Montana vs Lokomotiv G. Oryahovitsa: match statistics
Montana vs Lokomotiv G. Oryahovitsa: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Montana played against Lokomotiv G. Oryahovitsa in Second League (Bulgaria). The game was played on August 30, 2026. Venue: Stadion Ogosta. Final score: 3:0.
Recent form
Montana has 2 wins, 1 draw and 2 losses over its last five games, averaging 1.40 points per game. Lokomotiv G. Oryahovitsa has 2 wins, 1 draw and 2 losses, with 1.40 points per game.
Scoring records
Montana scores 1.80 goals per game and allows 1.60. Lokomotiv G. Oryahovitsa scores 1.00 and allows 1.20. Games in this league average 2.58 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 80% of Montana's games and 60% of Lokomotiv G. Oryahovitsa's. The Over 2.5 rates are 80% and 40%, compared with league averages of 48% for BTTS and 42% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Montana has the higher season xG average, 1.65 to 1.06 per game. Montana takes 13.2 shots per game, while Lokomotiv G. Oryahovitsa takes 9.2.
First-half and second-half trends
Montana leads at halftime in 0% of its games and scores 0.80 goals per game after halftime. Lokomotiv G. Oryahovitsa leads at halftime in 40% and scores 0.40 after halftime.
When the teams score
Montana's most productive scoring window is minutes 0-15 (3 goals). For Lokomotiv G. Oryahovitsa, it is minutes 0-15 (1 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Second League games average 2.58 goals. Both teams score in 48% of games, and 42% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
There is not enough head-to-head history for a meaningful comparison.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Montana have significantly stronger home numbers: they have won both of their home matches so far, scoring an average of 2 goals and conceding just 0.5 per game. The hosts also create higher-quality chances, averaging 1.81 xG compared with Lokomotiv’s 1.29 away from home, while registering 5 shots on target per match against 2 for the visitors. Lokomotiv G. Oryahovitsa score an average of just 1 goal away from home, and their defense allows opponents to generate 1.59 xG, which should benefit Montana’s attack. Both teams have identical records across their last five matches—2 wins, 1 draw and 2 defeats—but the hosts’ advantage is primarily based on their very solid home form. The visitors have scored in every away match, so a goal from them is a realistic possibility; however, a Montana win remains the most likely outcome.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
The signal for both teams to score is strengthened by Montana’s current form: BTTS landed in 80% of their last five matches, compared with 60% in Lokomotiv’s games. During this period, Montana averaged 1.8 goals scored and 1.6 conceded, while Lokomotiv scored 1.0 and allowed opponents 1.2 goals on average. The hosts have kept a clean sheet in none of their matches this season, and their average xG against stands at 1.44, giving the visitors a realistic route to finding the net. Lokomotiv do have a 50% clean-sheet rate, but their defense allows opponents an average xG of 1.59, while Montana have recently been generating 1.63 xG. The season-long BTTS figures—67% for Montana and 50% for Lokomotiv—are at least comparable with the league average of 49%, making a goal for each team the more likely outcome.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
The strongest signal is the low goal ceiling: in the matches played by both teams to date, at least 4 goals have never been scored, meaning that Under 3.5 goals has landed in 100% of each team’s matches. Montana score an average of 1.0 goal, while Lokomotiv also average 1.0, with the visitors keeping a clean sheet in 50% of their matches. The xG profile points to a moderate number of chances: Montana create an average of 0.91 xG, while Lokomotiv record 1.29 xG, producing a projected total of around 2.40 goals. Montana’s last five matches have been more open, averaging 3.4 goals with Over 2.5 landing in 80% of them, but Lokomotiv recorded Over 2.5 in only 40% of such matches. Therefore, Under 3.5 has a clear edge, as even with the hosts’ recent improvement in attack, the data for both teams does not support a scenario featuring four or more goals.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
The strongest signal is a draw at half-time: Montana were level at the break in all of their last five matches, with an average first-half record of 1.0 goals scored and 1.0 conceded. Lokomotiv led at half-time in 40% of their last five fixtures, but were also trailing in 40%, indicating greater volatility than the home side. After the break, the visitors have been particularly cautious, averaging just 0.4 goals scored and 0.4 conceded over their last five matches, while drawing the second half in 100% of cases. Montana have a stronger recent attacking record, averaging 1.8 goals per match compared with Lokomotiv’s 1.0, but their average xG is only 0.91, so the advantage is not sufficient to strongly favor a home win. The X/X scenario is therefore the most likely, although a half-time draw followed by a Montana win remains a close alternative.
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Montana | Lokomotiv G. Oryahovitsa | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 39% | 24% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.13 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.35 | 0.45 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Montana is 80% better for: goals scored per game.
1.8 goals / game - Montana · 1 goals / game - Lokomotiv G. Oryahovitsa
Lokomotiv G. Oryahovitsa is 33% better for: goals allowed per game.
1.6 goals / game - Montana · 1.2 goals / game - Lokomotiv G. Oryahovitsa
Montana scores in 100% of games (5 of 5 games), while Lokomotiv G. Oryahovitsa keeps a clean sheet in 20% (1 of 5 games).
Lokomotiv G. Oryahovitsa scores in 80% of games (4 of 5 games), while Montana keeps a clean sheet in 20% (1 of 5 games).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Montana
Over / Under - Lokomotiv G. Oryahovitsa
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Lokomotiv G. Oryahovitsa is 40% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1 pts / game - Montana · 1.4 pts / game - Lokomotiv G. Oryahovitsa
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Montana - second-half results
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
Lokomotiv G. Oryahovitsa - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 40% of games and wins 40%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.00 | 1.40 |
| Goals scored / game | 1.0 | 0.8 |
| Goals allowed / game | 1.0 | 0.6 |
| Average goals per game | 2.0 | 1.4 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 80% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 20% | 40% |
| No goal | 20% | 40% |
| Goal difference | 0 | +1 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.40 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.6 | 0.4 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.8 | 0.4 |
| Average goals per game | 1.4 | 0.8 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 40% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 60% |
| No goal | 40% | 60% |
| Goal difference | -1 | 0 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (3 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (1 goal). Concedes most in 31-45 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Montana
Lokomotiv G. Oryahovitsa
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Second League).
Teams vs league
| Montana | Liga | Lokomotiv G. Oryahovitsa | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▲ 3.40 | 2.58 | ▼ 2.20 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 80% | 48% | ▲ 60% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 80% | 42% | ▼ 40% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 20% | 29% | ▼ 20% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 80% | 62% | ▲ 80% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 100% | 77% | ▼ 40% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
FAQ
What was the result of Montana vs Lokomotiv G. Oryahovitsa?
The Second League match finished Montana 3:0 Lokomotiv G. Oryahovitsa. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Montana vs Lokomotiv G. Oryahovitsa?
Montana score 1.80 goals per game on average and Lokomotiv G. Oryahovitsa 1.00. The Second League average is 2.58 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 42% of games. Both teams score in 80% of Montana's matches and 60% of Lokomotiv G. Oryahovitsa's.
What form are Montana and Lokomotiv G. Oryahovitsa in?
Over the last 5 games Montana have a 2-1-2 record (1.40 points per game) and Lokomotiv G. Oryahovitsa 2-1-2 (1.40 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Montana vs Lokomotiv G. Oryahovitsa?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.


