Mukura vs APR: match statistics
Mukura vs APR: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Mukura played against APR in National Soccer League (Rwanda). The game was played on April 25, 2026. Final score: 0:3.
Recent form
Mukura has 2 wins, 1 draw and 2 losses over its last five games, averaging 1.40 points per game. APR has 3 wins, 1 draw and 1 loss, with 2.00 points per game.
Scoring records
Mukura scores 1.07 goals per game and allows 1.00. APR scores 1.37 and allows 0.78. Games in this league average 2.04 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 56% of Mukura's games and 52% of APR's. The Over 2.5 rates are 30% and 44%, compared with league averages of 44% for BTTS and 35% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
APR has the higher season xG average, 1.26 to 1.07 per game. Mukura takes 5.3 shots per game, while APR takes 8.1.
First-half and second-half trends
Mukura leads at halftime in 26% of its games and scores 0.67 goals per game after halftime. APR leads at halftime in 41% and scores 0.70 after halftime.
When the teams score
Mukura's most productive scoring window is minutes 61-75 (9 goals). For APR, it is minutes 76-90+ (10 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
National Soccer League games average 2.04 goals. Both teams score in 44% of games, and 35% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, one previous meeting was available. The record was 0 home wins, 0 draws and 1 away win. Those games averaged 1.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
The match looks balanced: APR is 2nd in the table and has scored 37 goals this season versus Mukura’s 29, and in the last 5 matches APR has scored 7 goals and has 3 wins with an average of 2.0 points per game, while Mukura has scored 5 goals and has 2 wins with 1.4 pts/game. However, the hosts have a clear home advantage: Mukura concedes only 0.64 goals on average in home matches, has 55% clean sheets and wins 64% of home games, whereas APR have only 29% wins away and concede 1.14 goals on average. In terms of quality of chances, the home xG is 1.05 versus 1.21 xG for the visitors away, but Mukura has better shot efficiency (22% conversion vs 15% for APR), which can swing the outcome with a small number of chances. Additionally APR records as many as 50% draws away, and Mukura’s home matches are characterized by a low total goal count (1.91), which increases the likelihood of a tight, low-scoring game and makes a draw a realistic outcome. Overall I favor the hosts but with significant draw risk — I estimate about 43% for a Mukura win, 34% for a draw and 23% for an APR win.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
The dominant signal is Mukura's defense: they concede only 0.38 goals per match this season and have 62% clean sheets, with the home side's season BTTS at 38%, which lowers the likelihood of both teams scoring. APR have stronger offensive numbers (1.29 goals per match and season BTTS 64%) and have scored 7 goals in the last 5 matches (1.4 avg), but their season average conceded is 1.14 goals (and 0.8 in the last 5). xG comparison shows Mukura generates 1.32 xG and allows 0.86 xG, while APR have 1.21 xG and allow 1.04 xG, so the hosts create slightly more chances and restrict them better. Although Mukura have 60% BTTS in the last 5 games, the season profile (62% clean sheets and 0.38 conceded) is stronger than short-term fluctuations, therefore I assign 60% to 'No' and 40% to 'BTTS - Yes' and recommend the 'No' pick.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Mukura averages 1.46 goals per game this season (xG 1.32), APR averages 1.29 goals with xG 1.21; combined xG is 2.53, indicating goal potential. Adjusting for opponent attack/defense: Mukura (xG 1.32) against APR’s average defense (xG against 1.04) yields an expected 1.18 goals for the home side, while APR (xG 1.21) against Mukura’s defense (xG against 0.86) yields 1.04 for the visitors — totaling 2.22 expected goals. From a Poisson distribution with mean 2.22 the probability of at least 2 goals (Over 1.5) is about 65%, while the probability of at least 3 goals (Over 2.5) is ~38%. Seasonal stats support this picture: Mukura has 62% of matches with ≥2 goals, APR 79%, but Over 2.5 occurs only in 38%/50% respectively, so the signal for Over 1.5 is stronger. Therefore I recommend backing Over on the 1.5 line — it has the strongest and most consistent numerical support.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Mukura clearly dominates at home: they average 1.46 goals scored and concede only 0.38 per match, earn 2.54 points per home game and win 77% of home fixtures. At half-time Mukura led in 7 matches (54%), score an average of 0.69 goals by the break and concede just 0.15, and keep a clean sheet at half-time in 85% of games, which strongly supports them leading after 45 minutes. APR, by contrast, averages 1.29 goals scored and 1.14 conceded, has an xG of 1.21 versus Mukura’s 1.32, and concedes 0.79 goals by half-time, so the visitors are more exposed to conceding in the first half. Considering these figures (HT leads 54% for Mukura, a low 0.15 average conceded by half-time, and strong home efficiency), the most likely scenario is 1/1 (48%), with X/1 at 16% and X/X at 12% as alternatives.
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Mukura | APR | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 31% | 35% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.20 | 0.16 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.66 | 0.48 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
APR is 43% better for: last-5 form.
1.4 pts / game - Mukura · 2 pts / game - APR
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
APR is 28% better for: goals scored per game.
1.07 goals / game - Mukura · 1.37 goals / game - APR
APR is 28% better for: goals allowed per game.
1 goals / game - Mukura · 0.78 goals / game - APR
Mukura scores in 85% of games (23 of 27 meczów), while APR keeps a clean sheet in 44% (12 of 27 meczów).
APR scores in 81% of games (22 of 27 meczów), while Mukura keeps a clean sheet in 33% (9 of 27 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Mukura
Over / Under - APR
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
APR is 34% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.19 pts / game - Mukura · 1.59 pts / game - APR
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Mukura - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 26% of games and wins 41%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
APR - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 41% of games and wins 52%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 0.60 | 1.80 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.0 | 1.0 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.6 | 0.6 |
| Average goals per game | 0.6 | 1.6 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 40% |
| No goal | 100% | 0% |
| Goal difference | -3 | +2 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.40 | 2.20 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.4 | 1.0 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.8 | 0.0 |
| Average goals per game | 1.2 | 1.0 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 100% |
| No goal | 60% | 40% |
| Goal difference | -2 | +5 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (9 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (10 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): +5 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Mukura
APR
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (National Soccer League).
Teams vs league
| Mukura | Liga | APR | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | • 2.07 | 2.04 | ▲ 2.15 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 56% | 44% | ▲ 52% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 30% | 35% | ▲ 44% |
| Clean sheets | • 33% | 34% | ▲ 44% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 67% | 60% | ▲ 70% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 74% | 69% | • 70% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Away team
Other recorded players
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
- APRGoalDjibril Cheick Ouattara
- APRGoalHakim Kiwanuka
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Record from Mukura's perspective: 0 wins, 0 draws and 1 loss against APR. Games average 1.00 goals, and both teams scored in 0% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Mukura vs APR?
The National Soccer League match finished Mukura 0:3 APR. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Mukura vs APR?
Mukura score 1.07 goals per game on average and APR 1.37. The National Soccer League average is 2.04 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 35% of games. Both teams score in 56% of Mukura's matches and 52% of APR's.
What form are Mukura and APR in?
Over the last 5 games Mukura have a 2-1-2 record (1.40 points per game) and APR 3-1-1 (2.00 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Mukura vs APR?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Mukura vs APR: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.


