Hungary - NB IData current as of 23 July 2026

MTK vs Zalaegerszegi TE: match statistics

MTK crest
MTK
3 : 0half-time 0:0
Zalaegerszegi TE crest
Zalaegerszegi TE

MTK vs Zalaegerszegi TE: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

MTK play Zalaegerszegi TE in NB I (Hungary). The match date is 11 April 2026 at 17:45. Final score: 3:0.

Current form

MTK: 2-3-0, 1.80 points/match. Zalaegerszegi TE: 1-0-4, 0.60 points/match.

Goal statistics

MTK scores 1.67 and concedes 1.88 goals per match. Zalaegerszegi TE scores 1.48 and concedes 1.30. League average: 3.00 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: MTK 67%, Zalaegerszegi TE 55%. Over 2.5: MTK 70%, Zalaegerszegi TE 52%. League level: BTTS 60%, Over 2.5 60%.

xG, shots and style

MTK has higher xG: 1.56 vs 1.51. MTK: 13.4 shots per match, Zalaegerszegi TE: 12.8.

Match halves

MTK: half-time lead 21%, second-half goals 1.09. Zalaegerszegi TE: half-time lead 18%, second-half goals 1.03.

Goals by minute

MTK: 76-90+ (14 goals). Zalaegerszegi TE: 76-90+ (17 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

NB I: 3.00 goals per match, BTTS 60%, Over 2.5 60%.

Head-to-head

2 H2H matches: 1-1-0. Average goals 1.50, BTTS 50%.

Match description

Zalaegerszegi TE sit 3rd in the table versus MTK in 10th and have a significantly better run over the last 5 matches — 4 wins and 1 draw, 8 goals scored and an average of 2.6 points per match; MTK have not won in that period (0 wins, 4 draws, 1 loss) and average only 0.8 points per match. MTK at home generate more attacking output (avg 14.07 shots, 5.29 on target) translating to 2.21 goals per game with an average xG of 1.66 and a conversion rate of 16%, which indicates high offensive efficiency in home conditions. However, the hosts’ defence is an issue — MTK concede 1.93 goals on average at home and have 58 goals conceded this season, whereas Zalaegerszegi concede only 1.23 goals away and 32 this season; in the last 5 matches the visitors have conceded just 2 goals, the hosts 7. Comparison of chance quality shows a mixed picture: home xG for MTK is 1.66 versus 1.39 xG for the visitors on the road, so MTK create more expected opportunities, but Zalaegerszegi have greater defensive stability (clean sheets in 31% of away games) and better recent points return (2.6 pts vs 0.8 pts in the last 5). Therefore I back a Zalaegerszegi TE win; proposed probabilities are 20% home win, 25% draw and 55% away win.

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
3 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

55Possession (%)45
MTKZalaegerszegi TE
14Shots11
MTKZalaegerszegi TE
4Shots on target3
MTKZalaegerszegi TE
1.49xG1.31
MTKZalaegerszegi TE
0Corners4
MTKZalaegerszegi TE
45Dangerous attacks55
MTKZalaegerszegi TE
7Fouls11
MTKZalaegerszegi TE
1Cards0
MTKZalaegerszegi TE

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

MTKZalaegerszegi TE
1.67Goals scored / match1.48
MTKZalaegerszegi TE
1.88Goals conceded / match1.3
MTKZalaegerszegi TE
50%Average possession51%
MTKZalaegerszegi TE
4.94Shots on target / match4.73
MTKZalaegerszegi TE

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

13.42Shots per match12.79
MTKZalaegerszegi TE
4.94Shots on target4.73
MTKZalaegerszegi TE
12.4%Shot conversion11.6%
MTKZalaegerszegi TE
50%Possession51%
MTKZalaegerszegi TE
1.56xG for1.51
MTKZalaegerszegi TE
1.81xG against1.58
MTKZalaegerszegi TE

Shooting quality

MTK: BalancedZalaegerszegi TE: Balanced
MTKZalaegerszegi TE
Accuracy (shots on target)37%37%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.340.31

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

MTK is 200% better for: last-5 form.

