Mura vs Bravo: match statistics
Mura vs Bravo: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Mura played against Bravo in PrvaLiga (Slovenia). The game was played on April 11, 2026. Final score: 1:2.
Recent form
Mura has 2 wins, 1 draw and 2 losses over its last five games, averaging 1.40 points per game. Bravo has 3 wins, 1 draw and 1 loss, with 2.00 points per game.
Scoring records
Mura scores 1.00 goals per game and allows 1.63. Bravo scores 1.74 and allows 1.67. Games in this league average 3.11 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 41% of Mura's games and 63% of Bravo's. The Over 2.5 rates are 52% and 67%, compared with league averages of 61% for BTTS and 64% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Bravo has the higher season xG average, 1.75 to 1.41 per game. Mura takes 10.8 shots per game, while Bravo takes 13.5.
First-half and second-half trends
Mura leads at halftime in 22% of its games and scores 0.52 goals per game after halftime. Bravo leads at halftime in 52% and scores 1.00 after halftime.
When the teams score
Mura's most productive scoring window is minutes 76-90+ (7 goals). For Bravo, it is minutes 76-90+ (11 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
PrvaLiga games average 3.11 goals. Both teams score in 61% of games, and 64% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, 3 previous meetings were available. The record was 1 home win, 1 draw and 1 away win. Those games averaged 2.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 33% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
I predict an away win (2) because seasonal statistics and recent form favor Bravo. Bravo have 12 wins this season versus Mura’s 6 and have scored 47 goals compared to 27 for the hosts; in the last 5 matches the visitors have scored 9 goals and won 4 games, averaging 2.6 points per match in that period. Mura at home scores 1.31 goals on average with 3.69 shots on target and have 38% of matches goalless for them, whereas Bravo away average 2.00 goals with 5.14 shots on target and only 21% of matches without a goal — a conversion rate of 15% versus Mura’s 11% confirms greater efficiency for the visitors. Mura’s home defense is solid (1.08 goals conceded per game and 31% clean sheets), but in the last 5 matches Mura conceded 7 goals while Bravo conceded only 3, reinforcing the visitors’ form advantage. Higher xG for Bravo away (1.72 vs 1.48 for Mura at home) suggests the visitors are creating better chances, so I give Bravo the higher probability of victory.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Season-long indicators strongly support BTTS: Bravo has BTTS at 71%, Mura 54%, and the league average is 61%. Both teams create chances — shots per game 13.46 (Mura) vs 13.5 (Bravo), shots on target 5.69 vs 5.14, attacking xG 1.79 vs 1.72 and conversion rate 11% (Mura) vs 15% (Bravo), which increases the likelihood of goals from both sides. Counterargument is Mura's poor recent form regarding BTTS: in the last 5 their BTTS is only 20%, scoring on average 1.0 and conceding 1.4, while Bravo in the same period has 60% BTTS, scores 1.8 and concedes 0.6. Season defensive numbers also favor goals — Mura conceded 44, Bravo 45, and clean sheets are only 23% and 14%; additionally the percentage of matches over 2.5 goals is 62% (Mura) and 71% (Bravo), the league averages 3.1 goals per match. Considering Bravo's 71% BTTS, Mura's 54% and the high xG and shot numbers, but factoring in Mura's weaker 20% BTTS in the last 5, I suggest selecting "BTTS - Yes" with a probability of 65% versus 35% for "No Goal".
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
The combined goal potential points to a multi-goal match: Mura xG 1.79, Bravo xG 1.72, with xG against 1.68 (Mura) and 1.58 (Bravo), translating to projected 1.69 goals for the home side and 1.70 for the visitors (total 3.39). Seasonally both teams have a high share of Over 2.5 goals — Mura 62% and Bravo 71% (average 66.5%) — versus a league average of 63%, which strongly supports Over 2.5. Additionally, the BTTS rate is 54% for Mura and 71% for Bravo, and shots on target 5.69 vs 5.14 plus Bravo’s higher conversion (15% vs Mura 11%) increase the likelihood of goals from both sides. The risk is mitigated by Mura’s form (last 5 matches: 1.0 goal per game on average) and the fact that Over 3.5 occurs less frequently for Mura this season (31% vs Bravo 50%), so Over 3.5 is less certain despite the high xG. On this basis I pick Over 2.5 as the best line — it is the strongest signal based on xG=3.39, seasonal 66.5% Over 2.5 and a high share of BTTS matches.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Mura led at the break in 9 of 13 matches this season (69%), averaging 0.85 goals scored before half-time versus Bravo’s 0.64, giving the hosts a clear first-half advantage. At the same time Bravo are in excellent form — they have won 4 of their last 5 matches (80%) and had the lead at half-time in 4 of those 5 (80%), while averaging 1.36 goals in second halves compared to Mura’s 0.62. The second-half difference is pronounced: gd_2hg_away +9 versus gd_2hg_home -5 and points_2hg_away 23 vs points_2hg_home 13, which indicates strong Bravo performance after the break. For that reason the most reliable signal is the scenario of Mura leading at the break but Bravo winning the match — HT/FT 1/2 (26%), although 1/1 also has a significant likelihood (20%).
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Mura | Bravo | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 31% | 40% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.13 | 0.13 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.30 | 0.32 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Bravo is 43% better for: last-5 form.
1.4 pts / game - Mura · 2 pts / game - Bravo
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Bravo is 74% better for: goals scored per game.
1 goals / game - Mura · 1.74 goals / game - Bravo
Mura scores in 52% of games (14 of 27 meczów), while Bravo keeps a clean sheet in 19% (5 of 27 meczów).
Bravo scores in 78% of games (21 of 27 meczów), while Mura keeps a clean sheet in 19% (5 of 27 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Mura
Over / Under - Bravo
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Bravo is 77% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
0.96 pts / game - Mura · 1.7 pts / game - Bravo
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Mura - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 22% of games and wins 22%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
Bravo - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 52% of games and wins 44%. Usually protects a halftime lead through the final whistle.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.00 | 1.60 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.4 | 0.6 |
| Goals allowed / game | 1.0 | 0.4 |
| Average goals per game | 1.4 | 1.0 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 80% |
| No goal | 60% | 60% |
| Goal difference | -3 | +1 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.80 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.8 | 0.6 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.4 | 0.6 |
| Average goals per game | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 40% |
| No goal | 40% | 60% |
| Goal difference | +2 | 0 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (7 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (11). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (11 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (12). Late-goal balance (76-90): +4 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Mura
Bravo
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (PrvaLiga).
Teams vs league
| Mura | Liga | Bravo | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▼ 2.63 | 3.11 | ▲ 3.41 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 41% | 61% | ▲ 63% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 52% | 64% | ▲ 67% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 19% | 22% | ▼ 19% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 81% | 85% | • 85% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 67% | 80% | ▲ 85% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Referee context
See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.
Head-to-head
Record from Mura's perspective: 1 win, 1 draw and 1 loss against Bravo. Games average 2.00 goals, and both teams scored in 33% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Mura vs Bravo?
The PrvaLiga match finished Mura 1:2 Bravo. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Mura and Bravo?
In the last 3 head-to-head matches Mura won 1, Bravo won 1 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 2.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 33% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Mura vs Bravo?
Mura score 1.00 goals per game on average and Bravo 1.74. The PrvaLiga average is 3.11 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 64% of games. Both teams score in 41% of Mura's matches and 63% of Bravo's.
What form are Mura and Bravo in?
Over the last 5 games Mura have a 2-1-2 record (1.40 points per game) and Bravo 3-1-1 (2.00 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Mura vs Bravo?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.