United States - MLSData current as of August 30, 2026

Montreal Impact vs Chicago Fire: match statistics

Montreal Impact crest
Montreal Impact
0 : 2half-time 0:1
Chicago Fire crest
Chicago Fire

Montreal Impact vs Chicago Fire: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

Montreal Impact played against Chicago Fire in MLS (United States). The game was played on May 16, 2026. Final score: 0:2.

Recent form

Montreal Impact has 3 wins, 1 draw and 1 loss over its last five games, averaging 2.00 points per game. Chicago Fire has 2 wins, 1 draw and 2 losses, with 1.40 points per game.

Scoring records

Montreal Impact scores 1.50 goals per game and allows 2.08. Chicago Fire scores 1.92 and allows 1.25. Games in this league average 3.28 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 50% of Montreal Impact's games and 58% of Chicago Fire's. The Over 2.5 rates are 83% and 75%, compared with league averages of 60% for BTTS and 63% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

Chicago Fire has the higher season xG average, 1.68 to 1.44 per game. Montreal Impact takes 13.0 shots per game, while Chicago Fire takes 15.2.

First-half and second-half trends

Montreal Impact leads at halftime in 50% of its games and scores 0.50 goals per game after halftime. Chicago Fire leads at halftime in 42% and scores 1.17 after halftime.

When the teams score

Montreal Impact's most productive scoring window is minutes 0-15 (5 goals). For Chicago Fire, it is minutes 76-90+ (7 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

MLS games average 3.28 goals. Both teams score in 60% of games, and 63% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

Before this game, one previous meeting was available. The record was 0 home wins, 0 draws and 1 away win. Those games averaged 3.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Montreal holds a clear home advantage: they win 60% of home matches and average 2.0 goals per game with an average xG of 1.56, while Chicago averages 1.8 goals on the road with xG 1.35. The hosts generate more shots (14 vs 11.4) and more shots on target (5.6 vs 4.8). In the last 5 matches Montreal has scored 11 goals vs Chicago’s 12, with Montreal conceding 5 and Chicago 9. Over the same 5-game sample Montreal averages 2.0 points per game (3W, 1D, 1L) versus Chicago’s 1.2 ppg (2W, 0D, 3L), indicating better form for the home side. Defensively Montreal is superior at home: 1.0 goals conceded per game and average xG against 1.14, compared to Chicago’s 1.4 goals conceded and xG against 1.6 on the road. Additionally Montreal records 40% clean sheets at home and 0% shutout-less matches, while Chicago has 20% clean sheets and 20% away matches without a goal, therefore I favor a Montreal victory.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

A strong signal for BTTS - Yes comes from Chicago Fire, who have a season BTTS rate of 80% (and 80% in the last 5 matches), meaning in 4 of their last 5 away games both teams scored. Montreal at home has a BTTS of 43% and as many as 57% clean sheets, which significantly limits the number of matches where the opponent scores. xG analysis shows: Montreal xG_for = 1.92 versus Chicago xG_against = 1.60 yields an expected ~1.76 goals for Montreal, while Chicago xG_for = 1.35 versus Montreal xG_against = 1.18 yields ~1.27 for Chicago. Using a Poisson approximation P(Montreal ≥1) ≈ 1 - e^-1.76 ≈ 82.8% and P(Chicago ≥1) ≈ 1 - e^-1.27 ≈ 71.7%, the product gives ~59% for BTTS = yes. Considering these numbers plus the last 5 matches (Montreal 11 goals, Chicago 12 goals) and the league average BTTS 60%, I recommend BTTS = Yes (est. 60% vs 40%).

