United States - MLSAllianz FieldData current as of August 31, 2026

Minnesota United vs Orlando City: match statistics

Minnesota United vs Orlando City: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

Minnesota United played against Orlando City in MLS (United States). The game was played on August 30, 2026. Venue: Allianz Field. Final score: 3:3.

Recent form

Minnesota United has 1 win, 3 draws and 1 loss over its last five games, averaging 1.20 points per game. Orlando City has 2 wins, 1 draw and 2 losses, with 1.40 points per game.

Scoring records

Minnesota United scores 1.29 goals per game and allows 1.38. Orlando City scores 1.62 and allows 2.43. Games in this league average 3.19 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 62% of Minnesota United's games and 67% of Orlando City's. The Over 2.5 rates are 52% and 71%, compared with league averages of 63% for BTTS and 61% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

Minnesota United has the higher season xG average, 1.50 to 1.41 per game. Minnesota United takes 13.2 shots per game, while Orlando City takes 12.3.

First-half and second-half trends

Minnesota United leads at halftime in 24% of its games and scores 0.76 goals per game after halftime. Orlando City leads at halftime in 29% and scores 1.00 after halftime.

When the teams score

Minnesota United's most productive scoring window is minutes 61-75 (7 goals). For Orlando City, it is minutes 16-30 (9 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

MLS games average 3.19 goals. Both teams score in 63% of games, and 61% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

There is not enough head-to-head history for a meaningful comparison.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Minnesota United have shown significantly more consistent form: they have collected 8 points in their last five matches, compared with Orlando City’s 5, while the goal difference over that period stands at 10:5. At home, the hosts concede just 0.8 goals per match and keep a clean sheet in 40% of fixtures, whereas Orlando allow their opponents as many as 3.4 goals on average away from home. Minnesota create chances worth an average of 1.54 xG at home, more than Orlando’s 1.35 xG in away matches, while the visitors’ defense allows 2.06 xG. Orlando score 1.5 goals per away match and have a 13% conversion rate, but they have lost 70% of such fixtures and kept just one clean sheet in ten matches. The hosts often draw at home, sharing the points in 50% of their matches, but Orlando’s major defensive weakness should tip the balance in Minnesota’s favor.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

Minnesota United records BTTS in 82% of matches, well above the MLS league average of 63%, while Orlando City stands at 50%; however, over the teams’ last five matches, these figures have risen to 80% and 100%, respectively. The hosts score an average of 1.73 goals per match, compared with Orlando’s 1.50, while their averages over the last five fixtures are 2.0 and 1.4 goals. Minnesota has kept a clean sheet in only 9% of matches, while Orlando has done so in 10%, and the visitors concede as many as 3.4 goals per game this season. Their attacking potential is supported by an xG of 1.47 for Minnesota and 1.35 for Orlando, while the hosts allow opponents an xG of 1.69. The strongest signal points to BTTS - Yes: Minnesota should be able to exploit Orlando’s very weak defense, while the visitors have been scoring regularly in their recent form and will face a team that rarely keeps a clean sheet.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

Minnesota score an average of 1.73 goals at home, while Orlando concede as many as 3.40 goals per away match, clearly strengthening the hosts’ attacking potential. At least two goals were scored in 82% of Minnesota’s matches and in all of Orlando’s games, while the Over 2.5 goals line landed in 64% and 80% of cases, respectively. Both teams regularly create chances: average xG stands at 1.47 for Minnesota and 1.35 for Orlando, while the hosts record 4.73 shots on target per match compared with 5.00 for the visitors. Across their last five appearances, Minnesota averaged 2.0 goals and Orlando 1.4, with both teams scoring in 80% and 100% of matches, respectively. The strongest signal remains Over 1.5 goals, as the defenses keep clean sheets in only 9% and 10% of matches, while the projected total of 3.40 goals gives this line a very large safety margin.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

Minnesota United have a clear advantage in the first halves: they led at the break in 36% of matches, while Orlando City were trailing after 45 minutes in as many as 70% of games. The hosts average 0.73 goals scored and concede just 0.64 before half-time, whereas the visitors concede as many as 1.80 goals away from home during this phase, while scoring only 0.50. Minnesota’s advantage should persist after the interval, as Orlando concede an average of 3.40 goals in full matches, while Minnesota score 1.73 at home. Recent results also support this assessment: in their previous five matches, the hosts averaged 2.0 goals scored and 1.0 conceded, compared with Orlando’s 1.4 scored and 1.6 conceded. The HT/FT scenario of Minnesota leading at the break and securing the final victory is therefore the strongest-supported outcome, based on both the difference in defensive quality and the teams’ first-half profiles.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Stats by half

0 : 1
First half
3 : 2
Second half

Game stats

43Possession (%)57
Minnesota UnitedOrlando City
21Shots6
Minnesota UnitedOrlando City
9Shots on target5
Minnesota UnitedOrlando City
2.38xG0.92
Minnesota UnitedOrlando City
8Corners1
Minnesota UnitedOrlando City
60Dangerous attacks24
Minnesota UnitedOrlando City
13Fouls10
Minnesota UnitedOrlando City
2Cards2
Minnesota UnitedOrlando City

