India - I-LeagueData current as of 16 July 2026

Namdhari vs Shillong Lajong: match statistics

Namdhari crest
Namdhari
0 : 2half-time 0:0
Shillong Lajong crest
Shillong Lajong

Namdhari vs Shillong Lajong: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Namdhari play Shillong Lajong in I-League (India). The match date is 10 April 2026 at 15:00. Final score: 0:2.

Current form

Namdhari: 1-0-4, 0.60 points/match. Shillong Lajong: 3-2-0, 2.20 points/match.

Goal statistics

Namdhari scores 1.33 and concedes 1.75 goals per match. Shillong Lajong scores 1.93 and concedes 0.86. League average: 3.03 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Namdhari 67%, Shillong Lajong 50%. Over 2.5: Namdhari 42%, Shillong Lajong 50%. League level: BTTS 64%, Over 2.5 56%.

xG, shots and style

Shillong Lajong has higher xG: 1.49 vs 1.41. Namdhari: 9.5 shots per match, Shillong Lajong: 9.5.

Match halves

Namdhari: half-time lead 25%, second-half goals 0.83. Shillong Lajong: half-time lead 43%, second-half goals 1.21.

Goals by minute

Namdhari: 76-90+ (6 goals). Shillong Lajong: 31-45+ (7 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

I-League: 3.03 goals per match, BTTS 64%, Over 2.5 56%.

Head-to-head

2 H2H matches: 1-0-1. Average goals 6.00, BTTS 100%.

Match description

I predict a draw (X). Namdhari at home averages 2.5 goals scored per match with 13 shots and 6 on target, has a shot conversion rate of 19% and an average xG of 1.64; in the last 5 home matches the hosts scored 9 goals. At the same time the hosts concede on average 3 goals per home match and have not kept a clean sheet, translating to 0 wins, 50% draws and 50% losses at home. Shillong Lajong away averages only 0.75 goals per match, 8.75 shots and 3.5 on target with a conversion rate of 9%, and in 50% of away games they failed to score; however the visitors concede only 1 goal away and have 50% of matches with a clean sheet. Considering both teams average 1 point in their last 5 matches, Namdhari’s advantage in chance creation and finishing (xG 1.64 vs opponents’ xG 1.44) and Shillong’s defensive solidity, the most likely outcome is a balanced, goalscorer draw.

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
0 : 2
2nd half

Match statistics

60Possession (%)40
NamdhariShillong Lajong
11Shots12
NamdhariShillong Lajong
1Shots on target4
NamdhariShillong Lajong
1.13xG1.32
NamdhariShillong Lajong
5Corners6
NamdhariShillong Lajong
49Dangerous attacks39
NamdhariShillong Lajong
-1Fouls-1
NamdhariShillong Lajong
2Cards2
NamdhariShillong Lajong

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

NamdhariShillong Lajong
1.33Goals scored / match1.93
NamdhariShillong Lajong
1.75Goals conceded / match0.86
NamdhariShillong Lajong
43%Average possession54%
NamdhariShillong Lajong
3.5Shots on target / match4
NamdhariShillong Lajong

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

9.5Shots per match9.5
NamdhariShillong Lajong
3.5Shots on target4
NamdhariShillong Lajong
14%Shot conversion20.3%
NamdhariShillong Lajong
43%Possession54%
NamdhariShillong Lajong
1.41xG for1.49
NamdhariShillong Lajong
1.7xG against1.37
NamdhariShillong Lajong

Shooting quality

Namdhari: Counter-attackingShillong Lajong: Efficient finishing
NamdhariShillong Lajong
Accuracy (shots on target)37%42%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.150.16
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.380.48

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Shillong Lajong is 267% better for: last-5 form.

