Naft Bandar Abbas vs Nassaji Mazandaran: match statistics
As the league leaders, Nassaji Mazandaran exhibit significantly superior form and away statistics. The visitors have won 67% of their away fixtures, boasting an impressive goal difference of +11, compared to the hosts' 44% home win rate. Nassaji possesses the league's best defense, conceding an average of just 0.56 goals per away match, underscored by 56% clean sheets. Naft Bandar Abbas struggles with clinical efficiency, averaging only 1 goal per home game, failing to score in 33% of matches. A higher average xG for the visitors (1.31 vs 1.05) and a vastly superior overall record (11 wins vs 5) indicate a clear advantage for Nassaji. While away fixtures can be challenging, the league leader's quality and current form should prove decisive.
Naft Bandar Abbas vs Nassaji Mazandaran: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Naft Bandar Abbas played against Nassaji Mazandaran in Azadegan League (Iran). The game was played on January 20, 2026. Final score: 1:1.
Recent form
Naft Bandar Abbas has 2 wins, 2 draws and 1 loss over its last five games, averaging 1.60 points per game. Nassaji Mazandaran has 2 wins, 2 draws and 1 loss, with 1.60 points per game.
Scoring records
Naft Bandar Abbas scores 0.88 goals per game and allows 0.71. Nassaji Mazandaran scores 1.47 and allows 0.29. Games in this league average 1.49 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 53% of Naft Bandar Abbas's games and 24% of Nassaji Mazandaran's. The Over 2.5 rates are 24% and 35%, compared with league averages of 32% for BTTS and 21% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Nassaji Mazandaran has the higher season xG average, 1.93 to 1.13 per game. Naft Bandar Abbas takes 1.4 shots per game, while Nassaji Mazandaran takes 6.8.
First-half and second-half trends
Naft Bandar Abbas leads at halftime in 35% of its games and scores 0.35 goals per game after halftime. Nassaji Mazandaran leads at halftime in 24% and scores 0.88 after halftime.
When the teams score
Naft Bandar Abbas's most productive scoring window is minutes 31-45+ (4 goals). For Nassaji Mazandaran, it is minutes 61-75 (8 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Azadegan League games average 1.49 goals. Both teams score in 32% of games, and 21% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, one previous meeting was available. The record was 0 home wins, 1 draw and 0 away wins. Those games averaged 0.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
As the league leaders, Nassaji Mazandaran exhibit significantly superior form and away statistics. The visitors have won 67% of their away fixtures, boasting an impressive goal difference of +11, compared to the hosts' 44% home win rate. Nassaji possesses the league's best defense, conceding an average of just 0.56 goals per away match, underscored by 56% clean sheets. Naft Bandar Abbas struggles with clinical efficiency, averaging only 1 goal per home game, failing to score in 33% of matches. A higher average xG for the visitors (1.31 vs 1.05) and a vastly superior overall record (11 wins vs 5) indicate a clear advantage for Nassaji. While away fixtures can be challenging, the league leader's quality and current form should prove decisive.
View the statistical overviewStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Naft Bandar Abbas | Nassaji Mazandaran | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 0% | 49% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.84 | 0.28 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.00 | 0.44 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Nassaji Mazandaran is 67% better for: goals scored per game.
0.88 goals / game - Naft Bandar Abbas · 1.47 goals / game - Nassaji Mazandaran
Nassaji Mazandaran is 145% better for: goals allowed per game.
0.71 goals / game - Naft Bandar Abbas · 0.29 goals / game - Nassaji Mazandaran
Naft Bandar Abbas scores in 65% of games (11 of 17 meczów), while Nassaji Mazandaran keeps a clean sheet in 76% (13 of 17 meczów).
Nassaji Mazandaran scores in 76% of games (13 of 17 meczów), while Naft Bandar Abbas keeps a clean sheet in 35% (6 of 17 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Naft Bandar Abbas
Over / Under - Nassaji Mazandaran
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Naft Bandar Abbas is 18% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.59 pts / game - Naft Bandar Abbas · 1.35 pts / game - Nassaji Mazandaran
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Naft Bandar Abbas - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 35% of games and wins 29%. Usually protects a halftime lead through the final whistle.
Allows 0.2 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
Nassaji Mazandaran - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 24% of games and wins 65%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.60 | 1.20 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.6 | 0.6 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.4 | 0.6 |
| Average goals per game | 1.0 | 1.2 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 40% |
| No goal | 40% | 40% |
| Goal difference | +1 | 0 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.60 | 1.40 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.6 | 0.6 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.2 | 0.4 |
| Average goals per game | 0.8 | 1.0 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 60% |
| No goal | 60% | 40% |
| Goal difference | +2 | +1 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (4 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (8 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): +5 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Naft Bandar Abbas
Nassaji Mazandaran
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Azadegan League).
Teams vs league
| Naft Bandar Abbas | Liga | Nassaji Mazandaran | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▲ 1.59 | 1.49 | ▲ 1.76 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 53% | 32% | ▼ 24% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 24% | 21% | ▲ 35% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 35% | 45% | ▲ 76% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 59% | 46% | ▼ 35% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 65% | 57% | ▲ 59% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Other recorded players
Away team
Other recorded players
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
- Naft Bandar AbbasGoalAli Fathi
- Nassaji MazandaranGoalAli Nasiri
Head-to-head
Record from Naft Bandar Abbas's perspective: 0 wins, 1 draw and 0 losses against Nassaji Mazandaran. Games average 0.00 goals, and both teams scored in 0% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Naft Bandar Abbas vs Nassaji Mazandaran?
The Azadegan League match finished Naft Bandar Abbas 1:1 Nassaji Mazandaran. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Naft Bandar Abbas vs Nassaji Mazandaran?
Naft Bandar Abbas score 0.88 goals per game on average and Nassaji Mazandaran 1.47. The Azadegan League average is 1.49 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 21% of games. Both teams score in 53% of Naft Bandar Abbas's matches and 24% of Nassaji Mazandaran's.
What form are Naft Bandar Abbas and Nassaji Mazandaran in?
Over the last 5 games Naft Bandar Abbas have a 2-2-1 record (1.60 points per game) and Nassaji Mazandaran 2-2-1 (1.60 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Naft Bandar Abbas vs Nassaji Mazandaran?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.