Nagoya Grampus vs Avispa Fukuoka: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

Nagoya Grampus played against Avispa Fukuoka in J1 League (Japan). The game was played on December 6, 2025. Final score: 1:0.

Recent form

Nagoya Grampus has 1 win, 1 draw and 3 losses over its last five games, averaging 0.80 points per game. Avispa Fukuoka has 3 wins, 2 draws and 0 losses, with 2.20 points per game.

Scoring records

Nagoya Grampus scores 1.16 goals per game and allows 1.51. Avispa Fukuoka scores 0.92 and allows 1.00. Games in this league average 2.39 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 62% of Nagoya Grampus's games and 41% of Avispa Fukuoka's. The Over 2.5 rates are 62% and 32%, compared with league averages of 46% for BTTS and 44% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

Avispa Fukuoka has the higher season xG average, 1.44 to 1.27 per game. Nagoya Grampus takes 11.6 shots per game, while Avispa Fukuoka takes 13.0.

First-half and second-half trends

Nagoya Grampus leads at halftime in 19% of its games and scores 0.73 goals per game after halftime. Avispa Fukuoka leads at halftime in 11% and scores 0.57 after halftime.

When the teams score

Nagoya Grampus's most productive scoring window is minutes 76-90+ (11 goals). For Avispa Fukuoka, it is minutes 76-90+ (12 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

J1 League games average 2.39 goals. Both teams score in 46% of games, and 44% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

Before this game, one previous meeting was available. The record was 0 home wins, 1 draw and 0 away wins. Those games averaged 2.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.

Stats by half

0 : 0
First half
1 : 0
Second half

Game stats

50Possession (%)50
Nagoya GrampusAvispa Fukuoka
10Shots11
Nagoya GrampusAvispa Fukuoka
7Shots on target4
Nagoya GrampusAvispa Fukuoka
1.34xG1.37
Nagoya GrampusAvispa Fukuoka
4Corners5
Nagoya GrampusAvispa Fukuoka
29Dangerous attacks54
Nagoya GrampusAvispa Fukuoka
7Fouls15
Nagoya GrampusAvispa Fukuoka
1Cards2
Nagoya GrampusAvispa Fukuoka

Pre-game profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

Nagoya GrampusAvispa Fukuoka
1.16Goals scored / game0.92
Nagoya GrampusAvispa Fukuoka
1.51Goals allowed / game1
Nagoya GrampusAvispa Fukuoka
47%Average possession46%
Nagoya GrampusAvispa Fukuoka
3.57Shots on target / game4
Nagoya GrampusAvispa Fukuoka

Team statswho is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

11.59Shots per game13
Nagoya GrampusAvispa Fukuoka
3.57Shots on target4
Nagoya GrampusAvispa Fukuoka
10%Shot conversion7.1%
Nagoya GrampusAvispa Fukuoka
47%Possession46%
Nagoya GrampusAvispa Fukuoka
1.27xG for1.44
Nagoya GrampusAvispa Fukuoka
1.36xG against1.26
Nagoya GrampusAvispa Fukuoka

Shooting quality

Nagoya Grampus: BalancedAvispa Fukuoka: Balanced
Nagoya GrampusAvispa Fukuoka
Accuracy (shots on target)31%31%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.110.11
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.320.23

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

Avispa Fukuoka is 175% better for: last-5 form.

0.8 pts / game - Nagoya Grampus · 2.2 pts / game - Avispa Fukuoka

Nagoya Grampus
WDLLL
Season result split
27% W27% R46% P
Season (W-D-L)
10-10-17
1.08 pts / game · goal difference -13
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-1-3
0.80 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
7-5-6
Last 5 at home
2-1-2
DWLWL
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 1.8xG: 1.40Opponent xG: 1.41BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%
Avispa Fukuoka
WDWDW
Unbeaten in the last 5 games
Season result split
32% W32% R35% P
Season (W-D-L)
12-12-13
1.30 pts / game · goal difference -3
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-2-0
2.20 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
5-5-8
Last 5 away
0-2-3
LLLDD
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 0.6Goals conceded: 0.0xG: 1.56Opponent xG: 1.13BTTS: 0%Over 2.5: 0%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Nagoya Grampus is 26% better for: goals scored per game.

1.16 goals / game - Nagoya Grampus · 0.92 goals / game - Avispa Fukuoka

Avispa Fukuoka is 51% better for: goals allowed per game.

