Namungo vs Kitayosce: match statistics
Namungo vs Kitayosce: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Namungo played against Kitayosce in Ligi kuu Bara (Tanzania). The game was played on June 16, 2026. Final score: 0:0.
Recent form
Namungo has 0 wins, 3 draws and 2 losses over its last five games, averaging 0.60 points per game. Kitayosce has 3 wins, 1 draw and 1 loss, with 2.00 points per game.
Scoring records
Namungo scores 0.80 goals per game and allows 1.12. Kitayosce scores 1.23 and allows 0.92. Games in this league average 2.16 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 48% of Namungo's games and 35% of Kitayosce's. The Over 2.5 rates are 20% and 42%, compared with league averages of 36% for BTTS and 39% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Kitayosce has the higher season xG average, 1.24 to 1.20 per game. Namungo takes 7.3 shots per game, while Kitayosce takes 6.3.
First-half and second-half trends
Namungo leads at halftime in 16% of its games and scores 0.44 goals per game after halftime. Kitayosce leads at halftime in 23% and scores 0.50 after halftime.
When the teams score
Namungo's most productive scoring window is minutes 31-45+ (6 goals). For Kitayosce, it is minutes 0-15 (8 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Ligi kuu Bara games average 2.16 goals. Both teams score in 36% of games, and 39% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, one previous meeting was available. The record was 0 home wins, 0 draws and 1 away win. Those games averaged 2.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
I predict a draw. Namungo concedes only 0.82 goals per home match on average and keeps a clean sheet in 45% of games, while Kitayosce concede 1.25 goals on average in away matches and have 25% clean sheets, giving the hosts a defensive edge. In attack the hosts generate 1.45 xG and average 3.9 shots on target with an 11% conversion rate at home, whereas the visitors have 1.03 xG, 2.33 shots on target and a 6% conversion as an away side, suggesting Namungo creates higher-quality chances. However, over the season Kitayosce have 11 wins and 32 goals scored versus Namungo’s 5 wins and 20 goals, and in the last 5 matches overall the visitors have scored 9 goals (record 3–1–1, 2.0 points per game), while Namungo have scored 3 goals and failed to win any (0–3–2, 0.6 points per game). Considering Namungo’s high home draw rate (55%), low percentage of scoreless home games (9%) and the fact that the visitors failed to score in 50% of their away matches, a point split appears most likely.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Season-long metrics point to a low incidence of both teams scoring (BTTS 36% Namungo, 33% Kitayosce; league BTTS 36%), which initially favors No Goal. However, the last 5 matches signal the opposite: Namungo BTTS 60%, Kitayosce 80%, with the visitors scoring 9 goals in the last 5 versus just 3 for the hosts. Last-5 xG also favors Kitayosce: visitors xG for 1.65 and xG against 1.03, while Namungo xG for 1.37 and xG against 1.88, indicating the visitors create more chances and the hosts have recently conceded more. Namungo’s seasonal defensive strengths (avg 0.64 goals conceded per match and 57% clean sheets) remain, but in the last 5 they concede an average of 1.2 goals and are less productive offensively. Considering Kitayosce’s offensive edge in the last 5 and the BTTS rise to 60–80% in that run, I assess BTTS - Yes at 65% versus No Goal 35%.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
I estimate total expected goals at 2.46 (Namungo 1.31, Kitayosce 1.15), calculated as the average of Namungo’s attacking xG (1.39) and xG against for the visitors (1.22), and analogously for the away side (xG 1.03 and xG against 1.27). Seasonally the home side has 64% of matches >1.5 goals, the away side 67% (average 65.5%), so I rate Over 1.5 highly at 75%. The 2.5 line is more balanced: season long >2.5 is 36% for Namungo and 50% for Kitayosce (average 43%), and the visitors’ last 5 matches show 60% >2.5 with an average of 1.8 goals, hence I give Over 2.5 a 48% probability. Meanwhile >3.5 is unlikely — only 14% of home matches and 17% of away matches exceeded that threshold, and the expected 2.46 is well below 3.5, so Under 3.5 (88%) is my strongest play signal.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
At half-time I predict a draw — Namungo were level at the break in 9 matches (64%), while Kitayosce were trailing after 45% of their games (5 times), which gives a clear signal for a draw at the half. For full-time I expect a home win: Namungo average 1.36 goals per game this season versus 1.08 for the visitors and have higher xG (1.39 vs 1.03), suggesting an advantage in chance creation. Additionally, Namungo average 9.15 shots and 3.31 on target compared to Kitayosce’s 5.33 and 2.33, have a conversion rate of 14% vs 6%, and won 50% of home matches while the visitors won only 33% of away games — this supports a turnaround after the break in favor of the hosts. Form must be considered: in the last 5 matches the visitors have a 60% win rate (3 of 5) and the hosts have 0% wins in their last 5, so a lead at the break being a draw with a later Namungo victory is realistic. For that reason I select HT/FT X/1 as the most likely scenario, with alternatives being X/X and 1/1.
