Tanzania - Ligi kuu BaraData current as of 23 July 2026

Mtibwa Sugar vs Namungo: match statistics

Mtibwa Sugar crest
Mtibwa Sugar
1 : 1half-time 1:1
Namungo crest
Namungo
155%(0.00)
X30%(0.00)
215%(0.00)

Mtibwa Sugar boasts impressive home form with an 83% win rate at home and a streak of five consecutive victories at their own stadium. The hosts are unbeaten in home matches this season, keeping clean sheets in half of their games and conceding an average of just 0.5 goals per match. Namungo displays poor away efficiency with just a 20% win rate and 40% losses, scoring an average of only 0.6 goals per away match. Mtibwa Sugar's positive goal difference (+6) in home matches contrasts with Namungo's negative goal difference (-3) on the road. Despite Namungo's good recent overall form (2.6 points per match), their evident struggles in away fixtures and the hosts' dominance on home turf argue in favor of a Mtibwa Sugar victory.

Mtibwa Sugar vs Namungo: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Mtibwa Sugar play Namungo in Ligi kuu Bara (Tanzania). The match date is 7 February 2026 at 17:00. Final score: 1:1.

Current form

Mtibwa Sugar: 0-0-5, 0.00 points/match. Namungo: 2-3-0, 1.80 points/match.

Goal statistics

Mtibwa Sugar scores 0.83 and concedes 1.60 goals per match. Namungo scores 0.86 and concedes 1.07. League average: 2.17 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Mtibwa Sugar 50%, Namungo 48%. Over 2.5: Mtibwa Sugar 53%, Namungo 24%. League level: BTTS 35%, Over 2.5 39%.

xG, shots and style

Namungo has higher xG: 1.33 vs 1.00. Mtibwa Sugar: 3.5 shots per match, Namungo: 8.9.

Match halves

Mtibwa Sugar: half-time lead 7%, second-half goals 0.43. Namungo: half-time lead 17%, second-half goals 0.45.

Goals by minute

Mtibwa Sugar: 76-90+ (8 goals). Namungo: 31-45+ (7 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Ligi kuu Bara: 2.17 goals per match, BTTS 35%, Over 2.5 39%.

Head-to-head

1 H2H matches: 0-0-1. Average goals 3.00, BTTS 100%.

Match description

Mtibwa Sugar boasts impressive home form with an 83% win rate at home and a streak of five consecutive victories at their own stadium. The hosts are unbeaten in home matches this season, keeping clean sheets in half of their games and conceding an average of just 0.5 goals per match. Namungo displays poor away efficiency with just a 20% win rate and 40% losses, scoring an average of only 0.6 goals per away match. Mtibwa Sugar's positive goal difference (+6) in home matches contrasts with Namungo's negative goal difference (-3) on the road. Despite Namungo's good recent overall form (2.6 points per match), their evident struggles in away fixtures and the hosts' dominance on home turf argue in favor of a Mtibwa Sugar victory.

Half-by-half

1 : 1
1st half
0 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

51Possession (%)49
Mtibwa SugarNamungo
8Shots6
Mtibwa SugarNamungo
2Shots on target4
Mtibwa SugarNamungo
1.13xG1.18
Mtibwa SugarNamungo
1Corners3
Mtibwa SugarNamungo
66Dangerous attacks70
Mtibwa SugarNamungo
-1Fouls-1
Mtibwa SugarNamungo
-1Cards-1
Mtibwa SugarNamungo

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Mtibwa SugarNamungo
0.83Goals scored / match0.86
Mtibwa SugarNamungo
1.6Goals conceded / match1.07
Mtibwa SugarNamungo
29%Average possession47%
Mtibwa SugarNamungo
1.2Shots on target / match3.31
Mtibwa SugarNamungo

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

3.5Shots per match8.86
Mtibwa SugarNamungo
1.2Shots on target3.31
Mtibwa SugarNamungo
23.8%Shot conversion9.7%
Mtibwa SugarNamungo
29%Possession47%
Mtibwa SugarNamungo
1xG for1.33
Mtibwa SugarNamungo
1.58xG against1.33
Mtibwa SugarNamungo

