Namdhari vs Chanmari: match statistics
Namdhari vs Chanmari: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Namdhari played against Chanmari in I-League (India). The game was played on April 17, 2026. Final score: 1:4.
Recent form
Namdhari has 1 win, 2 draws and 2 losses over its last five games, averaging 1.00 points per game. Chanmari has 1 win, 1 draw and 3 losses, with 0.80 points per game.
Scoring records
Namdhari scores 1.38 goals per game and allows 1.75. Chanmari scores 1.25 and allows 1.63. Games in this league average 2.88 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 75% of Namdhari's games and 75% of Chanmari's. The Over 2.5 rates are 25% and 63%, compared with league averages of 65% for BTTS and 50% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Chanmari has the higher season xG average, 1.44 to 1.35 per game. Namdhari takes 9.8 shots per game, while Chanmari takes 10.5.
First-half and second-half trends
Namdhari leads at halftime in 13% of its games and scores 1.00 goals per game after halftime. Chanmari leads at halftime in 50% and scores 0.50 after halftime.
When the teams score
Namdhari's most productive scoring window is minutes 76-90+ (5 goals). For Chanmari, it is minutes 31-45+ (3 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
I-League games average 2.88 goals. Both teams score in 65% of games, and 50% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
There is not enough head-to-head history for a meaningful comparison.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Namdhari holds a clear advantage in chance creation: at home they average 12.33 shots and 4.33 on target per match with xG 1.47, while Chanmari away register 8 shots and 2.5 on target with xG 1.15. Namdhari score 1.67 goals at home and concede 2.67 per match, and Chanmari score 1.25 away and concede 2.25, indicating defensive vulnerabilities for both sides. In the last 5 matches Namdhari have scored 7 and conceded 9 (form 1-2-2), whereas Chanmari have 6 scored and 10 conceded (form 1-1-3), so the hosts are slightly more potent offensively. Although Namdhari have 0% home wins and 33% of matches without scoring, the superiority in shots on target (4.33 vs 2.5) and higher xG (1.47 vs 1.15) suggests they will create more goalscoring opportunities. Based on this, I forecast a home win, with an expected probability distribution of 55% for Namdhari, 25% for a draw and 20% for Chanmari.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Both teams show very high season BTTS rates: Namdhari 75% and Chanmari 75%, versus a league average of 65%, strongly favoring a Goal/Goal scenario (BTTS - Yes). In the last 5 matches Namdhari had BTTS in 60% of games and Chanmari in 80%, while the visitors have recorded no clean sheets (0%) compared to 25% for the home side, further increasing the likelihood of goals from both teams. Namdhari creates more chances (avg. 13 shots and 5.75 on target with xG 1.72), whereas Chanmari averages 8 shots and 2.5 on target with xG 1.15; however, a higher conversion of 16% versus 10% for the hosts makes the visitors efficient with fewer opportunities. Both teams concede regularly: seasonally Namdhari concedes 1.0 goals per match, Chanmari 2.25, and in the last 5 fixtures the home side conceded 9 goals and the visitors 10 (averages 1.8 and 2.0), which increases the chance of both teams scoring. Considering the 75%/75% season BTTS, 60%/80% in the last 5, and a league average goals of 2.88, I estimate BTTS at 80% vs 20% and recommend a 'yes' play.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
The xG breakdown totals ~2.93 expected goals: Namdhari ~1.58 (xG_for 1.72 vs Chanmari’s average xG conceded 1.44), Chanmari ~1.35 (xG_for 1.15 vs hosts’ average xG conceded 1.54). Season metrics confirm an offensive profile: Namdhari have 75% of matches over 1.5 goals, Chanmari 100% over 1.5, and both teams have 75% BTTS, increasing the likelihood of goals from both sides. A Poisson model with λ=2.93 gives ~79% probability for Over 1.5, ~56% for Over 2.5 and ~34% for Over 3.5, so the strongest signal is Over 1.5. Additionally, the hosts average 13 shots and 5.75 on target per match versus 8 and 2.5 for the visitors, which confirms Namdhari’s chance-creation advantage and supports the Over 1.5 bet.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
In the last 5 matches the visitors led at the break in 60% of cases, while the hosts did so in only 20%, indicating a first-half advantage for Chanmari. However, the visitors concede an average of 2.25 goals after halftime, whereas the hosts score an average of 0.5 goals after the break and score in 75% of matches after the interval, so the second half favors Namdhari. Additionally, Namdhari have a higher xG of 1.72 versus the visitors' 1.15, more shots (13 vs 8) and more shots on target (5.75 vs 2.5), which increases their ability to produce a turnaround. Therefore the most likely scenario is the visitors leading at Half-Time and the hosts winning Full-Time (HT/FT 2/1 – 33%), with a draw at Full-Time after a turnaround (HT/FT 2/X – 18%) and the visitors holding their lead (HT/FT 2/2 – 9%) also possible. Furthermore, a high percentage of matches with both teams scoring at 75% supports the expectation of a goal-filled second half.
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Namdhari | Chanmari | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 37% | 39% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.14 | 0.14 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.38 | 0.30 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Namdhari is 25% better for: last-5 form.
1 pts / game - Namdhari · 0.8 pts / game - Chanmari
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Namdhari is 10% better for: goals scored per game.
1.38 goals / game - Namdhari · 1.25 goals / game - Chanmari
Chanmari is 7% better for: goals allowed per game.
1.75 goals / game - Namdhari · 1.63 goals / game - Chanmari
Namdhari scores in 88% of games (7 of 8 meczów), while Chanmari keeps a clean sheet in 13% (1 of 8 meczów).
Chanmari scores in 75% of games (6 of 8 meczów), while Namdhari keeps a clean sheet in 13% (1 of 8 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Namdhari
Over / Under - Chanmari
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Chanmari is 167% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
0.75 pts / game - Namdhari · 2 pts / game - Chanmari
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Namdhari - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 13% of games and wins 13%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.3 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
Chanmari - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 50% of games and wins 25%. Sometimes gives up a halftime lead.
Allows 1.4 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.20 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.6 | 0.8 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.6 | 1.2 |
| Average goals per game | 1.2 | 2.0 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 40% |
| No goal | 40% | 60% |
| Goal difference | 0 | -2 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 2.20 | 0.20 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.8 | 0.4 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.0 | 2.0 |
| Average goals per game | 0.8 | 2.4 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 80% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 100% | 0% |
| No goal | 40% | 60% |
| Goal difference | +4 | -8 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (5 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (3 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): -4 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Namdhari
Chanmari
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (I-League).
Teams vs league
| Namdhari | Liga | Chanmari | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▲ 3.13 | 2.88 | • 2.88 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 75% | 65% | ▲ 75% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 25% | 50% | ▲ 63% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 13% | 20% | ▼ 13% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 75% | 68% | ▼ 50% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 88% | 90% | ▼ 88% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
FAQ
What was the result of Namdhari vs Chanmari?
The I-League match finished Namdhari 1:4 Chanmari. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Namdhari vs Chanmari?
Namdhari score 1.38 goals per game on average and Chanmari 1.25. The I-League average is 2.88 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 50% of games. Both teams score in 75% of Namdhari's matches and 75% of Chanmari's.
What form are Namdhari and Chanmari in?
Over the last 5 games Namdhari have a 1-2-2 record (1.00 points per game) and Chanmari 1-1-3 (0.80 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Namdhari vs Chanmari?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.


