Nasaf vs Pakhtakor: match statistics
Nasaf vs Pakhtakor: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Nasaf played against Pakhtakor in Uzbekistan Super League (Uzbekistan). The game was played on August 16, 2026. Venue: Markaziy Stadion. Final score: 1:2.
Recent form
Nasaf has 3 wins, 2 draws and 0 losses over its last five games, averaging 2.20 points per game. Pakhtakor has 2 wins, 3 draws and 0 losses, with 1.80 points per game.
Scoring records
Nasaf scores 1.19 goals per game and allows 0.88. Pakhtakor scores 1.75 and allows 1.00. Games in this league average 2.66 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 56% of Nasaf's games and 63% of Pakhtakor's. The Over 2.5 rates are 31% and 50%, compared with league averages of 55% for BTTS and 53% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Pakhtakor has the higher season xG average, 1.56 to 1.50 per game. Nasaf takes 13.3 shots per game, while Pakhtakor takes 13.5.
First-half and second-half trends
Nasaf leads at halftime in 13% of its games and scores 0.75 goals per game after halftime. Pakhtakor leads at halftime in 44% and scores 0.88 after halftime.
When the teams score
Nasaf's most productive scoring window is minutes 76-90+ (6 goals). For Pakhtakor, it is minutes 16-30 (6 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Uzbekistan Super League games average 2.66 goals. Both teams score in 55% of games, and 53% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, 3 previous meetings were available. The record was 0 home wins, 2 draws and 1 away win. Those games averaged 3.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 67% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Pakhtakor sit 2nd in the table, while Nasaf are sixth, with an overall season record of 10 wins, 5 draws and just 1 defeat. The visitors are particularly solid away from home: they have won 71% of their matches, remain unbeaten and average 1.43 goals per game, compared with Nasaf’s 0.75 goals scored at home. Nasaf defend very well in front of their own supporters, conceding just 0.63 goals per match and keeping a clean sheet in 63% of their games, so a draw remains a realistic outcome. However, Pakhtakor’s edge comes from their finishing: they convert 11% of their shots, compared with just 6% for the hosts, and are less likely to fail to score — 14% versus 38%. Both teams are unbeaten in their last five league matches and have conceded 3 goals apiece during that period, but Pakhtakor’s more consistent away performances point to a slight advantage.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Nasaf has a very high seasonal rate of matches in which both teams score, at 78%, while Pakhtakor stands at 43%, providing a moderately positive signal for BTTS. The hosts score an average of 2.00 goals but concede 1.33, and only 11% of their matches end with a clean sheet. Pakhtakor is considerably more solid defensively, averaging 0.57 goals conceded and recording 57% clean sheets; however, its xG against is 1.07, while Nasaf creates an average of 1.64 xG. In their last five matches, both teams scored an average of 1.4 and 1.6 goals respectively, while each conceded only 0.6 goals per match, which limits confidence in the pick. Despite the visitors' strong defense, Nasaf's attacking advantage at home and the hosts' regular struggles to keep a clean sheet slightly favor the BTTS - Yes scenario.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
The strongest signal is Under 3.5 goals, as Pakhtakor concede just 0.57 goals per away match and have kept a clean sheet in 57% of their games. Both teams are also currently very stable defensively: in their last five matches, Nasaf and Pakhtakor have conceded just 3 goals each, averaging 0.6 per game. Their attacking potential remains evident, with average xG figures of 1.64 for Nasaf and 1.46 for Pakhtakor, but it is limited by the opponents’ xG conceded of 1.07 and 1.23, respectively. Only 14% of Pakhtakor’s away matches have gone Over 3.5 goals, while their games have ended Under 2.5 goals in as many as 71% of cases. The projected total of 2.35 goals points to a realistic chance of two or three goals, but clearly favors a match with fewer than four goals.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
A half-time draw is strongly supported by the current form: Nasaf were level at the break in 80% of their last five matches, while Pakhtakor recorded a draw at half-time in 60%. Pakhtakor concede an average of just 0.29 goals before the break, keeping a clean sheet at half-time in 71% of matches, which limits Nasaf’s chances of capitalising on their seasonal average of 1.22 first-half goals. After the interval, the advantage shifts to the visitors, who score an average of 1.00 goal and have not lost a single second half, while Nasaf concede an average of 1.00 goal during that period. Pakhtakor also have the stronger full-match record — winning 71% of matches and conceding just 0.57 goals on average — making a half-time draw followed by an away win at the final whistle the most likely HT/FT outcome.
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Nasaf | Pakhtakor | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 35% | 36% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.11 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.26 | 0.36 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Nasaf is 22% better for: last-5 form.
2.2 pts / game - Nasaf · 1.8 pts / game - Pakhtakor
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Pakhtakor is 47% better for: goals scored per game.
1.19 goals / game - Nasaf · 1.75 goals / game - Pakhtakor
Nasaf is 14% better for: goals allowed per game.
0.88 goals / game - Nasaf · 1 goals / game - Pakhtakor
Nasaf scores in 81% of games (13 of 16 games), while Pakhtakor keeps a clean sheet in 31% (5 of 16 games).
Pakhtakor scores in 88% of games (14 of 16 games), while Nasaf keeps a clean sheet in 38% (6 of 16 games).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Nasaf
Over / Under - Pakhtakor
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Pakhtakor is 60% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.13 pts / game - Nasaf · 1.81 pts / game - Pakhtakor
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Nasaf - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 13% of games and wins 38%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.1 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
Pakhtakor - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 44% of games and wins 63%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.4 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.40 | 1.80 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.6 | 0.8 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.4 | 0.2 |
| Average goals per game | 1.0 | 1.0 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 80% |
| No goal | 40% | 40% |
| Goal difference | +1 | +3 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.80 | 1.40 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.8 | 0.4 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.2 | 0.6 |
| Average goals per game | 1.0 | 1.0 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 60% |
| No goal | 40% | 60% |
| Goal difference | +3 | -1 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (6 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (6 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Nasaf
Pakhtakor
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Uzbekistan Super League).
Teams vs league
| Nasaf | Liga | Pakhtakor | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▼ 2.06 | 2.66 | • 2.75 |
| Both teams scored | • 56% | 55% | ▲ 63% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 31% | 53% | ▼ 50% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 38% | 26% | ▲ 31% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 50% | 68% | • 69% |
| Goal after half-time | • 75% | 76% | ▲ 81% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Record from Nasaf's perspective: 0 wins, 2 draws and 1 loss against Pakhtakor. Games average 3.00 goals, and both teams scored in 67% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Nasaf vs Pakhtakor?
The Uzbekistan Super League match finished Nasaf 1:2 Pakhtakor. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Nasaf and Pakhtakor?
In the last 3 head-to-head matches Nasaf won 0, Pakhtakor won 1 and 2 ended level. These games averaged 3.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 67% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Nasaf vs Pakhtakor?
Nasaf score 1.19 goals per game on average and Pakhtakor 1.75. The Uzbekistan Super League average is 2.66 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 53% of games. Both teams score in 56% of Nasaf's matches and 63% of Pakhtakor's.
What form are Nasaf and Pakhtakor in?
Over the last 5 games Nasaf have a 3-2-0 record (2.20 points per game) and Pakhtakor 2-3-0 (1.80 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Nasaf vs Pakhtakor?
The statistical background for Nasaf vs Pakhtakor — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.