1.8 pts / match - MTK · 0.6 pts / match - Zalaegerszegi TE

MTK
WWDDD
Unbeaten in the last 5 matches
Season result split
27% W33% R39% P
Season (W-D-L)
9-11-13
1.15 pts / match · goal difference -7
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-3-0
1.80 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
7-4-6
Last 5 at home
2-2-1
DLWWD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.6Goals conceded: 0.8xG: 1.78Opponent xG: 1.43BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%
Zalaegerszegi TE
LWLLL
Season result split
39% W27% R33% P
Season (W-D-L)
13-9-11
1.45 pts / match · goal difference +6
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-0-4
0.60 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
5-5-6
Last 5 away
0-2-3
DDLLL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.2Goals conceded: 2.2xG: 1.59Opponent xG: 1.42BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 100%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

MTK is 13% better for: goals scored per match.

1.67 goals / match - MTK · 1.48 goals / match - Zalaegerszegi TE

Zalaegerszegi TE is 45% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.88 goals / match - MTK · 1.3 goals / match - Zalaegerszegi TE

MTK scoring profile: very strong

MTK scores in 82% of matches (27 of 33 matches), while Zalaegerszegi TE keeps a clean sheet in 30% (10 of 33 matches).

Zalaegerszegi TE scoring profile: very strong

Zalaegerszegi TE scores in 85% of matches (28 of 33 matches), while MTK keeps a clean sheet in 21% (7 of 33 matches).

55Goals scored (season)49
MTKZalaegerszegi TE
62Goals conceded (season)43
MTKZalaegerszegi TE
3.55Average goals in match2.79
MTKZalaegerszegi TE
8Goals scored (last 5)6
MTKZalaegerszegi TE
4Goals conceded (last 5)11
MTKZalaegerszegi TE

How often they score at least...

82%1 goal85%
MTKZalaegerszegi TE
48%2 goals39%
MTKZalaegerszegi TE
21%3 goals15%
MTKZalaegerszegi TE
9%4 goals6%
MTKZalaegerszegi TE

How often they concede at least...

79%1 goal70%
MTKZalaegerszegi TE
52%2 goals36%
MTKZalaegerszegi TE
33%3 goals21%
MTKZalaegerszegi TE
15%4 goals3%
MTKZalaegerszegi TE

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

55%
Zalaegerszegi TE - BTTSBTTS - percentage of matches where both teams scored.18 of 33 matches
60%
League average

Goal patterns

21%BTTS at half-time18%
MTKZalaegerszegi TE
12%BTTS in both halves6%
MTKZalaegerszegi TE
27%Scored in both halves18%
MTKZalaegerszegi TE

BTTS and goal count

52%Min. 3 goals and BTTS39%
MTKZalaegerszegi TE
18%Min. 3 goals without BTTS12%
MTKZalaegerszegi TE
60%BTTS - last 540%
MTKZalaegerszegi TE

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

76%Min. 1 goal before half-time55%
MTKZalaegerszegi TE
39%Min. 2 goals before half-time30%
MTKZalaegerszegi TE
18%Min. 3 goals before half-time15%
MTKZalaegerszegi TE

2nd half

94%Min. 1 goal after half-time100%
MTKZalaegerszegi TE
61%Min. 2 goals after half-time48%
MTKZalaegerszegi TE
39%Min. 3 goals after half-time21%
MTKZalaegerszegi TE

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Zalaegerszegi TE is 12% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

0.97 pts / match - MTK · 1.09 pts / match - Zalaegerszegi TE

MTK - half-time state
21% leading33% draw45% trailing
Zalaegerszegi TE - half-time state
18% leading55% draw27% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

0.97Points per match (1st half)1.09
MTKZalaegerszegi TE
0.58Goals scored (1st half)0.45
MTKZalaegerszegi TE
0.85Goals conceded (1st half)0.58
MTKZalaegerszegi TE
1.42Average goals (1st half)1.03
MTKZalaegerszegi TE
39%Clean sheet before half-time61%
MTKZalaegerszegi TE
64%No goal before half-time67%
MTKZalaegerszegi TE

After half-time (2nd half)

