Mirassol vs Chapecoense: match statistics
Mirassol vs Chapecoense: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Mirassol play Chapecoense in Serie A (Brazil). The match date is 10 May 2026 at 23:30. Final score: 1:1.
Current form
Mirassol: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match. Chapecoense: 0-1-4, 0.20 points/match.
Goal statistics
Mirassol scores 1.11 and concedes 1.39 goals per match. Chapecoense scores 0.94 and concedes 1.94. League average: 2.64 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Mirassol 61%, Chapecoense 61%. Over 2.5: Mirassol 56%, Chapecoense 44%. League level: BTTS 58%, Over 2.5 50%.
xG, shots and style
Mirassol has higher xG: 1.53 vs 1.28. Mirassol: 14.0 shots per match, Chapecoense: 12.7.
Match halves
Mirassol: half-time lead 33%, second-half goals 0.39. Chapecoense: half-time lead 0%, second-half goals 0.61.
Goals by minute
Mirassol: 31-45+ (7 goals). Chapecoense: 76-90+ (8 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Serie A: 2.64 goals per match, BTTS 58%, Over 2.5 50%.
Head-to-head
No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.
Match description
Mirassol has a clear home advantage: on average 1.29 goals per home match with xG 1.76 and 6.14 shots on target, versus Chapecoense who score an average 0.4 goals away with xG 0.79 and only 1.2 shots on target. The visitors have major defensive issues — their average away xG against is 2.42, they conceded 11 goals in the last 5 matches, while Mirassol conceded 3 and scored 7 in that period. Additionally, Mirassol averages 2 points per match in the last 5 games, whereas Chapecoense has 0 points and 5 losses, indicating a significant form gap. The percentage of matches without scoring is 60% for Chapecoense away and 29% for Mirassol at home; both teams have 0% clean sheets, so I expect goals from both sides. Considering xG (1.76 vs 0.79), possession (52% vs 39%) and shot conversion (8% vs 5%), I forecast a Mirassol win and assess the chances as 72% for the home side, 18% for a draw and 10% for a visiting upset.
Half-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Mirassol | Chapecoense | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 33% | 26% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.11 | 0.10 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.24 | 0.28 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Mirassol is 600% better for: last-5 form.
1.4 pts / match - Mirassol · 0.2 pts / match - Chapecoense
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Mirassol is 18% better for: goals scored per match.
1.11 goals / match - Mirassol · 0.94 goals / match - Chapecoense
Mirassol is 40% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.39 goals / match - Mirassol · 1.94 goals / match - Chapecoense
Mirassol scores in 67% of matches (12 of 18 matches), while Chapecoense keeps a clean sheet in 6% (1 of 18 matches).
Chapecoense scores in 61% of matches (11 of 18 matches), while Mirassol keeps a clean sheet in 6% (1 of 18 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under — Mirassol
Over / Under — Chapecoense
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Mirassol is 100% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.44 pts / match - Mirassol · 0.72 pts / match - Chapecoense
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Mirassol - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 33% of matches and wins 28%. Usually protects the lead until full-time.
Concedes 0.4 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Chapecoense - second-half results
Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.80 | 0.40 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.8 | 0.2 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.2 | 1.0 |
| Average goals in match | 1.0 | 1.2 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 20% |
| No goal | 40% | 80% |
| Goal difference | +3 | -4 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.60 | 0.60 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.2 | 0.6 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.8 | 1.0 |
| Average goals in match | 1.0 | 1.6 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 20% |
| No goal | 80% | 40% |
| Goal difference | -3 | -2 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (7 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (11). Late-goal balance (76-90): -8 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (8 goli). Concedes most in 46-60 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Mirassol
Chapecoense
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Serie A).
Teams vs league
| Mirassol | Liga | Chapecoense | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▼ 2.50 | 2.64 | ▲ 2.89 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 61% | 58% | ▲ 61% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 56% | 50% | ▼ 44% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 6% | 23% | ▼ 6% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 72% | 77% | ▼ 56% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 83% | 78% | ▲ 83% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
FAQ
What was the result of Mirassol vs Chapecoense?
The Serie A match finished Mirassol 1:1 Chapecoense. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Mirassol vs Chapecoense?
Mirassol score 1.11 goals per game on average and Chapecoense 0.94. The Serie A average is 2.64 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 50% of games. Both teams score in 61% of Mirassol's matches and 61% of Chapecoense's.
What form are Mirassol and Chapecoense in?
Over the last 5 games Mirassol have a 2-1-2 record (1.40 points per game) and Chapecoense 0-1-4 (0.20 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Mirassol vs Chapecoense?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Mirassol vs Chapecoense: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.