United States - MLSData current as of 16 July 2026

Minnesota United vs Portland Timbers: match statistics

Minnesota United vs Portland Timbers: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Minnesota United play Portland Timbers in MLS (United States). The match date is 19 April 2026 at 02:30. Final score: 2:0.

Current form

Minnesota United: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match. Portland Timbers: 1-1-3, 0.80 points/match.

Goal statistics

Minnesota United scores 1.20 and concedes 1.47 goals per match. Portland Timbers scores 1.57 and concedes 2.00. League average: 3.30 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Minnesota United 53%, Portland Timbers 64%. Over 2.5: Minnesota United 53%, Portland Timbers 64%. League level: BTTS 61%, Over 2.5 62%.

xG, shots and style

Minnesota United has higher xG: 1.47 vs 1.39. Minnesota United: 13.1 shots per match, Portland Timbers: 12.1.

Match halves

Minnesota United: half-time lead 20%, second-half goals 0.73. Portland Timbers: half-time lead 29%, second-half goals 0.57.

Goals by minute

Minnesota United: 61-75 (5 goals). Portland Timbers: 16-30 (6 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

MLS: 3.30 goals per match, BTTS 61%, Over 2.5 62%.

Head-to-head

No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.

Match description

I assess that the hosts have the advantage and should win: Minnesota United at home have a 50% win share and have kept 100% clean sheets, averaging 0.00 goals conceded at home. Portland Timbers away perform very poorly — they have lost all away matches (100%) and concede on average 2.67 goals per away game, with 0% clean sheets. In terms of quality of chances xG is similar (Minnesota generates 1.26 xG at home vs 1.36 xG for Portland away), but the visitors allow significantly more xG against (2.36 vs 1.48), indicating a higher risk of conceding clear chances. Portland register slightly more shots on target away (5 vs 4) and have a higher conversion rate (11% vs 4%), yet in the last 5 matches Timbers scored 8 and conceded 12, while Minnesota scored 4 and conceded 8 in the same period, demonstrating greater defensive stability from the hosts. Considering Minnesota’s better recent form over the last 5 matches (1.6 points per game vs 0.8 for Portland) and Portland’s disastrous away stats, I give the hosts the higher probability of victory.

Half-by-half

1 : 0
1st half
1 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

44Possession (%)56
Minnesota UnitedPortland Timbers
17Shots13
Minnesota UnitedPortland Timbers
7Shots on target2
Minnesota UnitedPortland Timbers
1.98xG1.46
Minnesota UnitedPortland Timbers
3Corners4
Minnesota UnitedPortland Timbers
58Dangerous attacks69
Minnesota UnitedPortland Timbers
16Fouls8
Minnesota UnitedPortland Timbers
2Cards0
Minnesota UnitedPortland Timbers

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Minnesota UnitedPortland Timbers
1.2Goals scored / match1.57
Minnesota UnitedPortland Timbers
1.47Goals conceded / match2
Minnesota UnitedPortland Timbers
Minnesota UnitedPortland Timbers
47%Average possession50%
Minnesota UnitedPortland Timbers
4.4Shots on target / match4.43
Minnesota UnitedPortland Timbers

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

13.13Shots per match12.14
Minnesota UnitedPortland Timbers
4.4Shots on target4.43
Minnesota UnitedPortland Timbers
9.1%Shot conversion12.9%
Minnesota UnitedPortland Timbers
47%Possession50%
Minnesota UnitedPortland Timbers
1.47xG for1.39
Minnesota UnitedPortland Timbers
1.45xG against2.04
Minnesota UnitedPortland Timbers

Shooting quality

Minnesota United: BalancedPortland Timbers: Balanced
Minnesota UnitedPortland Timbers
Accuracy (shots on target)34%36%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.110.11
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.270.35

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Minnesota United is 25% better for: last-5 form.