Pre-game profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

Minnesota UnitedOrlando City
1.29Goals scored / game1.62
Minnesota UnitedOrlando City
1.38Goals allowed / game2.43
Minnesota UnitedOrlando City
46%Average possession48%
Minnesota UnitedOrlando City
4.81Shots on target / game4.86
Minnesota UnitedOrlando City

Team statswho is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

13.19Shots per game12.33
Minnesota UnitedOrlando City
4.81Shots on target4.86
Minnesota UnitedOrlando City
9.7%Shot conversion13.1%
Minnesota UnitedOrlando City
46%Possession48%
Minnesota UnitedOrlando City
1.5xG for1.41
Minnesota UnitedOrlando City
1.43xG against1.86
Minnesota UnitedOrlando City

Shooting quality

Minnesota United: BalancedOrlando City: Efficient finishing
Minnesota UnitedOrlando City
Accuracy (shots on target)36%39%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.110.11
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.270.33

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

Orlando City is 17% better for: last-5 form.

1.2 pts / game - Minnesota United · 1.4 pts / game - Orlando City

Minnesota United
DDDLW
Season result split
33% W33% R33% P
Season (W-D-L)
7-7-7
1.33 pts / game · goal difference -2
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-3-1
1.20 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
2-5-3
Last 5 at home
0-3-2
LDDDL
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.6Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 1.48Opponent xG: 1.36BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 40%
Orlando City
WLDLW
Season result split
33% W14% R52% P
Season (W-D-L)
7-3-11
1.14 pts / game · goal difference -17
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-2
1.40 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
2-1-7
Last 5 away
2-0-3
WLLWL
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.4Goals conceded: 1.4xG: 1.71Opponent xG: 1.20BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 60%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Orlando City is 26% better for: goals scored per game.

1.29 goals / game - Minnesota United · 1.62 goals / game - Orlando City

Minnesota United is 76% better for: goals allowed per game.

1.38 goals / game - Minnesota United · 2.43 goals / game - Orlando City

Minnesota United scoring profile: very strong

Minnesota United scores in 76% of games (16 of 21 meczów), while Orlando City keeps a clean sheet in 10% (2 of 21 meczów).

Orlando City scoring profile: very strong

Orlando City scores in 76% of games (16 of 21 meczów), while Minnesota United keeps a clean sheet in 24% (5 of 21 meczów).

27Goals scored (season)34
Minnesota UnitedOrlando City
29Goals conceded (season)51
Minnesota UnitedOrlando City
2.67Average goals per game4.05
Minnesota UnitedOrlando City
8Goals scored (last 5)7
Minnesota UnitedOrlando City
5Goals conceded (last 5)7
Minnesota UnitedOrlando City

How often they score at least...

76%1 goal76%
Minnesota UnitedOrlando City
33%2 goals48%
Minnesota UnitedOrlando City
10%3 goals19%
Minnesota UnitedOrlando City
5%4 goals19%
Minnesota UnitedOrlando City

How often they concede at least...

76%1 goal90%
Minnesota UnitedOrlando City
38%2 goals57%
Minnesota UnitedOrlando City
10%3 goals43%
Minnesota UnitedOrlando City
5%4 goals24%
Minnesota UnitedOrlando City

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

62%
Minnesota United - BTTSBTTS - percentage of matches where both teams scored.13 of 21 meczów
63%
League average

Goal patterns

24%BTTS at half-time19%
Minnesota UnitedOrlando City
5%BTTS in both halves5%
Minnesota UnitedOrlando City
14%Scored in both halves24%
Minnesota UnitedOrlando City

BTTS and goal count

48%Min. 3 goals and BTTS52%
Minnesota UnitedOrlando City
5%Min. 3 goals without BTTS19%
Minnesota UnitedOrlando City
80%BTTS - last 580%
Minnesota UnitedOrlando City

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

1st half

76%Min. 1 goal before half-time86%
Minnesota UnitedOrlando City
29%Min. 2 goals before half-time57%
Minnesota UnitedOrlando City
19%Min. 3 goals before half-time24%
Minnesota UnitedOrlando City

2nd half

71%Min. 1 goal after half-time95%
Minnesota UnitedOrlando City
43%Min. 2 goals after half-time62%
Minnesota UnitedOrlando City
14%Min. 3 goals after half-time38%
Minnesota UnitedOrlando City

Game halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Minnesota United - half-time state
24% leading33% draw43% trailing
Orlando City - half-time state
29% leading19% draw52% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.05Points per game (1st half)1.05
Minnesota UnitedOrlando City
0.52Goals scored (1st half)0.62
Minnesota UnitedOrlando City
0.81Goals conceded (1st half)1.19
Minnesota UnitedOrlando City
1.33Average goals (1st half)1.81
Minnesota UnitedOrlando City
38%Clean sheet before half-time38%
Minnesota UnitedOrlando City
62%No goal before half-time57%
Minnesota UnitedOrlando City

After half-time (2nd half)

1.48Points per game (2nd half)1.29
Minnesota UnitedOrlando City
0.76Goals scored (2nd half)1
Minnesota UnitedOrlando City
0.57Goals conceded (2nd half)1.24
Minnesota UnitedOrlando City
1.33Average goals (2nd half)2.24
Minnesota UnitedOrlando City
48%Clean sheet after half-time38%
Minnesota UnitedOrlando City
48%No goal after half-time43%
Minnesota UnitedOrlando City

Minnesota United - second-half results

33% W48% R19% P
22
Half-time points
11
Half-time goals
-6
Goal difference (1st half)
31
Second-half points
+4
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.05
PPG before half-time
Lead holding138%

Leads at halftime in 24% of games and wins 33%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime-0.2

Defense stays consistent across the full game.

