Bulgaria - Second LeagueStadion OgostaData current as of October 16, 2026

Montana vs Ludogorets II: match statistics

Montana crest
Montana
2 : 3half-time 2:1
Ludogorets II crest
Ludogorets II

Montana vs Ludogorets II: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

Montana played against Ludogorets II in Second League (Bulgaria). The game was played on October 13, 2026. Venue: Stadion Ogosta. Final score: 2:3.

Recent form

Montana has 0 wins, 1 draw and 4 losses over its last five games, averaging 0.20 points per game. Ludogorets II has 1 win, 2 draws and 2 losses, with 1.00 points per game.

Scoring records

Montana scores 1.18 goals per game and allows 2.09. Ludogorets II scores 0.90 and allows 1.00. Games in this league average 2.63 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 45% of Montana's games and 40% of Ludogorets II's. The Over 2.5 rates are 73% and 20%, compared with league averages of 44% for BTTS and 46% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

Montana has the higher season xG average, 1.34 to 1.05 per game. Montana takes 9.7 shots per game, while Ludogorets II takes 9.0.

First-half and second-half trends

Montana leads at halftime in 9% of its games and scores 0.64 goals per game after halftime. Ludogorets II leads at halftime in 20% and scores 0.40 after halftime.

When the teams score

Montana's most productive scoring window is minutes 0-15 (4 goals). For Ludogorets II, it is minutes 0-15 (3 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

Second League games average 2.63 goals. Both teams score in 44% of games, and 46% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

There is not enough head-to-head history for a meaningful comparison.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Montana have the home advantage: they have won 60% of their home matches, scoring an average of 1.6 goals, while Ludogorets II have won 33% of their away fixtures and scored 0.83 goals per game. The hosts also create more chances, with an average home xG of 1.48 compared with the visitors’ 1.04 away from home, and record 4.8 shots on target per match against 2.5. Montana’s main concern is their defense: they have conceded 15 goals and lost four of their last five matches. Ludogorets II have conceded only 4 goals over the same period, but have failed to score in half of their away matches. Montana’s attacking edge and strong home results point to a home win, although their recent form makes this prediction less certain.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

The strongest signal in favor of BTTS - No is Ludogorets II’s limited attacking output: the visitors failed to score in 50% of their matches and average 0.83 goals per game. Montana did keep a clean sheet in 0% of its matches, but scored an average of just 0.6 goals across its last 5 games. The visitors concede an average of 0.83 goals per game this season and 0.8 over their last 5 matches, increasing the risk that the hosts will fail to score. Season-long BTTS rates also differ considerably—75% for Montana and 17% for Ludogorets II—while the figures across their last 5 matches were 20% and 40%, respectively. Therefore, it is more likely that at least one team will fail to score, although Montana’s poor defending leaves the visitors with a chance to find the net.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

The Under 3.5 goals line has the strongest support in the results: every match played so far by both teams in the samples considered has ended with no more than three goals. Montana average 1.00 goals scored, while Ludogorets II average 0.83; their average xG figures are also similar, at 1.06 and 1.04 respectively. In addition, 75% of Montana's matches and 83% of the visitors' matches have finished Under 2.5 goals, pointing to a moderate goal total. The risk of a higher-scoring game is increased by the hosts' recent defensive struggles, having conceded 15 goals in five matches, so Under 3.5 goals is the safer option compared with Under 2.5.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

A half-time draw is the most likely outcome: Ludogorets II were level at the break in 4 of their 6 matches, while Montana were level in 2 of 4. The visitors averaged just 0.33 goals before half-time, while the hosts have failed to score in the first half in each of their last 5 matches, limiting the chances of them taking the lead at the break. Ludogorets II to win after half-time is supported by a clear difference in recent form: Montana lost 4 of their last 5 matches and conceded an average of 3 goals, while the visitors conceded 0.8. In the second halves of these matches, the hosts conceded an average of 1.8 goals and the visitors 0.4, making a half-time draw followed by a Ludogorets II win the most strongly supported scenario.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Stats by half