Shooting quality

Mtibwa Sugar: Counter-attackingNamungo: Balanced
Mtibwa SugarNamungo
Accuracy (shots on target)34%37%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.290.15
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.690.26

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Mtibwa Sugar
LLLLL
No win in the last 5 matches
Season result split
20% W30% R50% P
Season (W-D-L)
6-9-15
0.90 pts / match · goal difference -23
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-0-5
0.00 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
6-4-5
Last 5 at home
1-1-3
LLWDL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.4Goals conceded: 2.4xG: 0.85Opponent xG: 1.61BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 80%
Namungo
DDWDW
Unbeaten in the last 5 matches
Season result split
24% W45% R31% P
Season (W-D-L)
7-13-9
1.17 pts / match · goal difference -6
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-3-0
1.80 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
2-5-8
Last 5 away
1-1-3
LLLDW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.2Goals conceded: 0.8xG: 1.99Opponent xG: 1.24BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 40%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Namungo is 50% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.6 goals / match - Mtibwa Sugar · 1.07 goals / match - Namungo

Mtibwa Sugar scoring profile: strong

Mtibwa Sugar scores in 57% of matches (17 of 30 matches), while Namungo keeps a clean sheet in 31% (9 of 29 matches).

Namungo scoring profile: very strong

Namungo scores in 66% of matches (19 of 29 matches), while Mtibwa Sugar keeps a clean sheet in 20% (6 of 30 matches).

25Goals scored (season)25
Mtibwa SugarNamungo
48Goals conceded (season)31
Mtibwa SugarNamungo
2.43Average goals in match1.93
Mtibwa SugarNamungo
2Goals scored (last 5)6
Mtibwa SugarNamungo
12Goals conceded (last 5)4
Mtibwa SugarNamungo

How often they score at least...

57%1 goal66%
Mtibwa SugarNamungo
20%2 goals17%
Mtibwa SugarNamungo
3%3 goals3%
Mtibwa SugarNamungo
3%4 goals0%
Mtibwa SugarNamungo

How often they concede at least...

80%1 goal69%
Mtibwa SugarNamungo
47%2 goals24%
Mtibwa SugarNamungo
27%3 goals14%
Mtibwa SugarNamungo
7%4 goals0%
Mtibwa SugarNamungo

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

35%
League average

Goal patterns

23%BTTS at half-time21%
Mtibwa SugarNamungo
0%BTTS in both halves3%
Mtibwa SugarNamungo
17%Scored in both halves10%
Mtibwa SugarNamungo

BTTS and goal count

37%Min. 3 goals and BTTS21%
Mtibwa SugarNamungo
17%Min. 3 goals without BTTS3%
Mtibwa SugarNamungo
40%BTTS - last 560%
Mtibwa SugarNamungo

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

73%Min. 1 goal before half-time59%
Mtibwa SugarNamungo
43%Min. 2 goals before half-time24%
Mtibwa SugarNamungo
3%Min. 3 goals before half-time7%
Mtibwa SugarNamungo

2nd half

70%Min. 1 goal after half-time69%
Mtibwa SugarNamungo
27%Min. 2 goals after half-time28%
Mtibwa SugarNamungo
13%Min. 3 goals after half-time7%
Mtibwa SugarNamungo

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Namungo is 60% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

0.67 pts / match - Mtibwa Sugar · 1.07 pts / match - Namungo

Mtibwa Sugar - half-time state
7% leading47% draw47% trailing
Namungo - half-time state
17% leading55% draw28% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

0.67Points per match (1st half)1.07
Mtibwa SugarNamungo
0.33Goals scored (1st half)0.41
Mtibwa SugarNamungo
0.87Goals conceded (1st half)0.48
Mtibwa SugarNamungo
1.2Average goals (1st half)0.9
Mtibwa SugarNamungo
33%Clean sheet before half-time55%
Mtibwa SugarNamungo
70%No goal before half-time66%
Mtibwa SugarNamungo

