Mtibwa Sugar vs Kitayosce: match statistics
Mtibwa Sugar vs Kitayosce: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Mtibwa Sugar played against Kitayosce in Ligi kuu Bara (Tanzania). The game was played on November 29, 2025. Final score: 2:1.
Recent form
Mtibwa Sugar has 1 win, 3 draws and 1 loss over its last five games, averaging 1.20 points per game. Kitayosce has 1 win, 3 draws and 1 loss, with 1.20 points per game.
Scoring records
Mtibwa Sugar scores 0.33 goals per game and allows 0.50. Kitayosce scores 0.60 and allows 0.60. Games in this league average 1.70 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 0% of Mtibwa Sugar's games and 20% of Kitayosce's. The Over 2.5 rates are 0% and 20%, compared with league averages of 26% for BTTS and 24% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Mtibwa Sugar has the higher season xG average, 1.11 to 1.02 per game. Mtibwa Sugar takes 4.0 shots per game, while Kitayosce takes 6.2.
First-half and second-half trends
Mtibwa Sugar leads at halftime in 0% of its games and scores 0.00 goals per game after halftime. Kitayosce leads at halftime in 0% and scores 0.60 after halftime.
When the teams score
Mtibwa Sugar's most productive scoring window is minutes 0-15 (2 goals). For Kitayosce, it is minutes 46-60 (2 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Ligi kuu Bara games average 1.70 goals. Both teams score in 26% of games, and 24% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
There is not enough head-to-head history for a meaningful comparison.
Stats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Mtibwa Sugar | Kitayosce | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 46% | 26% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.28 | 0.16 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.18 | 0.37 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Kitayosce is 82% better for: goals scored per game.
0.33 goals / game - Mtibwa Sugar · 0.6 goals / game - Kitayosce
Mtibwa Sugar is 20% better for: goals allowed per game.
0.5 goals / game - Mtibwa Sugar · 0.6 goals / game - Kitayosce
Mtibwa Sugar scores in 17% of games (1 of 6 meczów), while Kitayosce keeps a clean sheet in 60% (3 of 5 meczów).
Kitayosce scores in 40% of games (2 of 5 meczów), while Mtibwa Sugar keeps a clean sheet in 67% (4 of 6 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Mtibwa Sugar
Over / Under - Kitayosce
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Kitayosce is 49% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
0.67 pts / game - Mtibwa Sugar · 1 pts / game - Kitayosce
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Mtibwa Sugar - second-half results
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
Kitayosce - second-half results
Allows 0.6 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 0.80 | 0.80 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.2 | 0.2 |
| Average goals per game | 0.2 | 0.2 |
| 1 goal | 20% | 20% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 0% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 80% |
| No goal | 100% | 100% |
| Goal difference | -1 | -1 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.00 | 1.20 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.0 | 0.6 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.0 | 0.6 |
| Average goals per game | 0.0 | 1.2 |
| 1 goal | 0% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 100% | 60% |
| No goal | 100% | 60% |
| Goal difference | 0 | 0 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (2 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (2 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Mtibwa Sugar
Kitayosce
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Ligi kuu Bara).
Teams vs league
| Mtibwa Sugar | Liga | Kitayosce | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▼ 0.83 | 1.70 | ▼ 1.20 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 0% | 26% | ▼ 20% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 0% | 24% | ▼ 20% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 67% | 44% | ▲ 60% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 33% | 44% | ▼ 0% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 17% | 56% | ▲ 60% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
FAQ
What was the result of Mtibwa Sugar vs Kitayosce?
The Ligi kuu Bara match finished Mtibwa Sugar 2:1 Kitayosce. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Mtibwa Sugar vs Kitayosce?
Mtibwa Sugar score 0.33 goals per game on average and Kitayosce 0.60. The Ligi kuu Bara average is 1.70 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 24% of games. Both teams score in 0% of Mtibwa Sugar's matches and 20% of Kitayosce's.
What form are Mtibwa Sugar and Kitayosce in?
Over the last 5 games Mtibwa Sugar have a 1-3-1 record (1.20 points per game) and Kitayosce 1-3-1 (1.20 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Mtibwa Sugar vs Kitayosce?
The statistical background for Mtibwa Sugar vs Kitayosce — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.