Nacional Potosí vs Blooming: match statistics
Nacional Potosí vs Blooming: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Nacional Potosí played against Blooming in LFPB (Bolivia). The game was played on September 7, 2026. Venue: Estadio Victor Agustín Ugarte. Final score: 2:1.
Recent form
Nacional Potosí has 2 wins, 0 draws and 3 losses over its last five games, averaging 1.20 points per game. Blooming has 1 win, 3 draws and 1 loss, with 1.20 points per game.
Scoring records
Nacional Potosí scores 1.47 goals per game and allows 1.35. Blooming scores 1.29 and allows 1.06. Games in this league average 3.05 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 59% of Nacional Potosí's games and 53% of Blooming's. The Over 2.5 rates are 53% and 35%, compared with league averages of 62% for BTTS and 62% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Blooming has the higher season xG average, 1.47 to 1.37 per game. Nacional Potosí takes 12.5 shots per game, while Blooming takes 13.9.
First-half and second-half trends
Nacional Potosí leads at halftime in 41% of its games and scores 0.88 goals per game after halftime. Blooming leads at halftime in 47% and scores 0.53 after halftime.
When the teams score
Nacional Potosí's most productive scoring window is minutes 46-60 (5 goals). For Blooming, it is minutes 0-15 (5 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
LFPB games average 3.05 goals. Both teams score in 62% of games, and 62% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, 3 previous meetings were available. The record was 1 home win, 1 draw and 1 away win. Those games averaged 2.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 33% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Nacional Potosí are clearly stronger at home, winning 63% of their matches, scoring an average of 2 goals per game, and failing to score in none of them. Blooming win just 13% of their away fixtures, concede an average of 1.75 goals, and keep a clean sheet in only 13% of matches. The hosts also create better chances, as reflected by their average xG of 1.55 compared with Blooming’s 1.31, while their opponents allow an xG as high as 1.82. Nacional register 13.38 shots and 4.88 shots on target per home game, with a 15% conversion rate, whereas the visitors convert just 8% of their attempts. Neither team’s recent form is perfect, but Nacional have won 2 of their last 5 matches, compared with just 1 for Blooming. Therefore, home advantage should swing the result in favor of the hosts.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Nacional Potosí has a very solid home defense, conceding just 0.44 goals per match on average and keeping a clean sheet in 56% of games. Blooming scores only 1.00 goal per away match, and fails to score in 25% of its appearances, further increasing the risk that the visitors will draw a blank. The hosts should create chances against a Blooming defense that concedes an average of 1.75 goals and 1.82 xG, but for the BTTS market, the key factor remains limiting the visitors’ attacking output. Nacional’s season BTTS rate is only 44%, well below the league average of 63%, while the figures across the teams’ last five matches stand at 40% and 60%, respectively. A BTTS - Yes outcome cannot be ruled out, as Blooming has recently averaged 1.4 goals per match, but Nacional’s strong home defense slightly favors the BTTS - No scenario, meaning that at least one team fails to score.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Nacional Potosí score an average of 1.56 goals at home, while Blooming concede as many as 1.75 away from home, clearly supporting a home tally in the region of 1–2 goals. At the same time, Nacional Potosí concede just 0.44 goals per home match and keep a clean sheet in 56% of games, while Blooming average 1.00 goal away from home. The projection of around 2.70 goals is supported by the xG figures: 1.60 for the hosts and 1.31 for the visitors, although Nacional’s highly solid defense limits the opponent’s attacking potential. Across the entire season, Nacional’s matches finished under 3.5 goals in 89% of cases, compared with 62% for Blooming; even with a more open recent run, this remains the strongest signal. Therefore, the best option is Under 3.5 goals, as a scenario involving four or more goals would require a clear breakdown of the hosts’ defensive profile.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Nacional Potosí have a clear home advantage: they score an average of 1.56 goals and concede just 0.44, while Blooming concede as many as 1.75 goals per away match. The hosts led at the break in 6 of their 9 home fixtures, or 67%, averaging 1.0 goal scored and no goals conceded before half-time. Blooming led at half-time in only 25% of their away matches, scoring an average of 0.5 goals and conceding the same number in first halves. After the interval, the visitors still look defensively vulnerable, allowing an average of 1.25 goals, whereas Nacional keep a clean sheet in 56% of their matches overall. The hosts’ superior xG, 1.60 compared with 1.31, and 5.78 shots on target per match versus 4.25 further support the scenario of Nacional leading at half-time and holding on for the win, corresponding to an HT/FT 1/1 outcome.
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Nacional Potosí | Blooming | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 34% | 36% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.11 | 0.11 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.35 | 0.25 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Nacional Potosí is 14% better for: goals scored per game.
1.47 goals / game - Nacional Potosí · 1.29 goals / game - Blooming
Blooming is 27% better for: goals allowed per game.
1.35 goals / game - Nacional Potosí · 1.06 goals / game - Blooming
Nacional Potosí scores in 88% of games (15 of 17 games), while Blooming keeps a clean sheet in 35% (6 of 17 games).
Blooming scores in 76% of games (13 of 17 games), while Nacional Potosí keeps a clean sheet in 29% (5 of 17 games).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Nacional Potosí
Over / Under - Blooming
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Blooming is 14% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.59 pts / game - Nacional Potosí · 1.82 pts / game - Blooming
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Nacional Potosí - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 41% of games and wins 35%. Usually protects a halftime lead through the final whistle.
Allows 0.4 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
Blooming - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 47% of games and wins 29%. Sometimes gives up a halftime lead.
Allows 0.6 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.80 | 1.40 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.8 | 0.8 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.6 | 0.8 |
| Average goals per game | 1.4 | 1.6 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 40% |
| No goal | 40% | 40% |
| Goal difference | +1 | 0 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.20 | 1.20 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.2 | 0.8 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.2 | 0.6 |
| Average goals per game | 0.4 | 1.4 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 40% |
| No goal | 80% | 40% |
| Goal difference | 0 | +1 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (5 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (5 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Nacional Potosí
Blooming
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (LFPB).
Teams vs league
| Nacional Potosí | Liga | Blooming | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▼ 2.82 | 3.05 | ▼ 2.35 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 59% | 62% | ▼ 53% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 53% | 62% | ▼ 35% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 29% | 22% | ▲ 35% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 65% | 73% | ▼ 71% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 100% | 87% | ▼ 82% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Record from Nacional Potosí's perspective: 1 win, 1 draw and 1 loss against Blooming. Games average 2.00 goals, and both teams scored in 33% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Nacional Potosí vs Blooming?
The LFPB match finished Nacional Potosí 2:1 Blooming. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Nacional Potosí and Blooming?
In the last 3 head-to-head matches Nacional Potosí won 1, Blooming won 1 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 2.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 33% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Nacional Potosí vs Blooming?
Nacional Potosí score 1.47 goals per game on average and Blooming 1.29. The LFPB average is 3.05 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 62% of games. Both teams score in 59% of Nacional Potosí's matches and 53% of Blooming's.
What form are Nacional Potosí and Blooming in?
Over the last 5 games Nacional Potosí have a 2-0-3 record (1.20 points per game) and Blooming 1-3-1 (1.20 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Nacional Potosí vs Blooming?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.


