Nasaf vs Buxoro: match statistics
Nasaf vs Buxoro: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Nasaf played against Buxoro in Uzbekistan Super League (Uzbekistan). The game was played on April 13, 2026. Final score: 1:1.
Recent form
Nasaf has 2 wins, 2 draws and 1 loss over its last five games, averaging 1.60 points per game. Buxoro has 3 wins, 1 draw and 1 loss, with 2.00 points per game.
Scoring records
Nasaf scores 1.00 goals per game and allows 0.50. Buxoro scores 1.50 and allows 0.83. Games in this league average 2.41 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 33% of Nasaf's games and 50% of Buxoro's. The Over 2.5 rates are 0% and 33%, compared with league averages of 47% for BTTS and 47% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Nasaf has the higher season xG average, 1.46 to 1.39 per game. Nasaf takes 12.8 shots per game, while Buxoro takes 11.8.
First-half and second-half trends
Nasaf leads at halftime in 17% of its games and scores 0.67 goals per game after halftime. Buxoro leads at halftime in 50% and scores 0.83 after halftime.
When the teams score
Nasaf's most productive scoring window is minutes 76-90+ (3 goals). For Buxoro, it is minutes 46-60 (3 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Uzbekistan Super League games average 2.41 goals. Both teams score in 47% of games, and 47% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, 2 previous meetings were available. The record was 2 home wins, 0 draws and 0 away wins. Those games averaged 4.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Nasaf holds an advantage in control and chance creation: the hosts average 63% possession, 14 shots per match (5 on target) and xG 1.65 per game, while Buxoro away records 47% possession, 12 shots (2.5 on target) and xG 1.16. Defensively Nasaf is strong at home — conceding just 0.33 goals per match on average and keeping a clean sheet in 67% of games, whereas Buxoro concedes 1.5 goals away with 50% clean sheets. The hosts’ issue is low chance conversion: Nasaf scores 0.67 goals per home match with a 5% conversion rate and 33% of matches without scoring, while Buxoro scores 1.0 goal away with an 8% conversion and 0% matches without a goal. In the last 5 matches Nasaf has scored 5 goals and averages 1.6 points per match, and Buxoro 8 goals and 2.0 points per match, indicating better scoring form from the visitors. Considering the hosts’ solid defense and superiority in xG and shots but also their low efficiency, I forecast a Nasaf win, though by a moderate margin.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Nasaf at home averages 1.75 goals scored and concedes only 0.5 per match; their attacking xG is 1.51 with xG against 1.30 and 50% clean sheets, indicating a strong home defense. Buxoro away averages 1.0 goals scored and 1.5 conceded, with attacking xG 1.16 and xG against 1.57; they also produce only 2.5 shots on target per game and have a conversion rate of 8%. Season-long metrics show BTTS 50% vs 50% for both teams, but in the last 5 matches Nasaf had BTTS 40% while Buxoro had 60%, and the league BTTS level is 46%. A clear advantage for Nasaf in shots on target (5.5 vs 2.5) and better efficiency (15% vs 8%) suggests the hosts are more likely to score, while the visitors have limited offensive opportunities. Given Nasaf’s strong defense (0.5 conceded and 50% clean sheets) and Buxoro’s poor away efficiency, I assess BTTS at about 35% for 'Yes' and 65% for 'No', therefore the best pick is 'No'.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
I project total expected goals at 2.77: Nasaf 1.54 and Buxoro 1.23. The estimate is the average of Nasaf’s attacking xG (1.51) and Buxoro’s defensive xG (1.57), yielding 1.54 for Nasaf, and Buxoro’s attacking xG (1.16) and Nasaf’s defensive xG (1.30), yielding 1.23 for Buxoro; the sum 2.77 is above the league average of 2.4. Nasaf averages 1.75 goals per match and records 5.5 shots on target with a conversion rate of 15%, while Buxoro averages 1.0 goal, 2.5 shots on target and an 8% conversion rate, which increases the hosts’ likelihood of scoring and pushes the match goal total up. Therefore I give a strong signal for Over 1.5 (95%) and a moderate signal for Over 2.5 (66%), since the projected total 2.77 exceeds the 2.5 line by 0.27, even though season Over2.5 rates are 25% for Nasaf and 50% for Buxoro; the league Over2.5 is 46%, indicating moderate risk. I rate Over 3.5 at 25% (Under 75%) because 2.77 is clearly below 3.5 and season Over3.5 rates are 25% for the home side and 50% for the away side.