1.48Points per match (2nd half)1.76
MTKZalaegerszegi TE
1.09Goals scored (2nd half)1.03
MTKZalaegerszegi TE
1.03Goals conceded (2nd half)0.73
MTKZalaegerszegi TE
2.12Average goals (2nd half)1.76
MTKZalaegerszegi TE
42%Clean sheet after half-time55%
MTKZalaegerszegi TE
27%No goal after half-time30%
MTKZalaegerszegi TE

MTK - second-half results

42% W21% R36% P
32
Half-time points
19
Half-time goals
-9
Goal difference (1st half)
49
Second-half points
+2
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.97
PPG before half-time
Lead holding129%

Leads at half-time in 21% of matches and wins 27%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.2

Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Zalaegerszegi TE - second-half results

55% W12% R33% P
36
Half-time points
15
Half-time goals
-4
Goal difference (1st half)
58
Second-half points
+10
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.09
PPG before half-time
Lead holding217%

Leads at half-time in 18% of matches and wins 39%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.2

Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

MTK - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.401.40
Goals scored / match0.21.4
Goals conceded / match0.00.8
Average goals in match0.22.2
1 goal20%80%
2 goals0%80%
3 goals0%40%
Clean sheet100%40%
No goal80%20%
Goal difference+1+3
Half-time: 20% leading - 80% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 80% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 1
Zalaegerszegi TE - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.000.80
Goals scored / match0.80.4
Goals conceded / match0.61.6
Average goals in match1.42.0
1 goal60%100%
2 goals40%60%
3 goals40%40%
Clean sheet60%20%
No goal60%60%
Goal difference+1-6
Half-time: 20% leading - 40% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 20% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 4

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

MTK
ScoredConceded
5
6
0-15
7
10
16-30
7
12
31-45
12
6
46-60
10
9
61-75
14
19
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (14 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (19). Late-goal balance (76-90): -5 - late phases are a weakness.

Zalaegerszegi TE
ScoredConceded
4
5
0-15
4
6
16-30
7
8
31-45
10
7
46-60
7
5
61-75
17
12
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (17 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (12). Late-goal balance (76-90): +5 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

3.17
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.5 : 1.7
Estimated goal split
home : away
106%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
61%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-53%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
70%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
3%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 33 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

MTK

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.25
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.04
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-5.6 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.11
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.07
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
107%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
131%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.65
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.5
Late goals
25% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 9% come in the first quarter-hour.
25%

Zalaegerszegi TE

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.07
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.25
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-7.9 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.03
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.28
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
103%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
83%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.85
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.6
Late goals
35% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 8% come in the first quarter-hour.
35%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (NB I).

Teams vs league

MTKLigaZalaegerszegi TE
Average goals in match 3.553.00 2.79
Both teams scored 67%60% 55%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 70%60% 52%
Clean sheets 21%22% 30%
Goal before half-time 76%70% 55%
Goal after half-time 94%87% 100%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.00
Average goals per match
60%
Both teams scored
60%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
22%
Clean sheets
1.56
Home goals / match
1.44
Away goals / match
+8%
Home attack advantage
+8%
Home defence advantage
+3%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
70%
1 goal
40%
2 goals
17%
3 goals
4%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
87%
1 goal
47%
2 goals
25%
3 goals
8%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (2): MTK 1 - 1 - 0 Zalaegerszegi TE. Average goals 1.50, both teams scored in 50% matches.

Zalaegerszegi TE
1 : 1
MTK Budapest FC
MTK Budapest FC
1 : 0
Zalaegerszegi TE

FAQ

What was the result of MTK vs Zalaegerszegi TE?

The NB I match finished MTK 3:0 Zalaegerszegi TE. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between MTK and Zalaegerszegi TE?

In the last 2 head-to-head matches MTK won 1, Zalaegerszegi TE won 0 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 1.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before MTK vs Zalaegerszegi TE?

MTK score 1.67 goals per game on average and Zalaegerszegi TE 1.48. The NB I average is 3.00 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 60% of games. Both teams score in 67% of MTK's matches and 55% of Zalaegerszegi TE's.

What form are MTK and Zalaegerszegi TE in?

Over the last 5 games MTK have a 2-3-0 record (1.80 points per game) and Zalaegerszegi TE 1-0-4 (0.60 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for MTK vs Zalaegerszegi TE?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.