United States - MLSGEODIS ParkData current as of 23 July 2026

Nashville SC vs Montreal Impact: match statistics

Nashville SC crest
Nashville SC
1 : 0half-time 0:0
Montreal Impact crest
Montreal Impact

Nashville SC vs Montreal Impact: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Nashville SC play Montreal Impact in MLS (United States). The match date is 23 July 2026 at 02:30. Venue: GEODIS Park. Final score: 1:0.

Current form

Nashville SC: 5-0-0, 3.00 points/match. Montreal Impact: 0-3-2, 0.60 points/match.

Goal statistics

Nashville SC scores 2.06 and concedes 0.69 goals per match. Montreal Impact scores 1.38 and concedes 2.00. League average: 3.30 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Nashville SC 44%, Montreal Impact 44%. Over 2.5: Nashville SC 56%, Montreal Impact 69%. League level: BTTS 62%, Over 2.5 63%.

xG, shots and style

Montreal Impact has higher xG: 1.48 vs 1.36. Nashville SC: 11.4 shots per match, Montreal Impact: 13.4.

Match halves

Nashville SC: half-time lead 44%, second-half goals 1.13. Montreal Impact: half-time lead 38%, second-half goals 0.56.

Goals by minute

Nashville SC: 16-30 (7 goals). Montreal Impact: 0-15 (5 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

MLS: 3.30 goals per match, BTTS 62%, Over 2.5 63%.

Head-to-head

No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.

Match description

Nashville holds a clear advantage: this season the hosts have recorded 11 wins, 3 draws and 1 loss, winning 88% of home matches and registering no defeats at home (Loss% 0). Offensively at home they score 3.0 goals per game on average, generate xG 1.54 and register 6.13 shots on target with a 23% conversion rate, while Montreal averages 1.5 goals away, has only 4.75 shots on target and an 11% conversion rate. Defensively the visitors are weak — they concede 3.0 goals on average away and allow 1.65 xG, with only 13% clean sheets on the road; the hosts concede 1.13 goals at home and keep 25% clean sheets. In the last 5 matches Nashville has scored 11 goals and has a 4-1-0 record, averaging 2.6 pts/game, whereas Montreal has 8 goals and a 2-2-1 record with 1.6 pts/game, which confirms the hosts’ superiority in both efficiency and form.

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
1 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

63Possession (%)37
Nashville SCMontreal Impact
10Shots7
Nashville SCMontreal Impact
1Shots on target2
Nashville SCMontreal Impact
1.14xG0.87
Nashville SCMontreal Impact
3Corners2
Nashville SCMontreal Impact
59Dangerous attacks39
Nashville SCMontreal Impact
9Fouls12
Nashville SCMontreal Impact
1Cards1
Nashville SCMontreal Impact

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Nashville SCMontreal Impact
2.06Goals scored / match1.38
Nashville SCMontreal Impact
0.69Goals conceded / match2
Nashville SCMontreal Impact
55%Average possession48%
Nashville SCMontreal Impact
4.88Shots on target / match4.75
Nashville SCMontreal Impact

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

11.44Shots per match13.38
Nashville SCMontreal Impact
4.88Shots on target4.75
Nashville SCMontreal Impact
18%Shot conversion10.3%
Nashville SCMontreal Impact
55%Possession48%
Nashville SCMontreal Impact
1.36xG for1.48
Nashville SCMontreal Impact
1.18xG against1.37
Nashville SCMontreal Impact

Shooting quality

Nashville SC: Efficient finishingMontreal Impact: Balanced
Nashville SCMontreal Impact
Accuracy (shots on target)43%36%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.11
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.420.29

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Nashville SC is 400% better for: last-5 form.

3 pts / match - Nashville SC · 0.6 pts / match - Montreal Impact

Nashville SC
WWWWW
5 wins in a row
Season result split
75% W19% R6% P
Season (W-D-L)
12-3-1
2.44 pts / match · goal difference +22
Last 5 (W-D-L)
5-0-0
3.00 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
8-1-0
Last 5 at home
4-1-0
DWWWW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.0Goals conceded: 0.6xG: 1.13Opponent xG: 1.33BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 60%
Montreal Impact
DLDDL
No win in the last 5 matches
Season result split
25% W19% R56% P
Season (W-D-L)
4-3-9
0.94 pts / match · goal difference -10
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-3-2
0.60 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
1-1-7
Last 5 away
0-1-4
LLLDL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.2Goals conceded: 1.8xG: 1.75Opponent xG: 1.32BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 40%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Nashville SC is 49% better for: goals scored per match.

2.06 goals / match - Nashville SC · 1.38 goals / match - Montreal Impact

Nashville SC is 190% better for: goals conceded per match.

0.69 goals / match - Nashville SC · 2 goals / match - Montreal Impact

Nashville SC scoring profile: very strong

Nashville SC scores in 81% of matches (13 of 16 matches), while Montreal Impact keeps a clean sheet in 25% (4 of 16 matches).

Montreal Impact scoring profile: mixed

Montreal Impact scores in 63% of matches (10 of 16 matches), while Nashville SC keeps a clean sheet in 50% (8 of 16 matches).

33Goals scored (season)22
Nashville SCMontreal Impact
11Goals conceded (season)32
Nashville SCMontreal Impact
2.75Average goals in match3.38
Nashville SCMontreal Impact
10Goals scored (last 5)6
Nashville SCMontreal Impact
3Goals conceded (last 5)9
Nashville SCMontreal Impact

How often they score at least...

81%1 goal63%
Nashville SCMontreal Impact
63%2 goals38%
Nashville SCMontreal Impact
38%3 goals25%
Nashville SCMontreal Impact
19%4 goals13%
Nashville SCMontreal Impact

How often they concede at least...