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Nasaf has a clear advantage in the first half: they led at the break in 3 of 4 home matches (75%), scoring an average of 0.75 goals by half-time and conceding only 0.25. Buxoro, by contrast, did not lead at the break in any case and concedes an average of 1.5 goals before the break, which favors the home side after 45 minutes. Over the full match Nasaf scores an average of 1.75 goals at home and wins 75% of matches, versus 1.0 goal and 50% wins for Buxoro, with xG of 1.51 against 1.16 for the visitors. Additionally, the hosts register more shots on target (5.5 vs 2.5) and have better conversion (15% vs 8%), and an average points at half-time of 2.25 versus 0.5 for Buxoro; therefore the most likely scenario is Nasaf leading at half-time and carrying the win through (1/1).
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Nasaf | Buxoro | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 34% | 38% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.11 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.23 | 0.33 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Buxoro is 25% better for: last-5 form.
1.6 pts / game - Nasaf · 2 pts / game - Buxoro
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Buxoro is 50% better for: goals scored per game.
1 goals / game - Nasaf · 1.5 goals / game - Buxoro
Nasaf is 66% better for: goals allowed per game.
0.5 goals / game - Nasaf · 0.83 goals / game - Buxoro
Nasaf scores in 83% of games (5 of 6 meczów), while Buxoro keeps a clean sheet in 50% (3 of 6 meczów).
Buxoro scores in 100% of games (6 of 6 meczów), while Nasaf keeps a clean sheet in 50% (3 of 6 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Nasaf
Over / Under - Buxoro
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Buxoro is 43% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.17 pts / game - Nasaf · 1.67 pts / game - Buxoro
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Nasaf - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 17% of games and wins 50%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.2 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
Buxoro - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 50% of games and wins 67%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.20 | 1.60 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.4 | 0.6 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.2 | 0.4 |
| Average goals per game | 0.6 | 1.0 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 60% |
| No goal | 80% | 40% |
| Goal difference | +1 | +1 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.40 | 2.00 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.6 | 1.0 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.8 | 0.2 |
| Average goals per game | 1.4 | 1.2 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 80% |
| No goal | 40% | 40% |
| Goal difference | -1 | +4 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (3 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (3 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Nasaf
Buxoro
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Uzbekistan Super League).
Teams vs league
| Nasaf | Liga | Buxoro | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▼ 1.50 | 2.41 | • 2.33 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 33% | 47% | ▲ 50% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 0% | 47% | ▼ 33% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 50% | 28% | ▲ 50% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 33% | 69% | ▲ 83% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 83% | 80% | ▼ 67% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Record from Nasaf's perspective: 2 wins, 0 draws and 0 losses against Buxoro. Games average 4.50 goals, and both teams scored in 50% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Nasaf vs Buxoro?
The Uzbekistan Super League match finished Nasaf 1:1 Buxoro. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Nasaf and Buxoro?
In the last 2 head-to-head matches Nasaf won 2, Buxoro won 0 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 4.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Nasaf vs Buxoro?
Nasaf score 1.00 goals per game on average and Buxoro 1.50. The Uzbekistan Super League average is 2.41 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 47% of games. Both teams score in 33% of Nasaf's matches and 50% of Buxoro's.
What form are Nasaf and Buxoro in?
Over the last 5 games Nasaf have a 2-2-1 record (1.60 points per game) and Buxoro 3-1-1 (2.00 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Nasaf vs Buxoro?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Nasaf vs Buxoro: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.


