Muhanga vs Amagaju: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

Muhanga played against Amagaju in National Soccer League (Rwanda). The game was played on December 6, 2025. Final score: 0:1.

Recent form

Muhanga has 3 wins, 0 draws and 2 losses over its last five games, averaging 1.80 points per game. Amagaju has 1 win, 1 draw and 3 losses, with 0.80 points per game.

Scoring records

Muhanga scores 0.56 goals per game and allows 1.00. Amagaju scores 0.44 and allows 1.00. Games in this league average 1.83 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 22% of Muhanga's games and 22% of Amagaju's. The Over 2.5 rates are 11% and 11%, compared with league averages of 39% for BTTS and 25% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

Amagaju has the higher season xG average, 0.96 to 0.93 per game. Muhanga takes 5.0 shots per game, while Amagaju takes 5.3.

First-half and second-half trends

Muhanga leads at halftime in 33% of its games and scores 0.11 goals per game after halftime. Amagaju leads at halftime in 11% and scores 0.33 after halftime.

When the teams score

Muhanga's most productive scoring window is minutes 16-30 (2 goals). For Amagaju, it is minutes 76-90+ (2 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

National Soccer League games average 1.83 goals. Both teams score in 39% of games, and 25% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

There is not enough head-to-head history for a meaningful comparison.

Stats by half

0 : 1
First half
0 : 0
Second half

Game stats

56Possession (%)44
MuhangaAmagaju
7Shots14
MuhangaAmagaju
2Shots on target6
MuhangaAmagaju
0.93xG1.7
MuhangaAmagaju
4Corners3
MuhangaAmagaju
47Dangerous attacks54
MuhangaAmagaju
12Fouls9
MuhangaAmagaju
0Cards0
MuhangaAmagaju

Pre-game profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

0.56Goals scored / game0.44
MuhangaAmagaju
1Goals allowed / game1
MuhangaAmagaju
42%Average possession40%
MuhangaAmagaju
1.78Shots on target / game1.44
MuhangaAmagaju

Team statswho is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

5Shots per game5.33
MuhangaAmagaju
1.78Shots on target1.44
MuhangaAmagaju
11.1%Shot conversion8.3%
MuhangaAmagaju
42%Possession40%
MuhangaAmagaju
0.93xG for0.96
MuhangaAmagaju
1.44xG against0.93
MuhangaAmagaju

Shooting quality

Muhanga: BalancedAmagaju: Balanced
MuhangaAmagaju
Accuracy (shots on target)36%27%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.190.18
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.310.31

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

Muhanga is 125% better for: last-5 form.

1.8 pts / game - Muhanga · 0.8 pts / game - Amagaju

Muhanga
WLLWW
Season result split
33% W11% R56% P
Season (W-D-L)
3-1-5
1.11 pts / game · goal difference -4
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-0-2
1.80 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
0-1-2
Last 5 at home
0-1-2
LDL
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 0.8Goals conceded: 0.8xG: 0.90Opponent xG: 1.22BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 20%
Amagaju
LLWDL
Season result split
22% W22% R56% P
Season (W-D-L)
2-2-5
0.89 pts / game · goal difference -5
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-1-3
0.80 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
2-0-2
Last 5 away
2-0-2
WLLW
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 0.4Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 1.08Opponent xG: 0.93BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 0%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Muhanga is 27% better for: goals scored per game.

0.56 goals / game - Muhanga · 0.44 goals / game - Amagaju

Muhanga scoring profile: mixed

Muhanga scores in 44% of games (4 of 9 meczów), while Amagaju keeps a clean sheet in 22% (2 of 9 meczów).

Amagaju scoring profile: mixed

Amagaju scores in 33% of games (3 of 9 meczów), while Muhanga keeps a clean sheet in 22% (2 of 9 meczów).

5Goals scored (season)4
MuhangaAmagaju
9Goals conceded (season)9
MuhangaAmagaju
1.56Average goals per game1.44
MuhangaAmagaju
4Goals scored (last 5)2
MuhangaAmagaju
4Goals conceded (last 5)5
MuhangaAmagaju

How often they score at least...

44%1 goal33%
MuhangaAmagaju
11%2 goals11%
MuhangaAmagaju
0%3 goals0%
MuhangaAmagaju
0%4 goals0%
MuhangaAmagaju

How often they concede at least...

