Mito Hollyhock vs Gamba Osaka: match statistics
Mito Hollyhock vs Gamba Osaka: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Mito Hollyhock played against Gamba Osaka in J1 League (Japan). The game was played on August 15, 2026. Venue: K's denki Stadium Mito. Final score: 1:1.
Recent form
Mito Hollyhock has 0 wins, 0 draws and 1 loss over its last five games, averaging 0.00 points per game. Gamba Osaka has 1 win, 0 draws and 0 losses, with 3.00 points per game.
Scoring records
Mito Hollyhock scores 1.00 goals per game and allows 2.00. Gamba Osaka scores 4.00 and allows 3.00. Games in this league average 3.64 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 100% of Mito Hollyhock's games and 100% of Gamba Osaka's. The Over 2.5 rates are 100% and 100%, compared with league averages of 73% for BTTS and 73% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Gamba Osaka has the higher season xG average, 1.74 to 1.58 per game. Mito Hollyhock takes 16.0 shots per game, while Gamba Osaka takes 12.0.
First-half and second-half trends
Mito Hollyhock leads at halftime in 0% of its games and scores 1.00 goals per game after halftime. Gamba Osaka leads at halftime in 100% and scores 2.00 after halftime.
When the teams score
Mito Hollyhock's most productive scoring window is minutes 61-75 (1 goals). For Gamba Osaka, it is minutes 31-45+ (2 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
J1 League games average 3.64 goals. Both teams score in 73% of games, and 73% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, one previous meeting was available. The record was 0 home wins, 0 draws and 1 away win. Those games averaged 1.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Gamba Osaka come into this match in significantly better form, having recorded 4 wins and 1 draw in their last five fixtures while scoring a total of 12 goals. Mito Hollyhock, meanwhile, have lost all 5 of their last matches, scoring just 2 goals and conceding 8. The visitors also won their only match so far this season, scoring 4 goals, while the hosts began their campaign with a 1:2 defeat. The difference in current attacking efficiency is clear: Gamba have averaged 2.4 goals across their last five appearances, compared with just 0.4 for Mito. The visitors’ defense is not flawless, having conceded 7 goals during this period, but their attacking superiority and more consistent run of results strongly point to an away win.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
The strongest argument against BTTS - Yes is Mito Hollyhock’s poor recent scoring record: the team averaged just 0.4 goals in its last 5 matches and failed to score in 3 of those 5 games. Gamba Osaka are in excellent form, averaging 2.4 goals per game across their last five outings, while Mito conceded 1.6 goals per match during this period, giving the visitors a high chance of scoring. However, Mito create chances worth an average of 1.42 xG, while Gamba allow opponents 1.85 xG and concede an average of 1.4 goals, leaving a realistic possibility of a home goal. Although BTTS - Yes occurred in 80% of Gamba’s last five matches, Mito’s five-match losing streak and the clear 0.4 versus 2.4 goals-per-game disparity slightly favor the scenario in which at least one team fails to score — BTTS - No.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Gamba Osaka have scored 12 goals in their last 5 matches, averaging 2.4 per game, while Mito Hollyhock conceded 1.6 goals over the same period. Mito have scored just 2 goals in their last five appearances, but their average xG stands at 1.42, while Gamba’s defense allows opponents 1.85 xG. The projected total of 2.90 goals, together with the league average of 3.6, points to a significantly greater chance of at least two goals than of a tight match. Over 2.5 is also a realistic option, as Gamba have seen over 2.5 total goals in 60% of their recent matches, although Mito’s poor finishing reduces the safety of this line. The strongest selection remains Over 1.5, supported by the high quality of chances created by both sides and the visitors’ highly productive recent form.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Gamba Osaka are in significantly better form: they have averaged 2.4 goals over their last five matches, winning four and suffering no defeats, while Mito Hollyhock have lost all five and scored just 0.4 goals per game. The visitors held a lead at the break in 60% of those matches, scoring an average of 1.0 goal before half-time, whereas the hosts failed to score in the first half in any of them and were trailing at half-time in 60% of cases. The difference remains evident after the interval: Gamba average 1.4 goals in second halves, while Mito have managed only 0.4, conceding an average of 0.8 goals. The hosts’ isolated season data comes from an extremely small sample and should not outweigh their current run; therefore, the most likely scenario is Gamba Osaka leading at half-time and securing a full-time victory.
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Mito Hollyhock | Gamba Osaka | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 19% | 75% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.10 | 0.14 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.33 | 0.44 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Gamba Osaka is 300% better for: goals scored per game.
1 goals / game - Mito Hollyhock · 4 goals / game - Gamba Osaka
Mito Hollyhock is 50% better for: goals allowed per game.
2 goals / game - Mito Hollyhock · 3 goals / game - Gamba Osaka
Mito Hollyhock scores in 100% of games (1 of 1 games), while Gamba Osaka keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 1 games).
Gamba Osaka scores in 100% of games (1 of 1 games), while Mito Hollyhock keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 1 games).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Mito Hollyhock
Over / Under - Gamba Osaka
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Mito Hollyhock - second-half results
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
Gamba Osaka - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 100% of games and wins 100%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 1.0 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 0.00 | 3.00 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.0 | 1.0 |
| Goals allowed / game | 2.0 | 0.0 |
| Average goals per game | 2.0 | 1.0 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 100% | 0% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 0% | 100% |
| No goal | 100% | 0% |
| Goal difference | -2 | +1 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 3.00 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / game | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| Goals allowed / game | 1.0 | 2.0 |
| Average goals per game | 3.0 | 4.0 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 100% | 100% |
| 3 goals | 100% | 100% |
| Clean sheet | 0% | 0% |
| No goal | 0% | 0% |
| Goal difference | +1 | 0 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (1 goal). Concedes most in 0-15 (1). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (2 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Mito Hollyhock
Gamba Osaka
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (J1 League).
Teams vs league
| Mito Hollyhock | Liga | Gamba Osaka | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▼ 3.00 | 3.64 | ▲ 7.00 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 100% | 73% | ▲ 100% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 100% | 73% | ▲ 100% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 0% | 14% | ▼ 0% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 100% | 91% | ▲ 100% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 100% | 73% | ▲ 100% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Record from Mito Hollyhock's perspective: 0 wins, 0 draws and 1 loss against Gamba Osaka. Games average 1.00 goals, and both teams scored in 0% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Mito Hollyhock vs Gamba Osaka?
The J1 League match finished Mito Hollyhock 1:1 Gamba Osaka. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Mito Hollyhock vs Gamba Osaka?
Mito Hollyhock score 1.00 goals per game on average and Gamba Osaka 4.00. The J1 League average is 3.64 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 73% of games. Both teams score in 100% of Mito Hollyhock's matches and 100% of Gamba Osaka's.
What form are Mito Hollyhock and Gamba Osaka in?
Over the last 5 games Mito Hollyhock have a 0-0-1 record (0.00 points per game) and Gamba Osaka 1-0-0 (3.00 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Mito Hollyhock vs Gamba Osaka?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.