1 pts / match - Minnesota United · 0.8 pts / match - Portland Timbers

Minnesota United
WDLLD
Season result split
40% W27% R33% P
Season (W-D-L)
6-4-5
1.47 pts / match · goal difference -4
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-2-2
1.00 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
2-3-2
Last 5 at home
1-2-2
WLDLD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.4Goals conceded: 1.6xG: 1.50Opponent xG: 1.15BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 60%
Portland Timbers
LWDLL
Season result split
29% W14% R57% P
Season (W-D-L)
4-2-8
1.00 pts / match · goal difference -6
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-1-3
0.80 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
1-1-6
Last 5 away
1-1-3
LWLDL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.8Goals conceded: 1.8xG: 1.57Opponent xG: 2.02BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 60%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Portland Timbers is 31% better for: goals scored per match.

1.2 goals / match - Minnesota United · 1.57 goals / match - Portland Timbers

Minnesota United is 36% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.47 goals / match - Minnesota United · 2 goals / match - Portland Timbers

Minnesota United scoring profile: very strong

Minnesota United scores in 73% of matches (11 of 15 matches), while Portland Timbers keeps a clean sheet in 7% (1 of 14 matches).

Portland Timbers scoring profile: strong

Portland Timbers scores in 71% of matches (10 of 14 matches), while Minnesota United keeps a clean sheet in 27% (4 of 15 matches).

18Goals scored (season)22
Minnesota UnitedPortland Timbers
22Goals conceded (season)28
Minnesota UnitedPortland Timbers
2.67Average goals in match3.57
Minnesota UnitedPortland Timbers
7Goals scored (last 5)9
Minnesota UnitedPortland Timbers
8Goals conceded (last 5)9
Minnesota UnitedPortland Timbers

How often they score at least...

73%1 goal71%
Minnesota UnitedPortland Timbers
40%2 goals50%
Minnesota UnitedPortland Timbers
7%3 goals14%
Minnesota UnitedPortland Timbers
0%4 goals7%
Minnesota UnitedPortland Timbers

How often they concede at least...

73%1 goal93%
Minnesota UnitedPortland Timbers
40%2 goals71%
Minnesota UnitedPortland Timbers
13%3 goals29%
Minnesota UnitedPortland Timbers
7%4 goals7%
Minnesota UnitedPortland Timbers

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

61%
League average

Goal patterns

27%BTTS at half-time43%
Minnesota UnitedPortland Timbers
7%BTTS in both halves0%
Minnesota UnitedPortland Timbers
13%Scored in both halves43%
Minnesota UnitedPortland Timbers

BTTS and goal count

47%Min. 3 goals and BTTS57%
Minnesota UnitedPortland Timbers
7%Min. 3 goals without BTTS7%
Minnesota UnitedPortland Timbers
80%BTTS - last 540%
Minnesota UnitedPortland Timbers

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

Full match - team comparison (Over)

1st half

80%Min. 1 goal before half-time100%
Minnesota UnitedPortland Timbers
33%Min. 2 goals before half-time64%
Minnesota UnitedPortland Timbers
20%Min. 3 goals before half-time36%
Minnesota UnitedPortland Timbers

2nd half

67%Min. 1 goal after half-time71%
Minnesota UnitedPortland Timbers
33%Min. 2 goals after half-time36%
Minnesota UnitedPortland Timbers
20%Min. 3 goals after half-time14%
Minnesota UnitedPortland Timbers

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Portland Timbers is 15% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

0.93 pts / match - Minnesota United · 1.07 pts / match - Portland Timbers

Minnesota United - half-time state
20% leading33% draw47% trailing
Portland Timbers - half-time state
29% leading21% draw50% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

0.93Points per match (1st half)1.07
Minnesota UnitedPortland Timbers
0.47Goals scored (1st half)1
Minnesota UnitedPortland Timbers
0.93Goals conceded (1st half)1.21
Minnesota UnitedPortland Timbers
1.4Average goals (1st half)2.21
Minnesota UnitedPortland Timbers
33%Clean sheet before half-time21%
Minnesota UnitedPortland Timbers
60%No goal before half-time36%
Minnesota UnitedPortland Timbers