50%1 goal75%
Nashville SCMontreal Impact
19%2 goals63%
Nashville SCMontreal Impact
0%3 goals38%
Nashville SCMontreal Impact
0%4 goals19%
Nashville SCMontreal Impact

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

62%
League average

Goal patterns

25%BTTS at half-time31%
Nashville SCMontreal Impact
13%BTTS in both halves13%
Nashville SCMontreal Impact
50%Scored in both halves25%
Nashville SCMontreal Impact

BTTS and goal count

44%Min. 3 goals and BTTS44%
Nashville SCMontreal Impact
13%Min. 3 goals without BTTS25%
Nashville SCMontreal Impact
40%BTTS - last 540%
Nashville SCMontreal Impact

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

63%Min. 1 goal before half-time81%
Nashville SCMontreal Impact
50%Min. 2 goals before half-time50%
Nashville SCMontreal Impact
25%Min. 3 goals before half-time31%
Nashville SCMontreal Impact

2nd half

81%Min. 1 goal after half-time81%
Nashville SCMontreal Impact
44%Min. 2 goals after half-time50%
Nashville SCMontreal Impact
13%Min. 3 goals after half-time25%
Nashville SCMontreal Impact

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Nashville SC is 34% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.75 pts / match - Nashville SC · 1.31 pts / match - Montreal Impact

Nashville SC - half-time state
44% leading44% draw13% trailing
Montreal Impact - half-time state
38% leading19% draw44% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.75Points per match (1st half)1.31
Nashville SCMontreal Impact
0.94Goals scored (1st half)0.81
Nashville SCMontreal Impact
0.44Goals conceded (1st half)0.81
Nashville SCMontreal Impact
1.38Average goals (1st half)1.63
Nashville SCMontreal Impact
63%Clean sheet before half-time44%
Nashville SCMontreal Impact
50%No goal before half-time44%
Nashville SCMontreal Impact

After half-time (2nd half)

2.25Points per match (2nd half)0.94
Nashville SCMontreal Impact
1.13Goals scored (2nd half)0.56
Nashville SCMontreal Impact
0.25Goals conceded (2nd half)1.19
Nashville SCMontreal Impact
1.38Average goals (2nd half)1.75
Nashville SCMontreal Impact
75%Clean sheet after half-time31%
Nashville SCMontreal Impact
19%No goal after half-time69%
Nashville SCMontreal Impact

Nashville SC - second-half results

63% W38% R0% P
28
Half-time points
15
Half-time goals
+8
Goal difference (1st half)
36
Second-half points
+14
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.75
PPG before half-time
Lead holding170%

Leads at half-time in 44% of matches and wins 75%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.2

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Montreal Impact - second-half results

25% W19% R56% P
21
Half-time points
13
Half-time goals
0
Goal difference (1st half)
15
Second-half points
-10
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.31
PPG before half-time
Lead holding66%

Leads at half-time in 38% of matches and wins 25%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.

Defence after half-time+0.4

Concedes 0.4 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Nashville SC - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.802.60
Goals scored / match1.01.0
Goals conceded / match0.40.2
Average goals in match1.41.2
1 goal60%100%
2 goals60%20%
3 goals20%0%
Clean sheet60%80%
No goal40%0%
Goal difference+3+4
Half-time: 40% leading - 60% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 80% won - 20% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 5
Montreal Impact - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.000.80
Goals scored / match0.60.6
Goals conceded / match0.81.0
Average goals in match1.41.6
1 goal60%80%
2 goals40%20%
3 goals40%20%
Clean sheet40%20%
No goal60%80%
Goal difference-1-2
Half-time: 20% leading - 40% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 20% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 3

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Nashville SC
ScoredConceded
4
1
0-15
7
4
16-30
4
2
31-45
6
1
46-60
6
2
61-75
6
1
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (7 goli). Concedes most in 16-30 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): +5 - wins late phases.

Montreal Impact
ScoredConceded
5
4
0-15
3
4
16-30
5
5
31-45
1
7
46-60
3
3
61-75
5
9
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (5 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): -4 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

3.07
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
2.0 : 1.0
Estimated goal split
home : away
93%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
44%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
51%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
7%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 14 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Nashville SC

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.18
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+1.19
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-4.2 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.70
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.49
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
108%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
50%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.56
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
18% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 12% come in the first quarter-hour.
18%

Montreal Impact

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.11
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.73
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-0.4 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.10
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.63
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
99%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
105%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.34
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.3
Late goals
23% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 23% come in the first quarter-hour.
23%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (MLS).

Teams vs league

Nashville SCLigaMontreal Impact
Average goals in match 2.753.30 3.38
Both teams scored 44%62% 44%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 56%63% 69%
Clean sheets 50%21% 25%
Goal before half-time 63%77% 81%
Goal after half-time 81%81% 81%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.30
Average goals per match
62%
Both teams scored
63%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
21%
Clean sheets
1.91
Home goals / match
1.39
Away goals / match
+37%
Home attack advantage
+27%
Home defence advantage
+19%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
77%
1 goal
45%
2 goals
20%
3 goals
6%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
81%
1 goal
53%
2 goals
24%
3 goals
12%
4 goals

FAQ

What was the result of Nashville SC vs Montreal Impact?

The MLS match finished Nashville SC 1:0 Montreal Impact. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Nashville SC vs Montreal Impact?

Nashville SC score 2.06 goals per game on average and Montreal Impact 1.38. The MLS average is 3.30 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 63% of games. Both teams score in 44% of Nashville SC's matches and 44% of Montreal Impact's.

What form are Nashville SC and Montreal Impact in?

Over the last 5 games Nashville SC have a 5-0-0 record (3.00 points per game) and Montreal Impact 0-3-2 (0.60 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Nashville SC vs Montreal Impact?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.