Tanzania - Ligi kuu BaraData current as of 23 July 2026

Mtibwa Sugar vs Mbeya City: match statistics

Mtibwa Sugar crest
Mtibwa Sugar
2 : 1half-time 1:1
Mbeya City crest
Mbeya City
165%(1.98)
X25%(2.84)
210%(4.09)

Mtibwa Sugar presents decidedly better home form with 67% wins and an impressive +3 goal difference, remaining unbeaten at home this season. The hosts show solid offensive efficiency (1.33 goals per match) and defensive stability (0.33 goals conceded per match, 67% clean sheets). Mbeya City, on the other hand, is in dismal form, losing 4 of their last 5 matches and earning just 0.2 PPG in recent outings. The visitors have poor away stats: 67% losses, a negative -4 goal difference, and 67% of matches without scoring. The clear advantage in expected goals (xG: 1.1 vs 0.89 for the visitors) and possession (54% vs 41%) further supports a confident victory for the hosts.

Mtibwa Sugar vs Mbeya City: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Mtibwa Sugar play Mbeya City in Ligi kuu Bara (Tanzania). The match date is 21 January 2026 at 14:00. Final score: 2:1.

Current form

Mtibwa Sugar: 0-0-5, 0.00 points/match. Mbeya City: 2-3-0, 1.80 points/match.

Goal statistics

Mtibwa Sugar scores 0.83 and concedes 1.60 goals per match. Mbeya City scores 0.78 and concedes 1.28. League average: 2.17 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Mtibwa Sugar 50%, Mbeya City 31%. Over 2.5: Mtibwa Sugar 53%, Mbeya City 28%. League level: BTTS 35%, Over 2.5 39%.

xG, shots and style

Mtibwa Sugar has higher xG: 1.00 vs 0.99. Mtibwa Sugar: 3.5 shots per match, Mbeya City: 4.7.

Match halves

Mtibwa Sugar: half-time lead 7%, second-half goals 0.43. Mbeya City: half-time lead 16%, second-half goals 0.28.

Goals by minute

Mtibwa Sugar: 76-90+ (8 goals). Mbeya City: 16-30 (7 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Ligi kuu Bara: 2.17 goals per match, BTTS 35%, Over 2.5 39%.

Head-to-head

1 H2H matches: 0-0-1. Average goals 1.00, BTTS 0%.

Match description

Mtibwa Sugar presents decidedly better home form with 67% wins and an impressive +3 goal difference, remaining unbeaten at home this season. The hosts show solid offensive efficiency (1.33 goals per match) and defensive stability (0.33 goals conceded per match, 67% clean sheets). Mbeya City, on the other hand, is in dismal form, losing 4 of their last 5 matches and earning just 0.2 PPG in recent outings. The visitors have poor away stats: 67% losses, a negative -4 goal difference, and 67% of matches without scoring. The clear advantage in expected goals (xG: 1.1 vs 0.89 for the visitors) and possession (54% vs 41%) further supports a confident victory for the hosts.

Half-by-half

1 : 1
1st half
1 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

38Possession (%)62
Mtibwa SugarMbeya City
9Shots11
Mtibwa SugarMbeya City
3Shots on target5
Mtibwa SugarMbeya City
1.18xG1.71
Mtibwa SugarMbeya City
1Corners8
Mtibwa SugarMbeya City
56Dangerous attacks93
Mtibwa SugarMbeya City
-1Fouls-1
Mtibwa SugarMbeya City
-1Cards-1
Mtibwa SugarMbeya City

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Mtibwa SugarMbeya City
0.83Goals scored / match0.78
Mtibwa SugarMbeya City
1.6Goals conceded / match1.28
Mtibwa SugarMbeya City
29%Average possession41%
Mtibwa SugarMbeya City
1.2Shots on target / match1.34
Mtibwa SugarMbeya City

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

3.5Shots per match4.66
Mtibwa SugarMbeya City
1.2Shots on target1.34
Mtibwa SugarMbeya City
23.8%Shot conversion16.8%
Mtibwa SugarMbeya City
29%Possession41%
Mtibwa SugarMbeya City
1xG for0.99
Mtibwa SugarMbeya City
1.58xG against1.35
Mtibwa SugarMbeya City

