Nasaf vs Andijan: match statistics
Nasaf vs Andijan: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Nasaf played against Andijan in Uzbekistan Super League (Uzbekistan). The game was played on April 3, 2026. Final score: 1:0.
Recent form
Nasaf has 2 wins, 1 draw and 1 loss over its last five games, averaging 1.75 points per game. Andijan has 2 wins, 0 draws and 2 losses, with 1.50 points per game.
Scoring records
Nasaf scores 1.00 goals per game and allows 0.50. Andijan scores 1.75 and allows 1.25. Games in this league average 2.44 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 25% of Nasaf's games and 25% of Andijan's. The Over 2.5 rates are 0% and 75%, compared with league averages of 44% for BTTS and 50% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Nasaf has the higher season xG average, 1.55 to 1.37 per game. Nasaf takes 14.0 shots per game, while Andijan takes 12.0.
First-half and second-half trends
Nasaf leads at halftime in 25% of its games and scores 0.50 goals per game after halftime. Andijan leads at halftime in 50% and scores 1.00 after halftime.
When the teams score
Nasaf's most productive scoring window is minutes 76-90+ (2 goals). For Andijan, it is minutes 76-90+ (3 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Uzbekistan Super League games average 2.44 goals. Both teams score in 44% of games, and 50% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, 2 previous meetings were available. The record was 0 home wins, 2 draws and 0 away wins. Those games averaged 2.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
I predict a Nasaf win (1). At home the hosts generate 1.65 xG on average, produce 15 shots (4.5 on target) per match, concede 0.5 goals on average and keep 50% clean sheets; in the last 5 matches they have 3 wins, 1 draw and 1 loss, averaging 2 points per game. Andijan away records only 1.01 xG, 8.5 shots (1.5 on target) per match, concedes 2.5 goals on the road and has lost 100% of away matches. Nasaf’s main advantages are possession dominance (64% vs 46%), significantly more shots per game (15 vs 8.5) and higher xG (1.65 vs 1.01), indicating better quality of chances. The risk stems from the hosts’ low conversion—only 0.5 goals taken from 1.65 xG—and the fact Andijan scored 7 goals in their last 5 matches, so I expect a Nasaf win by a small margin.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
A strong argument against BTTS (Both Teams To Score) is Nasaf's form: a season clean sheet rate of 100% and an average of 0.0 goals conceded per match, combined with 3.0 goals scored and 6.0 shots on target per game. Andijan this season scores only 0.5 goals and concedes 2.5 goals per match; additionally they average 8.5 shots with only 1.5 on target and have a 6% conversion, which limits their real attacking threat. From an xG perspective Nasaf has xG_for 1.74 versus xG_against 0.81, while Andijan has xG_for 1.01 versus xG_against 1.26, so expected offensive strength favors the hosts. In the last 5 matches BTTS occurred in 40% of Nasaf games and 20% of Andijan games, and the league BTTS rate is 41%, therefore historically both teams rarely score in the same match. As a result I assign 78% to no BTTS and 22% to BTTS, so the best pick is 'No' due to Nasaf's 100% clean sheets and Andijan's poor conversion and low number of shots on target.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Data analysis indicates a high goal potential: Nasaf scores an average of 3.0 goals at home with xG 1.74, while Andijan concedes an average of 2.5 goals with xG against 1.26, yielding expected 1.50 goals for the home side and 0.91 for the visitors (total 2.41). Both teams have 100% of matches this season over 1.5 goals, and Andijan additionally has 100% of matches over 2.5 (Nasaf 50% over 2.5), which is a strong signal for overs. Nasaf averages 15.5 shots and 6.0 shots on target with a 19% conversion, whereas Andijan records 8.5 shots, 1.5 on target and a 6% conversion, so the hosts have an advantage in creating and finishing chances. Based on this, I recommend the over side and as the strongest signal the line Over 1.5 with high probability; Over 2.5 also looks likely (~70%), while Over 3.5 is less certain (~35%).
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Nasaf led at the break in 2 of 2 home matches (100%) and scores on average 1.5 goals by half-time compared to 0.0 for Andijan, so HT=1 is clearly the most likely. Over 90 minutes Nasaf averages 3.0 home goals and concedes none (0.0), while Andijan scores 0.5 away and concedes 2.5 on average, which strongly supports a home win. Additionally, xG 1.74 for Nasaf versus 1.01 for Andijan, 6.0 shots on target versus 1.5 and shot conversion 19% vs 6% confirm the attacking superiority and greater finishing efficiency. The hosts have 100% clean sheets at home (seasonCSPercentage_home 100.0), and Andijan have taken no points away (seasonPPG_away 0.0, 100% losses), so the scenario of Nasaf leading at the break and winning the match (1/1) is the strongest signal.
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Nasaf | Andijan | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 29% | 31% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.11 | 0.11 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.25 | 0.47 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Nasaf is 17% better for: last-5 form.
1.75 pts / game - Nasaf · 1.5 pts / game - Andijan
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Andijan is 75% better for: goals scored per game.
1 goals / game - Nasaf · 1.75 goals / game - Andijan
Nasaf is 150% better for: goals allowed per game.
0.5 goals / game - Nasaf · 1.25 goals / game - Andijan
Nasaf scores in 75% of games (3 of 4 meczów), while Andijan keeps a clean sheet in 50% (2 of 4 meczów).
Andijan scores in 75% of games (3 of 4 meczów), while Nasaf keeps a clean sheet in 50% (2 of 4 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Nasaf
Over / Under - Andijan
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Andijan is 20% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.25 pts / game - Nasaf · 1.5 pts / game - Andijan
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Nasaf - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 25% of games and wins 50%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
Andijan - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 50% of games and wins 50%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.3 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.25 | 1.75 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.5 | 0.5 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.3 | 0.3 |
| Average goals per game | 0.8 | 0.8 |
| 1 goal | 50% | 75% |
| 2 goals | 25% | 0% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 75% | 75% |
| No goal | 75% | 50% |
| Goal difference | +1 | +1 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.50 | 1.75 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.8 | 1.0 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.5 | 0.8 |
| Average goals per game | 1.3 | 1.8 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 25% | 75% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 50% | 50% |
| No goal | 50% | 25% |
| Goal difference | +1 | +1 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (2 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (1). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (3 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Nasaf
Andijan
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Uzbekistan Super League).
Teams vs league
| Nasaf | Liga | Andijan | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▼ 1.50 | 2.44 | ▲ 3.00 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 25% | 44% | ▼ 25% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 0% | 50% | ▲ 75% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 50% | 31% | ▲ 50% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 50% | 72% | ▲ 100% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 75% | 78% | ▲ 100% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Record from Nasaf's perspective: 0 wins, 2 draws and 0 losses against Andijan. Games average 2.00 goals, and both teams scored in 100% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Nasaf vs Andijan?
The Uzbekistan Super League match finished Nasaf 1:0 Andijan. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Nasaf and Andijan?
In the last 2 head-to-head matches Nasaf won 0, Andijan won 0 and 2 ended level. These games averaged 2.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Nasaf vs Andijan?
Nasaf score 1.00 goals per game on average and Andijan 1.75. The Uzbekistan Super League average is 2.44 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 50% of games. Both teams score in 25% of Nasaf's matches and 25% of Andijan's.
What form are Nasaf and Andijan in?
Over the last 5 games Nasaf have a 2-1-1 record (1.75 points per game) and Andijan 2-0-2 (1.50 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Nasaf vs Andijan?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.