2 : 1
First half
0 : 2
Second half

Game stats

41Possession (%)59
MontanaLudogorets II
5Shots11
MontanaLudogorets II
5Shots on target7
MontanaLudogorets II
0.98xG1.69
MontanaLudogorets II
1Corners3
MontanaLudogorets II
41Dangerous attacks69
MontanaLudogorets II
16Fouls17
MontanaLudogorets II
0Cards0
MontanaLudogorets II

Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

1.18Goals scored / game0.9
MontanaLudogorets II
2.09Goals allowed / game1
MontanaLudogorets II
52%Average possession45%
MontanaLudogorets II
4.36Shots on target / game2.2
MontanaLudogorets II

Team stats— who is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

9.73Shots per game9
MontanaLudogorets II
4.36Shots on target2.2
MontanaLudogorets II
12.1%Shot conversion10%
MontanaLudogorets II
52%Possession45%
MontanaLudogorets II
1.34xG for1.05
MontanaLudogorets II
1.61xG against1.3
MontanaLudogorets II

Shooting quality

Montana: BalancedLudogorets II: Balanced
MontanaLudogorets II
Accuracy (shots on target)45%24%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.140.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.270.41

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team form— who is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

Ludogorets II is 400% better for: last-5 form.

0.2 pts / game - Montana · 1 pts / game - Ludogorets II

Montana
DLLLL
No win in the last 5 games
Season result split
27% W18% D55% L
Season (W-D-L)
3-2-6
1.00 pts / game · goal difference -10
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-1-4
0.20 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
3-0-2
Last 5 at home
3-0-2
WWWLL
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 0.2Goals conceded: 3.0xG: 1.13Opponent xG: 1.94BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 60%
Ludogorets II
DLWDL
Season result split
30% W30% D40% L
Season (W-D-L)
3-3-4
1.20 pts / game · goal difference -1
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-2-2
1.00 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
2-1-3
Last 5 away
1-1-3
LDLWL
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 0.8xG: 1.10Opponent xG: 1.21BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 20%

Goals— how do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Montana is 31% better for: goals scored per game.

1.18 goals / game - Montana · 0.9 goals / game - Ludogorets II

Ludogorets II is 109% better for: goals allowed per game.

2.09 goals / game - Montana · 1 goals / game - Ludogorets II

Montana scoring profile: strong

Montana scores in 64% of games (7 of 11 games), while Ludogorets II keeps a clean sheet in 20% (2 of 10 games).

Ludogorets II scoring profile: strong

Ludogorets II scores in 60% of games (6 of 10 games), while Montana keeps a clean sheet in 27% (3 of 11 games).

13Goals scored (season)9
MontanaLudogorets II
23Goals conceded (season)10
MontanaLudogorets II
3.27Average goals per game1.9
MontanaLudogorets II
1Goals scored (last 5)5
MontanaLudogorets II
15Goals conceded (last 5)4
MontanaLudogorets II

How often they score at least...

64%1 goal60%
MontanaLudogorets II
36%2 goals20%
MontanaLudogorets II
18%3 goals10%
MontanaLudogorets II
0%4 goals0%
MontanaLudogorets II

How often they concede at least...

73%1 goal80%
MontanaLudogorets II
64%2 goals20%
MontanaLudogorets II
36%3 goals0%
MontanaLudogorets II
27%4 goals0%
MontanaLudogorets II

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

36%BTTS at half-time20%
MontanaLudogorets II
9%BTTS in both halves0%
MontanaLudogorets II
27%Scored in both halves10%
MontanaLudogorets II

BTTS and goal count

45%Min. 3 goals and BTTS10%
MontanaLudogorets II
27%Min. 3 goals without BTTS10%
MontanaLudogorets II
20%BTTS - last 540%
MontanaLudogorets II

Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

1st half

82%Min. 1 goal before half-time50%
MontanaLudogorets II
45%Min. 2 goals before half-time30%
MontanaLudogorets II
18%Min. 3 goals before half-time10%
MontanaLudogorets II

2nd half

91%Min. 1 goal after half-time70%
MontanaLudogorets II
55%Min. 2 goals after half-time30%
MontanaLudogorets II
18%Min. 3 goals after half-time0%
MontanaLudogorets II

Game halves— when do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Ludogorets II is 46% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

0.82 pts / game - Montana · 1.2 pts / game - Ludogorets II

Montana - half-time state
9% leading55% draw36% trailing
Ludogorets II - half-time state
20% leading60% draw20% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