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

I project 1.76 goals for Montreal and 1.27 for Chicago (total 3.03), calculated as the average of attack and defense: Montreal’s attack xG 1.92 and Chicago’s defense xG 1.60 yield 1.76, while Chicago’s attack xG 1.35 and Montreal’s defense xG 1.18 yield 1.27. Seasonal data indicate a high probability of matches with three or more goals: Over 2.5 occurred in 71% of Montreal’s games and 80% of Chicago’s games, with Chicago recording Over 2.5 in 100% of their last 5 fixtures. Montreal averages 17.86 shots (5.57 on target) per match, Chicago 11.4 (4.8 on target), with Chicago showing a higher shot conversion rate of 16% versus Montreal’s 11%, enhancing the efficiency of their chances. Considering the expected 3.03 goals, the strong seasonal Over 2.5 percentages (71% and 80%) and recent form (Montreal 60% Over 2.5 in last 5; Chicago 100%), the strongest signal is an Over 2.5 bet (implied probability 78%).

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

Montreal holds a clear advantage in quality of chances: xG 1.92 versus Chicago's 1.35 and an average of 17.86 shots per match compared to 11.4, providing more opportunities for the home side. In their last five matches Montreal led at the break in 3 of 5 games (60%) and averaged 1.2 goals by half-time, while Chicago averaged 0.4 half-time goals and did not lead at the break in that period (0%). Montreal kept a clean sheet at half-time in 71% of their season matches, and the season shot conversion rate is 11% for Montreal versus 16% for Chicago; Chicago also has 80% of away matches with BTTS, so a second-half goal from the visitors is possible but less likely to be the first. Considering the xG advantage (1.92 vs 1.35), dominance in shot volume (17.86 vs 11.4) and the fact the hosts frequently lead at the break and have a 57% home win rate versus 40% for the visitors, the strongest scenario is 1/1 (Montreal leads at half-time and wins Full-Time).

View first-half and second-half statistics

Stats by half

0 : 1
First half
0 : 1
Second half

Game stats

60Possession (%)40
Montreal ImpactChicago Fire
15Shots11
Montreal ImpactChicago Fire
5Shots on target4
Montreal ImpactChicago Fire
1.83xG1.16
Montreal ImpactChicago Fire
16Corners3
Montreal ImpactChicago Fire
74Dangerous attacks24
Montreal ImpactChicago Fire
14Fouls13
Montreal ImpactChicago Fire
4Cards3
Montreal ImpactChicago Fire

Pre-game profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

Montreal ImpactChicago Fire
1.5Goals scored / game1.92
Montreal ImpactChicago Fire
2.08Goals allowed / game1.25
Montreal ImpactChicago Fire
47%Average possession54%
Montreal ImpactChicago Fire
4.83Shots on target / game5.25
Montreal ImpactChicago Fire

Team statswho is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

13Shots per game15.17
Montreal ImpactChicago Fire
4.83Shots on target5.25
Montreal ImpactChicago Fire
11.5%Shot conversion12.6%
Montreal ImpactChicago Fire
47%Possession54%
Montreal ImpactChicago Fire
1.44xG for1.68
Montreal ImpactChicago Fire
1.4xG against1.36
Montreal ImpactChicago Fire

Shooting quality

Montreal Impact: BalancedChicago Fire: Attacking
Montreal ImpactChicago Fire
Accuracy (shots on target)37%35%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.110.11
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.310.37

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

Montreal Impact is 43% better for: last-5 form.

2 pts / game - Montreal Impact · 1.4 pts / game - Chicago Fire

Montreal Impact
WWLWD
Season result split
33% W8% R58% P
Season (W-D-L)
4-1-7
1.08 pts / game · goal difference -7
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-1-1
2.00 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
3-1-1
Last 5 at home
3-1-1
LWWWD
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 2.0Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 1.65Opponent xG: 1.14BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%
Chicago Fire
DWLLW
Season result split
50% W17% R33% P
Season (W-D-L)
6-2-4
1.67 pts / game · goal difference +8
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-2
1.40 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
2-2-1
Last 5 away
2-2-1
LDWDW
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 2.8Goals conceded: 2.0xG: 2.11Opponent xG: 1.37BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 100%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Chicago Fire is 28% better for: goals scored per game.

1.5 goals / game - Montreal Impact · 1.92 goals / game - Chicago Fire

Chicago Fire is 66% better for: goals allowed per game.

