Hungary - NB IData current as of September 12, 2026

MTK vs Zalaegerszegi TE: match statistics

MTK crest
MTK
3 : 0half-time 0:0
Zalaegerszegi TE crest
Zalaegerszegi TE

MTK vs Zalaegerszegi TE: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

MTK played against Zalaegerszegi TE in NB I (Hungary). The game was played on April 11, 2026. Final score: 3:0.

Recent form

MTK has 0 wins, 4 draws and 1 loss over its last five games, averaging 0.80 points per game. Zalaegerszegi TE has 3 wins, 2 draws and 0 losses, with 2.20 points per game.

Scoring records

MTK scores 1.68 goals per game and allows 2.07. Zalaegerszegi TE scores 1.54 and allows 1.14. Games in this league average 2.98 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 68% of MTK's games and 57% of Zalaegerszegi TE's. The Over 2.5 rates are 71% and 43%, compared with league averages of 62% for BTTS and 59% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

MTK has the higher season xG average, 1.53 to 1.50 per game. MTK takes 12.9 shots per game, while Zalaegerszegi TE takes 12.9.

First-half and second-half trends

MTK leads at halftime in 21% of its games and scores 1.04 goals per game after halftime. Zalaegerszegi TE leads at halftime in 18% and scores 1.14 after halftime.

When the teams score

MTK's most productive scoring window is minutes 76-90+ (11 goals). For Zalaegerszegi TE, it is minutes 76-90+ (16 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

NB I games average 2.98 goals. Both teams score in 62% of games, and 59% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

Before this game, 2 previous meetings were available. The record was 1 home win, 1 draw and 0 away wins. Those games averaged 1.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Zalaegerszegi TE sit 3rd in the table versus MTK in 10th and have a significantly better run over the last 5 matches — 4 wins and 1 draw, 8 goals scored and an average of 2.6 points per match; MTK have not won in that period (0 wins, 4 draws, 1 loss) and average only 0.8 points per match. MTK at home generate more attacking output (avg 14.07 shots, 5.29 on target) translating to 2.21 goals per game with an average xG of 1.66 and a conversion rate of 16%, which indicates high offensive efficiency in home conditions. However, the hosts’ defense is an issue — MTK concede 1.93 goals on average at home and have 58 goals conceded this season, whereas Zalaegerszegi concede only 1.23 goals away and 32 this season; in the last 5 matches the visitors have conceded just 2 goals, the hosts 7. Comparison of chance quality shows a mixed picture: home xG for MTK is 1.66 versus 1.39 xG for the visitors on the road, so MTK create more expected opportunities, but Zalaegerszegi have greater defensive stability (clean sheets in 31% of away games) and better recent points return (2.6 pts vs 0.8 pts in the last 5). Therefore I back a Zalaegerszegi TE win; proposed probabilities are 20% home win, 25% draw and 55% away win.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

Seasonal BTTS rates are 53% for MTK and 62% for Zalaegerszegi, while the league average BTTS is 62%, strongly favoring the "both teams to score" scenario. MTK at home averages 1.67 goals scored and concedes 1.07, whereas Zalaegerszegi away averages 1.38 scored and concedes 1.23, so both units statistically generate scoring chances. xG shows 1.60 for MTK and 1.39 for Zalaegerszegi with xG against 1.38 (MTK) and 1.86 (ZTE), and over the season MTK has conceded 58 goals versus 32 for ZTE, which further increases the visitors' scoring probability. In the last 5 matches Zalaegerszegi form is 'wwdww' with 8 goals (1.6 avg) and only 2 conceded (0.4 per match), MTK in the last 5 is 'dddld' with 5 goals (1.0) and 7 conceded (1.4), indicating ZTE is in attacking form while MTK is less stable at the back. Considering seasonal BTTS 53%/62%, the league level of 62% and the fact both teams keep a clean sheet in only about 33% and 31% of matches respectively, I pick BTTS - Yes with a probability of 70% versus 30% for No.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

