Mito Hollyhock vs Oita Trinita: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

Mito Hollyhock played against Oita Trinita in J2 League (Japan). The game was played on November 29, 2025. Final score: 2:0.

Recent form

Mito Hollyhock has 2 wins, 0 draws and 3 losses over its last five games, averaging 1.20 points per game. Oita Trinita has 1 win, 1 draw and 3 losses, with 0.80 points per game.

Scoring records

Mito Hollyhock scores 1.43 goals per game and allows 0.92. Oita Trinita scores 0.73 and allows 1.14. Games in this league average 2.45 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 51% of Mito Hollyhock's games and 38% of Oita Trinita's. The Over 2.5 rates are 49% and 32%, compared with league averages of 51% for BTTS and 45% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

Mito Hollyhock has the higher season xG average, 1.35 to 1.08 per game. Mito Hollyhock takes 11.3 shots per game, while Oita Trinita takes 9.0.

First-half and second-half trends

Mito Hollyhock leads at halftime in 46% of its games and scores 0.76 goals per game after halftime. Oita Trinita leads at halftime in 22% and scores 0.38 after halftime.

When the teams score

Mito Hollyhock's most productive scoring window is minutes 76-90+ (13 goals). For Oita Trinita, it is minutes 46-60 (7 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

J2 League games average 2.45 goals. Both teams score in 51% of games, and 45% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

Before this game, one previous meeting was available. The record was 0 home wins, 1 draw and 0 away wins. Those games averaged 0.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.

Stats by half

0 : 0
First half
2 : 0
Second half

Game stats

53Possession (%)47
Mito HollyhockOita Trinita
14Shots4
Mito HollyhockOita Trinita
8Shots on target0
Mito HollyhockOita Trinita
1.76xG0.48
Mito HollyhockOita Trinita
5Corners3
Mito HollyhockOita Trinita
44Dangerous attacks31
Mito HollyhockOita Trinita
9Fouls14
Mito HollyhockOita Trinita
0Cards0
Mito HollyhockOita Trinita

Pre-game profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

Mito HollyhockOita Trinita
1.43Goals scored / game0.73
Mito HollyhockOita Trinita
0.92Goals allowed / game1.14
Mito HollyhockOita Trinita
49%Average possession44%
Mito HollyhockOita Trinita
3.57Shots on target / game2.43
Mito HollyhockOita Trinita

Team statswho is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

11.32Shots per game8.97
Mito HollyhockOita Trinita
3.57Shots on target2.43
Mito HollyhockOita Trinita
12.6%Shot conversion8.1%
Mito HollyhockOita Trinita
49%Possession44%
Mito HollyhockOita Trinita
1.35xG for1.08
Mito HollyhockOita Trinita
1.25xG against1.32
Mito HollyhockOita Trinita

Shooting quality

Mito Hollyhock: BalancedOita Trinita: Balanced
Mito HollyhockOita Trinita
Accuracy (shots on target)32%27%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.400.30

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

Mito Hollyhock is 50% better for: last-5 form.

1.2 pts / game - Mito Hollyhock · 0.8 pts / game - Oita Trinita

Mito Hollyhock
LWWLL
Season result split
51% W27% D22% L
Season (W-D-L)
19-10-8
1.81 pts / game · goal difference +19
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-0-3
1.20 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
9-6-3
Last 5 at home
1-1-3
LDWLL
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 0.6Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 1.00Opponent xG: 1.23BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 20%
Oita Trinita
DWLLL
Season result split
22% W38% D41% L
Season (W-D-L)
8-14-15
1.03 pts / game · goal difference -15
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-1-3
0.80 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
3-6-9
Last 5 away
1-2-2
LDDWL
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 0.6Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 0.98Opponent xG: 1.55BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 40%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Mito Hollyhock is 96% better for: goals scored per game.

1.43 goals / game - Mito Hollyhock · 0.73 goals / game - Oita Trinita

Mito Hollyhock is 24% better for: goals allowed per game.

