Norway - First DivisionData current as of 22 July 2026

Moss vs Hødd: match statistics

Moss crest
Moss
1 : 0half-time 1:0
Hødd crest
Hødd

Moss vs Hødd: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Moss play Hødd in First Division (Norway). The match date is 12 April 2026 at 17:00. Final score: 1:0.

Current form

Moss: 1-1-3, 0.80 points/match. Hødd: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match.

Goal statistics

Moss scores 1.64 and concedes 2.29 goals per match. Hødd scores 1.57 and concedes 1.36. League average: 3.75 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Moss 79%, Hødd 64%. Over 2.5: Moss 86%, Hødd 57%. League level: BTTS 60%, Over 2.5 73%.

xG, shots and style

Moss has higher xG: 1.69 vs 1.28. Moss: 14.6 shots per match, Hødd: 10.3.

Match halves

Moss: half-time lead 29%, second-half goals 1.00. Hødd: half-time lead 50%, second-half goals 0.64.

Goals by minute

Moss: 76-90+ (7 goals). Hødd: 16-30 (5 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

First Division: 3.75 goals per match, BTTS 60%, Over 2.5 73%.

Head-to-head

2 H2H matches: 1-0-1. Average goals 3.50, BTTS 100%.

Match description

I predict a home win (1). Moss has scored 8 goals in the last 5 matches (avg. 1.6 per match), while Hødd has only 3 in that period (0.6 per match), giving the hosts a clear offensive edge. Moss also has a higher points average in the last 5 matches – 1.4 points per match versus 1.0 for Hødd; in those five fixtures Moss recorded 2 wins, 1 draw and 2 losses, while Hødd recorded 1 win, 2 draws and 2 losses. Over the season Hødd occupy a higher position (4th vs 6th for Moss) and have 2 goals scored and 1 conceded, whereas Moss have 3 scored and 2 conceded, so defensively Hødd look marginally better on the season. However, in the last 5 matches both teams have been prone to conceding (Moss 8 conceded vs 7 for Hødd), therefore I assign the hosts a 55% chance, the draw 20% and the visitors 25%.

Half-by-half

1 : 0
1st half
0 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

43Possession (%)57
MossHødd
18Shots9
MossHødd
4Shots on target2
MossHødd
1.85xG1.11
MossHødd
6Corners6
MossHødd
60Dangerous attacks53
MossHødd
11Fouls11
MossHødd
3Cards0
MossHødd

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1.64Goals scored / match1.57
MossHødd
2.29Goals conceded / match1.36
MossHødd
49%Average possession50%
MossHødd
5.36Shots on target / match4.36
MossHødd

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

14.57Shots per match10.29
MossHødd
5.36Shots on target4.36
MossHødd
11.3%Shot conversion15.3%
MossHødd
49%Possession50%
MossHødd
1.69xG for1.28
MossHødd
1.75xG against1.8
MossHødd

Shooting quality

Moss: AttackingHødd: Efficient finishing
MossHødd
Accuracy (shots on target)37%42%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.310.36

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Hødd is 75% better for: last-5 form.

0.8 pts / match - Moss · 1.4 pts / match - Hødd

Moss
DWLLL
Season result split
36% W14% R50% P
Season (W-D-L)
5-2-7
1.21 pts / match · goal difference -9
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-1-3
0.80 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
2-2-2
Last 5 at home
1-2-2
WLDDL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.8Goals conceded: 2.8xG: 1.83Opponent xG: 1.81BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 100%
Hødd
LLDWW
Season result split
43% W21% R36% P
Season (W-D-L)
6-3-5
1.50 pts / match · goal difference +3
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-2
1.40 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
2-2-3
Last 5 away
2-1-2
WLLDW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.8Goals conceded: 1.4xG: 1.22Opponent xG: 2.03BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Hødd is 68% better for: goals conceded per match.

2.29 goals / match - Moss · 1.36 goals / match - Hødd

Moss scoring profile: very strong

Moss scores in 86% of matches (12 of 14 matches), while Hødd keeps a clean sheet in 14% (2 of 14 matches).

Hødd scoring profile: very strong

Hødd scores in 71% of matches (10 of 14 matches), while Moss keeps a clean sheet in 7% (1 of 14 matches).

23Goals scored (season)22
MossHødd
32Goals conceded (season)19
MossHødd
3.93Average goals in match2.93
MossHødd
9Goals scored (last 5)9
MossHødd
14Goals conceded (last 5)7
MossHødd

How often they score at least...

86%1 goal71%
MossHødd
50%2 goals50%
MossHødd
21%3 goals21%
MossHødd
7%4 goals14%
MossHødd

How often they concede at least...