Shooting quality

Mtibwa Sugar: Counter-attackingMbeya City: Counter-attacking
Mtibwa SugarMbeya City
Accuracy (shots on target)34%29%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.290.21
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.690.58

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Mtibwa Sugar
LLLLL
No win in the last 5 matches
Season result split
20% W30% R50% P
Season (W-D-L)
6-9-15
0.90 pts / match · goal difference -23
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-0-5
0.00 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
6-4-5
Last 5 at home
1-1-3
LLWDL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.4Goals conceded: 2.4xG: 0.85Opponent xG: 1.61BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 80%
Mbeya City
WDDWD
Unbeaten in the last 5 matches
Season result split
25% W31% R44% P
Season (W-D-L)
8-10-14
1.06 pts / match · goal difference -16
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-3-0
1.80 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
5-3-8
Last 5 away
1-3-1
DLWDD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 0.2xG: 0.96Opponent xG: 1.15BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 0%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Mtibwa Sugar is 6% better for: goals scored per match.

0.83 goals / match - Mtibwa Sugar · 0.78 goals / match - Mbeya City

Mbeya City is 25% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.6 goals / match - Mtibwa Sugar · 1.28 goals / match - Mbeya City

Mtibwa Sugar scoring profile: mixed

Mtibwa Sugar scores in 57% of matches (17 of 30 matches), while Mbeya City keeps a clean sheet in 34% (11 of 32 matches).

Mbeya City scoring profile: strong

Mbeya City scores in 50% of matches (16 of 32 matches), while Mtibwa Sugar keeps a clean sheet in 20% (6 of 30 matches).

25Goals scored (season)25
Mtibwa SugarMbeya City
48Goals conceded (season)41
Mtibwa SugarMbeya City
2.43Average goals in match2.06
Mtibwa SugarMbeya City
2Goals scored (last 5)5
Mtibwa SugarMbeya City
12Goals conceded (last 5)1
Mtibwa SugarMbeya City

How often they score at least...

57%1 goal50%
Mtibwa SugarMbeya City
20%2 goals22%
Mtibwa SugarMbeya City
3%3 goals6%
Mtibwa SugarMbeya City
3%4 goals0%
Mtibwa SugarMbeya City

How often they concede at least...

80%1 goal66%
Mtibwa SugarMbeya City
47%2 goals34%
Mtibwa SugarMbeya City
27%3 goals13%
Mtibwa SugarMbeya City
7%4 goals9%
Mtibwa SugarMbeya City

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

35%
League average

Goal patterns

23%BTTS at half-time25%
Mtibwa SugarMbeya City
0%BTTS in both halves0%
Mtibwa SugarMbeya City
17%Scored in both halves16%
Mtibwa SugarMbeya City

BTTS and goal count

37%Min. 3 goals and BTTS19%
Mtibwa SugarMbeya City
17%Min. 3 goals without BTTS9%
Mtibwa SugarMbeya City
40%BTTS - last 520%
Mtibwa SugarMbeya City

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

73%Min. 1 goal before half-time66%
Mtibwa SugarMbeya City
43%Min. 2 goals before half-time38%
Mtibwa SugarMbeya City
3%Min. 3 goals before half-time6%
Mtibwa SugarMbeya City

2nd half

70%Min. 1 goal after half-time56%
Mtibwa SugarMbeya City
27%Min. 2 goals after half-time16%
Mtibwa SugarMbeya City
13%Min. 3 goals after half-time9%
Mtibwa SugarMbeya City

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Mbeya City is 54% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

0.67 pts / match - Mtibwa Sugar · 1.03 pts / match - Mbeya City

Mtibwa Sugar - half-time state
7% leading47% draw47% trailing
Mbeya City - half-time state
16% leading56% draw28% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

0.67Points per match (1st half)1.03
Mtibwa SugarMbeya City
0.33Goals scored (1st half)0.44
Mtibwa SugarMbeya City
0.87Goals conceded (1st half)0.72
Mtibwa SugarMbeya City
1.2Average goals (1st half)1.16
Mtibwa SugarMbeya City
33%Clean sheet before half-time50%
Mtibwa SugarMbeya City
70%No goal before half-time59%
Mtibwa SugarMbeya City

