Uzbekistan - Uzbekistan Super LeagueData current as of September 07, 2026

Nasaf vs Buxoro: match statistics

Nasaf crest
Nasaf
1 : 1half-time 0:0
Buxoro crest
Buxoro

Nasaf vs Buxoro: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

Nasaf played against Buxoro in Uzbekistan Super League (Uzbekistan). The game was played on April 13, 2026. Final score: 1:1.

Recent form

Nasaf has 2 wins, 2 draws and 1 loss over its last five games, averaging 1.60 points per game. Buxoro has 3 wins, 1 draw and 1 loss, with 2.00 points per game.

Scoring records

Nasaf scores 1.00 goals per game and allows 0.50. Buxoro scores 1.50 and allows 0.83. Games in this league average 2.41 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 33% of Nasaf's games and 50% of Buxoro's. The Over 2.5 rates are 0% and 33%, compared with league averages of 47% for BTTS and 47% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

Nasaf has the higher season xG average, 1.46 to 1.39 per game. Nasaf takes 12.8 shots per game, while Buxoro takes 11.8.

First-half and second-half trends

Nasaf leads at halftime in 17% of its games and scores 0.67 goals per game after halftime. Buxoro leads at halftime in 50% and scores 0.83 after halftime.

When the teams score

Nasaf's most productive scoring window is minutes 76-90+ (3 goals). For Buxoro, it is minutes 46-60 (3 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

Uzbekistan Super League games average 2.41 goals. Both teams score in 47% of games, and 47% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

Before this game, 2 previous meetings were available. The record was 2 home wins, 0 draws and 0 away wins. Those games averaged 4.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Nasaf holds an advantage in control and chance creation: the hosts average 63% possession, 14 shots per match (5 on target) and xG 1.65 per game, while Buxoro away records 47% possession, 12 shots (2.5 on target) and xG 1.16. Defensively Nasaf is strong at home — conceding just 0.33 goals per match on average and keeping a clean sheet in 67% of games, whereas Buxoro concedes 1.5 goals away with 50% clean sheets. The hosts’ issue is low chance conversion: Nasaf scores 0.67 goals per home match with a 5% conversion rate and 33% of matches without scoring, while Buxoro scores 1.0 goal away with an 8% conversion and 0% matches without a goal. In the last 5 matches Nasaf has scored 5 goals and averages 1.6 points per match, and Buxoro 8 goals and 2.0 points per match, indicating better scoring form from the visitors. Considering the hosts’ solid defense and superiority in xG and shots but also their low efficiency, I forecast a Nasaf win, though by a moderate margin.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

Nasaf at home averages 1.75 goals scored and concedes only 0.5 per match; their attacking xG is 1.51 with xG against 1.30 and 50% clean sheets, indicating a strong home defense. Buxoro away averages 1.0 goals scored and 1.5 conceded, with attacking xG 1.16 and xG against 1.57; they also produce only 2.5 shots on target per game and have a conversion rate of 8%. Season-long metrics show BTTS 50% vs 50% for both teams, but in the last 5 matches Nasaf had BTTS 40% while Buxoro had 60%, and the league BTTS level is 46%. A clear advantage for Nasaf in shots on target (5.5 vs 2.5) and better efficiency (15% vs 8%) suggests the hosts are more likely to score, while the visitors have limited offensive opportunities. Given Nasaf’s strong defense (0.5 conceded and 50% clean sheets) and Buxoro’s poor away efficiency, I assess BTTS at about 35% for 'Yes' and 65% for 'No', therefore the best pick is 'No'.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

I project total expected goals at 2.77: Nasaf 1.54 and Buxoro 1.23. The estimate is the average of Nasaf’s attacking xG (1.51) and Buxoro’s defensive xG (1.57), yielding 1.54 for Nasaf, and Buxoro’s attacking xG (1.16) and Nasaf’s defensive xG (1.30), yielding 1.23 for Buxoro; the sum 2.77 is above the league average of 2.4. Nasaf averages 1.75 goals per match and records 5.5 shots on target with a conversion rate of 15%, while Buxoro averages 1.0 goal, 2.5 shots on target and an 8% conversion rate, which increases the hosts’ likelihood of scoring and pushes the match goal total up. Therefore I give a strong signal for Over 1.5 (95%) and a moderate signal for Over 2.5 (66%), since the projected total 2.77 exceeds the 2.5 line by 0.27, even though season Over2.5 rates are 25% for Nasaf and 50% for Buxoro; the league Over2.5 is 46%, indicating moderate risk. I rate Over 3.5 at 25% (Under 75%) because 2.77 is clearly below 3.5 and season Over3.5 rates are 25% for the home side and 50% for the away side.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

Nasaf has a clear advantage in the first half: they led at the break in 3 of 4 home matches (75%), scoring an average of 0.75 goals by half-time and conceding only 0.25. Buxoro, by contrast, did not lead at the break in any case and concedes an average of 1.5 goals before the break, which favors the home side after 45 minutes. Over the full match Nasaf scores an average of 1.75 goals at home and wins 75% of matches, versus 1.0 goal and 50% wins for Buxoro, with xG of 1.51 against 1.16 for the visitors. Additionally, the hosts register more shots on target (5.5 vs 2.5) and have better conversion (15% vs 8%), and an average points at half-time of 2.25 versus 0.5 for Buxoro; therefore the most likely scenario is Nasaf leading at half-time and carrying the win through (1/1).

