United States - MLSData current as of 16 July 2026

Minnesota United vs Los Angeles FC: match statistics

Minnesota United vs Los Angeles FC: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Minnesota United play Los Angeles FC in MLS (United States). The match date is 25 April 2026 at 22:45. Final score: 0:1.

Current form

Minnesota United: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match. Los Angeles FC: 1-1-3, 0.80 points/match.

Goal statistics

Minnesota United scores 1.20 and concedes 1.47 goals per match. Los Angeles FC scores 1.60 and concedes 1.13. League average: 3.30 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Minnesota United 53%, Los Angeles FC 40%. Over 2.5: Minnesota United 53%, Los Angeles FC 53%. League level: BTTS 61%, Over 2.5 62%.

xG, shots and style

Los Angeles FC has higher xG: 1.62 vs 1.47. Minnesota United: 13.1 shots per match, Los Angeles FC: 14.3.

Match halves

Minnesota United: half-time lead 20%, second-half goals 0.73. Los Angeles FC: half-time lead 20%, second-half goals 1.00.

Goals by minute

Minnesota United: 61-75 (5 goals). Los Angeles FC: 61-75 (6 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

MLS: 3.30 goals per match, BTTS 61%, Over 2.5 62%.

Head-to-head

No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.

Match description

Minnesota United have won 4 of their last 5 matches, scoring 7 goals in that period and averaging 2.6 points per game, while Los Angeles FC have just 1 win in their last five, scoring 6 goals and averaging 1.0 point per game. At home Minnesota have not conceded — 0.0 goals conceded per game and 100% clean sheets — whereas LAFC concede 0.67 goals per away match and have conceded 7 goals in their last five fixtures. Offensively LAFC have 16 goals this season versus Minnesota’s 11, and on the road generate an average xG of 1.67 compared to Minnesota’s home xG of 1.5, indicating slightly greater chance-creation potential from the visitors. However, Minnesota at home average 5 shots on target and 13.67 total shots with a conversion rate around 7%, while LAFC average 3.67 shots on target and 16 total shots with a conversion rate around 6%, which, combined with the hosts’ solid defensive profile, limits the realistic threat from the visitors. Considering Minnesota’s 4 wins in five, 100% home clean sheets and the defensive form differential (Minnesota 2 goals conceded in 5 matches vs LAFC 7), I predict a home victory.

Half-by-half

0 : 1
1st half
0 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

62Possession (%)38
Minnesota UnitedLos Angeles FC
23Shots7
Minnesota UnitedLos Angeles FC
4Shots on target7
Minnesota UnitedLos Angeles FC
2.18xG1.06
Minnesota UnitedLos Angeles FC
11Corners2
Minnesota UnitedLos Angeles FC
61Dangerous attacks17
Minnesota UnitedLos Angeles FC
11Fouls9
Minnesota UnitedLos Angeles FC
1Cards3
Minnesota UnitedLos Angeles FC

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Minnesota UnitedLos Angeles FC
1.2Goals scored / match1.6
Minnesota UnitedLos Angeles FC
1.47Goals conceded / match1.13
Minnesota UnitedLos Angeles FC
47%Average possession48%
Minnesota UnitedLos Angeles FC
4.4Shots on target / match4.73
Minnesota UnitedLos Angeles FC

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

13.13Shots per match14.27
Minnesota UnitedLos Angeles FC
4.4Shots on target4.73
Minnesota UnitedLos Angeles FC
9.1%Shot conversion11.2%
Minnesota UnitedLos Angeles FC
47%Possession48%
Minnesota UnitedLos Angeles FC
1.47xG for1.62
Minnesota UnitedLos Angeles FC
1.45xG against1.36
Minnesota UnitedLos Angeles FC

Shooting quality

Minnesota United: BalancedLos Angeles FC: Attacking
Minnesota UnitedLos Angeles FC
Accuracy (shots on target)34%33%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.110.11
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.270.34

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Minnesota United is 25% better for: last-5 form.

