Slovenia - PrvaLigaŠportni park LendavaData current as of October 17, 2026

Nafta vs Bravo: match statistics

Nafta crest
Nafta
1 : 0half-time 1:0
Bravo crest
Bravo

Nafta vs Bravo: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

Nafta played against Bravo in PrvaLiga (Slovenia). The game was played on October 11, 2026. Venue: Športni park Lendava. Final score: 1:0.

Recent form

Nafta has 2 wins, 0 draws and 3 losses over its last five games, averaging 1.20 points per game. Bravo has 3 wins, 1 draw and 1 loss, with 2.00 points per game.

Scoring records

Nafta scores 1.70 goals per game and allows 1.60. Bravo scores 1.20 and allows 1.00. Games in this league average 2.73 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 60% of Nafta's games and 50% of Bravo's. The Over 2.5 rates are 60% and 50%, compared with league averages of 54% for BTTS and 50% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

Bravo has the higher season xG average, 1.48 to 1.45 per game. Nafta takes 11.6 shots per game, while Bravo takes 11.9.

First-half and second-half trends

Nafta leads at halftime in 20% of its games and scores 1.20 goals per game after halftime. Bravo leads at halftime in 40% and scores 0.70 after halftime.

When the teams score

Nafta's most productive scoring window is minutes 46-60 (7 goals). For Bravo, it is minutes 16-30 (4 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

PrvaLiga games average 2.73 goals. Both teams score in 54% of games, and 50% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

Before this game, one previous meeting was available. The record was 1 home win, 0 draws and 0 away wins. Those games averaged 3.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Bravo have the edge in the standings and recent results: they sit 3rd and have won 4 of their last 5 matches, while sixth-placed Nafta have won 3 of 5. The strongest argument for the visitors is their defense—they have conceded just 2 goals in their last 5 matches, and away from home they concede an average of 0.8 goals and have kept a clean sheet in 60% of their matches. Nafta can nevertheless test that defense: they average 2.2 goals at home, and their shot conversion rate is 20% compared with Bravo’s 7% away from home. The hosts’ weakness is their own defense, which concedes an average of 2.2 goals at home against opponents’ xG of 1.91; Nafta have lost 3 of their last 5 home matches. The teams’ similar xG figures in these conditions—1.50 for Nafta and 1.51 for Bravo—point to a closely matched number of chances, but the visitors’ more reliable defense and current run of form tip the prediction slightly in their favor.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

I’m backing BTTS - No, as Bravo kept a clean sheet in 60% of its matches and conceded an average of just 0.4 goals across its last five. Nafta did score in 80% of its matches and averaged 3.6 goals in its last five, but Bravo’s defensive record this season makes Nafta to score a difficult bet to justify. On the other hand, Bravo failed to score in 40% of its matches, even though Nafta kept a clean sheet in only 20%. Both teams scored in 60% and 40% of their matches, respectively, so the overall indicators slightly favor the outcome that at least one team fails to score.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

The strongest pick is Over 1.5 goals: this line was reached in every Nafta match included and in 60% of Bravo’s games. Across their last 5 matches, Nafta averaged 3.6 goals scored and Bravo 2.4, strengthening the case for at least two goals. Their attacking potential is also reflected in average xG of 1.45 for Nafta and 1.51 for Bravo, although the visitors have conceded just 0.8 goals per game so far. The Over 2.5 line is less reliable, having been reached in 60% of Nafta’s matches and 40% of Bravo’s; Over 1.5 therefore offers a clearer signal despite the visitors’ more cautious defensive record.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

Bravo led at the break in 3 of the 5 matches analyzed and conceded no first-half goals, while Nafta were trailing at half-time on 3 occasions and conceded an average of 0.8 goals before the break. This points to the away side taking the lead, although their average of 0.6 first-half goals suggests only a narrow advantage. The balance of play shifts after the break: Nafta won the second half in 80% of matches and scored an average of 1.0 goals in that period, while Bravo conceded an average of 0.8. As Bravo won the second half in only 20% of matches, I consider a draw after a Nafta turnaround slightly more likely than the visitors holding on to their lead.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Stats by half

