Mirassol vs Chapecoense: match statistics
Mirassol vs Chapecoense: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Mirassol played against Chapecoense in Serie A (Brazil). The game was played on May 10, 2026. Final score: 1:1.
Recent form
Mirassol has 2 wins, 0 draws and 3 losses over its last five games, averaging 1.20 points per game. Chapecoense has 0 wins, 1 draw and 4 losses, with 0.20 points per game.
Scoring records
Mirassol scores 1.15 goals per game and allows 1.46. Chapecoense scores 1.00 and allows 2.00. Games in this league average 2.65 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 62% of Mirassol's games and 62% of Chapecoense's. The Over 2.5 rates are 62% and 46%, compared with league averages of 58% for BTTS and 50% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Mirassol has the higher season xG average, 1.56 to 1.26 per game. Mirassol takes 14.2 shots per game, while Chapecoense takes 12.8.
First-half and second-half trends
Mirassol leads at halftime in 31% of its games and scores 0.46 goals per game after halftime. Chapecoense leads at halftime in 0% and scores 0.62 after halftime.
When the teams score
Mirassol's most productive scoring window is minutes 16-30 (4 goals). For Chapecoense, it is minutes 76-90+ (6 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Serie A games average 2.65 goals. Both teams score in 58% of games, and 50% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
There is not enough head-to-head history for a meaningful comparison.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Mirassol has a clear home advantage: on average 1.29 goals per home match with xG 1.76 and 6.14 shots on target, versus Chapecoense who score an average 0.4 goals away with xG 0.79 and only 1.2 shots on target. The visitors have major defensive issues — their average away xG against is 2.42, they conceded 11 goals in the last 5 matches, while Mirassol conceded 3 and scored 7 in that period. Additionally, Mirassol averages 2 points per match in the last 5 games, whereas Chapecoense has 0 points and 5 losses, indicating a significant form gap. The percentage of matches without scoring is 60% for Chapecoense away and 29% for Mirassol at home; both teams have 0% clean sheets, so I expect goals from both sides. Considering xG (1.76 vs 0.79), possession (52% vs 39%) and shot conversion (8% vs 5%), I forecast a Mirassol win and assess the chances as 72% for the home side, 18% for a draw and 10% for a visiting upset.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Chapecoense has a season average of just 0.4 goals per game, registers only 1.2 shots on target on average and failed to score in 60% of matches, which is a strong argument against BTTS. Mirassol at home averages 1.38 goals per game with xG 1.56 and a season BTTS rate of 75%, but concedes 2.13 goals season-wide, so the hosts typically allow opponent goals. In the last 5 matches Mirassol scored 7 and conceded 3 (1.4 and 0.6 per game), while Chapecoense has 3 scored and 11 conceded (0.6 and 2.2), suggesting the hosts will create chances and the visitors have serious finishing problems. Considering Chapecoense’s 60% share of matches without scoring and the guests’ lower xG 0.79 versus the hosts’ 1.56, I assign a 65% probability to No BTTS and 35% to BTTS — recommendation: No (No Goal / clean sheet expected).
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
The strongest signal is Over 1.5 goals: Mirassol have 88% of home matches over 1.5, Chapecoense 100% away, averaging 94% probability for Over 1.5. An xG-based model gives (1.56+2.42)/2 = 1.99 xG for Mirassol and (0.79+1.62)/2 = 1.21 xG for Chapecoense, totaling 3.20 expected goals, which also supports an increased probability for Over 2.5 (I estimate 70%). Chapecoense conceded 11 goals in the last 5 matches (2.2 avg), while Mirassol in their last 5 have 7 scored and 3 conceded (1.4 and 0.6 avg); hosts also generate 4.13 shots on target vs. 1.2 for the visitors, so Mirassol will create the majority of chances. Although Mirassol have 50% of home matches over 3.5 this season and Chapecoense 0% away, the 3.20 expected goals is below the 3.5 threshold, so I rate Over 3.5 moderately (34%). In summary, the best pick is Over 1.5 at the 1.5 line based on the 94% seasonal rate and 3.20 expected goals (1.99 vs 1.21).
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
At half-time a draw appears most likely: Mirassol were level at the break in 75% of their matches, and Chapecoense in 80%, with the home side scoring 15 goals in the first 45 minutes this season versus 1 for the visitors. Mirassol also hold a clear overall attacking edge — home xG 1.56 vs 0.79, on average 4.13 shots on target compared to 1.2 for the away team, and season goal averages 1.38 vs 0.4. Form supports this picture: in their last 5 matches Mirassol won 3 of 5 (60%), while Chapecoense lost all 5 (100%), which increases the likelihood of a full-time victory for the hosts. Additionally, the home side average 0.63 goals by half-time while the visitors average 0.0, so the most logical scenario is a draw at Half-Time and a Mirassol win at Full-Time, hence the HT/FT selection X/1 (scenarios starting with a draw carry roughly ~70% combined probability).
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Mirassol | Chapecoense | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 34% | 23% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.11 | 0.10 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.24 | 0.33 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Mirassol is 500% better for: last-5 form.
1.2 pts / game - Mirassol · 0.2 pts / game - Chapecoense
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Mirassol is 15% better for: goals scored per game.
1.15 goals / game - Mirassol · 1 goals / game - Chapecoense
Mirassol is 37% better for: goals allowed per game.
1.46 goals / game - Mirassol · 2 goals / game - Chapecoense
Mirassol scores in 62% of games (8 of 13 meczów), while Chapecoense keeps a clean sheet in 8% (1 of 13 meczów).
Chapecoense scores in 62% of games (8 of 13 meczów), while Mirassol keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 13 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Mirassol
Over / Under - Chapecoense
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Mirassol is 70% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.31 pts / game - Mirassol · 0.77 pts / game - Chapecoense
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Mirassol - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 31% of games and wins 23%. Sometimes gives up a halftime lead.
Allows 0.2 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
Chapecoense - second-half results
Allows 0.3 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 2.20 | 0.00 |
| Goals scored / game | 1.0 | 0.0 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.0 | 1.2 |
| Average goals per game | 1.0 | 1.2 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 100% | 0% |
| No goal | 40% | 100% |
| Goal difference | +5 | -6 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 0.80 | 0.20 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.4 | 0.4 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.8 | 1.4 |
| Average goals per game | 1.2 | 1.8 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 0% |
| No goal | 60% | 60% |
| Goal difference | -2 | -5 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (4 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): -4 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (6 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Mirassol
Chapecoense
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Serie A).
Teams vs league
| Mirassol | Liga | Chapecoense | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | • 2.62 | 2.65 | ▲ 3.00 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 62% | 58% | ▲ 62% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 62% | 50% | ▼ 46% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 0% | 23% | ▼ 8% |
| Goal before half-time | • 77% | 76% | ▼ 54% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 85% | 76% | ▲ 85% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
FAQ
What was the result of Mirassol vs Chapecoense?
The Serie A match finished Mirassol 1:1 Chapecoense. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Mirassol vs Chapecoense?
Mirassol score 1.15 goals per game on average and Chapecoense 1.00. The Serie A average is 2.65 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 50% of games. Both teams score in 62% of Mirassol's matches and 62% of Chapecoense's.
What form are Mirassol and Chapecoense in?
Over the last 5 games Mirassol have a 2-0-3 record (1.20 points per game) and Chapecoense 0-1-4 (0.20 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Mirassol vs Chapecoense?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Mirassol vs Chapecoense: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.