The assessment is based on xG and match stats: MTK has an attacking xG of 1.60 while the opponent conceded xG of 1.86, yielding expected goals for MTK of approximately 1.73; ZTE has an attacking xG of 1.39 against MTK’s conceded xG of 1.38, giving about 1.39, totaling ~3.12 goals. Seasonal figures confirm a tendency toward matches with at least 2 goals — MTK averages 1.67 goals, ZTE 1.38, and Over 1.5 rates are 80% and 69%, so I estimate Over 1.5 at ~82%. Additionally, both teams scored in 53% of MTK’s games and 62% of ZTE’s games, and combined shooting activity (MTK 13.87 shots and 4.67 on target; ZTE 11.69 and 4.46) with a 12% conversion rate supports chances of converting opportunities. Although seasonal Over 2.5 rates are 40%/46%, the combined expected total of 3.12 is above the league average of 2.96 and suggests Over 2.5 around 60%, while Over 3.5 is weaker (~38%). On that basis the strongest signal is Over 1.5 (pick: Over 1.5), since 3.12 xG, high Over 1.5 shares (80%/69%) and the shot numbers and percentage of both-teams-to-score matches provide the largest edge.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

The strongest signal points to a draw at half-time: the home team were level at the break in 47% of their matches, the away team in 69%, which averages to roughly a 58% chance of a half-time draw. The home side are slightly more attacking this season — 1.67 goals per game versus 1.38 for Zalaegerszegi — and more often lead at the break (27% vs 8%), so scenarios starting with the home team leading are realistic (about a 25% chance of MTK leading at half-time). However, the visitors dominate after the break: in their last 5 matches Zalaegerszegi won 4 of 5 (80%), were level at half-time in 80% and scored on average 1.4 second-half goals while conceding 0.0, which strongly supports a turnaround after the break. Therefore I consider the most likely outcome to be draw at half-time and away win (X/2) with a probability of 28%, due to the high share of half-time draws (~58%) and the visitors’ second-half effectiveness. I rate the home holding the lead (1/1) at 16% and a full-time draw (X/X) at 20% — these scenarios reflect that the game is usually even at half-time and the decision is often made after the break.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Stats by half

0 : 0
First half
3 : 0
Second half

Game stats

55Possession (%)45
MTKZalaegerszegi TE
14Shots11
MTKZalaegerszegi TE
4Shots on target3
MTKZalaegerszegi TE
1.49xG1.31
MTKZalaegerszegi TE
0Corners4
MTKZalaegerszegi TE
45Dangerous attacks55
MTKZalaegerszegi TE
7Fouls11
MTKZalaegerszegi TE
1Cards0
MTKZalaegerszegi TE

Pre-game profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

MTKZalaegerszegi TE
1.68Goals scored / game1.54
MTKZalaegerszegi TE
2.07Goals allowed / game1.14
MTKZalaegerszegi TE
49%Average possession50%
MTKZalaegerszegi TE
4.79Shots on target / game4.57
MTKZalaegerszegi TE

Team statswho is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

12.89Shots per game12.86
MTKZalaegerszegi TE
4.79Shots on target4.57
MTKZalaegerszegi TE
13%Shot conversion11.9%
MTKZalaegerszegi TE
49%Possession50%
MTKZalaegerszegi TE
1.53xG for1.5
MTKZalaegerszegi TE
1.88xG against1.6
MTKZalaegerszegi TE

Shooting quality

MTK: Efficient finishingZalaegerszegi TE: Balanced
MTKZalaegerszegi TE
Accuracy (shots on target)37%36%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.350.34

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

Zalaegerszegi TE is 175% better for: last-5 form.

0.8 pts / game - MTK · 2.2 pts / game - Zalaegerszegi TE

MTK
DDDLD
No win in the last 5 games
Season result split
25% W29% D46% L
Season (W-D-L)
7-8-13
1.04 pts / game · goal difference -11
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-4-1
0.80 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
5-3-6
Last 5 at home
0-2-3
LDLDL
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 1.4xG: 1.31Opponent xG: 1.79BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 40%
Zalaegerszegi TE
DWDWW
Unbeaten in the last 5 games
Season result split
43% W32% D25% L
Season (W-D-L)
12-9-7
1.61 pts / game · goal difference +11
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-2-0
2.20 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
5-5-3
Last 5 away
2-3-0
DWWDD
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.6Goals conceded: 0.6xG: 1.26Opponent xG: 1.36BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 20%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

MTK is 9% better for: goals scored per game.