Orlando City - second-half results

38% W14% R48% P
22
Half-time points
13
Half-time goals
-12
Goal difference (1st half)
27
Second-half points
-5
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.05
PPG before half-time
Lead holding114%

Leads at halftime in 29% of games and wins 33%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime+0.1

Defense stays consistent across the full game.

Minnesota United - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.601.20
Goals scored / game0.80.8
Goals allowed / game0.40.6
Average goals per game1.21.4
1 goal60%80%
2 goals20%60%
3 goals20%0%
Clean sheet60%40%
No goal60%40%
Goal difference+2+1
Half-time: 40% leading - 40% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 60% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 4
Orlando City - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game0.202.60
Goals scored / game0.01.4
Goals allowed / game1.00.4
Average goals per game1.01.8
1 goal80%100%
2 goals20%60%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet20%60%
No goal100%0%
Goal difference-5+5
Half-time: 0% leading - 20% draw - 80% trailing
2nd half: 80% won - 20% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 0

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

Minnesota United
ScoredConceded
3
8
0-15
2
5
16-30
6
4
31-45
4
6
46-60
7
2
61-75
5
4
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (7 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.

Orlando City
ScoredConceded
2
6
0-15
9
9
16-30
2
10
31-45
8
9
46-60
7
5
61-75
6
12
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (9 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (12). Late-goal balance (76-90): -6 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

3.36
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
1.9 : 1.5
Estimated goal split
home : away
105%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
65%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
58%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
6%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 17 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

Minnesota United

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.07
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.16
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-1.3 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.21
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.05
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
70%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
101%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
-0.13
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
19% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 11% come in the first quarter-hour.
19%

Orlando City

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.45
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.36
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+4.6 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.21
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
-0.57
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
119%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
133%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
+0.26
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.4
Late goals
18% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 6% come in the first quarter-hour.
18%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (MLS).

Teams vs league

Minnesota UnitedLigaOrlando City
Average goals per game 2.673.19 4.05
Both teams scored 62%63% 67%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 52%61% 71%
Clean sheets 24%20% 10%
Goal before half-time 76%77% 86%
Goal after half-time 71%81% 95%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.19
Average goals per game
63%
Both teams scored
61%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
20%
Clean sheets
1.83
Home goals / game
1.36
Away goals / game
+35%
Home attack advantage
+26%
Home defensive advantage
+19%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
77%
1 goal
45%
2 goals
18%
3 goals
6%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
81%
1 goal
51%
2 goals
23%
3 goals
10%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Orlando CityGoalDaryl Dike
  2. Minnesota UnitedYellow cardAnthony Markanich
  3. Minnesota UnitedSubstitutionOn: Alec SmirOff: Drake Callender
  4. Orlando CityYellow cardAntoine Griezmann
  5. Orlando CityGoalAntoine GriezmannAssist: Justin Ellis
  6. Minnesota UnitedYellow cardMichael Boxall
  7. Minnesota UnitedGoalMarcus CaldeiraAssist: Kelvin Kwarteng Yeboah
  8. Orlando CitySubstitutionOn: Tyrese SpicerOff: Justin Ellis
  9. Minnesota UnitedGoalAnthony MarkanichAssist: Joaquín Nicolás Pereyra
  10. Minnesota UnitedGoalKelvin Kwarteng Yeboah
  11. Minnesota UnitedSubstitutionOn: Tomás Alejandro ChancalayOff: Kelvin Kwarteng Yeboah
  12. Minnesota UnitedSubstitutionOn: Carlos Miguel Harvey CesnerosOff: Joaquín Nicolás Pereyra
  13. Orlando CityYellow cardMarco Pasalic
  14. Orlando CityGoalTyrese SpicerAssist: Antoine Griezmann

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

FAQ

What was the result of Minnesota United vs Orlando City?

The MLS match finished Minnesota United 3:3 Orlando City. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Minnesota United vs Orlando City?

Minnesota United score 1.29 goals per game on average and Orlando City 1.62. The MLS average is 3.19 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 61% of games. Both teams score in 62% of Minnesota United's matches and 67% of Orlando City's.

What form are Minnesota United and Orlando City in?

Over the last 5 games Minnesota United have a 1-3-1 record (1.20 points per game) and Orlando City 2-1-2 (1.40 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Minnesota United vs Orlando City?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Minnesota United vs Orlando City: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.