Uzbekistan - Uzbekistan Super LeagueData current as of 23 July 2026

Nasaf vs Termez Surkhon: match statistics

Nasaf crest
Nasaf
0 : 1half-time 0:0
Termez Surkhon crest
Termez Surkhon
175%(0.00)
X18%(0.00)
27%(0.00)

Nasaf demonstrates a clear advantage in all key statistics, making them the clear favorite for this match. The hosts have a 100% win rate in home matches, without conceding a single goal at their own stadium and maintaining 100% clean sheets. Their advantage in possession (70% vs 51%), average xG (1.69 vs 0.75), and shot quality (5 on target per match vs 1) is overwhelming. Termez Surkhon, on the other hand, displays terrible away form - 100% losses, averaging 3 goals conceded per match and a zero win percentage. Additionally, the visitors' negative goal difference (-2) compared to Nasaf's perfect defense (+1 in home matches) and the difference in form over the last 5 matches (2.2 points per match vs 1.0) clearly point to a certain victory for the hosts.

Nasaf vs Termez Surkhon: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Nasaf play Termez Surkhon in Uzbekistan Super League (Uzbekistan). The match date is 20 March 2026 at 13:00. Final score: 0:1.

Current form

Nasaf: 1-3-1, 1.20 points/match. Termez Surkhon: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match.

Goal statistics

Nasaf scores 1.23 and concedes 1.00 goals per match. Termez Surkhon scores 1.08 and concedes 1.58. League average: 2.64 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Nasaf 62%, Termez Surkhon 58%. Over 2.5: Nasaf 31%, Termez Surkhon 50%. League level: BTTS 56%, Over 2.5 53%.

xG, shots and style

Nasaf has higher xG: 1.45 vs 1.22. Nasaf: 13.2 shots per match, Termez Surkhon: 11.4.

Match halves

Nasaf: half-time lead 8%, second-half goals 0.77. Termez Surkhon: half-time lead 17%, second-half goals 0.75.

Goals by minute

Nasaf: 76-90+ (5 goals). Termez Surkhon: 76-90+ (6 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Uzbekistan Super League: 2.64 goals per match, BTTS 56%, Over 2.5 53%.

Head-to-head

2 H2H matches: 2-0-0. Average goals 2.00, BTTS 50%.

Match description

Nasaf demonstrates a clear advantage in all key statistics, making them the clear favorite for this match. The hosts have a 100% win rate in home matches, without conceding a single goal at their own stadium and maintaining 100% clean sheets. Their advantage in possession (70% vs 51%), average xG (1.69 vs 0.75), and shot quality (5 on target per match vs 1) is overwhelming. Termez Surkhon, on the other hand, displays terrible away form - 100% losses, averaging 3 goals conceded per match and a zero win percentage. Additionally, the visitors' negative goal difference (-2) compared to Nasaf's perfect defense (+1 in home matches) and the difference in form over the last 5 matches (2.2 points per match vs 1.0) clearly point to a certain victory for the hosts.

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
0 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

58Possession (%)42
NasafTermez Surkhon
14Shots11
NasafTermez Surkhon
4Shots on target5
NasafTermez Surkhon
1.6xG1.26
NasafTermez Surkhon
4Corners2
NasafTermez Surkhon
60Dangerous attacks30
NasafTermez Surkhon
11Fouls8
NasafTermez Surkhon
1Cards0
NasafTermez Surkhon

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

NasafTermez Surkhon
1.23Goals scored / match1.08
NasafTermez Surkhon
1Goals conceded / match1.58
NasafTermez Surkhon
52%Average possession54%
NasafTermez Surkhon
3.92Shots on target / match2.75
NasafTermez Surkhon

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

13.15Shots per match11.42
NasafTermez Surkhon
3.92Shots on target2.75
NasafTermez Surkhon
9.4%Shot conversion9.5%
NasafTermez Surkhon
52%Possession54%
NasafTermez Surkhon
1.45xG for1.22
NasafTermez Surkhon
1.39xG against1.53
NasafTermez Surkhon

Shooting quality

Nasaf: BalancedTermez Surkhon: Balanced
NasafTermez Surkhon
Accuracy (shots on target)30%24%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.110.11
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.310.39

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Termez Surkhon is 17% better for: last-5 form.

