Japan - J1 LeagueK's denki Stadium MitoData current as of October 16, 2026

Mito Hollyhock vs Gamba Osaka: match statistics

Mito Hollyhock crest
Mito Hollyhock
1 : 1half-time 1:0
Gamba Osaka crest
Gamba Osaka

Mito Hollyhock vs Gamba Osaka: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

Mito Hollyhock played against Gamba Osaka in J1 League (Japan). The game was played on August 15, 2026. Venue: K's denki Stadium Mito. Final score: 1:1.

Recent form

Mito Hollyhock has 0 wins, 0 draws and 1 loss over its last five games, averaging 0.00 points per game. Gamba Osaka has 1 win, 0 draws and 0 losses, with 3.00 points per game.

Scoring records

Mito Hollyhock scores 1.00 goals per game and allows 2.00. Gamba Osaka scores 4.00 and allows 3.00. Games in this league average 3.64 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 100% of Mito Hollyhock's games and 100% of Gamba Osaka's. The Over 2.5 rates are 100% and 100%, compared with league averages of 73% for BTTS and 73% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

Gamba Osaka has the higher season xG average, 1.74 to 1.58 per game. Mito Hollyhock takes 16.0 shots per game, while Gamba Osaka takes 12.0.

First-half and second-half trends

Mito Hollyhock leads at halftime in 0% of its games and scores 1.00 goals per game after halftime. Gamba Osaka leads at halftime in 100% and scores 2.00 after halftime.

When the teams score

Mito Hollyhock's most productive scoring window is minutes 61-75 (1 goals). For Gamba Osaka, it is minutes 31-45+ (2 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

J1 League games average 3.64 goals. Both teams score in 73% of games, and 73% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

Before this game, one previous meeting was available. The record was 0 home wins, 0 draws and 1 away win. Those games averaged 1.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Gamba Osaka come into this match in significantly better form, having recorded 4 wins and 1 draw in their last five fixtures while scoring a total of 12 goals. Mito Hollyhock, meanwhile, have lost all 5 of their last matches, scoring just 2 goals and conceding 8. The visitors also won their only match so far this season, scoring 4 goals, while the hosts began their campaign with a 1:2 defeat. The difference in current attacking efficiency is clear: Gamba have averaged 2.4 goals across their last five appearances, compared with just 0.4 for Mito. The visitors’ defense is not flawless, having conceded 7 goals during this period, but their attacking superiority and more consistent run of results strongly point to an away win.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

The strongest argument against BTTS - Yes is Mito Hollyhock’s poor recent scoring record: the team averaged just 0.4 goals in its last 5 matches and failed to score in 3 of those 5 games. Gamba Osaka are in excellent form, averaging 2.4 goals per game across their last five outings, while Mito conceded 1.6 goals per match during this period, giving the visitors a high chance of scoring. However, Mito create chances worth an average of 1.42 xG, while Gamba allow opponents 1.85 xG and concede an average of 1.4 goals, leaving a realistic possibility of a home goal. Although BTTS - Yes occurred in 80% of Gamba’s last five matches, Mito’s five-match losing streak and the clear 0.4 versus 2.4 goals-per-game disparity slightly favor the scenario in which at least one team fails to score — BTTS - No.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

Gamba Osaka have scored 12 goals in their last 5 matches, averaging 2.4 per game, while Mito Hollyhock conceded 1.6 goals over the same period. Mito have scored just 2 goals in their last five appearances, but their average xG stands at 1.42, while Gamba’s defense allows opponents 1.85 xG. The projected total of 2.90 goals, together with the league average of 3.6, points to a significantly greater chance of at least two goals than of a tight match. Over 2.5 is also a realistic option, as Gamba have seen over 2.5 total goals in 60% of their recent matches, although Mito’s poor finishing reduces the safety of this line. The strongest selection remains Over 1.5, supported by the high quality of chances created by both sides and the visitors’ highly productive recent form.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

Gamba Osaka are in significantly better form: they have averaged 2.4 goals over their last five matches, winning four and suffering no defeats, while Mito Hollyhock have lost all five and scored just 0.4 goals per game. The visitors held a lead at the break in 60% of those matches, scoring an average of 1.0 goal before half-time, whereas the hosts failed to score in the first half in any of them and were trailing at half-time in 60% of cases. The difference remains evident after the interval: Gamba average 1.4 goals in second halves, while Mito have managed only 0.4, conceding an average of 0.8 goals. The hosts’ isolated season data comes from an extremely small sample and should not outweigh their current run; therefore, the most likely scenario is Gamba Osaka leading at half-time and securing a full-time victory.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Stats by half

1 : 0
First half
0 : 1
Second half

Game stats

32Possession (%)68
Mito HollyhockGamba Osaka
17Shots19
Mito HollyhockGamba Osaka
4Shots on target4
Mito HollyhockGamba Osaka
1.58xG1.9
Mito HollyhockGamba Osaka
9Corners9
Mito HollyhockGamba Osaka
33Dangerous attacks58
Mito HollyhockGamba Osaka
14Fouls9
Mito HollyhockGamba Osaka
1Cards0
Mito HollyhockGamba Osaka

Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

Mito HollyhockGamba Osaka
1Goals scored / game4
Mito HollyhockGamba Osaka
2Goals allowed / game3
Mito HollyhockGamba Osaka
47%Average possession61%
Mito HollyhockGamba Osaka
3Shots on target / game9
Mito HollyhockGamba Osaka

Team stats— who is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

16Shots per game12
Mito HollyhockGamba Osaka
3Shots on target9
Mito HollyhockGamba Osaka
6.3%Shot conversion33.3%
Mito HollyhockGamba Osaka
47%Possession61%
Mito HollyhockGamba Osaka
1.58xG for1.74
Mito HollyhockGamba Osaka
1.36xG against1.98
Mito HollyhockGamba Osaka

Shooting quality

Mito Hollyhock: AttackingGamba Osaka: Efficient finishing
Mito HollyhockGamba Osaka
Accuracy (shots on target)19%75%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.100.14
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.330.44

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team form— who is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

Mito Hollyhock
L
No win in the last 5 games
Season result split
0% W0% D100% L
Season (W-D-L)
0-0-1
0.00 pts / game · goal difference -1
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-0-1
0.00 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
0-0-0
Last 5 at home
0-0-0
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 2.0xG: 1.58Opponent xG: 1.36BTTS: 100%Over 2.5: 100%
Gamba Osaka
W
5 wins in a row
Season result split
100% W0% D0% L
Season (W-D-L)
1-0-0
3.00 pts / game · goal difference +1
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-0-0
3.00 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
0-0-0
Last 5 away
0-0-0
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 4.0Goals conceded: 3.0xG: 1.74Opponent xG: 1.98BTTS: 100%Over 2.5: 100%

Goals— how do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Gamba Osaka is 300% better for: goals scored per game.

1 goals / game - Mito Hollyhock · 4 goals / game - Gamba Osaka

Mito Hollyhock is 50% better for: goals allowed per game.

2 goals / game - Mito Hollyhock · 3 goals / game - Gamba Osaka

Mito Hollyhock scoring profile: very strong

Mito Hollyhock scores in 100% of games (1 of 1 games), while Gamba Osaka keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 1 games).

Gamba Osaka scoring profile: very strong

Gamba Osaka scores in 100% of games (1 of 1 games), while Mito Hollyhock keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 1 games).

1Goals scored (season)4
Mito HollyhockGamba Osaka
2Goals conceded (season)3
Mito HollyhockGamba Osaka
3Average goals per game7
Mito HollyhockGamba Osaka
1Goals scored (last 5)4
Mito HollyhockGamba Osaka
2Goals conceded (last 5)3
Mito HollyhockGamba Osaka

How often they score at least...

100%1 goal100%
Mito HollyhockGamba Osaka
0%2 goals100%
Mito HollyhockGamba Osaka
0%3 goals100%
Mito HollyhockGamba Osaka
0%4 goals100%
Mito HollyhockGamba Osaka

How often they concede at least...

100%1 goal100%
Mito HollyhockGamba Osaka
100%2 goals100%
Mito HollyhockGamba Osaka
0%3 goals100%
Mito HollyhockGamba Osaka
0%4 goals0%
Mito HollyhockGamba Osaka

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

73%
League average

Goal patterns

0%BTTS at half-time100%
Mito HollyhockGamba Osaka
0%BTTS in both halves100%
Mito HollyhockGamba Osaka
0%Scored in both halves100%
Mito HollyhockGamba Osaka

BTTS and goal count

100%Min. 3 goals and BTTS100%
Mito HollyhockGamba Osaka
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
Mito HollyhockGamba Osaka
100%BTTS - last 5100%
Mito HollyhockGamba Osaka

Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

1st half

100%Min. 1 goal before half-time100%
Mito HollyhockGamba Osaka
100%Min. 2 goals before half-time100%
Mito HollyhockGamba Osaka
0%Min. 3 goals before half-time100%
Mito HollyhockGamba Osaka

2nd half

100%Min. 1 goal after half-time100%
Mito HollyhockGamba Osaka
0%Min. 2 goals after half-time100%
Mito HollyhockGamba Osaka
0%Min. 3 goals after half-time100%
Mito HollyhockGamba Osaka

Game halves— when do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Mito Hollyhock - half-time state
0% leading0% draw100% trailing
Gamba Osaka - half-time state
100% leading0% draw0% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

0Points per game (1st half)3
Mito HollyhockGamba Osaka
0Goals scored (1st half)2
Mito HollyhockGamba Osaka
2Goals conceded (1st half)1
Mito HollyhockGamba Osaka
2Average goals (1st half)3
Mito HollyhockGamba Osaka
0%Clean sheet before half-time0%
Mito HollyhockGamba Osaka
100%No goal before half-time0%
Mito HollyhockGamba Osaka

After half-time (2nd half)

3Points per game (2nd half)1
Mito HollyhockGamba Osaka
1Goals scored (2nd half)2
Mito HollyhockGamba Osaka
0Goals conceded (2nd half)2
Mito HollyhockGamba Osaka
1Average goals (2nd half)4
Mito HollyhockGamba Osaka
100%Clean sheet after half-time0%
Mito HollyhockGamba Osaka
0%No goal after half-time0%
Mito HollyhockGamba Osaka

Mito Hollyhock - second-half results

100% W0% D0% L
0
Half-time points
0
Half-time goals
-2
Goal difference (1st half)
3
Second-half points
+1
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.00
PPG before half-time
Defense after halftime-2.0

Defense stays consistent across the full game.

