Tanzania - Ligi kuu BaraData current as of 22 July 2026

Namungo vs Kitayosce: match statistics

Namungo crest
Namungo
0 : 0half-time 0:0
Kitayosce crest
Kitayosce

Namungo vs Kitayosce: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Namungo play Kitayosce in Ligi kuu Bara (Tanzania). The match date is 16 June 2026 at 15:00. Final score: 0:0.

Current form

Namungo: 2-3-0, 1.80 points/match. Kitayosce: 1-3-1, 1.20 points/match.

Goal statistics

Namungo scores 0.86 and concedes 1.07 goals per match. Kitayosce scores 1.10 and concedes 0.93. League average: 2.17 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Namungo 48%, Kitayosce 33%. Over 2.5: Namungo 24%, Kitayosce 40%. League level: BTTS 35%, Over 2.5 39%.

xG, shots and style

Namungo has higher xG: 1.33 vs 1.25. Namungo: 8.9 shots per match, Kitayosce: 6.2.

Match halves

Namungo: half-time lead 17%, second-half goals 0.45. Kitayosce: half-time lead 20%, second-half goals 0.47.

Goals by minute

Namungo: 31-45+ (7 goals). Kitayosce: 0-15 (8 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Ligi kuu Bara: 2.17 goals per match, BTTS 35%, Over 2.5 39%.

Head-to-head

1 H2H matches: 0-0-1. Average goals 2.00, BTTS 0%.

Match description

I predict a draw. Namungo concedes only 0.82 goals per home match on average and keeps a clean sheet in 45% of games, while Kitayosce concede 1.25 goals on average in away matches and have 25% clean sheets, giving the hosts a defensive edge. In attack the hosts generate 1.45 xG and average 3.9 shots on target with an 11% conversion rate at home, whereas the visitors have 1.03 xG, 2.33 shots on target and a 6% conversion as an away side, suggesting Namungo creates higher-quality chances. However, over the season Kitayosce have 11 wins and 32 goals scored versus Namungo’s 5 wins and 20 goals, and in the last 5 matches overall the visitors have scored 9 goals (record 3–1–1, 2.0 points per game), while Namungo have scored 3 goals and failed to win any (0–3–2, 0.6 points per game). Considering Namungo’s high home draw rate (55%), low percentage of scoreless home games (9%) and the fact that the visitors failed to score in 50% of their away matches, a point split appears most likely.

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
0 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

56Possession (%)44
NamungoKitayosce
25Shots8
NamungoKitayosce
2Shots on target1
NamungoKitayosce
2.45xG1.26
NamungoKitayosce
7Corners0
NamungoKitayosce
103Dangerous attacks94
NamungoKitayosce
11Fouls18
NamungoKitayosce
0Cards0
NamungoKitayosce

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

0.86Goals scored / match1.1
NamungoKitayosce
1.07Goals conceded / match0.93
NamungoKitayosce
47%Average possession42%
NamungoKitayosce
3.31Shots on target / match2.27
NamungoKitayosce

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

8.86Shots per match6.23
NamungoKitayosce
3.31Shots on target2.27
NamungoKitayosce
9.7%Shot conversion17.6%
NamungoKitayosce
47%Possession42%
NamungoKitayosce
1.33xG for1.25
NamungoKitayosce
1.33xG against1.3
NamungoKitayosce

Shooting quality

Namungo: BalancedKitayosce: Counter-attacking
NamungoKitayosce
Accuracy (shots on target)37%36%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.150.20
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.260.48

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Namungo is 50% better for: last-5 form.

1.8 pts / match - Namungo · 1.2 pts / match - Kitayosce

Namungo
DDWDW
Unbeaten in the last 5 matches
Season result split
24% W45% R31% P
Season (W-D-L)
7-13-9
1.17 pts / match · goal difference -6
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-3-0
1.80 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
5-8-1
Last 5 at home
1-4-0
DDDDW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.2Goals conceded: 0.8xG: 1.99Opponent xG: 1.24BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 40%
Kitayosce
WDDLD
Season result split
37% W33% R30% P
Season (W-D-L)
11-10-9
1.43 pts / match · goal difference +5
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-3-1
1.20 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
4-4-7
Last 5 away
1-2-2
LWDLD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.4Goals conceded: 0.8xG: 1.39Opponent xG: 1.50BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 20%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Kitayosce is 28% better for: goals scored per match.

0.86 goals / match - Namungo · 1.1 goals / match - Kitayosce

Kitayosce is 15% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.07 goals / match - Namungo · 0.93 goals / match - Kitayosce

Namungo scoring profile: mixed

Namungo scores in 66% of matches (19 of 29 matches), while Kitayosce keeps a clean sheet in 43% (13 of 30 matches).

Kitayosce scoring profile: strong

Kitayosce scores in 57% of matches (17 of 30 matches), while Namungo keeps a clean sheet in 31% (9 of 29 matches).

25Goals scored (season)33
NamungoKitayosce
31Goals conceded (season)28
NamungoKitayosce
1.93Average goals in match2.03
NamungoKitayosce
6Goals scored (last 5)2
NamungoKitayosce
4Goals conceded (last 5)4
NamungoKitayosce

How often they score at least...

66%1 goal57%
NamungoKitayosce
17%2 goals30%
NamungoKitayosce
3%3 goals17%
NamungoKitayosce
0%4 goals7%
NamungoKitayosce

How often they concede at least...

