Minnesota United vs Orlando City: match statistics
Minnesota United vs Orlando City: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Minnesota United played against Orlando City in MLS (United States). The game was played on August 30, 2026. Venue: Allianz Field. Final score: 3:3.
Recent form
Minnesota United has 1 win, 3 draws and 1 loss over its last five games, averaging 1.20 points per game. Orlando City has 2 wins, 1 draw and 2 losses, with 1.40 points per game.
Scoring records
Minnesota United scores 1.29 goals per game and allows 1.38. Orlando City scores 1.62 and allows 2.43. Games in this league average 3.19 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 62% of Minnesota United's games and 67% of Orlando City's. The Over 2.5 rates are 52% and 71%, compared with league averages of 63% for BTTS and 61% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Minnesota United has the higher season xG average, 1.50 to 1.41 per game. Minnesota United takes 13.2 shots per game, while Orlando City takes 12.3.
First-half and second-half trends
Minnesota United leads at halftime in 24% of its games and scores 0.76 goals per game after halftime. Orlando City leads at halftime in 29% and scores 1.00 after halftime.
When the teams score
Minnesota United's most productive scoring window is minutes 61-75 (7 goals). For Orlando City, it is minutes 16-30 (9 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
MLS games average 3.19 goals. Both teams score in 63% of games, and 61% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
There is not enough head-to-head history for a meaningful comparison.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Minnesota United have shown significantly more consistent form: they have collected 8 points in their last five matches, compared with Orlando City’s 5, while the goal difference over that period stands at 10:5. At home, the hosts concede just 0.8 goals per match and keep a clean sheet in 40% of fixtures, whereas Orlando allow their opponents as many as 3.4 goals on average away from home. Minnesota create chances worth an average of 1.54 xG at home, more than Orlando’s 1.35 xG in away matches, while the visitors’ defense allows 2.06 xG. Orlando score 1.5 goals per away match and have a 13% conversion rate, but they have lost 70% of such fixtures and kept just one clean sheet in ten matches. The hosts often draw at home, sharing the points in 50% of their matches, but Orlando’s major defensive weakness should tip the balance in Minnesota’s favor.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Minnesota United records BTTS in 82% of matches, well above the MLS league average of 63%, while Orlando City stands at 50%; however, over the teams’ last five matches, these figures have risen to 80% and 100%, respectively. The hosts score an average of 1.73 goals per match, compared with Orlando’s 1.50, while their averages over the last five fixtures are 2.0 and 1.4 goals. Minnesota has kept a clean sheet in only 9% of matches, while Orlando has done so in 10%, and the visitors concede as many as 3.4 goals per game this season. Their attacking potential is supported by an xG of 1.47 for Minnesota and 1.35 for Orlando, while the hosts allow opponents an xG of 1.69. The strongest signal points to BTTS - Yes: Minnesota should be able to exploit Orlando’s very weak defense, while the visitors have been scoring regularly in their recent form and will face a team that rarely keeps a clean sheet.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Minnesota score an average of 1.73 goals at home, while Orlando concede as many as 3.40 goals per away match, clearly strengthening the hosts’ attacking potential. At least two goals were scored in 82% of Minnesota’s matches and in all of Orlando’s games, while the Over 2.5 goals line landed in 64% and 80% of cases, respectively. Both teams regularly create chances: average xG stands at 1.47 for Minnesota and 1.35 for Orlando, while the hosts record 4.73 shots on target per match compared with 5.00 for the visitors. Across their last five appearances, Minnesota averaged 2.0 goals and Orlando 1.4, with both teams scoring in 80% and 100% of matches, respectively. The strongest signal remains Over 1.5 goals, as the defenses keep clean sheets in only 9% and 10% of matches, while the projected total of 3.40 goals gives this line a very large safety margin.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Minnesota United have a clear advantage in the first halves: they led at the break in 36% of matches, while Orlando City were trailing after 45 minutes in as many as 70% of games. The hosts average 0.73 goals scored and concede just 0.64 before half-time, whereas the visitors concede as many as 1.80 goals away from home during this phase, while scoring only 0.50. Minnesota’s advantage should persist after the interval, as Orlando concede an average of 3.40 goals in full matches, while Minnesota score 1.73 at home. Recent results also support this assessment: in their previous five matches, the hosts averaged 2.0 goals scored and 1.0 conceded, compared with Orlando’s 1.4 scored and 1.6 conceded. The HT/FT scenario of Minnesota leading at the break and securing the final victory is therefore the strongest-supported outcome, based on both the difference in defensive quality and the teams’ first-half profiles.
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Minnesota United | Orlando City | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 36% | 39% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.11 | 0.11 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.27 | 0.33 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Orlando City is 17% better for: last-5 form.
1.2 pts / game - Minnesota United · 1.4 pts / game - Orlando City
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Orlando City is 26% better for: goals scored per game.
1.29 goals / game - Minnesota United · 1.62 goals / game - Orlando City
Minnesota United is 76% better for: goals allowed per game.
1.38 goals / game - Minnesota United · 2.43 goals / game - Orlando City
Minnesota United scores in 76% of games (16 of 21 meczów), while Orlando City keeps a clean sheet in 10% (2 of 21 meczów).
Orlando City scores in 76% of games (16 of 21 meczów), while Minnesota United keeps a clean sheet in 24% (5 of 21 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Minnesota United
Over / Under - Orlando City
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Minnesota United - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 24% of games and wins 33%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
Orlando City - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 29% of games and wins 33%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.60 | 1.20 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.8 | 0.8 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.4 | 0.6 |
| Average goals per game | 1.2 | 1.4 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 40% |
| No goal | 60% | 40% |
| Goal difference | +2 | +1 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 0.20 | 2.60 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.0 | 1.4 |
| Goals allowed / game | 1.0 | 0.4 |
| Average goals per game | 1.0 | 1.8 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 20% | 60% |
| No goal | 100% | 0% |
| Goal difference | -5 | +5 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (7 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (9 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (12). Late-goal balance (76-90): -6 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Minnesota United
Orlando City
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (MLS).
Teams vs league
| Minnesota United | Liga | Orlando City | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▼ 2.67 | 3.19 | ▲ 4.05 |
| Both teams scored | • 62% | 63% | ▲ 67% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 52% | 61% | ▲ 71% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 24% | 20% | ▼ 10% |
| Goal before half-time | • 76% | 77% | ▲ 86% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 71% | 81% | ▲ 95% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
FAQ
What was the result of Minnesota United vs Orlando City?
The MLS match finished Minnesota United 3:3 Orlando City. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Minnesota United vs Orlando City?
Minnesota United score 1.29 goals per game on average and Orlando City 1.62. The MLS average is 3.19 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 61% of games. Both teams score in 62% of Minnesota United's matches and 67% of Orlando City's.
What form are Minnesota United and Orlando City in?
Over the last 5 games Minnesota United have a 1-3-1 record (1.20 points per game) and Orlando City 2-1-2 (1.40 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Minnesota United vs Orlando City?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Minnesota United vs Orlando City: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.