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Namungo | Kitayosce | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 39% | 37% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.16 | 0.20 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.28 | 0.53 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Kitayosce is 233% better for: last-5 form.
0.6 pts / game - Namungo · 2 pts / game - Kitayosce
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Kitayosce is 54% better for: goals scored per game.
0.8 goals / game - Namungo · 1.23 goals / game - Kitayosce
Kitayosce is 22% better for: goals allowed per game.
1.12 goals / game - Namungo · 0.92 goals / game - Kitayosce
Namungo scores in 68% of games (17 of 25 games), while Kitayosce keeps a clean sheet in 42% (11 of 26 games).
Kitayosce scores in 62% of games (16 of 26 games), while Namungo keeps a clean sheet in 28% (7 of 25 games).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Namungo
Over / Under - Kitayosce
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Kitayosce is 19% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1 pts / game - Namungo · 1.19 pts / game - Kitayosce
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Namungo - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 16% of games and wins 20%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.2 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
Kitayosce - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 23% of games and wins 42%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 0.80 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.4 | 0.2 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.6 | 0.6 |
| Average goals per game | 1.0 | 0.8 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 60% |
| No goal | 60% | 80% |
| Goal difference | -1 | -2 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.60 | 1.80 |
| Goals scored / game | 1.4 | 0.4 |
| Goals allowed / game | 1.0 | 0.0 |
| Average goals per game | 2.4 | 0.4 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 40% |
| 2 goals | 80% | 0% |
| 3 goals | 40% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 20% | 100% |
| No goal | 0% | 60% |
| Goal difference | +2 | +2 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (6 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (8 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Namungo
Kitayosce
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Ligi kuu Bara).
Teams vs league
| Namungo | Liga | Kitayosce | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▼ 1.92 | 2.16 | • 2.15 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 48% | 36% | • 35% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 20% | 39% | ▲ 42% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 28% | 39% | ▲ 42% |
| Goal before half-time | • 60% | 60% | ▲ 62% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 72% | 63% | ▼ 58% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Head-to-head
Record from Namungo's perspective: 0 wins, 0 draws and 1 loss against Kitayosce. Games average 2.00 goals, and both teams scored in 0% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Namungo vs Kitayosce?
The Ligi kuu Bara match finished Namungo 0:0 Kitayosce. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Namungo vs Kitayosce?
Namungo score 0.80 goals per game on average and Kitayosce 1.23. The Ligi kuu Bara average is 2.16 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 39% of games. Both teams score in 48% of Namungo's matches and 35% of Kitayosce's.
What form are Namungo and Kitayosce in?
Over the last 5 games Namungo have a 0-3-2 record (0.60 points per game) and Kitayosce 3-1-1 (2.00 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Namungo vs Kitayosce?
The statistical background for Namungo vs Kitayosce — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.


