Montana vs Vihren Sandanski: match statistics
Montana vs Vihren Sandanski: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Montana played against Vihren Sandanski in Second League (Bulgaria). The game was played on September 8, 2026. Venue: Stadion Ogosta. Final score: 1:4.
Recent form
Montana has 2 wins, 1 draw and 2 losses over its last five games, averaging 1.40 points per game. Vihren Sandanski has 3 wins, 2 draws and 0 losses, with 2.20 points per game.
Scoring records
Montana scores 1.71 goals per game and allows 1.14. Vihren Sandanski scores 2.14 and allows 1.00. Games in this league average 2.59 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 57% of Montana's games and 71% of Vihren Sandanski's. The Over 2.5 rates are 71% and 43%, compared with league averages of 46% for BTTS and 45% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Vihren Sandanski has the higher season xG average, 1.79 to 1.49 per game. Montana takes 11.7 shots per game, while Vihren Sandanski takes 14.9.
First-half and second-half trends
Montana leads at halftime in 14% of its games and scores 0.86 goals per game after halftime. Vihren Sandanski leads at halftime in 57% and scores 1.43 after halftime.
When the teams score
Montana's most productive scoring window is minutes 0-15 (4 goals). For Vihren Sandanski, it is minutes 46-60 (4 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Second League games average 2.59 goals. Both teams score in 46% of games, and 45% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
There is not enough head-to-head history for a meaningful comparison.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Montana are extremely strong at home: they have won all three home matches, averaging 2.33 goals scored and just 0.33 conceded, while keeping a clean sheet in two-thirds of those games. Vihren Sandanski arrive as unbeaten leaders after 7 rounds, with a record of 4 wins and 3 draws, and have scored 11 goals while conceding only 4 in their last five matches. Both teams have a perfect record of three wins in matches played at home and away respectively, averaging an identical 2.33 goals in those venues and failing to score in none of them. Montana have marginally higher average xG, 1.50 compared to 1.45, and limit opponents more effectively in terms of xG against, 1.02 compared to 1.18, but the visitors boast a clearly stronger recent points run: 3 wins and 2 draws in their last five matches. The combination of highly balanced venue-based numbers and the leaders’ unbeaten form suggests a closely contested match in which a draw is the most likely outcome.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Montana average 2.00 goals per match, while Vihren average 2.33, with neither team recording a game without scoring this season. The hosts have kept no clean sheets and concede an average of 1.25 goals, which supports the prospect of the away side finding the net. Montana also create high-quality chances at 2.05 xG, above the 1.18 xG average allowed by Vihren, although the visitors have kept a clean sheet in as many as 67% of their matches. Across their last five outings, both teams recorded BTTS - Yes in 40% and 60% of matches respectively, with average xG figures of 1.54 and 1.79. The attacking strength of both sides and Montana’s poor clean-sheet record give a slight edge to the scenario in which both teams score.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Both teams have surpassed the 1.5-goal threshold in 100% of their league matches so far, which is the strongest indicator of a higher-scoring game. Montana average 2.00 goals at home and create chances worth 2.05 xG, while Vihren score an average of 2.33 goals away from home. The last five matches also point to attacking potential: the hosts have scored 1.4 goals per game, while the visitors have averaged 2.2. Vihren’s defense concedes just 0.67 goals away from home, but Montana average 17.5 shots and 7.25 shots on target per match, so they should create chances of their own. The projected total of 2.70 goals provides a clearer edge for Over 1.5 than for the more evenly balanced 2.5 line.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Vihren Sandanski have won all of their league matches so far, averaging 2.33 goals scored and conceding just 0.67, while Montana have recorded only a 25% win rate and 75% draws. The visitors led at the break in 67% of their matches and are yet to concede in the first half; Montana have also avoided trailing at half-time, but drew at the break in as many as 50% of cases. Vihren’s advantage should increase after the interval, as they average 1.67 goals in the second half compared with Montana’s 1.25, while their second-half average over the last five matches stands at an impressive 1.4 goals. Montana create plenty of chances, as reflected by an xG of 2.05 and 7.25 shots on target per match, but the visitors have kept a clean sheet in 67% of their games. Therefore, the most likely HT/FT outcome is a Vihren lead at half-time followed by a full-time victory (1/1).
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Montana | Vihren Sandanski | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 43% | 40% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.13 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.34 | 0.36 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Vihren Sandanski is 57% better for: last-5 form.
1.4 pts / game - Montana · 2.2 pts / game - Vihren Sandanski
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Vihren Sandanski is 25% better for: goals scored per game.
1.71 goals / game - Montana · 2.14 goals / game - Vihren Sandanski
Vihren Sandanski is 14% better for: goals allowed per game.
1.14 goals / game - Montana · 1 goals / game - Vihren Sandanski
Montana scores in 86% of games (6 of 7 games), while Vihren Sandanski keeps a clean sheet in 29% (2 of 7 games).
Vihren Sandanski scores in 100% of games (7 of 7 games), while Montana keeps a clean sheet in 43% (3 of 7 games).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Montana
Over / Under - Vihren Sandanski
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Vihren Sandanski is 66% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.29 pts / game - Montana · 2.14 pts / game - Vihren Sandanski
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Montana - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 14% of games and wins 43%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
Vihren Sandanski - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 57% of games and wins 57%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 1.0 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.40 | 1.40 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.8 | 0.6 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.6 | 0.4 |
| Average goals per game | 1.4 | 1.0 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 60% |
| No goal | 40% | 60% |
| Goal difference | +1 | +1 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 2.20 | 2.00 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.8 | 1.4 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.0 | 0.8 |
| Average goals per game | 0.8 | 2.2 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 80% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 100% | 40% |
| No goal | 40% | 0% |
| Goal difference | +4 | +3 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (4 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (4 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Montana
Vihren Sandanski
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Second League).
Teams vs league
| Montana | Liga | Vihren Sandanski | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▲ 2.86 | 2.59 | ▲ 3.14 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 57% | 46% | ▲ 71% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 71% | 45% | ▼ 43% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 43% | 30% | • 29% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 71% | 63% | ▼ 57% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 86% | 76% | ▲ 100% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Away team
Other recorded players
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
- Vihren SandanskiGoalPreslav Yordanov
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
FAQ
What was the result of Montana vs Vihren Sandanski?
The Second League match finished Montana 1:4 Vihren Sandanski. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Montana vs Vihren Sandanski?
Montana score 1.71 goals per game on average and Vihren Sandanski 2.14. The Second League average is 2.59 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 45% of games. Both teams score in 57% of Montana's matches and 71% of Vihren Sandanski's.
What form are Montana and Vihren Sandanski in?
Over the last 5 games Montana have a 2-1-2 record (1.40 points per game) and Vihren Sandanski 3-2-0 (2.20 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Montana vs Vihren Sandanski?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.