1.2 pts / match - Nasaf · 1.4 pts / match - Termez Surkhon

Nasaf
LDDWD
Season result split
31% W46% R23% P
Season (W-D-L)
4-6-3
1.38 pts / match · goal difference +3
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-3-1
1.20 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
2-2-2
Last 5 at home
1-2-2
LWDLD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.6Goals conceded: 1.4xG: 1.50Opponent xG: 1.56BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 60%
Termez Surkhon
LWLDW
Season result split
33% W25% R42% P
Season (W-D-L)
4-3-5
1.25 pts / match · goal difference -6
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-2
1.40 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
2-1-3
Last 5 away
2-1-2
WDLLW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.4Goals conceded: 1.8xG: 1.30Opponent xG: 1.57BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 60%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Nasaf is 14% better for: goals scored per match.

1.23 goals / match - Nasaf · 1.08 goals / match - Termez Surkhon

Nasaf is 58% better for: goals conceded per match.

1 goals / match - Nasaf · 1.58 goals / match - Termez Surkhon

Nasaf scoring profile: very strong

Nasaf scores in 85% of matches (11 of 13 matches), while Termez Surkhon keeps a clean sheet in 17% (2 of 12 matches).

Termez Surkhon scoring profile: strong

Termez Surkhon scores in 67% of matches (8 of 12 matches), while Nasaf keeps a clean sheet in 31% (4 of 13 matches).

16Goals scored (season)13
NasafTermez Surkhon
13Goals conceded (season)19
NasafTermez Surkhon
2.23Average goals in match2.67
NasafTermez Surkhon
8Goals scored (last 5)7
NasafTermez Surkhon
7Goals conceded (last 5)9
NasafTermez Surkhon

How often they score at least...

85%1 goal67%
NasafTermez Surkhon
31%2 goals33%
NasafTermez Surkhon
8%3 goals8%
NasafTermez Surkhon
0%4 goals0%
NasafTermez Surkhon

How often they concede at least...

69%1 goal83%
NasafTermez Surkhon
23%2 goals33%
NasafTermez Surkhon
8%3 goals25%
NasafTermez Surkhon
0%4 goals8%
NasafTermez Surkhon

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

56%
League average

Goal patterns

31%BTTS at half-time8%
NasafTermez Surkhon
8%BTTS in both halves0%
NasafTermez Surkhon
15%Scored in both halves0%
NasafTermez Surkhon

BTTS and goal count

31%Min. 3 goals and BTTS42%
NasafTermez Surkhon
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS8%
NasafTermez Surkhon
80%BTTS - last 580%
NasafTermez Surkhon

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

54%Min. 1 goal before half-time58%
NasafTermez Surkhon
38%Min. 2 goals before half-time17%
NasafTermez Surkhon
0%Min. 3 goals before half-time8%
NasafTermez Surkhon

2nd half

77%Min. 1 goal after half-time83%
NasafTermez Surkhon
38%Min. 2 goals after half-time42%
NasafTermez Surkhon
15%Min. 3 goals after half-time33%
NasafTermez Surkhon

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Nasaf is 9% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1 pts / match - Nasaf · 0.92 pts / match - Termez Surkhon

Nasaf - half-time state
8% leading77% draw15% trailing
Termez Surkhon - half-time state
17% leading42% draw42% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1Points per match (1st half)0.92
NasafTermez Surkhon
0.46Goals scored (1st half)0.33
NasafTermez Surkhon
0.46Goals conceded (1st half)0.58
NasafTermez Surkhon
0.92Average goals (1st half)0.92
NasafTermez Surkhon
54%Clean sheet before half-time50%
NasafTermez Surkhon
62%No goal before half-time83%
NasafTermez Surkhon

After half-time (2nd half)

