Minnesota United vs FC Dallas: match statistics
Minnesota United vs FC Dallas: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Minnesota United played against FC Dallas in MLS (United States). The game was played on September 10, 2026. Venue: Allianz Field. Final score: 1:2.
Recent form
Minnesota United has 1 win, 2 draws and 2 losses over its last five games, averaging 1.00 points per game. FC Dallas has 3 wins, 1 draw and 1 loss, with 2.00 points per game.
Scoring records
Minnesota United scores 1.48 goals per game and allows 1.61. FC Dallas scores 1.96 and allows 1.74. Games in this league average 3.21 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 65% of Minnesota United's games and 65% of FC Dallas's. The Over 2.5 rates are 57% and 70%, compared with league averages of 63% for BTTS and 62% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Minnesota United has the higher season xG average, 1.56 to 1.37 per game. Minnesota United takes 13.7 shots per game, while FC Dallas takes 12.2.
First-half and second-half trends
Minnesota United leads at halftime in 22% of its games and scores 0.91 goals per game after halftime. FC Dallas leads at halftime in 35% and scores 0.87 after halftime.
When the teams score
Minnesota United's most productive scoring window is minutes 61-75 (10 goals). For FC Dallas, it is minutes 76-90+ (12 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
MLS games average 3.21 goals. Both teams score in 63% of games, and 62% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, one previous meeting was available. The record was 1 home win, 0 draws and 0 away wins. Those games averaged 1.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Minnesota United are unbeaten in 4 of their last 5 matches, scoring 13 goals during that period, while FC Dallas have conceded as many as 15 goals in their five most recent games. At home, the hosts create chances worth an average of 1.62 xG, whereas Dallas allow opponents 1.67 xG away from home and concede 1.62 goals per match. FC Dallas remain dangerous offensively on the road, where they average 1.77 goals and win 46% of their matches, making a goal from the visitors a highly realistic scenario. However, Minnesota have a clearly better recent points return, averaging 1.6 points per match compared with their opponents’ 1.4, while Dallas’ current defensive weakness marginally shifts the forecast in favor of the hosts.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
The signal for both teams to score is clear: Minnesota has recorded BTTS in 78% of its matches this season, while FC Dallas has done so in 54%, compared with the league average of 62%. In their last five matches, both teams have regularly been involved in open games, with BTTS occurring in 100% of Minnesota’s matches and 80% of Dallas’s. During this period, Minnesota averaged 2.6 goals per game, while Dallas averaged 2.0, and the visitors’ defense conceded as many as 3.0 goals per match. The hosts kept a clean sheet in only 11% of their games, while Dallas failed to score in 31% of matches, which is the main argument limiting confidence in this pick. Nevertheless, Minnesota allows opponents an xG of 1.16, while Dallas averages 4.85 shots on target per match, so an away goal remains a likely scenario.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Minnesota scores an average of 2.00 goals per game, while FC Dallas averages 1.77, with both defenses conceding 1.78 and 1.62 goals, respectively. In their last five matches, the hosts have scored as many as 2.6 goals per game, while Dallas has conceded 3.0, clearly strengthening the goals outlook in Minnesota’s favor. At least three goals were scored in 67% of Minnesota’s matches and 69% of Dallas’s, while in their last five appearances these figures stood at 80% and 100%, respectively. The baseline signal for at least two goals is even stronger: both teams have surpassed this line in 78% and 77% of their matches throughout the season. Over 1.5 is therefore the strongest pick, as even with lower-than-expected finishing efficiency, the attacking profile of both teams strongly favors a minimum of two goals.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
The strongest scenario is FC Dallas leading at the break, followed by a Minnesota United win, as the hosts were trailing at half-time in 44% of their matches this season and in as many as 60% of their last five games. Dallas more often starts strongly, leading at half-time in 38% of its season matches, while across its last five games it averaged 1.2 goals scored before the break and 1.8 conceded. After the break, however, Minnesota is very difficult to beat: it has not lost any match in this phase of play this season and averaged 2.0 goals scored after half-time over its last five fixtures. Dallas’s defense has clearly weakened, with the team conceding an average of 3.0 goals per match in its last five appearances, including 1.2 after the break. In addition, Minnesota has the more favourable average xG figures against its opponent: its defense allows 1.16 xG, whereas Dallas allows opponents 1.67 xG, further strengthening the prospect of a turnaround by the hosts.
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Minnesota United | FC Dallas | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 37% | 39% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.11 | 0.11 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.29 | 0.42 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
FC Dallas is 100% better for: last-5 form.
1 pts / game - Minnesota United · 2 pts / game - FC Dallas
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
FC Dallas is 32% better for: goals scored per game.
1.48 goals / game - Minnesota United · 1.96 goals / game - FC Dallas
Minnesota United is 8% better for: goals allowed per game.
1.61 goals / game - Minnesota United · 1.74 goals / game - FC Dallas
Minnesota United scores in 78% of games (18 of 23 games), while FC Dallas keeps a clean sheet in 17% (4 of 23 games).
FC Dallas scores in 74% of games (17 of 23 games), while Minnesota United keeps a clean sheet in 22% (5 of 23 games).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Minnesota United
Over / Under - FC Dallas
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
FC Dallas is 45% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
0.96 pts / game - Minnesota United · 1.39 pts / game - FC Dallas
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Minnesota United - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 22% of games and wins 30%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
FC Dallas - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 35% of games and wins 43%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 0.80 | 1.80 |
| Goals scored / game | 1.0 | 1.8 |
| Goals allowed / game | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Average goals per game | 2.2 | 3.0 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 100% |
| 3 goals | 40% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 20% | 20% |
| No goal | 60% | 0% |
| Goal difference | -1 | +3 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.80 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / game | 1.6 | 1.0 |
| Goals allowed / game | 1.8 | 1.2 |
| Average goals per game | 3.4 | 2.2 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 80% | 80% |
| 3 goals | 80% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 20% | 0% |
| No goal | 20% | 20% |
| Goal difference | -1 | -1 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (10 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (12 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (10). Late-goal balance (76-90): +8 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Minnesota United
FC Dallas
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (MLS).
Teams vs league
| Minnesota United | Liga | FC Dallas | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▼ 3.09 | 3.21 | ▲ 3.70 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 65% | 63% | ▲ 65% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 57% | 62% | ▲ 70% |
| Clean sheets | • 22% | 21% | ▼ 17% |
| Goal before half-time | • 78% | 77% | ▼ 74% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 74% | 81% | ▼ 74% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Record from Minnesota United's perspective: 1 win, 0 draws and 0 losses against FC Dallas. Games average 1.00 goals, and both teams scored in 0% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Minnesota United vs FC Dallas?
The MLS match finished Minnesota United 1:2 FC Dallas. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Minnesota United vs FC Dallas?
Minnesota United score 1.48 goals per game on average and FC Dallas 1.96. The MLS average is 3.21 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 62% of games. Both teams score in 65% of Minnesota United's matches and 65% of FC Dallas's.
What form are Minnesota United and FC Dallas in?
Over the last 5 games Minnesota United have a 1-2-2 record (1.00 points per game) and FC Dallas 3-1-1 (2.00 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Minnesota United vs FC Dallas?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Minnesota United vs FC Dallas: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.


