Mtibwa Sugar vs Kitayosce: match statistics
Mtibwa Sugar vs Kitayosce: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Mtibwa Sugar play Kitayosce in Ligi kuu Bara (Tanzania). The match date is 29 November 2025 at 12:00. Final score: 2:1.
Current form
Mtibwa Sugar: 0-0-5, 0.00 points/match. Kitayosce: 1-3-1, 1.20 points/match.
Goal statistics
Mtibwa Sugar scores 0.83 and concedes 1.60 goals per match. Kitayosce scores 1.10 and concedes 0.93. League average: 2.17 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Mtibwa Sugar 50%, Kitayosce 33%. Over 2.5: Mtibwa Sugar 53%, Kitayosce 40%. League level: BTTS 35%, Over 2.5 39%.
xG, shots and style
Kitayosce has higher xG: 1.25 vs 1.00. Mtibwa Sugar: 3.5 shots per match, Kitayosce: 6.2.
Match halves
Mtibwa Sugar: half-time lead 7%, second-half goals 0.43. Kitayosce: half-time lead 20%, second-half goals 0.47.
Goals by minute
Mtibwa Sugar: 76-90+ (8 goals). Kitayosce: 0-15 (8 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Ligi kuu Bara: 2.17 goals per match, BTTS 35%, Over 2.5 39%.
Head-to-head
1 H2H matches: 0-0-1. Average goals 3.00, BTTS 100%.
Half-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Mtibwa Sugar | Kitayosce | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 34% | 36% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.29 | 0.20 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.69 | 0.48 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Kitayosce is 33% better for: goals scored per match.
0.83 goals / match - Mtibwa Sugar · 1.1 goals / match - Kitayosce
Kitayosce is 72% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.6 goals / match - Mtibwa Sugar · 0.93 goals / match - Kitayosce
Mtibwa Sugar scores in 57% of matches (17 of 30 matches), while Kitayosce keeps a clean sheet in 43% (13 of 30 matches).
Kitayosce scores in 57% of matches (17 of 30 matches), while Mtibwa Sugar keeps a clean sheet in 20% (6 of 30 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under — Mtibwa Sugar
Over / Under — Kitayosce
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Kitayosce is 69% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
0.67 pts / match - Mtibwa Sugar · 1.13 pts / match - Kitayosce
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Mtibwa Sugar - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 7% of matches and wins 20%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
Kitayosce - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 20% of matches and wins 37%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.40 | 0.20 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.2 | 0.2 |
| Goals conceded / match | 1.0 | 1.4 |
| Average goals in match | 1.2 | 1.6 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 20% | 20% |
| No goal | 80% | 80% |
| Goal difference | -4 | -6 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.20 | 0.80 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.2 | 0.2 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.2 | 0.6 |
| Average goals in match | 0.4 | 0.8 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 40% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 60% |
| No goal | 80% | 80% |
| Goal difference | 0 | -2 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (8 goli). Concedes most in 31-45 (11). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (8 goli). Concedes most in 31-45 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Mtibwa Sugar
Kitayosce
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Ligi kuu Bara).
Teams vs league
| Mtibwa Sugar | Liga | Kitayosce | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▲ 2.43 | 2.17 | ▼ 2.03 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 50% | 35% | ▼ 33% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 53% | 39% | • 40% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 20% | 39% | ▲ 43% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 73% | 60% | ▼ 57% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 70% | 63% | ▼ 57% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Head-to-head
Previous meeting: Mtibwa Sugar 0 - 0 - 1 Kitayosce. Average goals 3.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Mtibwa Sugar vs Kitayosce?
The Ligi kuu Bara match finished Mtibwa Sugar 2:1 Kitayosce. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Mtibwa Sugar vs Kitayosce?
Mtibwa Sugar score 0.83 goals per game on average and Kitayosce 1.10. The Ligi kuu Bara average is 2.17 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 39% of games. Both teams score in 50% of Mtibwa Sugar's matches and 33% of Kitayosce's.
What form are Mtibwa Sugar and Kitayosce in?
Over the last 5 games Mtibwa Sugar have a 0-0-5 record (0.00 points per game) and Kitayosce 1-3-1 (1.20 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Mtibwa Sugar vs Kitayosce?
The statistical background for Mtibwa Sugar vs Kitayosce — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.