United States - MLSAllianz FieldData current as of October 23, 2026

Minnesota United vs FC Dallas: match statistics

Minnesota United crest
Minnesota United
1 : 2half-time 0:0
FC Dallas crest
FC Dallas

Minnesota United vs FC Dallas: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

Minnesota United played against FC Dallas in MLS (United States). The game was played on September 10, 2026. Venue: Allianz Field. Final score: 1:2.

Recent form

Minnesota United has 1 win, 2 draws and 2 losses over its last five games, averaging 1.00 points per game. FC Dallas has 3 wins, 1 draw and 1 loss, with 2.00 points per game.

Scoring records

Minnesota United scores 1.48 goals per game and allows 1.61. FC Dallas scores 1.96 and allows 1.74. Games in this league average 3.21 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 65% of Minnesota United's games and 65% of FC Dallas's. The Over 2.5 rates are 57% and 70%, compared with league averages of 63% for BTTS and 62% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

Minnesota United has the higher season xG average, 1.56 to 1.37 per game. Minnesota United takes 13.7 shots per game, while FC Dallas takes 12.2.

First-half and second-half trends

Minnesota United leads at halftime in 22% of its games and scores 0.91 goals per game after halftime. FC Dallas leads at halftime in 35% and scores 0.87 after halftime.

When the teams score

Minnesota United's most productive scoring window is minutes 61-75 (10 goals). For FC Dallas, it is minutes 76-90+ (12 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

MLS games average 3.21 goals. Both teams score in 63% of games, and 62% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

Before this game, one previous meeting was available. The record was 1 home win, 0 draws and 0 away wins. Those games averaged 1.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Minnesota United are unbeaten in 4 of their last 5 matches, scoring 13 goals during that period, while FC Dallas have conceded as many as 15 goals in their five most recent games. At home, the hosts create chances worth an average of 1.62 xG, whereas Dallas allow opponents 1.67 xG away from home and concede 1.62 goals per match. FC Dallas remain dangerous offensively on the road, where they average 1.77 goals and win 46% of their matches, making a goal from the visitors a highly realistic scenario. However, Minnesota have a clearly better recent points return, averaging 1.6 points per match compared with their opponents’ 1.4, while Dallas’ current defensive weakness marginally shifts the forecast in favor of the hosts.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

The signal for both teams to score is clear: Minnesota has recorded BTTS in 78% of its matches this season, while FC Dallas has done so in 54%, compared with the league average of 62%. In their last five matches, both teams have regularly been involved in open games, with BTTS occurring in 100% of Minnesota’s matches and 80% of Dallas’s. During this period, Minnesota averaged 2.6 goals per game, while Dallas averaged 2.0, and the visitors’ defense conceded as many as 3.0 goals per match. The hosts kept a clean sheet in only 11% of their games, while Dallas failed to score in 31% of matches, which is the main argument limiting confidence in this pick. Nevertheless, Minnesota allows opponents an xG of 1.16, while Dallas averages 4.85 shots on target per match, so an away goal remains a likely scenario.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

Minnesota scores an average of 2.00 goals per game, while FC Dallas averages 1.77, with both defenses conceding 1.78 and 1.62 goals, respectively. In their last five matches, the hosts have scored as many as 2.6 goals per game, while Dallas has conceded 3.0, clearly strengthening the goals outlook in Minnesota’s favor. At least three goals were scored in 67% of Minnesota’s matches and 69% of Dallas’s, while in their last five appearances these figures stood at 80% and 100%, respectively. The baseline signal for at least two goals is even stronger: both teams have surpassed this line in 78% and 77% of their matches throughout the season. Over 1.5 is therefore the strongest pick, as even with lower-than-expected finishing efficiency, the attacking profile of both teams strongly favors a minimum of two goals.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

The strongest scenario is FC Dallas leading at the break, followed by a Minnesota United win, as the hosts were trailing at half-time in 44% of their matches this season and in as many as 60% of their last five games. Dallas more often starts strongly, leading at half-time in 38% of its season matches, while across its last five games it averaged 1.2 goals scored before the break and 1.8 conceded. After the break, however, Minnesota is very difficult to beat: it has not lost any match in this phase of play this season and averaged 2.0 goals scored after half-time over its last five fixtures. Dallas’s defense has clearly weakened, with the team conceding an average of 3.0 goals per match in its last five appearances, including 1.2 after the break. In addition, Minnesota has the more favourable average xG figures against its opponent: its defense allows 1.16 xG, whereas Dallas allows opponents 1.67 xG, further strengthening the prospect of a turnaround by the hosts.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Stats by half

0 : 0
First half
1 : 2
Second half

Game stats

51Possession (%)49
Minnesota UnitedFC Dallas
8Shots13
Minnesota UnitedFC Dallas
2Shots on target6
Minnesota UnitedFC Dallas
0.94xG1.56
Minnesota UnitedFC Dallas
2Corners6
Minnesota UnitedFC Dallas
40Dangerous attacks43
Minnesota UnitedFC Dallas
13Fouls21
Minnesota UnitedFC Dallas
2Cards2
Minnesota UnitedFC Dallas

Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

Minnesota UnitedFC Dallas
1.48Goals scored / game1.96
Minnesota UnitedFC Dallas
1.61Goals allowed / game1.74
Minnesota UnitedFC Dallas
46%Average possession42%
Minnesota UnitedFC Dallas
5.13Shots on target / game4.7
Minnesota UnitedFC Dallas

Team stats— who is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

13.7Shots per game12.17
Minnesota UnitedFC Dallas
5.13Shots on target4.7
Minnesota UnitedFC Dallas
10.8%Shot conversion16.1%
Minnesota UnitedFC Dallas
46%Possession42%
Minnesota UnitedFC Dallas
1.56xG for1.37
Minnesota UnitedFC Dallas
1.41xG against1.51
Minnesota UnitedFC Dallas

Shooting quality

Minnesota United: BalancedFC Dallas: Counter-attacking
Minnesota UnitedFC Dallas
Accuracy (shots on target)37%39%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.110.11
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.290.42

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team form— who is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

FC Dallas is 100% better for: last-5 form.

1 pts / game - Minnesota United · 2 pts / game - FC Dallas

Minnesota United
DLWDL
Season result split
30% W35% D35% L
Season (W-D-L)
7-8-8
1.26 pts / game · goal difference -3
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-2-2
1.00 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
2-6-3
Last 5 at home
0-4-1
DDDLD
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 2.8Goals conceded: 2.4xG: 1.78Opponent xG: 1.25BTTS: 100%Over 2.5: 80%
FC Dallas
WWLDW
Season result split
43% W30% D26% L
Season (W-D-L)
10-7-6
1.61 pts / game · goal difference +5
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-1-1
2.00 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
6-3-4
Last 5 away
2-2-1
DWWLD
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 2.6Goals conceded: 3.0xG: 1.39Opponent xG: 1.83BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 100%

Goals— how do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

FC Dallas is 32% better for: goals scored per game.

1.48 goals / game - Minnesota United · 1.96 goals / game - FC Dallas

Minnesota United is 8% better for: goals allowed per game.

1.61 goals / game - Minnesota United · 1.74 goals / game - FC Dallas

Minnesota United scoring profile: very strong

Minnesota United scores in 78% of games (18 of 23 games), while FC Dallas keeps a clean sheet in 17% (4 of 23 games).

FC Dallas scoring profile: very strong

FC Dallas scores in 74% of games (17 of 23 games), while Minnesota United keeps a clean sheet in 22% (5 of 23 games).

34Goals scored (season)45
Minnesota UnitedFC Dallas
37Goals conceded (season)40
Minnesota UnitedFC Dallas
3.09Average goals per game3.7
Minnesota UnitedFC Dallas
14Goals scored (last 5)13
Minnesota UnitedFC Dallas
12Goals conceded (last 5)15
Minnesota UnitedFC Dallas

How often they score at least...

78%1 goal74%
Minnesota UnitedFC Dallas
39%2 goals65%
Minnesota UnitedFC Dallas
17%3 goals39%
Minnesota UnitedFC Dallas
9%4 goals17%
Minnesota UnitedFC Dallas

How often they concede at least...

78%1 goal83%
Minnesota UnitedFC Dallas
43%2 goals52%
Minnesota UnitedFC Dallas
17%3 goals30%
Minnesota UnitedFC Dallas
9%4 goals4%
Minnesota UnitedFC Dallas

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

63%
League average

Goal patterns

26%BTTS at half-time48%
Minnesota UnitedFC Dallas
9%BTTS in both halves30%
Minnesota UnitedFC Dallas
17%Scored in both halves52%
Minnesota UnitedFC Dallas

BTTS and goal count

52%Min. 3 goals and BTTS61%
Minnesota UnitedFC Dallas
4%Min. 3 goals without BTTS9%
Minnesota UnitedFC Dallas
100%BTTS - last 580%
Minnesota UnitedFC Dallas

Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

1st half

78%Min. 1 goal before half-time74%
Minnesota UnitedFC Dallas
30%Min. 2 goals before half-time61%
Minnesota UnitedFC Dallas
22%Min. 3 goals before half-time48%
Minnesota UnitedFC Dallas

2nd half

74%Min. 1 goal after half-time74%
Minnesota UnitedFC Dallas
48%Min. 2 goals after half-time61%
Minnesota UnitedFC Dallas
22%Min. 3 goals after half-time22%
Minnesota UnitedFC Dallas

Game halves— when do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

FC Dallas is 45% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

0.96 pts / game - Minnesota United · 1.39 pts / game - FC Dallas

Minnesota United - half-time state
22% leading30% draw48% trailing
FC Dallas - half-time state
35% leading35% draw30% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

0.96Points per game (1st half)1.39
Minnesota UnitedFC Dallas
0.57Goals scored (1st half)1.09
Minnesota UnitedFC Dallas
0.91Goals conceded (1st half)1.04
Minnesota UnitedFC Dallas
1.48Average goals (1st half)2.13
Minnesota UnitedFC Dallas
35%Clean sheet before half-time43%
Minnesota UnitedFC Dallas
61%No goal before half-time35%
Minnesota UnitedFC Dallas