1 pts / match - Minnesota United · 0.8 pts / match - Los Angeles FC

Minnesota United
WDLLD
Season result split
40% W27% R33% P
Season (W-D-L)
6-4-5
1.47 pts / match · goal difference -4
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-2-2
1.00 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
2-3-2
Last 5 at home
1-2-2
WLDLD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.4Goals conceded: 1.6xG: 1.50Opponent xG: 1.15BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 60%
Los Angeles FC
DLLLW
Season result split
47% W20% R33% P
Season (W-D-L)
7-3-5
1.60 pts / match · goal difference +7
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-1-3
0.80 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
2-2-3
Last 5 away
1-1-3
LWDLL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.4Goals conceded: 2.2xG: 1.95Opponent xG: 1.10BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 80%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Los Angeles FC is 33% better for: goals scored per match.

1.2 goals / match - Minnesota United · 1.6 goals / match - Los Angeles FC

Los Angeles FC is 30% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.47 goals / match - Minnesota United · 1.13 goals / match - Los Angeles FC

Minnesota United scoring profile: mixed

Minnesota United scores in 73% of matches (11 of 15 matches), while Los Angeles FC keeps a clean sheet in 60% (9 of 15 matches).

Los Angeles FC scoring profile: very strong

Los Angeles FC scores in 87% of matches (13 of 15 matches), while Minnesota United keeps a clean sheet in 27% (4 of 15 matches).

18Goals scored (season)24
Minnesota UnitedLos Angeles FC
22Goals conceded (season)17
Minnesota UnitedLos Angeles FC
2.67Average goals in match2.73
Minnesota UnitedLos Angeles FC
7Goals scored (last 5)7
Minnesota UnitedLos Angeles FC
8Goals conceded (last 5)11
Minnesota UnitedLos Angeles FC

How often they score at least...

73%1 goal87%
Minnesota UnitedLos Angeles FC
40%2 goals40%
Minnesota UnitedLos Angeles FC
7%3 goals13%
Minnesota UnitedLos Angeles FC
0%4 goals7%
Minnesota UnitedLos Angeles FC

How often they concede at least...

73%1 goal40%
Minnesota UnitedLos Angeles FC
40%2 goals40%
Minnesota UnitedLos Angeles FC
13%3 goals20%
Minnesota UnitedLos Angeles FC
7%4 goals13%
Minnesota UnitedLos Angeles FC

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

61%
League average

Goal patterns

27%BTTS at half-time13%
Minnesota UnitedLos Angeles FC
7%BTTS in both halves7%
Minnesota UnitedLos Angeles FC
13%Scored in both halves20%
Minnesota UnitedLos Angeles FC

BTTS and goal count

47%Min. 3 goals and BTTS40%
Minnesota UnitedLos Angeles FC
7%Min. 3 goals without BTTS13%
Minnesota UnitedLos Angeles FC
80%BTTS - last 580%
Minnesota UnitedLos Angeles FC

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

80%Min. 1 goal before half-time53%
Minnesota UnitedLos Angeles FC
33%Min. 2 goals before half-time20%
Minnesota UnitedLos Angeles FC
20%Min. 3 goals before half-time20%
Minnesota UnitedLos Angeles FC

2nd half

67%Min. 1 goal after half-time80%
Minnesota UnitedLos Angeles FC
33%Min. 2 goals after half-time60%
Minnesota UnitedLos Angeles FC
20%Min. 3 goals after half-time13%
Minnesota UnitedLos Angeles FC

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Los Angeles FC is 15% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

0.93 pts / match - Minnesota United · 1.07 pts / match - Los Angeles FC

Minnesota United - half-time state
20% leading33% draw47% trailing
Los Angeles FC - half-time state
20% leading47% draw33% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

0.93Points per match (1st half)1.07
Minnesota UnitedLos Angeles FC
0.47Goals scored (1st half)0.6
Minnesota UnitedLos Angeles FC
0.93Goals conceded (1st half)0.47
Minnesota UnitedLos Angeles FC
1.4Average goals (1st half)1.07
Minnesota UnitedLos Angeles FC
33%Clean sheet before half-time67%
Minnesota UnitedLos Angeles FC
60%No goal before half-time67%
Minnesota UnitedLos Angeles FC