78%1 goal78%
MuhangaAmagaju
22%2 goals22%
MuhangaAmagaju
0%3 goals0%
MuhangaAmagaju
0%4 goals0%
MuhangaAmagaju

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

11%BTTS at half-time0%
MuhangaAmagaju
0%BTTS in both halves0%
MuhangaAmagaju
0%Scored in both halves11%
MuhangaAmagaju

BTTS and goal count

11%Min. 3 goals and BTTS11%
MuhangaAmagaju
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
MuhangaAmagaju
20%BTTS - last 520%
MuhangaAmagaju

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

1st half

56%Min. 1 goal before half-time33%
MuhangaAmagaju
11%Min. 2 goals before half-time11%
MuhangaAmagaju
11%Min. 3 goals before half-time0%
MuhangaAmagaju

2nd half

67%Min. 1 goal after half-time78%
MuhangaAmagaju
11%Min. 2 goals after half-time22%
MuhangaAmagaju
0%Min. 3 goals after half-time0%
MuhangaAmagaju

Game halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Muhanga is 44% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.44 pts / game - Muhanga · 1 pts / game - Amagaju

Muhanga - half-time state
33% leading44% draw22% trailing
Amagaju - half-time state
11% leading67% draw22% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.44Points per game (1st half)1
MuhangaAmagaju
0.44Goals scored (1st half)0.11
MuhangaAmagaju
0.33Goals conceded (1st half)0.33
MuhangaAmagaju
0.78Average goals (1st half)0.44
MuhangaAmagaju
67%Clean sheet before half-time78%
MuhangaAmagaju
67%No goal before half-time89%
MuhangaAmagaju

After half-time (2nd half)

0.67Points per game (2nd half)1
MuhangaAmagaju
0.11Goals scored (2nd half)0.33
MuhangaAmagaju
0.67Goals conceded (2nd half)0.67
MuhangaAmagaju
0.78Average goals (2nd half)1
MuhangaAmagaju
44%Clean sheet after half-time44%
MuhangaAmagaju
89%No goal after half-time67%
MuhangaAmagaju

Muhanga - second-half results

11% W33% R56% P
13
Half-time points
4
Half-time goals
+1
Goal difference (1st half)
6
Second-half points
-5
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.44
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at halftime in 33% of games and wins 33%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime+0.3

Allows 0.3 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

Amagaju - second-half results

22% W33% R44% P
9
Half-time points
1
Half-time goals
-2
Goal difference (1st half)
9
Second-half points
-3
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.00
PPG before half-time
Lead holding200%

Leads at halftime in 11% of games and wins 22%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime+0.3

Allows 0.3 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

Muhanga - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.401.20
Goals scored / game0.60.2
Goals allowed / game0.60.2
Average goals per game1.20.4
1 goal80%40%
2 goals20%0%
3 goals20%0%
Clean sheet40%80%
No goal60%80%
Goal difference00
Half-time: 40% leading - 20% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 60% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 3
Amagaju - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game0.801.20
Goals scored / game0.00.4
Goals allowed / game0.20.8
Average goals per game0.21.2
1 goal20%100%
2 goals0%20%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet80%40%
No goal100%60%
Goal difference-1-2
Half-time: 0% leading - 80% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 0% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 0

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

Muhanga
ScoredConceded
1
0
0-15
2
1
16-30
1
2
31-45
1
0
46-60
0
2
61-75
0
4
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (2 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): -4 - late phases are a weakness.

Amagaju
ScoredConceded
0
0
0-15
0
1
16-30
1
2
31-45
0
1
46-60
1
2
61-75
2
3
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (2 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

1.50
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
0.8 : 0.7
Estimated goal split
home : away
82%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
22%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
15%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
38%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 3 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

Muhanga

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.51
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.07
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+3.6 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.37
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.44
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
62%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
108%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
+0.69
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.3
Late goals
0% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 20% come in the first quarter-hour.
0%

Amagaju

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.03
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.59
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+3.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.52
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
-0.07
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
47%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
111%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
-0.09
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
50% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
50%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (National Soccer League).

Teams vs league

MuhangaLigaAmagaju
Average goals per game 1.561.83 1.44
Both teams scored 22%39% 22%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 11%25% 11%
Clean sheets 22%38% 22%
Goal before half-time 56%53% 33%
Goal after half-time 67%69% 78%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

1.83
Average goals per game
39%
Both teams scored
25%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
38%
Clean sheets
0.90
Home goals / game
0.93
Away goals / game
+-3%
Home attack advantage
+-3%
Home defensive advantage
+1%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
53%
1 goal
23%
2 goals
7%
3 goals
1%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
69%
1 goal
28%
2 goals
2%
3 goals
0%
4 goals

FAQ

What was the result of Muhanga vs Amagaju?

The National Soccer League match finished Muhanga 0:1 Amagaju. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Muhanga vs Amagaju?

Muhanga score 0.56 goals per game on average and Amagaju 0.44. The National Soccer League average is 1.83 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 25% of games. Both teams score in 22% of Muhanga's matches and 22% of Amagaju's.

What form are Muhanga and Amagaju in?

Over the last 5 games Muhanga have a 3-0-2 record (1.80 points per game) and Amagaju 1-1-3 (0.80 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Muhanga vs Amagaju?

The statistical background for Muhanga vs Amagaju — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.