1.51 goals / game - Nagoya Grampus · 1 goals / game - Avispa Fukuoka

Nagoya Grampus scoring profile: strong

Nagoya Grampus scores in 73% of games (27 of 37 meczów), while Avispa Fukuoka keeps a clean sheet in 43% (16 of 37 meczów).

Avispa Fukuoka scoring profile: very strong

Avispa Fukuoka scores in 65% of games (24 of 37 meczów), while Nagoya Grampus keeps a clean sheet in 19% (7 of 37 meczów).

43Goals scored (season)34
Nagoya GrampusAvispa Fukuoka
56Goals conceded (season)37
Nagoya GrampusAvispa Fukuoka
2.68Average goals per game1.92
Nagoya GrampusAvispa Fukuoka
5Goals scored (last 5)3
Nagoya GrampusAvispa Fukuoka
9Goals conceded (last 5)0
Nagoya GrampusAvispa Fukuoka

How often they score at least...

73%1 goal65%
Nagoya GrampusAvispa Fukuoka
32%2 goals16%
Nagoya GrampusAvispa Fukuoka
11%3 goals5%
Nagoya GrampusAvispa Fukuoka
0%4 goals3%
Nagoya GrampusAvispa Fukuoka

How often they concede at least...

81%1 goal57%
Nagoya GrampusAvispa Fukuoka
46%2 goals35%
Nagoya GrampusAvispa Fukuoka
16%3 goals5%
Nagoya GrampusAvispa Fukuoka
8%4 goals3%
Nagoya GrampusAvispa Fukuoka

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

46%
League average

Goal patterns

11%BTTS at half-time19%
Nagoya GrampusAvispa Fukuoka
3%BTTS in both halves3%
Nagoya GrampusAvispa Fukuoka
11%Scored in both halves11%
Nagoya GrampusAvispa Fukuoka

BTTS and goal count

49%Min. 3 goals and BTTS32%
Nagoya GrampusAvispa Fukuoka
14%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
Nagoya GrampusAvispa Fukuoka
60%BTTS - last 50%
Nagoya GrampusAvispa Fukuoka

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

1st half

51%Min. 1 goal before half-time41%
Nagoya GrampusAvispa Fukuoka
30%Min. 2 goals before half-time22%
Nagoya GrampusAvispa Fukuoka
8%Min. 3 goals before half-time8%
Nagoya GrampusAvispa Fukuoka

2nd half

89%Min. 1 goal after half-time65%
Nagoya GrampusAvispa Fukuoka
57%Min. 2 goals after half-time27%
Nagoya GrampusAvispa Fukuoka
24%Min. 3 goals after half-time11%
Nagoya GrampusAvispa Fukuoka

Game halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Nagoya Grampus is 9% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.14 pts / game - Nagoya Grampus · 1.05 pts / game - Avispa Fukuoka

Nagoya Grampus - half-time state
19% leading57% draw24% trailing
Avispa Fukuoka - half-time state
11% leading73% draw16% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.14Points per game (1st half)1.05
Nagoya GrampusAvispa Fukuoka
0.43Goals scored (1st half)0.35
Nagoya GrampusAvispa Fukuoka
0.49Goals conceded (1st half)0.46
Nagoya GrampusAvispa Fukuoka
0.92Average goals (1st half)0.81
Nagoya GrampusAvispa Fukuoka
68%Clean sheet before half-time68%
Nagoya GrampusAvispa Fukuoka
70%No goal before half-time73%
Nagoya GrampusAvispa Fukuoka

After half-time (2nd half)

1.03Points per game (2nd half)1.32
Nagoya GrampusAvispa Fukuoka
0.73Goals scored (2nd half)0.57
Nagoya GrampusAvispa Fukuoka
1.03Goals conceded (2nd half)0.54
Nagoya GrampusAvispa Fukuoka
1.76Average goals (2nd half)1.11
Nagoya GrampusAvispa Fukuoka
30%Clean sheet after half-time62%
Nagoya GrampusAvispa Fukuoka
46%No goal after half-time51%
Nagoya GrampusAvispa Fukuoka

Nagoya Grampus - second-half results

24% W30% R46% P
42
Half-time points
16
Half-time goals
-2
Goal difference (1st half)
38
Second-half points
-11
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.14
PPG before half-time
Lead holding142%

Leads at halftime in 19% of games and wins 27%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime+0.5

Allows 0.5 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

Avispa Fukuoka - second-half results

27% W51% R22% P
39
Half-time points
13
Half-time goals
-4
Goal difference (1st half)
49
Second-half points
+1
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.05
PPG before half-time
Lead holding291%

Leads at halftime in 11% of games and wins 32%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime+0.1

Defense stays consistent across the full game.