1.54Points per match (2nd half)1.17
NasafTermez Surkhon
0.77Goals scored (2nd half)0.75
NasafTermez Surkhon
0.54Goals conceded (2nd half)1
NasafTermez Surkhon
1.31Average goals (2nd half)1.75
NasafTermez Surkhon
54%Clean sheet after half-time33%
NasafTermez Surkhon
38%No goal after half-time50%
NasafTermez Surkhon

Nasaf - second-half results

38% W38% R23% P
13
Half-time points
6
Half-time goals
0
Goal difference (1st half)
20
Second-half points
+3
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.00
PPG before half-time
Lead holding388%

Leads at half-time in 8% of matches and wins 31%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Termez Surkhon - second-half results

33% W17% R50% P
11
Half-time points
4
Half-time goals
-3
Goal difference (1st half)
14
Second-half points
-3
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.92
PPG before half-time
Lead holding194%

Leads at half-time in 17% of matches and wins 33%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.4

Concedes 0.4 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Nasaf - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.801.60
Goals scored / match0.61.0
Goals conceded / match0.80.6
Average goals in match1.41.6
1 goal80%60%
2 goals60%60%
3 goals0%40%
Clean sheet20%60%
No goal40%40%
Goal difference-1+2
Half-time: 0% leading - 80% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 40% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 60% - Half-time goals total: 3
Termez Surkhon - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.201.20
Goals scored / match0.21.2
Goals conceded / match0.41.4
Average goals in match0.62.6
1 goal40%100%
2 goals20%60%
3 goals0%60%
Clean sheet80%0%
No goal80%40%
Goal difference-1-1
Half-time: 20% leading - 60% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 0% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 1

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Nasaf
ScoredConceded
2
1
0-15
2
2
16-30
2
3
31-45
3
0
46-60
2
3
61-75
5
4
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (5 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.

Termez Surkhon
ScoredConceded
2
3
0-15
0
2
16-30
2
2
31-45
0
3
46-60
3
4
61-75
6
5
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (6 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.45
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.4 : 1.0
Estimated goal split
home : away
93%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
60%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-18%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
57%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
5%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 20 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Nasaf

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.06
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.17
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-5.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.22
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.39
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
91%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
78%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.18
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
31% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 13% come in the first quarter-hour.
31%

Termez Surkhon

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.31
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.19
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+3.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.14
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.05
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
84%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
117%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.15
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.4
Late goals
46% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 15% come in the first quarter-hour.
46%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Uzbekistan Super League).

Teams vs league

NasafLigaTermez Surkhon
Average goals in match 2.232.64 2.67
Both teams scored 62%56% 58%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 31%53% 50%
Clean sheets 31%25% 17%
Goal before half-time 54%69% 58%
Goal after half-time 77%78% 83%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.64
Average goals per match
56%
Both teams scored
53%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
25%
Clean sheets
1.35
Home goals / match
1.28
Away goals / match
+5%
Home attack advantage
+5%
Home defence advantage
+4%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
69%
1 goal
39%
2 goals
9%
3 goals
5%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
78%
1 goal
41%
2 goals
16%
3 goals
4%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (2): Nasaf 2 - 0 - 0 Termez Surkhon. Average goals 2.00, both teams scored in 50% matches.

Termez Surkhon
1 : 2
FC Nasaf Qarshi
FC Nasaf Qarshi
1 : 0
Termez Surkhon

FAQ

What was the result of Nasaf vs Termez Surkhon?

The Uzbekistan Super League match finished Nasaf 0:1 Termez Surkhon. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Nasaf and Termez Surkhon?

In the last 2 head-to-head matches Nasaf won 2, Termez Surkhon won 0 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 2.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Nasaf vs Termez Surkhon?

Nasaf score 1.23 goals per game on average and Termez Surkhon 1.08. The Uzbekistan Super League average is 2.64 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 53% of games. Both teams score in 62% of Nasaf's matches and 58% of Termez Surkhon's.

What form are Nasaf and Termez Surkhon in?

Over the last 5 games Nasaf have a 1-3-1 record (1.20 points per game) and Termez Surkhon 2-1-2 (1.40 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Nasaf vs Termez Surkhon?

The statistical background for Nasaf vs Termez Surkhon — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.