After half-time (2nd half)

1.52Points per game (2nd half)1.3
Minnesota UnitedFC Dallas
0.91Goals scored (2nd half)0.87
Minnesota UnitedFC Dallas
0.7Goals conceded (2nd half)0.7
Minnesota UnitedFC Dallas
1.61Average goals (2nd half)1.57
Minnesota UnitedFC Dallas
43%Clean sheet after half-time39%
Minnesota UnitedFC Dallas
43%No goal after half-time39%
Minnesota UnitedFC Dallas

Minnesota United - second-half results

35% W48% D17% L
22
Half-time points
13
Half-time goals
-8
Goal difference (1st half)
35
Second-half points
+5
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.96
PPG before half-time
Lead holding136%

Leads at halftime in 22% of games and wins 30%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime-0.2

Defense stays consistent across the full game.

FC Dallas - second-half results

26% W52% D22% L
32
Half-time points
25
Half-time goals
+1
Goal difference (1st half)
30
Second-half points
+4
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.39
PPG before half-time
Lead holding123%

Leads at halftime in 35% of games and wins 43%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime-0.3

Defense stays consistent across the full game.

Minnesota United - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game0.801.80
Goals scored / game1.01.8
Goals allowed / game1.21.2
Average goals per game2.23.0
1 goal80%100%
2 goals40%100%
3 goals40%40%
Clean sheet20%20%
No goal60%0%
Goal difference-1+3
Half-time: 20% leading - 20% draw - 60% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 60% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 5
FC Dallas - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.801.00
Goals scored / game1.61.0
Goals allowed / game1.81.2
Average goals per game3.42.2
1 goal100%100%
2 goals80%80%
3 goals80%40%
Clean sheet20%0%
No goal20%20%
Goal difference-1-1
Half-time: 60% leading - 0% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 60% - Half-time goals total: 8

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

Minnesota United
ScoredConceded
3
9
0-15
2
8
16-30
8
4
31-45
5
7
46-60
10
4
61-75
6
5
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (10 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.

FC Dallas
ScoredConceded
7
6
0-15
8
8
16-30
10
10
31-45
6
5
46-60
2
7
61-75
12
4
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (12 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (10). Late-goal balance (76-90): +8 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

3.40
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
1.6 : 1.8
Estimated goal split
home : away
106%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
65%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-71%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
58%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
6%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 17 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

Minnesota United

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.15
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.28
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-2.6 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.08
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
-0.20
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
80%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
118%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
-0.26
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
18% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 9% come in the first quarter-hour.
18%

FC Dallas

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.14
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.36
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-1.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.59
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
-0.23
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
143%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
95%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
+0.39
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.2
Late goals
27% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 16% come in the first quarter-hour.
27%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League context— is this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (MLS).

Teams vs league

Minnesota UnitedLigaFC Dallas
Average goals per game▼ 3.093.21▲ 3.70
Both teams scored▲ 65%63%▲ 65%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)▼ 57%62%▲ 70%
Clean sheets• 22%21%▼ 17%
Goal before half-time• 78%77%▼ 74%
Goal after half-time▼ 74%81%▼ 74%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.21
Average goals per game
63%
Both teams scored
62%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
21%
Clean sheets
1.84
Home goals / game
1.37
Away goals / game
+34%
Home attack advantage
+26%
Home defensive advantage
+19%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
77%
1 goal
45%
2 goals
19%
3 goals
6%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
81%
1 goal
51%
2 goals
23%
3 goals
10%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. FC DallasYellow cardOsaze Urhoghide
  2. Minnesota UnitedYellow cardNectarios Triantis
  3. Minnesota UnitedGoalKelvin Kwarteng YeboahAssist: Kyle Duncan
  4. FC DallasYellow cardRamiro Moschen Benetti
  5. FC DallasGoalSantiago MorenoAssist: Samuel Sarver
  6. FC DallasSubstitutionOn: Samuel SarverOff: Logan Farrington
  7. Minnesota UnitedSubstitutionOn: Mauricio GonzalezOff: Wil Trapp
  8. Minnesota UnitedYellow cardOwen Géne

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Record from Minnesota United's perspective: 1 win, 0 draws and 0 losses against FC Dallas. Games average 1.00 goals, and both teams scored in 0% of them.

FAQ

What was the result of Minnesota United vs FC Dallas?

The MLS match finished Minnesota United 1:2 FC Dallas. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Minnesota United vs FC Dallas?

Minnesota United score 1.48 goals per game on average and FC Dallas 1.96. The MLS average is 3.21 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 62% of games. Both teams score in 65% of Minnesota United's matches and 65% of FC Dallas's.

What form are Minnesota United and FC Dallas in?

Over the last 5 games Minnesota United have a 1-2-2 record (1.00 points per game) and FC Dallas 3-1-1 (2.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Minnesota United vs FC Dallas?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Minnesota United vs FC Dallas: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.