United States - MLSData current as of 23 July 2026

Montreal Impact vs Portland Timbers: match statistics

Montreal Impact vs Portland Timbers: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Montreal Impact play Portland Timbers in MLS (United States). The match date is 14 May 2026 at 01:30. Final score: 2:2.

Current form

Montreal Impact: 1-3-1, 1.20 points/match. Portland Timbers: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match.

Goal statistics

Montreal Impact scores 1.47 and concedes 2.07 goals per match. Portland Timbers scores 1.80 and concedes 1.93. League average: 3.31 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Montreal Impact 47%, Portland Timbers 67%. Over 2.5: Montreal Impact 73%, Portland Timbers 67%. League level: BTTS 61%, Over 2.5 63%.

xG, shots and style

Montreal Impact has higher xG: 1.52 vs 1.46. Montreal Impact: 13.8 shots per match, Portland Timbers: 12.7.

Match halves

Montreal Impact: half-time lead 40%, second-half goals 0.60. Portland Timbers: half-time lead 33%, second-half goals 0.80.

Goals by minute

Montreal Impact: 0-15 (5 goals). Portland Timbers: 16-30 (7 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

MLS: 3.31 goals per match, BTTS 61%, Over 2.5 63%.

Head-to-head

No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.

Match description

I back a Montreal win (1). At home the hosts score an average of 2.0 goals per game and have 0% matches without scoring, while Portland averages only 1.0 goal away and has 50% of away games without a goal. Defensively Montreal concedes 0.75 goals on average at the stadium and has 50% clean sheets, whereas the visitors concede 2.17 goals on the road and have recorded no clean sheets away from home. Montreal generates 1.37 xG at home with 5 shots on target and a 17% conversion rate, while Portland posts 1.32 xG, 4 shots on target and an 8% conversion rate away, indicating higher efficiency from the hosts. Given Montreal’s 4 wins in their last 5 matches and 2.4 average points over the last 5 versus Portland’s 3 wins and 1.8 points, I assign a 70% probability to a home win, 18% to a draw and 12% to an away win.

Half-by-half

2 : 1
1st half
0 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

43Possession (%)57
Montreal ImpactPortland Timbers
23Shots14
Montreal ImpactPortland Timbers
8Shots on target3
Montreal ImpactPortland Timbers
2.34xG1.37
Montreal ImpactPortland Timbers
6Corners9
Montreal ImpactPortland Timbers
46Dangerous attacks39
Montreal ImpactPortland Timbers
17Fouls6
Montreal ImpactPortland Timbers
4Cards1
Montreal ImpactPortland Timbers

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Montreal ImpactPortland Timbers
1.47Goals scored / match1.8
Montreal ImpactPortland Timbers
2.07Goals conceded / match1.93
Montreal ImpactPortland Timbers
Montreal ImpactPortland Timbers
49%Average possession50%
Montreal ImpactPortland Timbers
4.93Shots on target / match4.8
Montreal ImpactPortland Timbers

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

13.8Shots per match12.67
Montreal ImpactPortland Timbers
4.93Shots on target4.8
Montreal ImpactPortland Timbers
10.6%Shot conversion14.2%
Montreal ImpactPortland Timbers
49%Possession50%
Montreal ImpactPortland Timbers
1.52xG for1.46
Montreal ImpactPortland Timbers
1.39xG against2.01
Montreal ImpactPortland Timbers

Shooting quality

Montreal Impact: BalancedPortland Timbers: Efficient finishing
Montreal ImpactPortland Timbers
Accuracy (shots on target)36%38%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.110.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.300.38

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Portland Timbers is 17% better for: last-5 form.