After half-time (2nd half)

1.6Points per match (2nd half)1.21
Minnesota UnitedPortland Timbers
0.73Goals scored (2nd half)0.57
Minnesota UnitedPortland Timbers
0.53Goals conceded (2nd half)0.79
Minnesota UnitedPortland Timbers
1.27Average goals (2nd half)1.36
Minnesota UnitedPortland Timbers
53%Clean sheet after half-time57%
Minnesota UnitedPortland Timbers
53%No goal after half-time50%
Minnesota UnitedPortland Timbers

Minnesota United - second-half results

40% W40% R20% P
14
Half-time points
7
Half-time goals
-7
Goal difference (1st half)
24
Second-half points
+3
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.93
PPG before half-time
Lead holding200%

Leads at half-time in 20% of matches and wins 40%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.4

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Portland Timbers - second-half results

29% W36% R36% P
15
Half-time points
14
Half-time goals
-3
Goal difference (1st half)
17
Second-half points
-3
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.07
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 29% of matches and wins 29%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.4

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Minnesota United - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.202.00
Goals scored / match0.21.2
Goals conceded / match1.00.6
Average goals in match1.21.8
1 goal100%80%
2 goals20%40%
3 goals0%40%
Clean sheet0%40%
No goal80%40%
Goal difference-4+3
Half-time: 0% leading - 20% draw - 80% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 20% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 1
Portland Timbers - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.601.80
Goals scored / match1.20.6
Goals conceded / match1.80.0
Average goals in match3.00.6
1 goal100%40%
2 goals100%20%
3 goals60%0%
Clean sheet20%100%
No goal40%60%
Goal difference-3+3
Half-time: 20% leading - 0% draw - 80% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 60% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 6

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Minnesota United
ScoredConceded
1
7
0-15
2
4
16-30
4
3
31-45
3
5
46-60
5
1
61-75
3
2
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (5 goli). Concedes most in 0-15 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.

Portland Timbers
ScoredConceded
4
7
0-15
6
5
16-30
4
5
31-45
0
4
46-60
3
2
61-75
5
5
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (6 goli). Concedes most in 0-15 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

3.12
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.6 : 1.5
Estimated goal split
home : away
95%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
59%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
52%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
8%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 13 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Minnesota United

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.02
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.29
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+4.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.27
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.02
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
62%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
107%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.47
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
17% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 6% come in the first quarter-hour.
17%

Portland Timbers

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.65
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.22
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-2.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.18
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.04
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
115%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
103%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.20
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.4
Late goals
23% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 18% come in the first quarter-hour.
23%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (MLS).

Teams vs league

Minnesota UnitedLigaPortland Timbers
Average goals in match 2.673.30 3.57
Both teams scored 53%61% 64%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 53%62% 64%
Clean sheets 27%21% 7%
Goal before half-time 80%78% 100%
Goal after half-time 67%80% 71%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.30
Average goals per match
61%
Both teams scored
62%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
21%
Clean sheets
1.94
Home goals / match
1.37
Away goals / match
+42%
Home attack advantage
+29%
Home defence advantage
+18%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
78%
1 goal
45%
2 goals
21%
3 goals
6%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
80%
1 goal
52%
2 goals
25%
3 goals
12%
4 goals

FAQ

What was the result of Minnesota United vs Portland Timbers?

The MLS match finished Minnesota United 2:0 Portland Timbers. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Minnesota United vs Portland Timbers?

Minnesota United score 1.20 goals per game on average and Portland Timbers 1.57. The MLS average is 3.30 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 62% of games. Both teams score in 53% of Minnesota United's matches and 64% of Portland Timbers's.

What form are Minnesota United and Portland Timbers in?

Over the last 5 games Minnesota United have a 1-2-2 record (1.00 points per game) and Portland Timbers 1-1-3 (0.80 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Minnesota United vs Portland Timbers?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.