93%1 goal86%
MossHødd
79%2 goals36%
MossHødd
43%3 goals14%
MossHødd
14%4 goals0%
MossHødd

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

29%BTTS at half-time21%
MossHødd
7%BTTS in both halves7%
MossHødd
21%Scored in both halves36%
MossHødd

BTTS and goal count

71%Min. 3 goals and BTTS57%
MossHødd
14%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
MossHødd
80%BTTS - last 560%
MossHødd

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

79%Min. 1 goal before half-time71%
MossHødd
50%Min. 2 goals before half-time36%
MossHødd
36%Min. 3 goals before half-time14%
MossHødd

2nd half

93%Min. 1 goal after half-time79%
MossHødd
64%Min. 2 goals after half-time57%
MossHødd
36%Min. 3 goals after half-time14%
MossHødd

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Hødd is 74% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.07 pts / match - Moss · 1.86 pts / match - Hødd

Moss - half-time state
29% leading21% draw50% trailing
Hødd - half-time state
50% leading36% draw14% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.07Points per match (1st half)1.86
MossHødd
0.64Goals scored (1st half)0.93
MossHødd
1.14Goals conceded (1st half)0.43
MossHødd
1.79Average goals (1st half)1.36
MossHødd
36%Clean sheet before half-time64%
MossHødd
57%No goal before half-time43%
MossHødd

After half-time (2nd half)

1.21Points per match (2nd half)1.07
MossHødd
1Goals scored (2nd half)0.64
MossHødd
1.14Goals conceded (2nd half)0.93
MossHødd
2.14Average goals (2nd half)1.57
MossHødd
29%Clean sheet after half-time36%
MossHødd
36%No goal after half-time50%
MossHødd

Moss - second-half results

36% W14% R50% P
15
Half-time points
9
Half-time goals
-7
Goal difference (1st half)
17
Second-half points
-2
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.07
PPG before half-time
Lead holding124%

Leads at half-time in 29% of matches and wins 36%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Hødd - second-half results

21% W43% R36% P
26
Half-time points
13
Half-time goals
+7
Goal difference (1st half)
15
Second-half points
-4
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.86
PPG before half-time
Lead holding86%

Leads at half-time in 50% of matches and wins 43%. Usually protects the lead until full-time.

Defence after half-time+0.5

Concedes 0.5 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Moss - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.200.80
Goals scored / match1.20.6
Goals conceded / match1.61.2
Average goals in match2.81.8
1 goal100%100%
2 goals80%40%
3 goals60%20%
Clean sheet0%20%
No goal40%40%
Goal difference-2-3
Half-time: 40% leading - 0% draw - 60% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 20% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 60% - Half-time goals total: 6
Hødd - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match2.201.00
Goals scored / match1.20.6
Goals conceded / match0.60.8
Average goals in match1.81.4
1 goal60%80%
2 goals40%60%
3 goals40%0%
Clean sheet60%40%
No goal40%60%
Goal difference+3-1
Half-time: 60% leading - 40% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 6

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Moss
ScoredConceded
3
3
0-15
3
9
16-30
3
4
31-45
4
5
46-60
3
5
61-75
7
6
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (7 goli). Concedes most in 16-30 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.

Hødd
ScoredConceded
4
0
0-15
5
3
16-30
4
3
31-45
4
7
46-60
3
4
61-75
2
2
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (5 goli). Concedes most in 46-60 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

3.43
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.5 : 1.9
Estimated goal split
home : away
91%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
72%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+2%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
61%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
4%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 25 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Moss

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.06
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.59
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+2.7 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.05
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.54
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
76%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
145%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.41
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.4
Late goals
30% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 13% come in the first quarter-hour.
30%

Hødd

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.52
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.73
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-3.1 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.29
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.44
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
99%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
63%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.10
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.3
Late goals
9% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 18% come in the first quarter-hour.
9%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (First Division).

Teams vs league

MossLigaHødd
Average goals in match 3.933.75 2.93
Both teams scored 79%60% 64%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 86%73% 57%
Clean sheets 7%21% 14%
Goal before half-time 79%77% 71%
Goal after half-time 93%88% 79%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.75
Average goals per match
60%
Both teams scored
73%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
21%
Clean sheets
2.17
Home goals / match
1.58
Away goals / match
+37%
Home attack advantage
+27%
Home defence advantage
+27%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
77%
1 goal
48%
2 goals
25%
3 goals
7%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
88%
1 goal
61%
2 goals
38%
3 goals
16%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (2): Moss 1 - 0 - 1 Hødd. Average goals 3.50, both teams scored in 100% matches.

IL Hødd
2 : 1
Moss FK
Moss FK
3 : 1
IL Hødd

FAQ

What was the result of Moss vs Hødd?

The First Division match finished Moss 1:0 Hødd. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Moss and Hødd?

In the last 2 head-to-head matches Moss won 1, Hødd won 1 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 3.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Moss vs Hødd?

Moss score 1.64 goals per game on average and Hødd 1.57. The First Division average is 3.75 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 73% of games. Both teams score in 79% of Moss's matches and 64% of Hødd's.

What form are Moss and Hødd in?

Over the last 5 games Moss have a 1-1-3 record (0.80 points per game) and Hødd 2-1-2 (1.40 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Moss vs Hødd?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.