2.08 goals / game - Montreal Impact · 1.25 goals / game - Chicago Fire

Montreal Impact scoring profile: strong

Montreal Impact scores in 75% of games (9 of 12 meczów), while Chicago Fire keeps a clean sheet in 42% (5 of 12 meczów).

Chicago Fire scoring profile: very strong

Chicago Fire scores in 92% of games (11 of 12 meczów), while Montreal Impact keeps a clean sheet in 25% (3 of 12 meczów).

18Goals scored (season)23
Montreal ImpactChicago Fire
25Goals conceded (season)15
Montreal ImpactChicago Fire
3.58Average goals per game3.17
Montreal ImpactChicago Fire
10Goals scored (last 5)14
Montreal ImpactChicago Fire
6Goals conceded (last 5)10
Montreal ImpactChicago Fire

How often they score at least...

75%1 goal92%
Montreal ImpactChicago Fire
42%2 goals50%
Montreal ImpactChicago Fire
25%3 goals33%
Montreal ImpactChicago Fire
8%4 goals8%
Montreal ImpactChicago Fire

How often they concede at least...

75%1 goal58%
Montreal ImpactChicago Fire
67%2 goals42%
Montreal ImpactChicago Fire
42%3 goals25%
Montreal ImpactChicago Fire
17%4 goals0%
Montreal ImpactChicago Fire

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

60%
League average

Goal patterns

33%BTTS at half-time25%
Montreal ImpactChicago Fire
8%BTTS in both halves8%
Montreal ImpactChicago Fire
25%Scored in both halves25%
Montreal ImpactChicago Fire

BTTS and goal count

50%Min. 3 goals and BTTS58%
Montreal ImpactChicago Fire
33%Min. 3 goals without BTTS17%
Montreal ImpactChicago Fire
60%BTTS - last 580%
Montreal ImpactChicago Fire

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

1st half

92%Min. 1 goal before half-time75%
Montreal ImpactChicago Fire
58%Min. 2 goals before half-time25%
Montreal ImpactChicago Fire
33%Min. 3 goals before half-time17%
Montreal ImpactChicago Fire

2nd half

83%Min. 1 goal after half-time75%
Montreal ImpactChicago Fire
58%Min. 2 goals after half-time58%
Montreal ImpactChicago Fire
25%Min. 3 goals after half-time42%
Montreal ImpactChicago Fire

Game halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Chicago Fire is 6% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.58 pts / game - Montreal Impact · 1.67 pts / game - Chicago Fire

Montreal Impact - half-time state
50% leading8% draw42% trailing
Chicago Fire - half-time state
42% leading42% draw17% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.58Points per game (1st half)1.67
Montreal ImpactChicago Fire
1Goals scored (1st half)0.75
Montreal ImpactChicago Fire
0.83Goals conceded (1st half)0.5
Montreal ImpactChicago Fire
1.83Average goals (1st half)1.25
Montreal ImpactChicago Fire
42%Clean sheet before half-time58%
Montreal ImpactChicago Fire
33%No goal before half-time42%
Montreal ImpactChicago Fire

After half-time (2nd half)

0.92Points per game (2nd half)1.25
Montreal ImpactChicago Fire
0.5Goals scored (2nd half)1.17
Montreal ImpactChicago Fire
1.25Goals conceded (2nd half)0.75
Montreal ImpactChicago Fire
1.75Average goals (2nd half)1.92
Montreal ImpactChicago Fire
33%Clean sheet after half-time58%
Montreal ImpactChicago Fire
67%No goal after half-time42%
Montreal ImpactChicago Fire

Montreal Impact - second-half results

25% W17% R58% P
19
Half-time points
12
Half-time goals
+2
Goal difference (1st half)
11
Second-half points
-9
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.58
PPG before half-time
Lead holding66%

Leads at halftime in 50% of games and wins 33%. Sometimes gives up a halftime lead.