View first-half and second-half statistics

Stats by half

0 : 0
First half
1 : 1
Second half

Game stats

55Possession (%)45
NasafBuxoro
15Shots8
NasafBuxoro
5Shots on target4
NasafBuxoro
1.63xG1
NasafBuxoro
12Corners4
NasafBuxoro
47Dangerous attacks30
NasafBuxoro
5Fouls13
NasafBuxoro
3Cards1
NasafBuxoro

Pre-game profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

1Goals scored / game1.5
NasafBuxoro
0.5Goals allowed / game0.83
NasafBuxoro
56%Average possession45%
NasafBuxoro
4.33Shots on target / game4.5
NasafBuxoro

Team statswho is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

12.83Shots per game11.83
NasafBuxoro
4.33Shots on target4.5
NasafBuxoro
7.8%Shot conversion12.7%
NasafBuxoro
56%Possession45%
NasafBuxoro
1.46xG for1.39
NasafBuxoro
1.28xG against1.38
NasafBuxoro

Shooting quality

Nasaf: BalancedBuxoro: Counter-attacking
NasafBuxoro
Accuracy (shots on target)34%38%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.110.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.230.33

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

Buxoro is 25% better for: last-5 form.

1.6 pts / game - Nasaf · 2 pts / game - Buxoro

Nasaf
WDLWD
Season result split
50% W33% R17% P
Season (W-D-L)
3-2-1
1.83 pts / game · goal difference +3
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-2-1
1.60 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
2-0-1
Last 5 at home
2-0-1
WLW
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 0.6xG: 1.40Opponent xG: 1.43BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 0%
Buxoro
WDWLW
Season result split
67% W17% R17% P
Season (W-D-L)
4-1-1
2.17 pts / game · goal difference +4
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-1-1
2.00 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
1-0-1
Last 5 away
1-0-1
WL
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.6Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 1.35Opponent xG: 1.37BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 40%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Buxoro is 50% better for: goals scored per game.

1 goals / game - Nasaf · 1.5 goals / game - Buxoro

Nasaf is 66% better for: goals allowed per game.

0.5 goals / game - Nasaf · 0.83 goals / game - Buxoro

Nasaf scoring profile: strong

Nasaf scores in 83% of games (5 of 6 meczów), while Buxoro keeps a clean sheet in 50% (3 of 6 meczów).

Buxoro scoring profile: very strong

Buxoro scores in 100% of games (6 of 6 meczów), while Nasaf keeps a clean sheet in 50% (3 of 6 meczów).

6Goals scored (season)9
NasafBuxoro
3Goals conceded (season)5
NasafBuxoro
1.5Average goals per game2.33
NasafBuxoro
5Goals scored (last 5)8
NasafBuxoro
3Goals conceded (last 5)5
NasafBuxoro

How often they score at least...

83%1 goal100%
NasafBuxoro
17%2 goals33%
NasafBuxoro
0%3 goals17%
NasafBuxoro
0%4 goals0%
NasafBuxoro

How often they concede at least...

50%1 goal50%
NasafBuxoro
0%2 goals17%
NasafBuxoro
0%3 goals17%
NasafBuxoro
0%4 goals0%
NasafBuxoro

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

0%BTTS at half-time17%
NasafBuxoro
0%BTTS in both halves0%
NasafBuxoro
0%Scored in both halves17%
NasafBuxoro

BTTS and goal count

0%Min. 3 goals and BTTS33%
NasafBuxoro
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
NasafBuxoro
40%BTTS - last 560%
NasafBuxoro

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

1st half

33%Min. 1 goal before half-time83%
NasafBuxoro
17%Min. 2 goals before half-time17%
NasafBuxoro
0%Min. 3 goals before half-time17%
NasafBuxoro

2nd half

83%Min. 1 goal after half-time67%
NasafBuxoro
17%Min. 2 goals after half-time17%
NasafBuxoro
0%Min. 3 goals after half-time17%
NasafBuxoro

Game halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Buxoro is 43% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.17 pts / game - Nasaf · 1.67 pts / game - Buxoro

