Monopoli vs Virtus Casarano: match statistics
Monopoli demonstrates solid home form with 40% victories and only 27% defeats at their own stadium, maintaining a positive goal difference of +2 in home matches. The hosts exhibit defensive stability, conceding an average of just 1 goal per game at home, which represents a significant advantage over Virtus Casarano, who concede an average of 2.33 goals on the road. The visitors have a disastrous away record with 60% losses and a goal difference of -15, underscoring their struggles on away grounds. Monopoli boasts superior xG figures (1.26 vs 1.17) and a higher clean sheet rate (27% vs 7%), further tipping the scales in their favor. Taking all statistical parameters into account, particularly the hosts' home advantage and the guests' poor away form, a Monopoli victory is the most likely scenario, although a draw cannot be ruled out given the hosts' 33% draw rate at home.
Monopoli vs Virtus Casarano: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Monopoli played against Virtus Casarano in Serie C Group C (Italy). The game was played on March 9, 2026. Final score: 2:1.
Recent form
Monopoli has 2 wins, 1 draw and 2 losses over its last five games, averaging 1.40 points per game. Virtus Casarano has 2 wins, 1 draw and 2 losses, with 1.40 points per game.
Scoring records
Monopoli scores 1.00 goals per game and allows 1.07. Virtus Casarano scores 1.37 and allows 1.63. Games in this league average 2.47 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 43% of Monopoli's games and 53% of Virtus Casarano's. The Over 2.5 rates are 30% and 60%, compared with league averages of 48% for BTTS and 46% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Monopoli has the higher season xG average, 1.24 to 1.22 per game. Monopoli takes 9.6 shots per game, while Virtus Casarano takes 9.4.
First-half and second-half trends
Monopoli leads at halftime in 10% of its games and scores 0.80 goals per game after halftime. Virtus Casarano leads at halftime in 23% and scores 0.87 after halftime.
When the teams score
Monopoli's most productive scoring window is minutes 46-60 (10 goals). For Virtus Casarano, it is minutes 76-90+ (12 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Serie C Group C games average 2.47 goals. Both teams score in 48% of games, and 46% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, one previous meeting was available. The record was 1 home win, 0 draws and 0 away wins. Those games averaged 4.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Monopoli demonstrates solid home form with 40% victories and only 27% defeats at their own stadium, maintaining a positive goal difference of +2 in home matches. The hosts exhibit defensive stability, conceding an average of just 1 goal per game at home, which represents a significant advantage over Virtus Casarano, who concede an average of 2.33 goals on the road. The visitors have a disastrous away record with 60% losses and a goal difference of -15, underscoring their struggles on away grounds. Monopoli boasts superior xG figures (1.26 vs 1.17) and a higher clean sheet rate (27% vs 7%), further tipping the scales in their favor. Taking all statistical parameters into account, particularly the hosts' home advantage and the guests' poor away form, a Monopoli victory is the most likely scenario, although a draw cannot be ruled out given the hosts' 33% draw rate at home.
View the statistical overviewStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Monopoli | Virtus Casarano | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 34% | 39% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.13 | 0.13 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.31 | 0.37 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Virtus Casarano is 37% better for: goals scored per game.
1 goals / game - Monopoli · 1.37 goals / game - Virtus Casarano
Monopoli is 52% better for: goals allowed per game.
1.07 goals / game - Monopoli · 1.63 goals / game - Virtus Casarano
Monopoli scores in 70% of games (21 of 30 meczów), while Virtus Casarano keeps a clean sheet in 27% (8 of 30 meczów).
Virtus Casarano scores in 77% of games (23 of 30 meczów), while Monopoli keeps a clean sheet in 33% (10 of 30 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Monopoli
Over / Under - Virtus Casarano
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Virtus Casarano is 46% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
0.8 pts / game - Monopoli · 1.17 pts / game - Virtus Casarano
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Monopoli - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 10% of games and wins 40%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
Virtus Casarano - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 23% of games and wins 37%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.2 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 0.40 | 2.00 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.0 | 0.6 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.6 | 0.2 |
| Average goals per game | 0.6 | 0.8 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 0% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 80% |
| No goal | 100% | 40% |
| Goal difference | -3 | +2 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 0.80 | 1.40 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.6 | 0.8 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.8 | 1.0 |
| Average goals per game | 1.4 | 1.8 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 20% | 20% |
| No goal | 40% | 40% |
| Goal difference | -1 | -1 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (10 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (12 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (15). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Monopoli
Virtus Casarano
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Serie C Group C).
Teams vs league
| Monopoli | Liga | Virtus Casarano | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▼ 2.07 | 2.47 | ▲ 3.00 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 43% | 48% | ▲ 53% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 30% | 46% | ▲ 60% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 33% | 30% | ▼ 27% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 57% | 66% | ▲ 70% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 83% | 79% | ▲ 83% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Record from Monopoli's perspective: 1 win, 0 draws and 0 losses against Virtus Casarano. Games average 4.00 goals, and both teams scored in 100% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Monopoli vs Virtus Casarano?
The Serie C Group C match finished Monopoli 2:1 Virtus Casarano. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Monopoli vs Virtus Casarano?
Monopoli score 1.00 goals per game on average and Virtus Casarano 1.37. The Serie C Group C average is 2.47 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 46% of games. Both teams score in 43% of Monopoli's matches and 53% of Virtus Casarano's.
What form are Monopoli and Virtus Casarano in?
Over the last 5 games Monopoli have a 2-1-2 record (1.40 points per game) and Virtus Casarano 2-1-2 (1.40 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Monopoli vs Virtus Casarano?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.