0.92 goals / game - Mito Hollyhock · 1.14 goals / game - Oita Trinita

Mito Hollyhock scoring profile: very strong

Mito Hollyhock scores in 81% of games (30 of 37 meczów), while Oita Trinita keeps a clean sheet in 35% (13 of 37 meczów).

Oita Trinita scoring profile: mixed

Oita Trinita scores in 57% of games (21 of 37 meczów), while Mito Hollyhock keeps a clean sheet in 41% (15 of 37 meczów).

53Goals scored (season)27
Mito HollyhockOita Trinita
34Goals conceded (season)42
Mito HollyhockOita Trinita
2.35Average goals per game1.86
Mito HollyhockOita Trinita
3Goals scored (last 5)3
Mito HollyhockOita Trinita
5Goals conceded (last 5)6
Mito HollyhockOita Trinita

How often they score at least...

81%1 goal57%
Mito HollyhockOita Trinita
46%2 goals14%
Mito HollyhockOita Trinita
14%3 goals3%
Mito HollyhockOita Trinita
3%4 goals0%
Mito HollyhockOita Trinita

How often they concede at least...

59%1 goal65%
Mito HollyhockOita Trinita
27%2 goals35%
Mito HollyhockOita Trinita
5%3 goals11%
Mito HollyhockOita Trinita
0%4 goals3%
Mito HollyhockOita Trinita

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

51%
League average

Goal patterns

11%BTTS at half-time14%
Mito HollyhockOita Trinita
0%BTTS in both halves3%
Mito HollyhockOita Trinita
24%Scored in both halves5%
Mito HollyhockOita Trinita

BTTS and goal count

43%Min. 3 goals and BTTS22%
Mito HollyhockOita Trinita
5%Min. 3 goals without BTTS11%
Mito HollyhockOita Trinita
20%BTTS - last 540%
Mito HollyhockOita Trinita

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

1st half

62%Min. 1 goal before half-time68%
Mito HollyhockOita Trinita
22%Min. 2 goals before half-time24%
Mito HollyhockOita Trinita
8%Min. 3 goals before half-time3%
Mito HollyhockOita Trinita

2nd half

76%Min. 1 goal after half-time62%
Mito HollyhockOita Trinita
41%Min. 2 goals after half-time30%
Mito HollyhockOita Trinita
19%Min. 3 goals after half-time0%
Mito HollyhockOita Trinita

Game halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Mito Hollyhock is 68% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.81 pts / game - Mito Hollyhock · 1.08 pts / game - Oita Trinita

Mito Hollyhock - half-time state
46% leading43% draw11% trailing
Oita Trinita - half-time state
22% leading43% draw35% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.81Points per game (1st half)1.08
Mito HollyhockOita Trinita
0.68Goals scored (1st half)0.35
Mito HollyhockOita Trinita
0.24Goals conceded (1st half)0.59
Mito HollyhockOita Trinita
0.92Average goals (1st half)0.95
Mito HollyhockOita Trinita
78%Clean sheet before half-time51%
Mito HollyhockOita Trinita
49%No goal before half-time68%
Mito HollyhockOita Trinita

After half-time (2nd half)

1.35Points per game (2nd half)1.11
Mito HollyhockOita Trinita
0.76Goals scored (2nd half)0.38
Mito HollyhockOita Trinita
0.68Goals conceded (2nd half)0.54
Mito HollyhockOita Trinita
1.43Average goals (2nd half)0.92
Mito HollyhockOita Trinita
54%Clean sheet after half-time59%
Mito HollyhockOita Trinita
46%No goal after half-time70%
Mito HollyhockOita Trinita

Mito Hollyhock - second-half results

32% W38% D30% L
67
Half-time points
25
Half-time goals
+16
Goal difference (1st half)
50
Second-half points
+3
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.81
PPG before half-time
Lead holding111%

Leads at halftime in 46% of games and wins 51%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime+0.4

Allows 0.4 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

Oita Trinita - second-half results

22% W46% D32% L
40
Half-time points
13
Half-time goals
-9
Goal difference (1st half)
41
Second-half points
-6
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.08
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at halftime in 22% of games and wins 22%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime-0.0

Defense stays consistent across the full game.