Defense after halftime+0.4

Allows 0.4 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

Chicago Fire - second-half results

33% W25% R42% P
20
Half-time points
9
Half-time goals
+3
Goal difference (1st half)
15
Second-half points
+5
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.67
PPG before half-time
Lead holding119%

Leads at halftime in 42% of games and wins 50%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime+0.3

Allows 0.3 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

Montreal Impact - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game2.001.40
Goals scored / game1.20.8
Goals allowed / game0.60.6
Average goals per game1.81.4
1 goal80%80%
2 goals60%40%
3 goals40%20%
Clean sheet60%40%
No goal20%60%
Goal difference+3+1
Half-time: 60% leading - 20% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 20% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 6
Chicago Fire - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.001.20
Goals scored / game0.82.0
Goals allowed / game1.01.0
Average goals per game1.83.0
1 goal80%100%
2 goals40%80%
3 goals40%80%
Clean sheet20%40%
No goal60%20%
Goal difference-1+5
Half-time: 20% leading - 40% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 0% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 4

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

Montreal Impact
ScoredConceded
5
2
0-15
3
3
16-30
4
5
31-45
1
6
46-60
2
1
61-75
3
8
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (5 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): -5 - late phases are a weakness.

Chicago Fire
ScoredConceded
2
0
0-15
4
1
16-30
3
5
31-45
3
1
46-60
4
1
61-75
7
7
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (7 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

3.38
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
1.4 : 2.0
Estimated goal split
home : away
103%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
54%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-11%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
69%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
2%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 50 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

Montreal Impact

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.04
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.62
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+0.7 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.06
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
-0.68
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
77%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
155%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
+0.92
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.5
Late goals
17% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 28% come in the first quarter-hour.
17%

Chicago Fire

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.32
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.35
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-5.3 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.24
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.11
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
143%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
64%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
-0.27
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.4
Late goals
30% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 9% come in the first quarter-hour.
30%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (MLS).

Teams vs league

Montreal ImpactLigaChicago Fire
Average goals per game 3.583.28 3.17
Both teams scored 50%60% 58%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 83%63% 75%
Clean sheets 25%23% 42%
Goal before half-time 92%76% 75%
Goal after half-time 83%80% 75%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.28
Average goals per game
60%
Both teams scored
63%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
23%
Clean sheets
1.94
Home goals / game
1.34
Away goals / game
+45%
Home attack advantage
+31%
Home defensive advantage
+18%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
76%
1 goal
43%
2 goals
20%
3 goals
6%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
80%
1 goal
55%
2 goals
27%
3 goals
12%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Chicago FireYellow cardViktor Radojević
  2. Montreal ImpactYellow cardSamuel Piette
  3. Chicago FireYellow cardMbekezeli Mbokazi
  4. Chicago FireSubstitutionOn: Andrew GutmanOff: Viktor Radojević
  5. Montreal ImpactYellow cardBrandan Craig
  6. Montreal ImpactYellow cardPrince-Osei Owusu
  7. Montreal ImpactYellow cardBrayan Emanuel Vera Ramírez
  8. Montreal ImpactSubstitutionOn: Hennadiy SynchukOff: Luca Petrasso
  9. Chicago FireYellow cardPuso Dithejane

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Referee context

See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.

Fotis BazakosMatches officiated: 9
5.44Cards per match
0Penalties per match
1 / X / 244%Home wins11%Draws44%Away wins

Head-to-head

Record from Montreal Impact's perspective: 0 wins, 0 draws and 1 loss against Chicago Fire. Games average 3.00 goals, and both teams scored in 0% of them.

FAQ

What was the result of Montreal Impact vs Chicago Fire?

The MLS match finished Montreal Impact 0:2 Chicago Fire. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Montreal Impact vs Chicago Fire?

Montreal Impact score 1.50 goals per game on average and Chicago Fire 1.92. The MLS average is 3.28 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 63% of games. Both teams score in 50% of Montreal Impact's matches and 58% of Chicago Fire's.

What form are Montreal Impact and Chicago Fire in?

Over the last 5 games Montreal Impact have a 3-1-1 record (2.00 points per game) and Chicago Fire 2-1-2 (1.40 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Montreal Impact vs Chicago Fire?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Montreal Impact vs Chicago Fire: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.