Norway - First DivisionData current as of September 11, 2026

Moss vs Hødd: match statistics

Moss crest
Moss
1 : 0half-time 1:0
Hødd crest
Hødd

Moss vs Hødd: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

Moss played against Hødd in First Division (Norway). The game was played on April 12, 2026. Final score: 1:0.

Recent form

Moss has 1 win, 0 draws and 0 losses over its last five games, averaging 3.00 points per game. Hødd has 1 win, 0 draws and 0 losses, with 3.00 points per game.

Scoring records

Moss scores 3.00 goals per game and allows 2.00. Hødd scores 2.00 and allows 1.00. Games in this league average 4.00 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 100% of Moss's games and 100% of Hødd's. The Over 2.5 rates are 100% and 100%, compared with league averages of 60% for BTTS and 100% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

Moss has the higher season xG average, 2.05 to 0.94 per game. Moss takes 16.0 shots per game, while Hødd takes 6.0.

First-half and second-half trends

Moss leads at halftime in 0% of its games and scores 3.00 goals per game after halftime. Hødd leads at halftime in 100% and scores 1.00 after halftime.

When the teams score

Moss's most productive scoring window is minutes 61-75 (2 goals). For Hødd, it is minutes 0-15 (1 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

First Division games average 4.00 goals. Both teams score in 60% of games, and 100% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

Before this game, 2 previous meetings were available. The record was 1 home win, 0 draws and 1 away win. Those games averaged 3.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

I predict a home win (1). Moss has scored 8 goals in the last 5 matches (avg. 1.6 per match), while Hødd has only 3 in that period (0.6 per match), giving the hosts a clear offensive edge. Moss also has a higher points average in the last 5 matches – 1.4 points per match versus 1.0 for Hødd; in those five fixtures Moss recorded 2 wins, 1 draw and 2 losses, while Hødd recorded 1 win, 2 draws and 2 losses. Over the season Hødd occupy a higher position (4th vs 6th for Moss) and have 2 goals scored and 1 conceded, whereas Moss have 3 scored and 2 conceded, so defensively Hødd look marginally better on the season. However, in the last 5 matches both teams have been prone to conceding (Moss 8 conceded vs 7 for Hødd), therefore I assign the hosts a 55% chance, the draw 20% and the visitors 25%.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

Moss has a seasonal BTTS 100% and 100% in the last 5 matches, with 8 goals scored and 8 conceded in those five (avg 1.6 scored and 1.6 conceded), which strongly supports goals from both sides. Hødd has a seasonal BTTS 0% and only 40% in the last 5, scoring 3 and conceding 7 in the last five (avg 0.6 scored and 1.4 conceded), so their attack is limited. xG in the last 5 is 1.51 for Moss and 1.02 for Hødd, with xG against 1.33 (Moss) and 1.76 (Hødd) — Moss creates more high-quality chances, while Hødd more frequently allows opponents opportunities. Moss averages 6 shots and 4 on target per game versus 0 shots and 0 on target for Hødd in seasonal data, and the league has BTTS at 67%, so despite the visitors' lower efficiency I expect Goal/Goal. Therefore I assign 68% to 'BTTS - Yes' and 32% to 'No Goal' as the most justified choice.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

Moss averages 2.0 goals per season and 1.6 goals in the last 5 matches; his xG is 0.94 for the season and 1.51 in the last 5, indicating consistent chance generation. Hødd has a season goals figure of 0.0 (no season data), but in the last 5 matches he averaged 0.6 goals with an xG of 1.02, suggesting a realistic potential of around 0.9 goals. Weighing recent xG and season values I estimate expected goals: Moss 1.70, Hødd 0.90, total 2.60 goals. Additionally, the league averages 4.0 goals per match with 100% of matches over 2.5, and Moss has 100% of matches over 1.5 this season, so the strongest signal is over 1.5; over 2.5 looks moderately likely (~65%), and over 3.5 has low probability (~25%).