1.68 goals / game - MTK · 1.54 goals / game - Zalaegerszegi TE

Zalaegerszegi TE is 82% better for: goals allowed per game.

2.07 goals / game - MTK · 1.14 goals / game - Zalaegerszegi TE

MTK scoring profile: very strong

MTK scores in 82% of games (23 of 28 meczów), while Zalaegerszegi TE keeps a clean sheet in 32% (9 of 28 meczów).

Zalaegerszegi TE scoring profile: very strong

Zalaegerszegi TE scores in 89% of games (25 of 28 meczów), while MTK keeps a clean sheet in 18% (5 of 28 meczów).

47Goals scored (season)43
MTKZalaegerszegi TE
58Goals conceded (season)32
MTKZalaegerszegi TE
3.75Average goals per game2.68
MTKZalaegerszegi TE
5Goals scored (last 5)8
MTKZalaegerszegi TE
7Goals conceded (last 5)3
MTKZalaegerszegi TE

How often they score at least...

82%1 goal89%
MTKZalaegerszegi TE
46%2 goals43%
MTKZalaegerszegi TE
21%3 goals14%
MTKZalaegerszegi TE
11%4 goals4%
MTKZalaegerszegi TE

How often they concede at least...

82%1 goal68%
MTKZalaegerszegi TE
57%2 goals29%
MTKZalaegerszegi TE
39%3 goals14%
MTKZalaegerszegi TE
18%4 goals4%
MTKZalaegerszegi TE

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

57%
Zalaegerszegi TE - BTTSBTTS - percentage of matches where both teams scored.16 of 28 meczów
62%
League average

Goal patterns

25%BTTS at half-time18%
MTKZalaegerszegi TE
14%BTTS in both halves7%
MTKZalaegerszegi TE
29%Scored in both halves18%
MTKZalaegerszegi TE

BTTS and goal count

54%Min. 3 goals and BTTS39%
MTKZalaegerszegi TE
18%Min. 3 goals without BTTS4%
MTKZalaegerszegi TE
60%BTTS - last 560%
MTKZalaegerszegi TE

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

1st half

86%Min. 1 goal before half-time54%
MTKZalaegerszegi TE
46%Min. 2 goals before half-time29%
MTKZalaegerszegi TE
21%Min. 3 goals before half-time11%
MTKZalaegerszegi TE

2nd half

96%Min. 1 goal after half-time100%
MTKZalaegerszegi TE
57%Min. 2 goals after half-time46%
MTKZalaegerszegi TE
39%Min. 3 goals after half-time18%
MTKZalaegerszegi TE

Game halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Zalaegerszegi TE is 25% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

0.89 pts / game - MTK · 1.11 pts / game - Zalaegerszegi TE

MTK - half-time state
21% leading25% draw54% trailing
Zalaegerszegi TE - half-time state
18% leading57% draw25% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

0.89Points per game (1st half)1.11
MTKZalaegerszegi TE
0.64Goals scored (1st half)0.39
MTKZalaegerszegi TE
1Goals conceded (1st half)0.57
MTKZalaegerszegi TE
1.64Average goals (1st half)0.96
MTKZalaegerszegi TE
29%Clean sheet before half-time61%
MTKZalaegerszegi TE
61%No goal before half-time68%
MTKZalaegerszegi TE

After half-time (2nd half)

1.5Points per game (2nd half)1.93
MTKZalaegerszegi TE
1.04Goals scored (2nd half)1.14
MTKZalaegerszegi TE
1.07Goals conceded (2nd half)0.57
MTKZalaegerszegi TE
2.11Average goals (2nd half)1.71
MTKZalaegerszegi TE
43%Clean sheet after half-time61%
MTKZalaegerszegi TE
29%No goal after half-time25%
MTKZalaegerszegi TE

MTK - second-half results

46% W11% D43% L
25
Half-time points
18
Half-time goals
-10
Goal difference (1st half)
42
Second-half points
-1
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.89
PPG before half-time
Lead holding119%

Leads at halftime in 21% of games and wins 25%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime+0.1

Defense stays consistent across the full game.

