37% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

0.93 pts / match - Minnesota United · 1.27 pts / match - Colorado Rapids

Minnesota United - half-time state
20% leading33% draw47% trailing
Colorado Rapids - half-time state
33% leading27% draw40% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

0.93Points per match (1st half)1.27
Minnesota UnitedColorado Rapids
0.47Goals scored (1st half)0.73
Minnesota UnitedColorado Rapids
0.93Goals conceded (1st half)0.8
Minnesota UnitedColorado Rapids
1.4Average goals (1st half)1.53
Minnesota UnitedColorado Rapids
33%Clean sheet before half-time47%
Minnesota UnitedColorado Rapids
60%No goal before half-time40%
Minnesota UnitedColorado Rapids

After half-time (2nd half)

1.6Points per match (2nd half)1.27
Minnesota UnitedColorado Rapids
0.73Goals scored (2nd half)0.93
Minnesota UnitedColorado Rapids
0.53Goals conceded (2nd half)0.8
Minnesota UnitedColorado Rapids
1.27Average goals (2nd half)1.73
Minnesota UnitedColorado Rapids
53%Clean sheet after half-time40%
Minnesota UnitedColorado Rapids
53%No goal after half-time60%
Minnesota UnitedColorado Rapids

Minnesota United - second-half results

40% W40% R20% P
14
Half-time points
7
Half-time goals
-7
Goal difference (1st half)
24
Second-half points
+3
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.93
PPG before half-time
Lead holding200%

Leads at half-time in 20% of matches and wins 40%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.4

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Colorado Rapids - second-half results

33% W27% R40% P
19
Half-time points
11
Half-time goals
-1
Goal difference (1st half)
19
Second-half points
+2
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.27
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 33% of matches and wins 33%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Minnesota United - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.202.00
Goals scored / match0.21.2
Goals conceded / match1.00.6
Average goals in match1.21.8
1 goal100%80%
2 goals20%40%
3 goals0%40%
Clean sheet0%40%
No goal80%40%
Goal difference-4+3
Half-time: 0% leading - 20% draw - 80% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 20% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 1
Colorado Rapids - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.000.60
Goals scored / match0.60.0
Goals conceded / match0.80.4
Average goals in match1.40.4
1 goal80%40%
2 goals40%0%
3 goals20%0%
Clean sheet40%60%
No goal40%100%
Goal difference-1-2
Half-time: 20% leading - 40% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 60% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 3

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Minnesota United
ScoredConceded
1
7
0-15
2
4
16-30
4
3
31-45
3
5
46-60
5
1
61-75
3
2
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (5 goli). Concedes most in 0-15 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.

Colorado Rapids
ScoredConceded
5
3
0-15
3
4
16-30
3
5
31-45
5
1
46-60
5
5
61-75
4
6
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (5 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.97
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.4 : 1.6
Estimated goal split
home : away
90%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
57%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
53%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
7%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 14 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Minnesota United

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.02
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.29
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+4.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.27
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.02
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
62%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
108%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.47
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
17% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 6% come in the first quarter-hour.
17%

Colorado Rapids

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.05
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.12
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-7.4 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.36
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.24
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
123%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
83%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.47
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
16% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 20% come in the first quarter-hour.
16%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (MLS).

Teams vs league

Minnesota UnitedLigaColorado Rapids
Average goals in match 2.673.29 3.27
Both teams scored 53%61% 60%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 53%62% 60%
Clean sheets 27%22% 20%
Goal before half-time 80%77% 80%
Goal after half-time 67%79% 73%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.29
Average goals per match
61%
Both teams scored
62%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
22%
Clean sheets
1.93
Home goals / match
1.36
Away goals / match
+42%
Home attack advantage
+30%
Home defence advantage
+18%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
77%
1 goal
45%
2 goals
21%
3 goals
6%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
79%
1 goal
52%
2 goals
25%
3 goals
12%
4 goals

FAQ

What was the result of Minnesota United vs Colorado Rapids?

The MLS match finished Minnesota United 0:1 Colorado Rapids. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Minnesota United vs Colorado Rapids?

Minnesota United score 1.20 goals per game on average and Colorado Rapids 1.67. The MLS average is 3.29 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 62% of games. Both teams score in 53% of Minnesota United's matches and 60% of Colorado Rapids's.

What form are Minnesota United and Colorado Rapids in?

Over the last 5 games Minnesota United have a 1-2-2 record (1.00 points per game) and Colorado Rapids 1-0-4 (0.60 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Minnesota United vs Colorado Rapids?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Minnesota United vs Colorado Rapids: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.