1.2 pts / match - Montreal Impact · 1.4 pts / match - Portland Timbers

Montreal Impact
WDLDD
Season result split
27% W20% R53% P
Season (W-D-L)
4-3-8
1.00 pts / match · goal difference -9
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-3-1
1.20 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
3-2-2
Last 5 at home
2-2-1
WWDLD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.6Goals conceded: 1.6xG: 2.02Opponent xG: 1.29BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 40%
Portland Timbers
WDLLW
Season result split
33% W13% R53% P
Season (W-D-L)
5-2-8
1.13 pts / match · goal difference -2
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-2
1.40 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
2-1-6
Last 5 away
2-1-2
WLDLW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.8Goals conceded: 1.6xG: 1.84Opponent xG: 1.73BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 80%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Portland Timbers is 22% better for: goals scored per match.

1.47 goals / match - Montreal Impact · 1.8 goals / match - Portland Timbers

Portland Timbers is 7% better for: goals conceded per match.

2.07 goals / match - Montreal Impact · 1.93 goals / match - Portland Timbers

Montreal Impact scoring profile: very strong

Montreal Impact scores in 67% of matches (10 of 15 matches), while Portland Timbers keeps a clean sheet in 7% (1 of 15 matches).

Portland Timbers scoring profile: very strong

Portland Timbers scores in 73% of matches (11 of 15 matches), while Montreal Impact keeps a clean sheet in 27% (4 of 15 matches).

22Goals scored (season)27
Montreal ImpactPortland Timbers
31Goals conceded (season)29
Montreal ImpactPortland Timbers
3.53Average goals in match3.73
Montreal ImpactPortland Timbers
8Goals scored (last 5)14
Montreal ImpactPortland Timbers
8Goals conceded (last 5)8
Montreal ImpactPortland Timbers

How often they score at least...

67%1 goal73%
Montreal ImpactPortland Timbers
40%2 goals53%
Montreal ImpactPortland Timbers
27%3 goals20%
Montreal ImpactPortland Timbers
13%4 goals13%
Montreal ImpactPortland Timbers

How often they concede at least...

73%1 goal93%
Montreal ImpactPortland Timbers
67%2 goals67%
Montreal ImpactPortland Timbers
40%3 goals27%
Montreal ImpactPortland Timbers
20%4 goals7%
Montreal ImpactPortland Timbers

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

67%
Portland Timbers - BTTSBTTS - percentage of matches where both teams scored.10 of 15 matches
61%
League average

Goal patterns

33%BTTS at half-time40%
Montreal ImpactPortland Timbers
13%BTTS in both halves0%
Montreal ImpactPortland Timbers
27%Scored in both halves47%
Montreal ImpactPortland Timbers

BTTS and goal count

47%Min. 3 goals and BTTS60%
Montreal ImpactPortland Timbers
27%Min. 3 goals without BTTS7%
Montreal ImpactPortland Timbers
40%BTTS - last 560%
Montreal ImpactPortland Timbers

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

Full match - team comparison (Over)

1st half

87%Min. 1 goal before half-time100%
Montreal ImpactPortland Timbers
53%Min. 2 goals before half-time60%
Montreal ImpactPortland Timbers
33%Min. 3 goals before half-time33%
Montreal ImpactPortland Timbers

2nd half

80%Min. 1 goal after half-time73%
Montreal ImpactPortland Timbers
53%Min. 2 goals after half-time40%
Montreal ImpactPortland Timbers
27%Min. 3 goals after half-time20%
Montreal ImpactPortland Timbers

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Montreal Impact is 11% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.33 pts / match - Montreal Impact · 1.2 pts / match - Portland Timbers

Montreal Impact - half-time state
40% leading13% draw47% trailing
Portland Timbers - half-time state
33% leading20% draw47% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.33Points per match (1st half)1.2
Montreal ImpactPortland Timbers
0.87Goals scored (1st half)1
Montreal ImpactPortland Timbers
0.87Goals conceded (1st half)1.13
Montreal ImpactPortland Timbers
1.73Average goals (1st half)2.13
Montreal ImpactPortland Timbers
40%Clean sheet before half-time27%
Montreal ImpactPortland Timbers
40%No goal before half-time33%
Montreal ImpactPortland Timbers

