Naft Bandar Abbas vs Navad Urmia: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

Naft Bandar Abbas played against Navad Urmia in Azadegan League (Iran). The game was played on November 27, 2025. Final score: 2:1.

Recent form

Naft Bandar Abbas has 1 win, 4 draws and 0 losses over its last five games, averaging 1.40 points per game. Navad Urmia has 1 win, 3 draws and 1 loss, with 1.20 points per game.

Scoring records

Naft Bandar Abbas scores 0.75 goals per game and allows 0.58. Navad Urmia scores 0.75 and allows 0.50. Games in this league average 1.47 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 42% of Naft Bandar Abbas's games and 33% of Navad Urmia's. The Over 2.5 rates are 8% and 8%, compared with league averages of 28% for BTTS and 21% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

Naft Bandar Abbas has the higher season xG average, 1.35 to 1.09 per game. Naft Bandar Abbas takes 1.1 shots per game, while Navad Urmia takes 2.3.

First-half and second-half trends

Naft Bandar Abbas leads at halftime in 33% of its games and scores 0.25 goals per game after halftime. Navad Urmia leads at halftime in 25% and scores 0.42 after halftime.

When the teams score

Naft Bandar Abbas's most productive scoring window is minutes 16-30 (3 goals). For Navad Urmia, it is minutes 76-90+ (3 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

Azadegan League games average 1.47 goals. Both teams score in 28% of games, and 21% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

There is not enough head-to-head history for a meaningful comparison.

Stats by half

1 : 0
First half
1 : 1
Second half

Game stats

-1Possession (%)-1
Naft Bandar AbbasNavad Urmia
-1Shots-1
Naft Bandar AbbasNavad Urmia
-1Shots on target-1
Naft Bandar AbbasNavad Urmia
0xG0
Naft Bandar AbbasNavad Urmia
-1Corners-1
Naft Bandar AbbasNavad Urmia
0Dangerous attacks0
Naft Bandar AbbasNavad Urmia
-1Fouls-1
Naft Bandar AbbasNavad Urmia
-1Cards-1
Naft Bandar AbbasNavad Urmia

Pre-game profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

Naft Bandar AbbasNavad Urmia
0.75Goals scored / game0.75
Naft Bandar AbbasNavad Urmia
0.58Goals allowed / game0.5
Naft Bandar AbbasNavad Urmia
12%Average possession16%
Naft Bandar AbbasNavad Urmia
-0.25Shots on target / game0.5
Naft Bandar AbbasNavad Urmia

Team statswho is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

1.08Shots per game2.25
Naft Bandar AbbasNavad Urmia
-0.25Shots on target0.5
Naft Bandar AbbasNavad Urmia
69.2%Shot conversion33.3%
Naft Bandar AbbasNavad Urmia
12%Possession16%
Naft Bandar AbbasNavad Urmia
1.35xG for1.09
Naft Bandar AbbasNavad Urmia
0.83xG against1.35
Naft Bandar AbbasNavad Urmia

Shooting quality

Naft Bandar Abbas: Counter-attackingNavad Urmia: Counter-attacking
Naft Bandar AbbasNavad Urmia
Accuracy (shots on target)-23%22%
Chance quality (xG per shot)1.250.48
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.001.50

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

Naft Bandar Abbas is 17% better for: last-5 form.

1.4 pts / game - Naft Bandar Abbas · 1.2 pts / game - Navad Urmia

Naft Bandar Abbas
WDDDD
Unbeaten in the last 5 games
Season result split
25% W58% R17% P
Season (W-D-L)
3-7-2
1.33 pts / game · goal difference +2
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-4-0
1.40 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
2-3-1
Last 5 at home
1-3-1
LDWDD
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 0.8xG: 0.81Opponent xG: 1.11BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 0%
Navad Urmia
DLDDW
Season result split
25% W58% R17% P
Season (W-D-L)
3-7-2
1.33 pts / game · goal difference +3
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-3-1
1.20 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
1-3-2
Last 5 away
0-3-2
LDDLD
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 0.4Goals conceded: 0.4xG: 0.68Opponent xG: 1.11BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 0%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Navad Urmia is 16% better for: goals allowed per game.

