Montana vs CSKA Sofia: match statistics
Montana vs CSKA Sofia: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Montana played against CSKA Sofia in First League (Bulgaria). The game was played on April 8, 2026. Final score: 0:1.
Recent form
Montana has 0 wins, 0 draws and 5 losses over its last five games, averaging 0.00 points per game. CSKA Sofia has 4 wins, 0 draws and 1 loss, with 2.40 points per game.
Scoring records
Montana scores 0.54 goals per game and allows 1.57. CSKA Sofia scores 1.46 and allows 0.79. Games in this league average 2.37 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 39% of Montana's games and 39% of CSKA Sofia's. The Over 2.5 rates are 43% and 36%, compared with league averages of 44% for BTTS and 46% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
CSKA Sofia has the higher season xG average, 2.03 to 1.17 per game. Montana takes 9.2 shots per game, while CSKA Sofia takes 16.5.
First-half and second-half trends
Montana leads at halftime in 7% of its games and scores 0.29 goals per game after halftime. CSKA Sofia leads at halftime in 43% and scores 0.82 after halftime.
When the teams score
Montana's most productive scoring window is minutes 46-60 (5 goals). For CSKA Sofia, it is minutes 76-90+ (12 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
First League games average 2.37 goals. Both teams score in 44% of games, and 46% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, one previous meeting was available. The record was 0 home wins, 0 draws and 1 away win. Those games averaged 4.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
CSKA Sofia is the clear favorite in this match: they have 41 goals scored this season versus Montana’s 15 and sit 4th in the table compared to the hosts’ 16th place. The form gap is stark — Montana have lost all 5 of their last matches, scoring just 1 and conceding 8, while CSKA have won 4 of their last 5, scoring 8 and conceding 3 and averaging 2.4 points per match over that period. In attack and chance creation CSKA dominate: away xG 1.80 versus Montana’s home xG 1.22, average shots 14.36 vs 9.92, shots on target 4.14 vs 3.15, with possession 56% vs 43%. Defensively CSKA also look stronger — Montana concede 1.46 goals at home on average (44 this season), while CSKA concede 1.00 on the road (22 this season), which, combined with superior shot metrics, gives the visitors the edge and leads me to back their victory.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
I select the 'no' scenario because in the last 5 matches Montana scored only 1 goal (0.2 per match) and conceded 8 goals (1.6 per match), while CSKA in the same period scored 8 goals (1.6 per match) and conceded 3 (0.6 per match). These forms translate into a very low rate of matches with both teams scoring: Montana has 20% BTTS in their last five, and CSKA has 0% BTTS in their last five. Seasonal indicators further support a lack of BTTS — CSKA away BTTS is 29% versus Montana at home 50%, and the league-wide clean sheet rate is as high as 70%, suggesting that often only one side finishes without conceding. Although Montana generates more season xG (2.25 vs 1.8) and shots (18.57 vs 14.36), their recent finishing is poor (0.2 goals per match in the last five), so seasonal xG advantages are not translating into actual goals now. Considering Montana's 0.2 goals in the last 5, CSKA's 0% BTTS and the league's 70% clean sheets, I assess the probability of BTTS 'no' at 75% and 'yes' at 25%.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Based on xG, Montana is expected to score 1.77 goals (xG attack 2.25 vs CSKA conceded xG 1.28) and CSKA 1.36 goals (xG attack 1.80 vs Montana defense 0.92), total 3.13. With that total the Poisson distribution gives probability for Over 1.5 at ~82%, Over 2.5 at ~61% and Over 3.5 at ~38%. Additionally, Montana at home averages 18.57 shots (6.07 on target) versus CSKA 14.36 (4.14 on target), and conversion rates are 10% vs 8%, which supports xG being realized as goals. Season rates for matches Over 1.5 are 64% (Montana) and 71% (CSKA), confirming both teams’ tendency to reach at least two goals, although Montana’s last 5 matches show only 0.2 goals per game, which is a risk. Considering the computed probabilities, the home side’s offensive edge and shot intensity, the strongest signal is Over 1.5.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
The most likely scenario is Montana leading at half-time and the home side winning (1/1). Montana led at the break in 50% of their home matches, while CSKA were leading in 36% of their away games; the home team average half-time goals are 0.71 scored and 0.29 conceded, whereas the visitors average 0.57 scored and 0.43 conceded by half-time. Seasonal figures confirm Montana’s advantage: on average 1.79 goals per match versus CSKA’s 1.14, higher xG of 2.25 versus 1.80 and more shots on target 6.07 versus 4.14, which increases the likelihood of sustaining the lead. Additionally, Montana scores more often in the second half—an average of 1.07 goals after the break compared to CSKA’s 0.57—so a draw or a turnaround after half-time appears less likely than maintaining the win. For these reasons I select 1/1 as the strongest signal from the available data.
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Montana | CSKA Sofia | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 32% | 31% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.13 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.18 | 0.29 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
CSKA Sofia is 170% better for: goals scored per game.
0.54 goals / game - Montana · 1.46 goals / game - CSKA Sofia
CSKA Sofia is 99% better for: goals allowed per game.
1.57 goals / game - Montana · 0.79 goals / game - CSKA Sofia
Montana scores in 50% of games (14 of 28 meczów), while CSKA Sofia keeps a clean sheet in 39% (11 of 28 meczów).
CSKA Sofia scores in 71% of games (20 of 28 meczów), while Montana keeps a clean sheet in 25% (7 of 28 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Montana
Over / Under - CSKA Sofia
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
CSKA Sofia is 137% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
0.71 pts / game - Montana · 1.68 pts / game - CSKA Sofia
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Montana - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 7% of games and wins 11%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
CSKA Sofia - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 43% of games and wins 54%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 0.80 | 0.20 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.2 | 0.0 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.8 | 0.8 |
| Average goals per game | 1.0 | 0.8 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 0% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 20% |
| No goal | 80% | 100% |
| Goal difference | -3 | -4 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 2.00 | 2.40 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.6 | 1.0 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.4 | 0.2 |
| Average goals per game | 1.0 | 1.2 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 80% |
| No goal | 40% | 20% |
| Goal difference | +1 | +4 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (5 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (10). Late-goal balance (76-90): -6 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (12 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): +5 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Montana
CSKA Sofia
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (First League).
Teams vs league
| Montana | Liga | CSKA Sofia | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▼ 2.11 | 2.37 | ▼ 2.25 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 39% | 44% | ▼ 39% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 43% | 46% | ▼ 36% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 25% | 35% | ▲ 39% |
| Goal before half-time | • 64% | 63% | ▲ 68% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 57% | 73% | ▲ 82% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Referee context
See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.
Head-to-head
Record from Montana's perspective: 0 wins, 0 draws and 1 loss against CSKA Sofia. Games average 4.00 goals, and both teams scored in 100% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Montana vs CSKA Sofia?
The First League match finished Montana 0:1 CSKA Sofia. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Montana vs CSKA Sofia?
Montana score 0.54 goals per game on average and CSKA Sofia 1.46. The First League average is 2.37 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 46% of games. Both teams score in 39% of Montana's matches and 39% of CSKA Sofia's.
What form are Montana and CSKA Sofia in?
Over the last 5 games Montana have a 0-0-5 record (0.00 points per game) and CSKA Sofia 4-0-1 (2.40 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Montana vs CSKA Sofia?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.