After half-time (2nd half)

1.6Points per match (2nd half)1.8
Minnesota UnitedLos Angeles FC
0.73Goals scored (2nd half)1
Minnesota UnitedLos Angeles FC
0.53Goals conceded (2nd half)0.67
Minnesota UnitedLos Angeles FC
1.27Average goals (2nd half)1.67
Minnesota UnitedLos Angeles FC
53%Clean sheet after half-time60%
Minnesota UnitedLos Angeles FC
53%No goal after half-time27%
Minnesota UnitedLos Angeles FC

Minnesota United - second-half results

40% W40% R20% P
14
Half-time points
7
Half-time goals
-7
Goal difference (1st half)
24
Second-half points
+3
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.93
PPG before half-time
Lead holding200%

Leads at half-time in 20% of matches and wins 40%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.4

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Los Angeles FC - second-half results

47% W40% R13% P
16
Half-time points
9
Half-time goals
+2
Goal difference (1st half)
27
Second-half points
+5
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.07
PPG before half-time
Lead holding235%

Leads at half-time in 20% of matches and wins 47%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.2

Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Minnesota United - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.202.00
Goals scored / match0.21.2
Goals conceded / match1.00.6
Average goals in match1.21.8
1 goal100%80%
2 goals20%40%
3 goals0%40%
Clean sheet0%40%
No goal80%40%
Goal difference-4+3
Half-time: 0% leading - 20% draw - 80% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 20% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 1
Los Angeles FC - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.201.60
Goals scored / match0.41.0
Goals conceded / match1.21.0
Average goals in match1.62.0
1 goal80%100%
2 goals40%80%
3 goals40%20%
Clean sheet20%20%
No goal60%20%
Goal difference-40
Half-time: 0% leading - 20% draw - 80% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 40% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 2

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Minnesota United
ScoredConceded
1
7
0-15
2
4
16-30
4
3
31-45
3
5
46-60
5
1
61-75
3
2
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (5 goli). Concedes most in 0-15 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.

Los Angeles FC
ScoredConceded
2
3
0-15
4
2
16-30
3
2
31-45
3
6
46-60
6
2
61-75
6
2
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (6 goli). Concedes most in 46-60 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): +4 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.70
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.2 : 1.5
Estimated goal split
home : away
82%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
47%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
64%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
4%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 25 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Minnesota United

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.02
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.29
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+4.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.27
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.02
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
62%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
107%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.47
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
17% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 6% come in the first quarter-hour.
17%

Los Angeles FC

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.26
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.21
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-6.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.02
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.23
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
117%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
58%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.80
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.4
Late goals
25% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 8% come in the first quarter-hour.
25%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (MLS).

Teams vs league

Minnesota UnitedLigaLos Angeles FC
Average goals in match 2.673.30 2.73
Both teams scored 53%61% 40%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 53%62% 53%
Clean sheets 27%21% 60%
Goal before half-time 80%78% 53%
Goal after half-time 67%80% 80%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.30
Average goals per match
61%
Both teams scored
62%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
21%
Clean sheets
1.94
Home goals / match
1.37
Away goals / match
+42%
Home attack advantage
+29%
Home defence advantage
+18%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
78%
1 goal
45%
2 goals
21%
3 goals
6%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
80%
1 goal
52%
2 goals
25%
3 goals
12%
4 goals

FAQ

What was the result of Minnesota United vs Los Angeles FC?

The MLS match finished Minnesota United 0:1 Los Angeles FC. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Minnesota United vs Los Angeles FC?

Minnesota United score 1.20 goals per game on average and Los Angeles FC 1.60. The MLS average is 3.30 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 62% of games. Both teams score in 53% of Minnesota United's matches and 40% of Los Angeles FC's.

What form are Minnesota United and Los Angeles FC in?

Over the last 5 games Minnesota United have a 1-2-2 record (1.00 points per game) and Los Angeles FC 1-1-3 (0.80 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Minnesota United vs Los Angeles FC?

The statistical background for Minnesota United vs Los Angeles FC — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.