0.58 goals / game - Naft Bandar Abbas · 0.5 goals / game - Navad Urmia

Naft Bandar Abbas scoring profile: mixed

Naft Bandar Abbas scores in 58% of games (7 of 12 meczów), while Navad Urmia keeps a clean sheet in 50% (6 of 12 meczów).

Navad Urmia scoring profile: mixed

Navad Urmia scores in 58% of games (7 of 12 meczów), while Naft Bandar Abbas keeps a clean sheet in 42% (5 of 12 meczów).

9Goals scored (season)9
Naft Bandar AbbasNavad Urmia
7Goals conceded (season)6
Naft Bandar AbbasNavad Urmia
1.33Average goals per game1.25
Naft Bandar AbbasNavad Urmia
5Goals scored (last 5)2
Naft Bandar AbbasNavad Urmia
4Goals conceded (last 5)2
Naft Bandar AbbasNavad Urmia

How often they score at least...

58%1 goal58%
Naft Bandar AbbasNavad Urmia
17%2 goals8%
Naft Bandar AbbasNavad Urmia
0%3 goals8%
Naft Bandar AbbasNavad Urmia
0%4 goals0%
Naft Bandar AbbasNavad Urmia

How often they concede at least...

58%1 goal50%
Naft Bandar AbbasNavad Urmia
0%2 goals0%
Naft Bandar AbbasNavad Urmia
0%3 goals0%
Naft Bandar AbbasNavad Urmia
0%4 goals0%
Naft Bandar AbbasNavad Urmia

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

42%
Naft Bandar Abbas - BTTSBTTS - percentage of matches where both teams scored.5 of 12 meczów
28%
League average

Goal patterns

8%BTTS at half-time0%
Naft Bandar AbbasNavad Urmia
0%BTTS in both halves0%
Naft Bandar AbbasNavad Urmia
8%Scored in both halves8%
Naft Bandar AbbasNavad Urmia

BTTS and goal count

8%Min. 3 goals and BTTS0%
Naft Bandar AbbasNavad Urmia
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS8%
Naft Bandar AbbasNavad Urmia
80%BTTS - last 520%
Naft Bandar AbbasNavad Urmia

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

1st half

50%Min. 1 goal before half-time33%
Naft Bandar AbbasNavad Urmia
17%Min. 2 goals before half-time8%
Naft Bandar AbbasNavad Urmia
0%Min. 3 goals before half-time0%
Naft Bandar AbbasNavad Urmia

2nd half

58%Min. 1 goal after half-time58%
Naft Bandar AbbasNavad Urmia
8%Min. 2 goals after half-time25%
Naft Bandar AbbasNavad Urmia
0%Min. 3 goals after half-time0%
Naft Bandar AbbasNavad Urmia

Game halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Naft Bandar Abbas is 11% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.58 pts / game - Naft Bandar Abbas · 1.42 pts / game - Navad Urmia

Naft Bandar Abbas - half-time state
33% leading58% draw8% trailing
Navad Urmia - half-time state
25% leading67% draw8% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.58Points per game (1st half)1.42
Naft Bandar AbbasNavad Urmia
0.5Goals scored (1st half)0.33
Naft Bandar AbbasNavad Urmia
0.17Goals conceded (1st half)0.08
Naft Bandar AbbasNavad Urmia
0.67Average goals (1st half)0.42
Naft Bandar AbbasNavad Urmia
83%Clean sheet before half-time92%
Naft Bandar AbbasNavad Urmia
58%No goal before half-time75%
Naft Bandar AbbasNavad Urmia

After half-time (2nd half)