Nasaf - half-time state
17% leading67% draw17% trailing
Buxoro - half-time state
50% leading17% draw33% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.17Points per game (1st half)1.67
NasafBuxoro
0.33Goals scored (1st half)0.67
NasafBuxoro
0.17Goals conceded (1st half)0.67
NasafBuxoro
0.5Average goals (1st half)1.33
NasafBuxoro
83%Clean sheet before half-time67%
NasafBuxoro
83%No goal before half-time33%
NasafBuxoro

After half-time (2nd half)

1.83Points per game (2nd half)1.83
NasafBuxoro
0.67Goals scored (2nd half)0.83
NasafBuxoro
0.33Goals conceded (2nd half)0.17
NasafBuxoro
1Average goals (2nd half)1
NasafBuxoro
67%Clean sheet after half-time83%
NasafBuxoro
33%No goal after half-time50%
NasafBuxoro

Nasaf - second-half results

50% W33% R17% P
7
Half-time points
2
Half-time goals
+1
Goal difference (1st half)
11
Second-half points
+2
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.17
PPG before half-time
Lead holding294%

Leads at halftime in 17% of games and wins 50%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime+0.2

Allows 0.2 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

Buxoro - second-half results

50% W33% R17% P
10
Half-time points
4
Half-time goals
0
Goal difference (1st half)
11
Second-half points
+4
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.67
PPG before half-time
Lead holding134%

Leads at halftime in 50% of games and wins 67%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime-0.5

Defense stays consistent across the full game.

Nasaf - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.201.60
Goals scored / game0.40.6
Goals allowed / game0.20.4
Average goals per game0.61.0
1 goal40%80%
2 goals20%20%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet80%60%
No goal80%40%
Goal difference+1+1
Half-time: 20% leading - 60% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 40% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 2
Buxoro - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.402.00
Goals scored / game0.61.0
Goals allowed / game0.80.2
Average goals per game1.41.2
1 goal80%80%
2 goals20%20%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet60%80%
No goal40%40%
Goal difference-1+4
Half-time: 40% leading - 20% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 20% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 3

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

Nasaf
ScoredConceded
1
0
0-15
1
0
16-30
0
1
31-45
1
0
46-60
0
0
61-75
3
2
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (3 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.

Buxoro
ScoredConceded
1
2
0-15
1
0
16-30
2
2
31-45
3
1
46-60
2
0
61-75
0
0
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (3 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

1.92
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
0.9 : 1.0
Estimated goal split
home : away
79%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
42%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+135%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
83%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
0%
0:0 risk
practically zero
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

Nasaf

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.18
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.32
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-3.4 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.46
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.78
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
78%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
45%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
-0.23
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
50% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 17% come in the first quarter-hour.
50%

Buxoro

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.01
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.66
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-0.8 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.11
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.55
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
134%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
64%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
-0.17
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
0% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 11% come in the first quarter-hour.
0%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Uzbekistan Super League).

Teams vs league

NasafLigaBuxoro
Average goals per game 1.502.41 2.33
Both teams scored 33%47% 50%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 0%47% 33%
Clean sheets 50%28% 50%
Goal before half-time 33%69% 83%
Goal after half-time 83%80% 67%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.41
Average goals per game
47%
Both teams scored
47%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
28%
Clean sheets
1.29
Home goals / game
1.12
Away goals / game
+15%
Home attack advantage
+13%
Home defensive advantage
+4%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
69%
1 goal
35%
2 goals
4%
3 goals
2%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
80%
1 goal
37%
2 goals
12%
3 goals
2%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. NasafRed cardUmar Eshmuradov
  2. BuxoroYellow cardRavshan Hayrullayev
  3. NasafSubstitutionOn: Davronbek UsmonovOff: Murodbek Rahmatov
  4. NasafYellow cardGolib Gaybullaev

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Record from Nasaf's perspective: 2 wins, 0 draws and 0 losses against Buxoro. Games average 4.50 goals, and both teams scored in 50% of them.

FC Nasaf Qarshi
5 : 0
Buxoro FK
Buxoro FK
1 : 3
FC Nasaf Qarshi

FAQ

What was the result of Nasaf vs Buxoro?

The Uzbekistan Super League match finished Nasaf 1:1 Buxoro. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Nasaf and Buxoro?

In the last 2 head-to-head matches Nasaf won 2, Buxoro won 0 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 4.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Nasaf vs Buxoro?

Nasaf score 1.00 goals per game on average and Buxoro 1.50. The Uzbekistan Super League average is 2.41 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 47% of games. Both teams score in 33% of Nasaf's matches and 50% of Buxoro's.

What form are Nasaf and Buxoro in?

Over the last 5 games Nasaf have a 2-2-1 record (1.60 points per game) and Buxoro 3-1-1 (2.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Nasaf vs Buxoro?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Nasaf vs Buxoro: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.