1 : 0
First half
0 : 0
Second half

Game stats

47Possession (%)53
NaftaBravo
11Shots11
NaftaBravo
5Shots on target5
NaftaBravo
1.43xG1.54
NaftaBravo
6Corners8
NaftaBravo
53Dangerous attacks68
NaftaBravo
11Fouls11
NaftaBravo
1Cards1
NaftaBravo

Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

1.7Goals scored / game1.2
NaftaBravo
1.6Goals allowed / game1
NaftaBravo
41%Average possession41%
NaftaBravo
5.3Shots on target / game4.2
NaftaBravo

Team stats— who is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

11.6Shots per game11.9
NaftaBravo
5.3Shots on target4.2
NaftaBravo
14.7%Shot conversion10.1%
NaftaBravo
41%Possession41%
NaftaBravo
1.45xG for1.48
NaftaBravo
2xG against1.74
NaftaBravo

Shooting quality

Nafta: Counter-attackingBravo: Balanced
NaftaBravo
Accuracy (shots on target)46%35%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.130.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.320.29

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team form— who is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

Bravo is 67% better for: last-5 form.

1.2 pts / game - Nafta · 2 pts / game - Bravo

Nafta
LLWWL
Season result split
40% W10% D50% L
Season (W-D-L)
4-1-5
1.30 pts / game · goal difference +1
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-0-3
1.20 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
2-0-3
Last 5 at home
2-0-3
LWLLW
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.4Goals conceded: 1.6xG: 1.36Opponent xG: 1.99BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%
Bravo
LWDWW
Season result split
50% W30% D20% L
Season (W-D-L)
5-3-2
1.80 pts / game · goal difference +2
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-1-1
2.00 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
2-2-1
Last 5 away
2-2-1
WWDLD
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.4Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 1.24Opponent xG: 1.40BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%

Goals— how do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Nafta is 42% better for: goals scored per game.

1.7 goals / game - Nafta · 1.2 goals / game - Bravo

Bravo is 60% better for: goals allowed per game.

1.6 goals / game - Nafta · 1 goals / game - Bravo

Nafta scoring profile: strong

Nafta scores in 70% of games (7 of 10 games), while Bravo keeps a clean sheet in 40% (4 of 10 games).

Bravo scoring profile: very strong

Bravo scores in 70% of games (7 of 10 games), while Nafta keeps a clean sheet in 10% (1 of 10 games).

17Goals scored (season)12
NaftaBravo
16Goals conceded (season)10
NaftaBravo
3.3Average goals per game2.2
NaftaBravo
7Goals scored (last 5)7
NaftaBravo
8Goals conceded (last 5)5
NaftaBravo

How often they score at least...

70%1 goal70%
NaftaBravo
50%2 goals50%
NaftaBravo
30%3 goals0%
NaftaBravo
10%4 goals0%
NaftaBravo

How often they concede at least...

90%1 goal60%
NaftaBravo
50%2 goals20%
NaftaBravo
20%3 goals20%
NaftaBravo
0%4 goals0%
NaftaBravo

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

30%BTTS at half-time10%
NaftaBravo
20%BTTS in both halves0%
NaftaBravo
30%Scored in both halves40%
NaftaBravo

BTTS and goal count

50%Min. 3 goals and BTTS40%
NaftaBravo
10%Min. 3 goals without BTTS10%
NaftaBravo
60%BTTS - last 560%
NaftaBravo

Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

1st half

70%Min. 1 goal before half-time80%
NaftaBravo
30%Min. 2 goals before half-time10%
NaftaBravo
30%Min. 3 goals before half-time0%
NaftaBravo

2nd half

100%Min. 1 goal after half-time80%
NaftaBravo
50%Min. 2 goals after half-time40%
NaftaBravo
30%Min. 3 goals after half-time10%
NaftaBravo

Game halves— when do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Bravo is 67% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

0.9 pts / game - Nafta · 1.5 pts / game - Bravo

Nafta - half-time state
20% leading30% draw50% trailing
Bravo - half-time state
40% leading30% draw30% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

0.9Points per game (1st half)1.5
NaftaBravo
0.5Goals scored (1st half)0.5
NaftaBravo
0.8Goals conceded (1st half)0.4
NaftaBravo
1.3Average goals (1st half)0.9
NaftaBravo
40%Clean sheet before half-time60%
NaftaBravo
60%No goal before half-time50%
NaftaBravo