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

Seasonal data show Moss led at the break in 1 of 1 matches (100%) and averaged 1.0 goal by half-time, while Hødd has 0.0 half-time goals this season. Over full matches Moss average 2.0 scored and 1.0 conceded (2.0 vs 1.0), whereas Hødd’s seasonal stats are 0.0 scored and 0.0 conceded, and with Moss’s 100% home win percentage this gives a strong signal for the home victory. The offensive advantage is supported by an xG of 0.94 for Moss versus 0.0 for Hødd and an average of 4.0 shots on target to 0.0, translating into more clear scoring opportunities. Considering the 100% HT lead, an average of 1.0 goal at half-time and the clear superiority in xG and shots, the most likely scenario is Moss leading at the break and Moss winning the match (1/1).

View first-half and second-half statistics

Stats by half

1 : 0
First half
0 : 0
Second half

Game stats

43Possession (%)57
MossHødd
18Shots9
MossHødd
4Shots on target2
MossHødd
1.85xG1.11
MossHødd
6Corners6
MossHødd
60Dangerous attacks53
MossHødd
11Fouls11
MossHødd
3Cards0
MossHødd

Pre-game profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

3Goals scored / game2
MossHødd
2Goals allowed / game1
MossHødd
51%Average possession57%
MossHødd
8Shots on target / game4
MossHødd

Team statswho is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

16Shots per game6
MossHødd
8Shots on target4
MossHødd
18.8%Shot conversion33.3%
MossHødd
51%Possession57%
MossHødd
2.05xG for0.94
MossHødd
1.16xG against1.49
MossHødd

Shooting quality

Moss: AttackingHødd: Efficient finishing
MossHødd
Accuracy (shots on target)50%67%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.130.16
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.380.50

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

Moss
W
5 wins in a row
Season result split
100% W0% D0% L
Season (W-D-L)
1-0-0
3.00 pts / game · goal difference +1
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-0-0
3.00 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
0-0-0
Last 5 at home
0-0-0
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 3.0Goals conceded: 2.0xG: 2.05Opponent xG: 1.16BTTS: 100%Over 2.5: 100%
Hødd
W
5 wins in a row
Season result split
100% W0% D0% L
Season (W-D-L)
1-0-0
3.00 pts / game · goal difference +1
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-0-0
3.00 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
0-0-0
Last 5 away
0-0-0
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 2.0Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 0.94Opponent xG: 1.49BTTS: 100%Over 2.5: 100%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Moss is 50% better for: goals scored per game.

3 goals / game - Moss · 2 goals / game - Hødd

Hødd is 100% better for: goals allowed per game.

2 goals / game - Moss · 1 goals / game - Hødd

Moss scoring profile: very strong

Moss scores in 100% of games (1 of 1 meczów), while Hødd keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 1 meczów).

Hødd scoring profile: very strong

Hødd scores in 100% of games (1 of 1 meczów), while Moss keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 1 meczów).

3Goals scored (season)2
MossHødd
2Goals conceded (season)1
MossHødd
5Average goals per game3
MossHødd
3Goals scored (last 5)2
MossHødd
2Goals conceded (last 5)1
MossHødd

How often they score at least...

100%1 goal100%
MossHødd
100%2 goals100%
MossHødd
100%3 goals0%
MossHødd
0%4 goals0%
MossHødd

How often they concede at least...

100%1 goal100%
MossHødd
100%2 goals0%
MossHødd
0%3 goals0%
MossHødd
0%4 goals0%
MossHødd

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

0%BTTS at half-time0%
MossHødd
0%BTTS in both halves0%
MossHødd
0%Scored in both halves100%
MossHødd

BTTS and goal count

100%Min. 3 goals and BTTS100%
MossHødd
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
MossHødd
100%BTTS - last 5100%
MossHødd

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

1st half

100%Min. 1 goal before half-time100%
MossHødd
0%Min. 2 goals before half-time0%
MossHødd
0%Min. 3 goals before half-time0%
MossHødd

2nd half

100%Min. 1 goal after half-time100%
MossHødd
100%Min. 2 goals after half-time100%
MossHødd
100%Min. 3 goals after half-time0%
MossHødd

Game halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Moss - half-time state
0% leading0% draw100% trailing
Hødd - half-time state
100% leading0% draw0% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

0Points per game (1st half)3
MossHødd
0Goals scored (1st half)1
MossHødd
1Goals conceded (1st half)0
MossHødd
1Average goals (1st half)1
MossHødd
0%Clean sheet before half-time100%
MossHødd
100%No goal before half-time0%
MossHødd

After half-time (2nd half)

3Points per game (2nd half)1
MossHødd
3Goals scored (2nd half)1
MossHødd
1Goals conceded (2nd half)1
MossHødd
4Average goals (2nd half)2
MossHødd
0%Clean sheet after half-time0%
MossHødd
0%No goal after half-time0%
MossHødd

Moss - second-half results

100% W0% D0% L
0
Half-time points
0
Half-time goals
-1
Goal difference (1st half)
3
Second-half points
+2
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.00
PPG before half-time
Defense after halftime0.0

Defense stays consistent across the full game.