Nagoya Grampus - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.000.60
Goals scored / game0.40.6
Goals allowed / game0.41.4
Average goals per game0.82.0
1 goal60%100%
2 goals20%60%
3 goals0%40%
Clean sheet60%0%
No goal80%60%
Goal difference0-4
Half-time: 20% leading - 40% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 0% draw - 80% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 2
Avispa Fukuoka - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.002.20
Goals scored / game0.00.6
Goals allowed / game0.00.0
Average goals per game0.00.6
1 goal0%60%
2 goals0%0%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet100%100%
No goal100%40%
Goal difference0+3
Half-time: 0% leading - 100% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 40% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 0

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

Nagoya Grampus
ScoredConceded
1
5
0-15
5
3
16-30
10
10
31-45
8
8
46-60
8
10
61-75
11
20
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (11 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (20). Late-goal balance (76-90): -9 - late phases are a weakness.

Avispa Fukuoka
ScoredConceded
4
5
0-15
3
4
16-30
6
8
31-45
4
5
46-60
5
3
61-75
12
12
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (12 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (12). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

2.29
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
1.1 : 1.2
Estimated goal split
home : away
96%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
52%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-13%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
47%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
9%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 11 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

Nagoya Grampus

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.09
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.26
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-1.2 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.11
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
-0.15
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
89%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
139%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
-0.28
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
26% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 2% come in the first quarter-hour.
26%

Avispa Fukuoka

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.18
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.26
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-2.8 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.52
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.26
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
84%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
77%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
+0.90
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
35% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 12% come in the first quarter-hour.
35%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (J1 League).

Teams vs league

Nagoya GrampusLigaAvispa Fukuoka
Average goals per game 2.682.39 1.92
Both teams scored 62%46% 41%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 62%44% 32%
Clean sheets 19%31% 43%
Goal before half-time 51%60% 41%
Goal after half-time 89%75% 65%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.39
Average goals per game
46%
Both teams scored
44%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
31%
Clean sheets
1.30
Home goals / game
1.09
Away goals / game
+19%
Home attack advantage
+16%
Home defensive advantage
+13%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
60%
1 goal
29%
2 goals
9%
3 goals
4%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
75%
1 goal
39%
2 goals
16%
3 goals
5%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Nagoya GrampusYellow cardTeruki Hara
  2. Avispa FukuokaYellow cardDaiki Matsuoka
  3. Avispa FukuokaSubstitutionOn: Yuto IwasakiOff: Hikaru Maeda
  4. Nagoya GrampusSubstitutionOn: Masahito OnoOff: Kensuke Nagai
  5. Avispa FukuokaSubstitutionOn: Sani Brown Abdel HananOff: Shosei Usui
  6. Nagoya GrampusSubstitutionOn: Shungo SugiuraOff: Kasper Junker
  7. Avispa FukuokaSubstitutionOn: Masato YuzawaOff: Yu Hashimoto
  8. Nagoya GrampusGoalSho Inagaki
  9. Avispa FukuokaYellow cardTatsuki Nara

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Record from Nagoya Grampus's perspective: 0 wins, 1 draw and 0 losses against Avispa Fukuoka. Games average 2.00 goals, and both teams scored in 100% of them.

Avispa Fukuoka
1 : 1
Nagoya Grampus

FAQ

What was the result of Nagoya Grampus vs Avispa Fukuoka?

The J1 League match finished Nagoya Grampus 1:0 Avispa Fukuoka. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Nagoya Grampus vs Avispa Fukuoka?

Nagoya Grampus score 1.16 goals per game on average and Avispa Fukuoka 0.92. The J1 League average is 2.39 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 44% of games. Both teams score in 62% of Nagoya Grampus's matches and 41% of Avispa Fukuoka's.

What form are Nagoya Grampus and Avispa Fukuoka in?

Over the last 5 games Nagoya Grampus have a 1-1-3 record (0.80 points per game) and Avispa Fukuoka 3-2-0 (2.20 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Nagoya Grampus vs Avispa Fukuoka?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.