Zalaegerszegi TE - second-half results

61% W11% D29% L
31
Half-time points
11
Half-time goals
-5
Goal difference (1st half)
54
Second-half points
+16
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.11
PPG before half-time
Lead holding239%

Leads at halftime in 18% of games and wins 43%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime0.0

Defense stays consistent across the full game.

MTK - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game0.601.20
Goals scored / game0.20.8
Goals allowed / game0.60.8
Average goals per game0.81.6
1 goal60%80%
2 goals20%40%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet40%40%
No goal80%40%
Goal difference-20
Half-time: 0% leading - 60% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 60% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 1
Zalaegerszegi TE - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game0.802.60
Goals scored / game0.21.4
Goals allowed / game0.40.2
Average goals per game0.61.6
1 goal40%100%
2 goals20%60%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet60%80%
No goal80%0%
Goal difference-1+6
Half-time: 0% leading - 80% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 80% won - 20% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 1

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

MTK
ScoredConceded
5
6
0-15
6
10
16-30
7
12
31-45
9
6
46-60
9
9
61-75
11
15
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (11 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (15). Late-goal balance (76-90): -4 - late phases are a weakness.

Zalaegerszegi TE
ScoredConceded
2
4
0-15
4
4
16-30
5
8
31-45
9
5
46-60
7
4
61-75
16
7
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (16 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): +9 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

3.21
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
1.4 : 1.8
Estimated goal split
home : away
108%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
63%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-53%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
73%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
2%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 50 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

MTK

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.35
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.04
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-4.3 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.15
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
-0.19
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
112%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
140%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
-0.24
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.4
Late goals
23% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 11% come in the first quarter-hour.
23%

Zalaegerszegi TE

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.10
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.50
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-9.1 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.04
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.46
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
104%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
76%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
+0.59
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.7
Late goals
37% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 5% come in the first quarter-hour.
37%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (NB I).

Teams vs league

MTKLigaZalaegerszegi TE
Average goals per game 3.752.98 2.68
Both teams scored 68%62% 57%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 71%59% 43%
Clean sheets 18%21% 32%
Goal before half-time 86%69% 54%
Goal after half-time 96%88% 100%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.98
Average goals per game
62%
Both teams scored
59%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
21%
Clean sheets
1.50
Home goals / game
1.48
Away goals / game
+1%
Home attack advantage
+1%
Home defensive advantage
+-2%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
69%
1 goal
39%
2 goals
16%
3 goals
4%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
88%
1 goal
48%
2 goals
24%
3 goals
8%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Zalaegerszegi TESubstitutionOn: Daniel Alves de LimaOff: Maxsuel Alexandre Alves Soares
  2. MTKSubstitutionOn: Gábor JurekOff: Ádin Molnár
  3. MTKYellow cardVilius Armalas
  4. Zalaegerszegi TESubstitutionOn: Viktor PetrókOff: Fabricio Amato
  5. MTKSubstitutionOn: Artúr HorváthOff: Mihály Kata

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Referee context

See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.

Bence CsonkaMatches officiated: 17
4.82Cards per match
0Penalties per match
1 / X / 224%Home wins41%Draws35%Away wins

Head-to-head

Record from MTK's perspective: 1 win, 1 draw and 0 losses against Zalaegerszegi TE. Games average 1.50 goals, and both teams scored in 50% of them.

Zalaegerszegi TE
1 : 1
MTK Budapest FC
MTK Budapest FC
1 : 0
Zalaegerszegi TE

FAQ

What was the result of MTK vs Zalaegerszegi TE?

The NB I match finished MTK 3:0 Zalaegerszegi TE. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between MTK and Zalaegerszegi TE?

In the last 2 head-to-head matches MTK won 1, Zalaegerszegi TE won 0 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 1.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before MTK vs Zalaegerszegi TE?

MTK score 1.68 goals per game on average and Zalaegerszegi TE 1.54. The NB I average is 2.98 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 59% of games. Both teams score in 68% of MTK's matches and 57% of Zalaegerszegi TE's.

What form are MTK and Zalaegerszegi TE in?

Over the last 5 games MTK have a 0-4-1 record (0.80 points per game) and Zalaegerszegi TE 3-2-0 (2.20 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for MTK vs Zalaegerszegi TE?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.