Moss vs Sogndal: match statistics
Moss vs Sogndal: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Moss played against Sogndal in First Division (Norway). The game was played on August 26, 2026. Venue: Melløs Stadion. Final score: 2:2.
Recent form
Moss has 0 wins, 1 draw and 4 losses over its last five games, averaging 0.20 points per game. Sogndal has 2 wins, 0 draws and 3 losses, with 1.20 points per game.
Scoring records
Moss scores 1.61 goals per game and allows 2.28. Sogndal scores 1.78 and allows 2.39. Games in this league average 3.85 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 83% of Moss's games and 61% of Sogndal's. The Over 2.5 rates are 89% and 78%, compared with league averages of 62% for BTTS and 73% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Sogndal has the higher season xG average, 1.73 to 1.64 per game. Moss takes 13.7 shots per game, while Sogndal takes 15.0.
First-half and second-half trends
Moss leads at halftime in 22% of its games and scores 1.00 goals per game after halftime. Sogndal leads at halftime in 39% and scores 0.94 after halftime.
When the teams score
Moss's most productive scoring window is minutes 46-60 (7 goals). For Sogndal, it is minutes 76-90+ (9 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
First Division games average 3.85 goals. Both teams score in 62% of games, and 73% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, 3 previous meetings were available. The record was 2 home wins, 0 draws and 1 away win. Those games averaged 4.67 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Sogndal come into this fixture in clearly better form: they have won 3 of their last 5 matches, scoring 15 goals and conceding just 7. Moss, meanwhile, have failed to win during the same period, scoring only 6 goals while their defense has conceded 12. However, the hosts are more dangerous at home than their current form suggests, averaging 1.63 goals per match and failing to score in none of their home games. Sogndal’s main weakness remains their away record: they have lost 67% of their away matches, conceded an average of 3 goals and kept a clean sheet on zero occasions. Despite this away-day weakness, the visitors’ current attacking efficiency and slight edge in chance quality, with an xG of 1.66 compared to Moss’s 1.64, marginally favor a Sogndal win in a match with a strong chance of both teams scoring.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
The signal for goals from both sides is clear, as Sogndal have failed to keep a single clean sheet this season and concede an average of as many as 3.00 goals per away match. Moss score 2.22 goals per home game, average 5.78 shots on target, and have an xG of 1.81, which should give the hosts a solid chance of finding the net. The visitors, however, are in excellent attacking form: they have scored 15 goals in their last five matches, averaging 3.00 per game, while Moss conceded an average of 2.40 goals during this period. The season-long BTTS rate stands at 56% for Moss and 67% for Sogndal, while the league average of 63% further supports a scenario in which both teams score. The main risk to the pick is Moss's weaker attacking output in their last five matches, during which they scored just 1.20 goals per game, although Sogndal's defense still points towards the hosts breaking their duck.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Both teams have recorded at least 2 goals in 100% of their league matches, creating an exceptionally strong signal for Over 1.5. Sogndal concede as many as 3.00 goals per away game on average and have kept no clean sheets, while Moss score 2.22 goals per home match. However, the visitors are in very dangerous form: they have scored 15 goals in their last five matches, averaging 3.0, while Moss have conceded 12 over the same period, or 2.4 per game. The quality of chances also points towards an open game, with the two teams averaging 1.81 and 1.66 xG, while their defenses allow 1.97 and 2.01 xG respectively. The Over 1.5 line offers the strongest value, as even with lower finishing efficiency, the statistics of both sides clearly point to at least two goals.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Sogndal are in clearly better current form: they have won 3 of their last 5 matches, averaging 3.0 goals scored and conceding just 1.4, while Moss have failed to win any of their games, scoring 1.2 goals and allowing 2.4 per match. The visitors held a lead at the break in 60% of their last five appearances, whereas Moss have not led at half-time in any of those matches and were trailing at the break in 60% of cases. Sogndal’s advantage is also evident after the interval, having averaged 1.8 goals in the second half over their last five matches and won 60% of those second halves, compared with Moss’s 0.8 goals and 60% of second-half defeats. Moss do have better season-long home statistics, with a 56% win rate and an average of 2.22 goals scored, but the current trend and their recent defensive weakness more strongly support the scenario of Sogndal leading at half-time and securing the full-time victory.
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Moss | Sogndal | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 38% | 30% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.31 | 0.39 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Sogndal is 500% better for: last-5 form.
0.2 pts / game - Moss · 1.2 pts / game - Sogndal
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Sogndal is 11% better for: goals scored per game.
1.61 goals / game - Moss · 1.78 goals / game - Sogndal
Moss is 5% better for: goals allowed per game.
2.28 goals / game - Moss · 2.39 goals / game - Sogndal
Moss scores in 89% of games (16 of 18 meczów), while Sogndal keeps a clean sheet in 11% (2 of 18 meczów).
Sogndal scores in 72% of games (13 of 18 meczów), while Moss keeps a clean sheet in 6% (1 of 18 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Moss
Over / Under - Sogndal
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Sogndal is 30% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
0.94 pts / game - Moss · 1.22 pts / game - Sogndal
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Moss - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 22% of games and wins 28%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
Sogndal - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 39% of games and wins 33%. Usually protects a halftime lead through the final whistle.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 0.40 | 0.80 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.4 | 0.8 |
| Goals allowed / game | 1.4 | 1.0 |
| Average goals per game | 1.8 | 1.8 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 80% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 20% | 20% |
| No goal | 60% | 60% |
| Goal difference | -5 | -1 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.20 | 1.40 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.6 | 1.0 |
| Goals allowed / game | 1.6 | 0.8 |
| Average goals per game | 2.2 | 1.8 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 40% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 40% |
| No goal | 40% | 40% |
| Goal difference | -5 | +1 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (7 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (9 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (11). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Moss
Sogndal
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (First Division).
Teams vs league
| Moss | Liga | Sogndal | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | • 3.89 | 3.85 | ▲ 4.17 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 83% | 62% | • 61% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 89% | 73% | ▲ 78% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 6% | 20% | ▼ 11% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 78% | 76% | ▲ 94% |
| Goal after half-time | • 89% | 89% | ▲ 94% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Record from Moss's perspective: 2 wins, 0 draws and 1 loss against Sogndal. Games average 4.67 goals, and both teams scored in 100% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Moss vs Sogndal?
The First Division match finished Moss 2:2 Sogndal. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Moss and Sogndal?
In the last 3 head-to-head matches Moss won 2, Sogndal won 1 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 4.67 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Moss vs Sogndal?
Moss score 1.61 goals per game on average and Sogndal 1.78. The First Division average is 3.85 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 73% of games. Both teams score in 83% of Moss's matches and 61% of Sogndal's.
What form are Moss and Sogndal in?
Over the last 5 games Moss have a 0-1-4 record (0.20 points per game) and Sogndal 2-0-3 (1.20 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Moss vs Sogndal?
The statistical background for Moss vs Sogndal — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.