Mito Hollyhock - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.800.40
Goals scored / game0.60.0
Goals allowed / game0.20.8
Average goals per game0.80.8
1 goal60%60%
2 goals20%20%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet80%40%
No goal40%100%
Goal difference+2-4
Half-time: 40% leading - 60% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 40% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 3
Oita Trinita - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game0.401.80
Goals scored / game0.00.6
Goals allowed / game1.00.2
Average goals per game1.00.8
1 goal60%60%
2 goals40%20%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet40%80%
No goal100%40%
Goal difference-5+2
Half-time: 0% leading - 40% draw - 60% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 60% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 0

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

Mito Hollyhock
ScoredConceded
8
5
0-15
6
4
16-30
11
0
31-45
10
6
46-60
5
5
61-75
13
14
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (13 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (14). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

Oita Trinita
ScoredConceded
5
7
0-15
5
10
16-30
3
5
31-45
7
8
46-60
4
5
61-75
3
7
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (7 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (10). Late-goal balance (76-90): -4 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

2.11
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
1.3 : 0.8
Estimated goal split
home : away
86%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
45%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
46%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
8%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 13 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

Mito Hollyhock

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.10
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.41
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-11.6 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.08
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.33
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
113%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
77%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
-0.61
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
25% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 15% come in the first quarter-hour.
25%

Oita Trinita

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.24
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.17
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+5.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.35
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.18
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
61%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
90%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
-0.23
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.0
Late goals
11% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 19% come in the first quarter-hour.
11%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (J2 League).

Teams vs league

Mito HollyhockLigaOita Trinita
Average goals per game 2.352.45 1.86
Both teams scored 51%51% 38%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 49%45% 32%
Clean sheets 41%29% 35%
Goal before half-time 62%68% 68%
Goal after half-time 76%74% 62%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.45
Average goals per game
51%
Both teams scored
45%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
29%
Clean sheets
1.26
Home goals / game
1.19
Away goals / game
+6%
Home attack advantage
+6%
Home defensive advantage
+3%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
68%
1 goal
29%
2 goals
8%
3 goals
3%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
74%
1 goal
37%
2 goals
17%
3 goals
6%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Oita TrinitaSubstitutionOn: Gleyson Garcia de OliveiraOff: Ren Ikeda
  2. Mito HollyhockGoalKeisuke TadaAssist: Shunsuke Saito
  3. Oita TrinitaSubstitutionOn: Shun AyukawaOff: Taiki Amagasa
  4. Mito HollyhockSubstitutionOn: Koki TsukagawaOff: Keisuke Tada
  5. Mito HollyhockGoalHayata YamamotoAssist: Koki Tsukagawa
  6. Oita TrinitaSubstitutionOn: Shinya UtsumotoOff: Atsuki Satsukawa
  7. Mito HollyhockSubstitutionOn: Koichi MurataOff: Chihiro Kato
  8. Mito HollyhockSubstitutionOn: Arata WatanabeOff: Hayata Yamamoto

Head-to-head

Record from Mito Hollyhock's perspective: 0 wins, 1 draw and 0 losses against Oita Trinita. Games average 0.00 goals, and both teams scored in 0% of them.

Oita Trinita
0 : 0
Mito Hollyhock

FAQ

What was the result of Mito Hollyhock vs Oita Trinita?

The J2 League match finished Mito Hollyhock 2:0 Oita Trinita. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Mito Hollyhock vs Oita Trinita?

Mito Hollyhock score 1.43 goals per game on average and Oita Trinita 0.73. The J2 League average is 2.45 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 45% of games. Both teams score in 51% of Mito Hollyhock's matches and 38% of Oita Trinita's.

What form are Mito Hollyhock and Oita Trinita in?

Over the last 5 games Mito Hollyhock have a 2-0-3 record (1.20 points per game) and Oita Trinita 1-1-3 (0.80 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Mito Hollyhock vs Oita Trinita?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Mito Hollyhock vs Oita Trinita: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.