0.6 pts / match - Namdhari · 2.2 pts / match - Shillong Lajong

Namdhari
LLLWL
Season result split
17% W33% R50% P
Season (W-D-L)
2-4-6
0.83 pts / match · goal difference -5
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-0-4
0.60 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
0-1-4
Last 5 at home
0-1-4
DLLLL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 1.8xG: 1.44Opponent xG: 1.54BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 60%
Shillong Lajong
DWDWW
Unbeaten in the last 5 matches
Season result split
50% W36% R14% P
Season (W-D-L)
7-5-2
1.86 pts / match · goal difference +15
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-2-0
2.20 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
3-3-1
Last 5 away
2-2-1
DLWDW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.4Goals conceded: 0.6xG: 1.61Opponent xG: 1.33BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 60%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Shillong Lajong is 45% better for: goals scored per match.

1.33 goals / match - Namdhari · 1.93 goals / match - Shillong Lajong

Shillong Lajong is 103% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.75 goals / match - Namdhari · 0.86 goals / match - Shillong Lajong

Namdhari scoring profile: strong

Namdhari scores in 83% of matches (10 of 12 matches), while Shillong Lajong keeps a clean sheet in 43% (6 of 14 matches).

Shillong Lajong scoring profile: very strong

Shillong Lajong scores in 79% of matches (11 of 14 matches), while Namdhari keeps a clean sheet in 17% (2 of 12 matches).

16Goals scored (season)27
NamdhariShillong Lajong
21Goals conceded (season)12
NamdhariShillong Lajong
3.08Average goals in match2.79
NamdhariShillong Lajong
5Goals scored (last 5)12
NamdhariShillong Lajong
9Goals conceded (last 5)3
NamdhariShillong Lajong

How often they score at least...

83%1 goal79%
NamdhariShillong Lajong
25%2 goals50%
NamdhariShillong Lajong
17%3 goals29%
NamdhariShillong Lajong
8%4 goals21%
NamdhariShillong Lajong

How often they concede at least...

83%1 goal57%
NamdhariShillong Lajong
42%2 goals21%
NamdhariShillong Lajong
25%3 goals7%
NamdhariShillong Lajong
17%4 goals0%
NamdhariShillong Lajong

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

64%
League average

Goal patterns

17%BTTS at half-time14%
NamdhariShillong Lajong
8%BTTS in both halves7%
NamdhariShillong Lajong
17%Scored in both halves43%
NamdhariShillong Lajong

BTTS and goal count

33%Min. 3 goals and BTTS29%
NamdhariShillong Lajong
8%Min. 3 goals without BTTS21%
NamdhariShillong Lajong
40%BTTS - last 540%
NamdhariShillong Lajong

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

75%Min. 1 goal before half-time79%
NamdhariShillong Lajong
25%Min. 2 goals before half-time43%
NamdhariShillong Lajong
8%Min. 3 goals before half-time7%
NamdhariShillong Lajong

2nd half

92%Min. 1 goal after half-time86%
NamdhariShillong Lajong
42%Min. 2 goals after half-time29%
NamdhariShillong Lajong
25%Min. 3 goals after half-time21%
NamdhariShillong Lajong

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Shillong Lajong is 45% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.08 pts / match - Namdhari · 1.57 pts / match - Shillong Lajong

Namdhari - half-time state
25% leading33% draw42% trailing
Shillong Lajong - half-time state
43% leading29% draw29% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.08Points per match (1st half)1.57
NamdhariShillong Lajong
0.5Goals scored (1st half)0.71
NamdhariShillong Lajong
0.58Goals conceded (1st half)0.57
NamdhariShillong Lajong
1.08Average goals (1st half)1.29
NamdhariShillong Lajong
50%Clean sheet before half-time57%
NamdhariShillong Lajong
58%No goal before half-time50%
NamdhariShillong Lajong

After half-time (2nd half)

1.25Points per match (2nd half)2.29
NamdhariShillong Lajong
0.83Goals scored (2nd half)1.21
NamdhariShillong Lajong
1.17Goals conceded (2nd half)0.29
NamdhariShillong Lajong
2Average goals (2nd half)1.5
NamdhariShillong Lajong
42%Clean sheet after half-time71%
NamdhariShillong Lajong
42%No goal after half-time29%
NamdhariShillong Lajong

Namdhari - second-half results

33% W25% R42% P
13
Half-time points
6
Half-time goals
-1
Goal difference (1st half)
15
Second-half points
-4
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.08
PPG before half-time
Lead holding68%

Leads at half-time in 25% of matches and wins 17%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.