After half-time (2nd half)

1.6Points per game (2nd half)1.8
NaftaBravo
1.2Goals scored (2nd half)0.7
NaftaBravo
0.8Goals conceded (2nd half)0.6
NaftaBravo
2Average goals (2nd half)1.3
NaftaBravo
20%Clean sheet after half-time70%
NaftaBravo
40%No goal after half-time40%
NaftaBravo

Nafta - second-half results

50% W10% D40% L
9
Half-time points
5
Half-time goals
-3
Goal difference (1st half)
16
Second-half points
+4
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.90
PPG before half-time
Lead holding200%

Leads at halftime in 20% of games and wins 40%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime0.0

Defense stays consistent across the full game.

Bravo - second-half results

50% W30% D20% L
15
Half-time points
5
Half-time goals
+1
Goal difference (1st half)
18
Second-half points
+1
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.50
PPG before half-time
Lead holding125%

Leads at halftime in 40% of games and wins 50%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime+0.2

Allows 0.2 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

Nafta - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game0.601.40
Goals scored / game0.21.2
Goals allowed / game0.61.0
Average goals per game0.82.2
1 goal40%100%
2 goals20%60%
3 goals20%40%
Clean sheet60%0%
No goal80%40%
Goal difference-2+1
Half-time: 0% leading - 60% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 20% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 1
Bravo - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.602.00
Goals scored / game0.60.8
Goals allowed / game0.40.6
Average goals per game1.01.4
1 goal80%80%
2 goals20%40%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet60%80%
No goal40%40%
Goal difference+1+1
Half-time: 40% leading - 40% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 20% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 3

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

Nafta
ScoredConceded
1
3
0-15
1
3
16-30
3
2
31-45
7
1
46-60
2
3
61-75
3
4
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (7 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

Bravo
ScoredConceded
1
1
0-15
4
1
16-30
0
2
31-45
1
1
46-60
3
0
61-75
3
5
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (4 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

2.75
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
1.4 : 1.4
Estimated goal split
home : away
101%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
55%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+9%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
49%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
9%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 11 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

Nafta

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.55
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.65
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-2.9 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.25
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.40
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
126%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
116%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
-0.10
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.7
Late goals
18% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 6% come in the first quarter-hour.
18%

Bravo

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.26
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.46
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+0.3 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.28
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.74
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
87%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
74%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
+0.20
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
25% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 8% come in the first quarter-hour.
25%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League context— is this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (PrvaLiga).

Teams vs league

NaftaLigaBravo
Average goals per game▲ 3.302.73▼ 2.20
Both teams scored▲ 60%54%▼ 50%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)▲ 60%50%• 50%
Clean sheets▼ 10%28%▲ 40%
Goal before half-time▼ 70%73%▲ 80%
Goal after half-time▲ 100%81%• 80%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.73
Average goals per game
54%
Both teams scored
50%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
28%
Clean sheets
1.35
Home goals / game
1.38
Away goals / game
+-2%
Home attack advantage
+-2%
Home defensive advantage
+0%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
73%
1 goal
23%
2 goals
13%
3 goals
4%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
81%
1 goal
44%
2 goals
23%
3 goals
10%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. NaftaYellow cardJosip Ivan Zorica
  2. NaftaSubstitutionOn: Luka PihlerOff: Mátyás Vidnyánszky
  3. NaftaSubstitutionOn: Divaio Jhaïr-BobsonOff: Amadej Maroša
  4. BravoYellow cardJon Ficko
  5. NaftaSubstitutionOn: Michael OgwucheOff: Shyon Omrani

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Record from Nafta's perspective: 1 win, 0 draws and 0 losses against Bravo. Games average 3.00 goals, and both teams scored in 0% of them.

FAQ

What was the result of Nafta vs Bravo?

The PrvaLiga match finished Nafta 1:0 Bravo. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Nafta vs Bravo?

Nafta score 1.70 goals per game on average and Bravo 1.20. The PrvaLiga average is 2.73 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 50% of games. Both teams score in 60% of Nafta's matches and 50% of Bravo's.

What form are Nafta and Bravo in?

Over the last 5 games Nafta have a 2-0-3 record (1.20 points per game) and Bravo 3-1-1 (2.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Nafta vs Bravo?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.