1Points per game (2nd half)1.17
Naft Bandar AbbasNavad Urmia
0.25Goals scored (2nd half)0.42
Naft Bandar AbbasNavad Urmia
0.42Goals conceded (2nd half)0.42
Naft Bandar AbbasNavad Urmia
0.67Average goals (2nd half)0.83
Naft Bandar AbbasNavad Urmia
58%Clean sheet after half-time58%
Naft Bandar AbbasNavad Urmia
75%No goal after half-time58%
Naft Bandar AbbasNavad Urmia

Naft Bandar Abbas - second-half results

17% W50% R33% P
19
Half-time points
6
Half-time goals
+4
Goal difference (1st half)
12
Second-half points
-2
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.58
PPG before half-time
Lead holding76%

Leads at halftime in 33% of games and wins 25%. Sometimes gives up a halftime lead.

Defense after halftime+0.2

Allows 0.2 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

Navad Urmia - second-half results

17% W67% R17% P
17
Half-time points
4
Half-time goals
+3
Goal difference (1st half)
14
Second-half points
0
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.42
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at halftime in 25% of games and wins 25%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime+0.3

Allows 0.3 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

Naft Bandar Abbas - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game2.200.80
Goals scored / game0.60.4
Goals allowed / game0.00.8
Average goals per game0.61.2
1 goal60%100%
2 goals0%20%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet100%20%
No goal40%60%
Goal difference+3-2
Half-time: 60% leading - 40% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 20% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 3
Navad Urmia - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.600.80
Goals scored / game0.40.0
Goals allowed / game0.20.2
Average goals per game0.60.2
1 goal60%20%
2 goals0%0%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet80%80%
No goal60%100%
Goal difference+1-1
Half-time: 40% leading - 40% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 80% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 2

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

Naft Bandar Abbas
ScoredConceded
0
1
0-15
3
0
16-30
3
1
31-45
2
1
46-60
0
2
61-75
1
2
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (3 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

Navad Urmia
ScoredConceded
1
0
0-15
1
0
16-30
2
1
31-45
1
0
46-60
1
1
61-75
3
4
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (3 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

1.29
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
0.6 : 0.7
Estimated goal split
home : away
88%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
38%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
34%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
18%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 6 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

Naft Bandar Abbas

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.52
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.35
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-6.4 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.60
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.25
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
88%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
95%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
+0.07
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.3
Late goals
11% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
11%

Navad Urmia

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.26
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.51
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-8.9 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.34
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.85
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
123%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
59%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
-0.13
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
33% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 11% come in the first quarter-hour.
33%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Azadegan League).

Teams vs league

Naft Bandar AbbasLigaNavad Urmia
Average goals per game 1.331.47 1.25
Both teams scored 42%28% 33%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 8%21% 8%
Clean sheets 42%48% 50%
Goal before half-time 50%40% 33%
Goal after half-time 58%59% 58%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

1.47
Average goals per game
28%
Both teams scored
21%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
48%
Clean sheets
0.85
Home goals / game
0.61
Away goals / game
+39%
Home attack advantage
+28%
Home defensive advantage
+21%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
40%
1 goal
12%
2 goals
3%
3 goals
0%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
59%
1 goal
21%
2 goals
6%
3 goals
1%
4 goals

FAQ

What was the result of Naft Bandar Abbas vs Navad Urmia?

The Azadegan League match finished Naft Bandar Abbas 2:1 Navad Urmia. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Naft Bandar Abbas vs Navad Urmia?

Naft Bandar Abbas score 0.75 goals per game on average and Navad Urmia 0.75. The Azadegan League average is 1.47 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 21% of games. Both teams score in 42% of Naft Bandar Abbas's matches and 33% of Navad Urmia's.

What form are Naft Bandar Abbas and Navad Urmia in?

Over the last 5 games Naft Bandar Abbas have a 1-4-0 record (1.40 points per game) and Navad Urmia 1-3-1 (1.20 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Naft Bandar Abbas vs Navad Urmia?

The statistical background for Naft Bandar Abbas vs Navad Urmia — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.