After half-time (2nd half)

1.03Points per match (2nd half)1
Mtibwa SugarMbeya City
0.43Goals scored (2nd half)0.28
Mtibwa SugarMbeya City
0.73Goals conceded (2nd half)0.56
Mtibwa SugarMbeya City
1.17Average goals (2nd half)0.84
Mtibwa SugarMbeya City
53%Clean sheet after half-time59%
Mtibwa SugarMbeya City
60%No goal after half-time78%
Mtibwa SugarMbeya City

Mtibwa Sugar - second-half results

23% W33% R43% P
20
Half-time points
10
Half-time goals
-16
Goal difference (1st half)
31
Second-half points
-9
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.67
PPG before half-time
Lead holding286%

Leads at half-time in 7% of matches and wins 20%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Mbeya City - second-half results

19% W44% R38% P
33
Half-time points
14
Half-time goals
-9
Goal difference (1st half)
32
Second-half points
-9
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.03
PPG before half-time
Lead holding156%

Leads at half-time in 16% of matches and wins 25%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.2

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Mtibwa Sugar - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.400.20
Goals scored / match0.20.2
Goals conceded / match1.01.4
Average goals in match1.21.6
1 goal80%80%
2 goals40%60%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet20%20%
No goal80%80%
Goal difference-4-6
Half-time: 0% leading - 40% draw - 60% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 20% draw - 80% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 1
Mbeya City - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.401.40
Goals scored / match0.40.2
Goals conceded / match0.20.0
Average goals in match0.60.2
1 goal40%20%
2 goals20%0%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet80%100%
No goal60%80%
Goal difference+1+1
Half-time: 20% leading - 80% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 80% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 2

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Mtibwa Sugar
ScoredConceded
4
9
0-15
1
6
16-30
7
11
31-45
3
8
46-60
2
5
61-75
8
9
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (8 goli). Concedes most in 31-45 (11). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

Mbeya City
ScoredConceded
6
4
0-15
7
8
16-30
3
11
31-45
3
2
46-60
3
7
61-75
3
9
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (7 goli). Concedes most in 31-45 (11). Late-goal balance (76-90): -6 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.25
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.1 : 1.2
Estimated goal split
home : away
103%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
41%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-55%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
28%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
22%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 5 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Mtibwa Sugar

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.58
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.19
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+7.8 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.17
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.02
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
64%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
184%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.90
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
32% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 16% come in the first quarter-hour.
32%

Mbeya City

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.36
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.14
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+8.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.21
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.07
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
90%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
98%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.74
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.2
Late goals
12% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 24% come in the first quarter-hour.
12%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Ligi kuu Bara).

Teams vs league

Mtibwa SugarLigaMbeya City
Average goals in match 2.432.17 2.06
Both teams scored 50%35% 31%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 53%39% 28%
Clean sheets 20%39% 34%
Goal before half-time 73%60% 66%
Goal after half-time 70%63% 56%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.17
Average goals per match
35%
Both teams scored
39%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
39%
Clean sheets
1.30
Home goals / match
0.87
Away goals / match
+49%
Home attack advantage
+33%
Home defence advantage
+20%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
60%
1 goal
32%
2 goals
9%
3 goals
1%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
63%
1 goal
27%
2 goals
10%
3 goals
2%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Mtibwa Sugar 0 - 0 - 1 Mbeya City. Average goals 1.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.

FAQ

What was the result of Mtibwa Sugar vs Mbeya City?

The Ligi kuu Bara match finished Mtibwa Sugar 2:1 Mbeya City. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Mtibwa Sugar vs Mbeya City?

Mtibwa Sugar score 0.83 goals per game on average and Mbeya City 0.78. The Ligi kuu Bara average is 2.17 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 39% of games. Both teams score in 50% of Mtibwa Sugar's matches and 31% of Mbeya City's.

What form are Mtibwa Sugar and Mbeya City in?

Over the last 5 games Mtibwa Sugar have a 0-0-5 record (0.00 points per game) and Mbeya City 2-3-0 (1.80 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Mtibwa Sugar vs Mbeya City?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Mtibwa Sugar vs Mbeya City: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.