After half-time (2nd half)

1Points per match (2nd half)1.33
Montreal ImpactPortland Timbers
0.6Goals scored (2nd half)0.8
Montreal ImpactPortland Timbers
1.2Goals conceded (2nd half)0.8
Montreal ImpactPortland Timbers
1.8Average goals (2nd half)1.6
Montreal ImpactPortland Timbers
33%Clean sheet after half-time53%
Montreal ImpactPortland Timbers
67%No goal after half-time47%
Montreal ImpactPortland Timbers

Montreal Impact - second-half results

27% W20% R53% P
20
Half-time points
13
Half-time goals
0
Goal difference (1st half)
15
Second-half points
-9
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.33
PPG before half-time
Lead holding68%

Leads at half-time in 40% of matches and wins 27%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.

Defence after half-time+0.3

Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Portland Timbers - second-half results

33% W33% R33% P
18
Half-time points
15
Half-time goals
-2
Goal difference (1st half)
20
Second-half points
0
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.20
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 33% of matches and wins 33%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.3

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Montreal Impact - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.001.40
Goals scored / match0.61.0
Goals conceded / match0.80.8
Average goals in match1.41.8
1 goal60%80%
2 goals40%40%
3 goals40%20%
Clean sheet40%40%
No goal60%60%
Goal difference-1+1
Half-time: 20% leading - 40% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 20% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 3
Portland Timbers - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.202.20
Goals scored / match1.41.4
Goals conceded / match1.40.2
Average goals in match2.81.6
1 goal100%60%
2 goals80%40%
3 goals60%20%
Clean sheet40%80%
No goal20%40%
Goal difference0+6
Half-time: 40% leading - 0% draw - 60% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 40% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 7

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Montreal Impact
ScoredConceded
5
4
0-15
3
4
16-30
5
5
31-45
1
7
46-60
3
2
61-75
5
9
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (5 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): -4 - late phases are a weakness.

Portland Timbers
ScoredConceded
4
7
0-15
7
5
16-30
4
5
31-45
2
4
46-60
4
2
61-75
6
6
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (7 goli). Concedes most in 0-15 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

3.63
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.7 : 1.9
Estimated goal split
home : away
110%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
57%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
49%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
9%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 11 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Montreal Impact

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.13
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.73
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-0.1 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.05
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.68
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
77%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
149%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.20
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.3
Late goals
23% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 23% come in the first quarter-hour.
23%

Portland Timbers

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.55
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.42
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-3.9 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.34
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.08
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
129%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
101%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.27
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.2
Late goals
22% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 15% come in the first quarter-hour.
22%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (MLS).

Teams vs league

Montreal ImpactLigaPortland Timbers
Average goals in match 3.533.31 3.73
Both teams scored 47%61% 67%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 73%63% 67%
Clean sheets 27%22% 7%
Goal before half-time 87%77% 100%
Goal after half-time 80%80% 73%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.31
Average goals per match
61%
Both teams scored
63%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
22%
Clean sheets
1.92
Home goals / match
1.39
Away goals / match
+38%
Home attack advantage
+28%
Home defence advantage
+18%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
77%
1 goal
45%
2 goals
21%
3 goals
6%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
80%
1 goal
53%
2 goals
25%
3 goals
12%
4 goals

FAQ

What was the result of Montreal Impact vs Portland Timbers?

The MLS match finished Montreal Impact 2:2 Portland Timbers. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Montreal Impact vs Portland Timbers?

Montreal Impact score 1.47 goals per game on average and Portland Timbers 1.80. The MLS average is 3.31 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 63% of games. Both teams score in 47% of Montreal Impact's matches and 67% of Portland Timbers's.

What form are Montreal Impact and Portland Timbers in?

Over the last 5 games Montreal Impact have a 1-3-1 record (1.20 points per game) and Portland Timbers 2-1-2 (1.40 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Montreal Impact vs Portland Timbers?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.