Gamba Osaka - second-half results

0% W100% D0% L
3
Half-time points
2
Half-time goals
+1
Goal difference (1st half)
1
Second-half points
0
Goal difference (2nd half)
3.00
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at halftime in 100% of games and wins 100%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime+1.0

Allows 1.0 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

Mito Hollyhock - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game0.003.00
Goals scored / game0.01.0
Goals allowed / game2.00.0
Average goals per game2.01.0
1 goal100%100%
2 goals100%0%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet0%100%
No goal100%0%
Goal difference-2+1
Half-time: 0% leading - 0% draw - 100% trailing
2nd half: 100% won - 0% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 0
Gamba Osaka - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game3.001.00
Goals scored / game2.02.0
Goals allowed / game1.02.0
Average goals per game3.04.0
1 goal100%100%
2 goals100%100%
3 goals100%100%
Clean sheet0%0%
No goal0%0%
Goal difference+10
Half-time: 100% leading - 0% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 100% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 100% - Half-time goals total: 2

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

Mito Hollyhock
ScoredConceded
0
1
0-15
0
0
16-30
0
1
31-45
0
0
46-60
1
0
61-75
0
0
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (1 goal). Concedes most in 0-15 (1). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

Gamba Osaka
ScoredConceded
0
0
0-15
0
1
16-30
2
0
31-45
0
0
46-60
0
0
61-75
2
2
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (2 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

5.00
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
2.0 : 3.0
Estimated goal split
home : away
137%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
100%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-80%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
100%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
0%
0:0 risk
practically zero
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

Mito Hollyhock

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.22
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-1.22
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-0.6 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.58
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
-0.64
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
58%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
105%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+1.0
Late goals
0% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
0%

Gamba Osaka

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.24
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+1.24
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+1.1 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+2.26
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
-1.02
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
209%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
173%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
0.0
Late goals
50% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
50%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League context— is this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (J1 League).

Teams vs league

Mito HollyhockLigaGamba Osaka
Average goals per game▼ 3.003.64▲ 7.00
Both teams scored▲ 100%73%▲ 100%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)▲ 100%73%▲ 100%
Clean sheets▼ 0%14%▼ 0%
Goal before half-time▲ 100%91%▲ 100%
Goal after half-time▲ 100%73%▲ 100%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.64
Average goals per game
73%
Both teams scored
73%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
14%
Clean sheets
1.73
Home goals / game
1.91
Away goals / game
+-9%
Home attack advantage
+-10%
Home defensive advantage
+0%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
91%
1 goal
64%
2 goals
36%
3 goals
0%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
73%
1 goal
55%
2 goals
27%
3 goals
18%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Mito HollyhockGoalYoshiki TorikaiAssist: Kaito Taniguchi
  2. Gamba OsakaSubstitutionOn: Shogo SasakiOff: Ginjiro Ikegaya
  3. Mito HollyhockSubstitutionOn: Chihiro KatoOff: Yoshiki Torikai
  4. Gamba OsakaSubstitutionOn: Deniz HümmetOff: Takashi Usami
  5. Mito HollyhockSubstitutionOn: Akinari KawazuraOff: Yasuki Kimoto
  6. Gamba OsakaSubstitutionOn: Eli AdamsOff: Rin Mito
  7. Gamba OsakaGoalShinnosuke NakataniAssist: Ryo Hatsuse
  8. Mito HollyhockSubstitutionOn: Matheus Leiria dos SantosOff: Yu Funabashi
  9. Mito HollyhockYellow cardHayata Yamamoto

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Record from Mito Hollyhock's perspective: 0 wins, 0 draws and 1 loss against Gamba Osaka. Games average 1.00 goals, and both teams scored in 0% of them.

Mito Hollyhock
0 : 1
Gamba Osaka

FAQ

What was the result of Mito Hollyhock vs Gamba Osaka?

The J1 League match finished Mito Hollyhock 1:1 Gamba Osaka. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Mito Hollyhock vs Gamba Osaka?

Mito Hollyhock score 1.00 goals per game on average and Gamba Osaka 4.00. The J1 League average is 3.64 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 73% of games. Both teams score in 100% of Mito Hollyhock's matches and 100% of Gamba Osaka's.

What form are Mito Hollyhock and Gamba Osaka in?

Over the last 5 games Mito Hollyhock have a 0-0-1 record (0.00 points per game) and Gamba Osaka 1-0-0 (3.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Mito Hollyhock vs Gamba Osaka?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.