0.82Points per game (1st half)1.2
MontanaLudogorets II
0.55Goals scored (1st half)0.5
MontanaLudogorets II
1Goals conceded (1st half)0.4
MontanaLudogorets II
1.55Average goals (1st half)0.9
MontanaLudogorets II
27%Clean sheet before half-time60%
MontanaLudogorets II
55%No goal before half-time70%
MontanaLudogorets II

After half-time (2nd half)

1Points per game (2nd half)1.1
MontanaLudogorets II
0.64Goals scored (2nd half)0.4
MontanaLudogorets II
1.09Goals conceded (2nd half)0.6
MontanaLudogorets II
1.73Average goals (2nd half)1
MontanaLudogorets II
36%Clean sheet after half-time50%
MontanaLudogorets II
55%No goal after half-time60%
MontanaLudogorets II

Montana - second-half results

27% W18% D55% L
9
Half-time points
6
Half-time goals
-5
Goal difference (1st half)
11
Second-half points
-5
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.82
PPG before half-time
Lead holding300%

Leads at halftime in 9% of games and wins 27%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime+0.1

Defense stays consistent across the full game.

Ludogorets II - second-half results

20% W50% D30% L
12
Half-time points
5
Half-time goals
+1
Goal difference (1st half)
11
Second-half points
-2
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.20
PPG before half-time
Lead holding150%

Leads at halftime in 20% of games and wins 30%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime+0.2

Allows 0.2 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

Montana - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game0.200.20
Goals scored / game0.00.2
Goals allowed / game1.21.8
Average goals per game1.22.0
1 goal80%80%
2 goals20%60%
3 goals20%40%
Clean sheet20%20%
No goal100%80%
Goal difference-6-8
Half-time: 0% leading - 20% draw - 80% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 20% draw - 80% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 0
Ludogorets II - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.201.20
Goals scored / game0.60.4
Goals allowed / game0.40.4
Average goals per game1.00.8
1 goal60%60%
2 goals40%20%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet60%60%
No goal60%60%
Goal difference+10
Half-time: 20% leading - 60% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 60% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 3

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

Montana
ScoredConceded
4
4
0-15
1
5
16-30
1
2
31-45
2
1
46-60
2
5
61-75
3
6
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (4 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.

Ludogorets II
ScoredConceded
3
2
0-15
0
0
16-30
2
2
31-45
1
1
46-60
1
2
61-75
2
3
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (3 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

2.58
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
1.1 : 1.5
Estimated goal split
home : away
98%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
43%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
38%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
14%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 7 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

Montana

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.27
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.64
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+3.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.16
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
-0.48
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
77%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
192%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
-0.80
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
23% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 31% come in the first quarter-hour.
23%

Ludogorets II

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.25
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.15
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-1.4 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.15
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.30
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
83%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
65%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
-0.20
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.1
Late goals
22% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 33% come in the first quarter-hour.
22%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League context— is this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Second League).

Teams vs league

MontanaLigaLudogorets II
Average goals per game▲ 3.272.63▼ 1.90
Both teams scored• 45%44%▼ 40%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)▲ 73%46%▼ 20%
Clean sheets▼ 27%32%▼ 20%
Goal before half-time▲ 82%61%▼ 50%
Goal after half-time▲ 91%77%▼ 70%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.63
Average goals per game
44%
Both teams scored
46%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
32%
Clean sheets
1.54
Home goals / game
1.09
Away goals / game
+41%
Home attack advantage
+29%
Home defensive advantage
+27%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
61%
1 goal
33%
2 goals
10%
3 goals
3%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
77%
1 goal
49%
2 goals
17%
3 goals
8%
4 goals

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

FAQ

What was the result of Montana vs Ludogorets II?

The Second League match finished Montana 2:3 Ludogorets II. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Montana vs Ludogorets II?

Montana score 1.18 goals per game on average and Ludogorets II 0.90. The Second League average is 2.63 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 46% of games. Both teams score in 45% of Montana's matches and 40% of Ludogorets II's.

What form are Montana and Ludogorets II in?

Over the last 5 games Montana have a 0-1-4 record (0.20 points per game) and Ludogorets II 1-2-2 (1.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Montana vs Ludogorets II?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.