Defence after half-time+0.6

Concedes 0.6 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Shillong Lajong - second-half results

71% W14% R14% P
22
Half-time points
10
Half-time goals
+2
Goal difference (1st half)
32
Second-half points
+13
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.57
PPG before half-time
Lead holding116%

Leads at half-time in 43% of matches and wins 50%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.3

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Namdhari - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.600.60
Goals scored / match0.60.4
Goals conceded / match0.21.6
Average goals in match0.82.0
1 goal60%100%
2 goals20%60%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet80%20%
No goal60%60%
Goal difference+2-6
Half-time: 40% leading - 40% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 0% draw - 80% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 3
Shillong Lajong - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match2.002.60
Goals scored / match1.01.4
Goals conceded / match0.40.2
Average goals in match1.41.6
1 goal80%80%
2 goals40%40%
3 goals20%40%
Clean sheet60%80%
No goal40%20%
Goal difference+3+6
Half-time: 60% leading - 20% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 80% won - 20% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 5

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Namdhari
ScoredConceded
1
3
0-15
1
2
16-30
4
2
31-45
1
5
46-60
3
1
61-75
6
8
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (6 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.

Shillong Lajong
ScoredConceded
1
3
0-15
2
5
16-30
7
0
31-45
6
4
46-60
5
0
61-75
6
0
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (7 goli). Concedes most in 16-30 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): +6 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.93
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.1 : 1.8
Estimated goal split
home : away
97%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
59%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+104%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
66%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
4%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 25 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Namdhari

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.29
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.13
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-3.2 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.08
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.05
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
78%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
133%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.23
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
38% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 6% come in the first quarter-hour.
38%

Shillong Lajong

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.12
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.95
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-9.1 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.44
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.51
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
146%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
50%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.34
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.5
Late goals
22% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 4% come in the first quarter-hour.
22%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (I-League).

Teams vs league

NamdhariLigaShillong Lajong
Average goals in match 3.083.03 2.79
Both teams scored 67%64% 50%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 42%56% 50%
Clean sheets 17%20% 43%
Goal before half-time 75%73% 79%
Goal after half-time 92%89% 86%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.03
Average goals per match
64%
Both teams scored
56%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
20%
Clean sheets
1.71
Home goals / match
1.32
Away goals / match
+30%
Home attack advantage
+23%
Home defence advantage
+11%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
73%
1 goal
35%
2 goals
11%
3 goals
3%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
89%
1 goal
50%
2 goals
23%
3 goals
11%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (2): Namdhari 1 - 0 - 1 Shillong Lajong. Average goals 6.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.

Shillong Lajong FC
3 : 2
Namdhari FC
Namdhari FC
5 : 2
Shillong Lajong FC

FAQ

What was the result of Namdhari vs Shillong Lajong?

The I-League match finished Namdhari 0:2 Shillong Lajong. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Namdhari and Shillong Lajong?

In the last 2 head-to-head matches Namdhari won 1, Shillong Lajong won 1 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 6.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Namdhari vs Shillong Lajong?

Namdhari score 1.33 goals per game on average and Shillong Lajong 1.93. The I-League average is 3.03 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 56% of games. Both teams score in 67% of Namdhari's matches and 50% of Shillong Lajong's.

What form are Namdhari and Shillong Lajong in?

Over the last 5 games Namdhari have a 1-0-4 record (0.60 points per game) and Shillong Lajong 3-2-0 (2.20 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Namdhari vs Shillong Lajong?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Namdhari vs Shillong Lajong: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.