MTK vs ETO: match statistics
MTK vs ETO: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
MTK played against ETO in NB I (Hungary). The game was played on September 20, 2026. Venue: Hidegkuti Nándor Stadion. Final score: 1:2.
Recent form
MTK has 1 win, 2 draws and 2 losses over its last five games, averaging 1.00 points per game. ETO has 2 wins, 2 draws and 1 loss, with 1.60 points per game.
Scoring records
MTK scores 2.00 goals per game and allows 1.71. ETO scores 2.00 and allows 1.29. Games in this league average 3.30 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 86% of MTK's games and 57% of ETO's. The Over 2.5 rates are 86% and 71%, compared with league averages of 64% for BTTS and 64% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
MTK has the higher season xG average, 1.65 to 1.14 per game. MTK takes 12.1 shots per game, while ETO takes 8.6.
First-half and second-half trends
MTK leads at halftime in 29% of its games and scores 1.14 goals per game after halftime. ETO leads at halftime in 43% and scores 1.43 after halftime.
When the teams score
MTK's most productive scoring window is minutes 0-15 (3 goals). For ETO, it is minutes 76-90+ (7 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
NB I games average 3.30 goals. Both teams score in 64% of games, and 64% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, 3 previous meetings were available. The record was 0 home wins, 1 draw and 2 away wins. Those games averaged 4.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 33% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
MTK have significantly stronger home numbers: they average 2.00 goals with an xG of 1.72, while ETO score 1.33 goals away from home and generate just 1.05 xG. The hosts also create more chances, averaging 13.25 shots and 7.5 shots on target per match, compared with ETO’s 8.67 shots and 2.67 on target. The league leaders are in better overall form, with 3 wins in their last 5 matches and 12 goals scored, but all 3 of their away fixtures have ended in draws. MTK also score consistently, having failed to find the net in none of their home matches, while ETO have not kept a clean sheet away from home. The hosts’ edge in the quality of chances created and home advantage is not substantial, but it points towards a narrow MTK win in an open game.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
The BTTS signal is strengthened by the teams’ form over their last five matches: MTK recorded both teams scoring in 80% of games, while ETO did so in 60%, averaging 1.6 and 2.4 goals scored respectively. ETO kept a clean sheet in none of its away matches, while scoring in every one, which clearly supports a Goal/Goal outcome. MTK averages 2.50 goals scored at home, while its defense allows opponents an xG of 1.88, higher than ETO’s 1.44 away from home. The latest quality data is also offensive: MTK’s xG stands at 1.74 and ETO’s at 1.33, while both teams conceded an average of 1.2 and 1.4 goals respectively. MTK’s season-long 25% BTTS rate and the hosts’ 50% clean-sheet rate call for caution, but current form and ETO’s profile tilt the prediction toward BTTS - Yes.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Both teams have exceeded the 1.5-goal line in 100% of their league matches so far, which is the strongest signal pointing to a high probability of at least two goals. MTK average 2.50 goals at home, while ETO score 1.33 away from home, with the hosts allowing opponents an xG of 1.88. In their last five matches, MTK averaged 2.8 total goals, while ETO matches produced as many as 3.8 goals, with both teams recording Over 2.5 goals in 60% and 80% of their matches, respectively. The estimate of 3.05 goals is also supported by the current quality of chances: MTK’s xG stands at 1.74 and ETO’s at 1.33, while the opponents’ defensive xG figures are 1.48 and 1.52. Over 1.5 is the best selection, as it is clearly supported by both the full-season data and recent form, with lower risk than the 2.5 and 3.5 lines.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
The most likely HT/FT outcome is a draw at half-time followed by an MTK win, as ETO were level at the break in 67% of their away matches, while MTK had a half-time draw in 25% of their home fixtures. The opening stages are expected to be cautious: the hosts concede an average of just 0.25 goals before the break, compared with 0.33 for the visitors, while the corresponding total-goal averages are 0.75 and 1.00. After the interval, MTK’s home advantage increases significantly: they score an average of 2.0 goals in the second half and won it in 75% of their matches, whereas ETO have not won a single second half away from home. The hosts have also won 75% of their home matches and average 4.75 shots on target compared with ETO’s 2.67, further supporting the scenario of an MTK turnaround after the break. However, ETO’s strong current form must be taken into account, as they have scored an average of 2.4 goals per match in their last five fixtures; therefore, a draw at half-time followed by an ETO win remains a significant alternative.
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| MTK | ETO | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 60% | 45% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.14 | 0.13 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.27 | 0.52 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
ETO is 60% better for: last-5 form.
1 pts / game - MTK · 1.6 pts / game - ETO
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
ETO is 33% better for: goals allowed per game.
1.71 goals / game - MTK · 1.29 goals / game - ETO
MTK scores in 100% of games (7 of 7 games), while ETO keeps a clean sheet in 29% (2 of 7 games).
ETO scores in 86% of games (6 of 7 games), while MTK keeps a clean sheet in 14% (1 of 7 games).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - MTK
Over / Under - ETO
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
ETO is 33% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.29 pts / game - MTK · 1.71 pts / game - ETO
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
MTK - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 29% of games and wins 29%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
ETO - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 43% of games and wins 43%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.7 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.20 | 1.40 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.8 | 0.8 |
| Goals allowed / game | 1.0 | 0.8 |
| Average goals per game | 1.8 | 1.6 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 80% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 20% | 40% |
| No goal | 40% | 40% |
| Goal difference | -1 | 0 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.60 | 1.40 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.6 | 1.0 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.4 | 1.0 |
| Average goals per game | 1.0 | 2.0 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 40% |
| No goal | 40% | 60% |
| Goal difference | +1 | 0 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (3 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (7 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): +5 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
MTK
ETO
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (NB I).
Teams vs league
| MTK | Liga | ETO | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▲ 3.71 | 3.30 | • 3.29 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 86% | 64% | ▼ 57% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 86% | 64% | ▲ 71% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 14% | 20% | ▲ 29% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 86% | 70% | • 71% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 86% | 80% | ▲ 86% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Record from MTK's perspective: 0 wins, 1 draw and 2 losses against ETO. Games average 4.00 goals, and both teams scored in 33% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of MTK vs ETO?
The NB I match finished MTK 1:2 ETO. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between MTK and ETO?
In the last 3 head-to-head matches MTK won 0, ETO won 2 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 4.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 33% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before MTK vs ETO?
MTK score 2.00 goals per game on average and ETO 2.00. The NB I average is 3.30 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 64% of games. Both teams score in 86% of MTK's matches and 57% of ETO's.
What form are MTK and ETO in?
Over the last 5 games MTK have a 1-2-2 record (1.00 points per game) and ETO 2-2-1 (1.60 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for MTK vs ETO?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for MTK vs ETO: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.