Hødd - second-half results

0% W100% D0% L
3
Half-time points
1
Half-time goals
+1
Goal difference (1st half)
1
Second-half points
0
Goal difference (2nd half)
3.00
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at halftime in 100% of games and wins 100%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime+1.0

Allows 1.0 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

Moss - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game0.003.00
Goals scored / game0.03.0
Goals allowed / game1.01.0
Average goals per game1.04.0
1 goal100%100%
2 goals0%100%
3 goals0%100%
Clean sheet0%0%
No goal100%0%
Goal difference-1+2
Half-time: 0% leading - 0% draw - 100% trailing
2nd half: 100% won - 0% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 0
Hødd - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game3.001.00
Goals scored / game1.01.0
Goals allowed / game0.01.0
Average goals per game1.02.0
1 goal100%100%
2 goals0%100%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet100%0%
No goal0%0%
Goal difference+10
Half-time: 100% leading - 0% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 100% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 1

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

Moss
ScoredConceded
0
0
0-15
0
1
16-30
0
0
31-45
1
1
46-60
2
0
61-75
0
0
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (2 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (1). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

Hødd
ScoredConceded
1
0
0-15
0
0
16-30
0
0
31-45
1
1
46-60
0
0
61-75
0
0
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (1 goal). Concedes most in 46-60 (1). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

4.00
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
2.0 : 2.0
Estimated goal split
home : away
100%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
100%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-12%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
100%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
0%
0:0 risk
practically zero
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

Moss

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.89
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.11
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+0.9 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.95
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
-0.84
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
150%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
100%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+3.0
Late goals
0% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
0%

Hødd

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.55
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+1.55
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+0.6 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+1.06
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.49
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
100%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
50%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
0.0
Late goals
0% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 50% come in the first quarter-hour.
0%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (First Division).

Teams vs league

MossLigaHødd
Average goals per game 5.004.00 3.00
Both teams scored 100%60% 100%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 100%100% 100%
Clean sheets 0%20% 0%
Goal before half-time 100%80% 100%
Goal after half-time 100%90% 100%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

4.00
Average goals per game
60%
Both teams scored
100%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
20%
Clean sheets
2.00
Home goals / game
2.00
Away goals / game
+0%
Home attack advantage
+0%
Home defensive advantage
+0%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
80%
1 goal
50%
2 goals
20%
3 goals
0%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
90%
1 goal
80%
2 goals
40%
3 goals
20%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. HøddSubstitutionOn: Manaf RawufuOff: Villum Dalsgaard
  2. MossYellow cardJamiu Musbaudeen
  3. MossYellow cardMarius Cassidy
  4. MossSubstitutionOn: Håkon Vold KrohgOff: Robert Marcus
  5. MossYellow cardJamiu Musbaudeen

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Record from Moss's perspective: 1 win, 0 draws and 1 loss against Hødd. Games average 3.50 goals, and both teams scored in 100% of them.

IL Hødd
2 : 1
Moss FK
Moss FK
3 : 1
IL Hødd

FAQ

What was the result of Moss vs Hødd?

The First Division match finished Moss 1:0 Hødd. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Moss and Hødd?

In the last 2 head-to-head matches Moss won 1, Hødd won 1 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 3.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Moss vs Hødd?

Moss score 3.00 goals per game on average and Hødd 2.00. The First Division average is 4.00 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 100% of games. Both teams score in 100% of Moss's matches and 100% of Hødd's.

What form are Moss and Hødd in?

Over the last 5 games Moss have a 1-0-0 record (3.00 points per game) and Hødd 1-0-0 (3.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Moss vs Hødd?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.