69%1 goal57%
NamungoKitayosce
24%2 goals27%
NamungoKitayosce
14%3 goals10%
NamungoKitayosce
0%4 goals0%
NamungoKitayosce

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

35%
League average

Goal patterns

21%BTTS at half-time17%
NamungoKitayosce
3%BTTS in both halves0%
NamungoKitayosce
10%Scored in both halves13%
NamungoKitayosce

BTTS and goal count

21%Min. 3 goals and BTTS23%
NamungoKitayosce
3%Min. 3 goals without BTTS17%
NamungoKitayosce
60%BTTS - last 520%
NamungoKitayosce

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

59%Min. 1 goal before half-time57%
NamungoKitayosce
24%Min. 2 goals before half-time30%
NamungoKitayosce
7%Min. 3 goals before half-time10%
NamungoKitayosce

2nd half

69%Min. 1 goal after half-time57%
NamungoKitayosce
28%Min. 2 goals after half-time23%
NamungoKitayosce
7%Min. 3 goals after half-time7%
NamungoKitayosce

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Kitayosce is 6% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.07 pts / match - Namungo · 1.13 pts / match - Kitayosce

Namungo - half-time state
17% leading55% draw28% trailing
Kitayosce - half-time state
20% leading53% draw27% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.07Points per match (1st half)1.13
NamungoKitayosce
0.41Goals scored (1st half)0.53
NamungoKitayosce
0.48Goals conceded (1st half)0.47
NamungoKitayosce
0.9Average goals (1st half)1
NamungoKitayosce
55%Clean sheet before half-time60%
NamungoKitayosce
66%No goal before half-time67%
NamungoKitayosce

After half-time (2nd half)

1.31Points per match (2nd half)1.3
NamungoKitayosce
0.45Goals scored (2nd half)0.47
NamungoKitayosce
0.59Goals conceded (2nd half)0.43
NamungoKitayosce
1.03Average goals (2nd half)0.9
NamungoKitayosce
62%Clean sheet after half-time67%
NamungoKitayosce
59%No goal after half-time67%
NamungoKitayosce

Namungo - second-half results

31% W38% R31% P
31
Half-time points
12
Half-time goals
-2
Goal difference (1st half)
38
Second-half points
-4
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.07
PPG before half-time
Lead holding141%

Leads at half-time in 17% of matches and wins 24%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Concedes 0.1 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Kitayosce - second-half results

27% W50% R23% P
34
Half-time points
16
Half-time goals
+2
Goal difference (1st half)
39
Second-half points
+1
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.13
PPG before half-time
Lead holding185%

Leads at half-time in 20% of matches and wins 37%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Namungo - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.201.80
Goals scored / match0.60.6
Goals conceded / match0.60.2
Average goals in match1.20.8
1 goal60%60%
2 goals40%20%
3 goals20%0%
Clean sheet40%80%
No goal60%40%
Goal difference0+2
Half-time: 20% leading - 60% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 60% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 3
Kitayosce - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.200.80
Goals scored / match0.20.2
Goals conceded / match0.20.6
Average goals in match0.40.8
1 goal40%40%
2 goals0%40%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet80%60%
No goal80%80%
Goal difference0-2
Half-time: 20% leading - 60% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 80% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 1

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Namungo
ScoredConceded
1
4
0-15
4
4
16-30
7
6
31-45
3
4
46-60
6
6
61-75
4
7
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (7 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.

Kitayosce
ScoredConceded
8
4
0-15
4
4
16-30
7
7
31-45
6
4
46-60
4
4
61-75
4
5
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (8 goli). Concedes most in 31-45 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

1.98
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
0.9 : 1.1
Estimated goal split
home : away
91%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
41%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+1%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
38%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
15%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 7 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Namungo

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
0.00
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.21
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-0.3 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.47
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.26
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
66%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
123%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.63
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.0
Late goals
16% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 4% come in the first quarter-hour.
16%

Kitayosce

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.05
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.22
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-9.3 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.15
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.37
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
126%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
72%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.23
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.1
Late goals
12% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 24% come in the first quarter-hour.
12%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Ligi kuu Bara).

Teams vs league

NamungoLigaKitayosce
Average goals in match 1.932.17 2.03
Both teams scored 48%35% 33%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 24%39% 40%
Clean sheets 31%39% 43%
Goal before half-time 59%60% 57%
Goal after half-time 69%63% 57%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.17
Average goals per match
35%
Both teams scored
39%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
39%
Clean sheets
1.30
Home goals / match
0.87
Away goals / match
+49%
Home attack advantage
+33%
Home defence advantage
+20%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
60%
1 goal
32%
2 goals
9%
3 goals
1%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
63%
1 goal
27%
2 goals
10%
3 goals
2%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Namungo 0 - 0 - 1 Kitayosce. Average goals 2.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.

FAQ

What was the result of Namungo vs Kitayosce?

The Ligi kuu Bara match finished Namungo 0:0 Kitayosce. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Namungo vs Kitayosce?

Namungo score 0.86 goals per game on average and Kitayosce 1.10. The Ligi kuu Bara average is 2.17 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 39% of games. Both teams score in 48% of Namungo's matches and 33% of Kitayosce's.

What form are Namungo and Kitayosce in?

Over the last 5 games Namungo have a 2-3-0 record (1.80 points per game) and Kitayosce 1-3-1 (1.20 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Namungo vs Kitayosce?

The statistical background for Namungo vs Kitayosce — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.