After half-time (2nd half)

1.03Points per match (2nd half)1.31
Mtibwa SugarNamungo
0.43Goals scored (2nd half)0.45
Mtibwa SugarNamungo
0.73Goals conceded (2nd half)0.59
Mtibwa SugarNamungo
1.17Average goals (2nd half)1.03
Mtibwa SugarNamungo
53%Clean sheet after half-time62%
Mtibwa SugarNamungo
60%No goal after half-time59%
Mtibwa SugarNamungo

Mtibwa Sugar - second-half results

23% W33% R43% P
20
Half-time points
10
Half-time goals
-16
Goal difference (1st half)
31
Second-half points
-9
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.67
PPG before half-time
Lead holding286%

Leads at half-time in 7% of matches and wins 20%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Namungo - second-half results

31% W38% R31% P
31
Half-time points
12
Half-time goals
-2
Goal difference (1st half)
38
Second-half points
-4
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.07
PPG before half-time
Lead holding141%

Leads at half-time in 17% of matches and wins 24%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Concedes 0.1 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Mtibwa Sugar - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.400.20
Goals scored / match0.20.2
Goals conceded / match1.01.4
Average goals in match1.21.6
1 goal80%80%
2 goals40%60%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet20%20%
No goal80%80%
Goal difference-4-6
Half-time: 0% leading - 40% draw - 60% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 20% draw - 80% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 1
Namungo - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.201.80
Goals scored / match0.60.6
Goals conceded / match0.60.2
Average goals in match1.20.8
1 goal60%60%
2 goals40%20%
3 goals20%0%
Clean sheet40%80%
No goal60%40%
Goal difference0+2
Half-time: 20% leading - 60% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 60% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 3

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Mtibwa Sugar
ScoredConceded
4
9
0-15
1
6
16-30
7
11
31-45
3
8
46-60
2
5
61-75
8
9
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (8 goli). Concedes most in 31-45 (11). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

Namungo
ScoredConceded
1
4
0-15
4
4
16-30
7
6
31-45
3
4
46-60
6
6
61-75
4
7
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (7 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.18
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
0.9 : 1.2
Estimated goal split
home : away
100%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
49%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+38%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
38%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
15%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 7 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Mtibwa Sugar

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.58
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.19
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+7.8 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.17
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.02
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
64%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
184%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.90
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
32% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 16% come in the first quarter-hour.
32%

Namungo

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
0.00
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.21
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-0.3 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.47
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.26
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
99%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
82%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.63
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.0
Late goals
16% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 4% come in the first quarter-hour.
16%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Ligi kuu Bara).

Teams vs league

Mtibwa SugarLigaNamungo
Average goals in match 2.432.17 1.93
Both teams scored 50%35% 48%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 53%39% 24%
Clean sheets 20%39% 31%
Goal before half-time 73%60% 59%
Goal after half-time 70%63% 69%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.17
Average goals per match
35%
Both teams scored
39%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
39%
Clean sheets
1.30
Home goals / match
0.87
Away goals / match
+49%
Home attack advantage
+33%
Home defence advantage
+20%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
60%
1 goal
32%
2 goals
9%
3 goals
1%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
63%
1 goal
27%
2 goals
10%
3 goals
2%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Mtibwa Sugar 0 - 0 - 1 Namungo. Average goals 3.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.

FAQ

What was the result of Mtibwa Sugar vs Namungo?

The Ligi kuu Bara match finished Mtibwa Sugar 1:1 Namungo. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Mtibwa Sugar vs Namungo?

Mtibwa Sugar score 0.83 goals per game on average and Namungo 0.86. The Ligi kuu Bara average is 2.17 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 39% of games. Both teams score in 50% of Mtibwa Sugar's matches and 48% of Namungo's.

What form are Mtibwa Sugar and Namungo in?

Over the last 5 games Mtibwa Sugar have a 0-0-5 record (0.00 points per game) and Namungo 2-3-0 (1.80 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Mtibwa Sugar vs Namungo?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.