United States - MLSGEODIS ParkData current as of September 07, 2026

Nashville SC vs Montreal Impact: match statistics

Nashville SC crest
Nashville SC
1 : 0half-time 0:0
Montreal Impact crest
Montreal Impact

Nashville SC vs Montreal Impact: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

Nashville SC played against Montreal Impact in MLS (United States). The game was played on July 23, 2026. Venue: GEODIS Park. Final score: 1:0.

Recent form

Nashville SC has 4 wins, 1 draw and 0 losses over its last five games, averaging 2.60 points per game. Montreal Impact has 1 win, 3 draws and 1 loss, with 1.20 points per game.

Scoring records

Nashville SC scores 2.13 goals per game and allows 0.73. Montreal Impact scores 1.47 and allows 2.07. Games in this league average 3.31 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 47% of Nashville SC's games and 47% of Montreal Impact's. The Over 2.5 rates are 60% and 73%, compared with league averages of 62% for BTTS and 63% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

Montreal Impact has the higher season xG average, 1.52 to 1.37 per game. Nashville SC takes 11.5 shots per game, while Montreal Impact takes 13.8.

First-half and second-half trends

Nashville SC leads at halftime in 47% of its games and scores 1.13 goals per game after halftime. Montreal Impact leads at halftime in 40% and scores 0.60 after halftime.

When the teams score

Nashville SC's most productive scoring window is minutes 16-30 (7 goals). For Montreal Impact, it is minutes 0-15 (5 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

MLS games average 3.31 goals. Both teams score in 62% of games, and 63% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

There is not enough head-to-head history for a meaningful comparison.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Nashville holds a clear advantage: this season the hosts have recorded 11 wins, 3 draws and 1 loss, winning 88% of home matches and registering no defeats at home (Loss% 0). Offensively at home they score 3.0 goals per game on average, generate xG 1.54 and register 6.13 shots on target with a 23% conversion rate, while Montreal averages 1.5 goals away, has only 4.75 shots on target and an 11% conversion rate. Defensively the visitors are weak — they concede 3.0 goals on average away and allow 1.65 xG, with only 13% clean sheets on the road; the hosts concede 1.13 goals at home and keep 25% clean sheets. In the last 5 matches Nashville has scored 11 goals and has a 4-1-0 record, averaging 2.6 pts/game, whereas Montreal has 8 goals and a 2-2-1 record with 1.6 pts/game, which confirms the hosts’ superiority in both efficiency and form.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

League stats and recent form favor the "Both Teams To Score" market: BTTS occurs in 61% of league matches, and in the last 5 games both teams recorded BTTS in 60% each. xG indicates realistic scoring chances for both sides: estimated xG for Nashville is around 1.62 (1.59 xG_for_home and 1.65 xG_against_away), and for Montreal about 1.28 (1.46 xG_for_away and 1.09 xG_against_home). Montreal defends poorly — conceding an average of 3.0 goals per game and 31 conceded this season, while Nashville have scored 32 goals at home and concede only 1.0 on average, so Nashville have a high probability of scoring. On the other hand Nashville fail to score in 29% of matches, and hosts’ season BTTS is 43% versus Montreal’s 50%, which partially tempers the signal for “Yes”. Considering the league 61%, recent 60% and balanced xG ~1.62 vs ~1.28, I assess BTTS at 65% (YES) vs 35% (NO).

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

I project approximately 2.90 total goals: Nashville ~1.62 xG (xG_for 1.59 vs xG_against_away 1.65 → ~1.62) and Montreal ~1.28 xG (xG_for 1.46 vs xG_against_home 1.09 → ~1.28). Season trends show Montreal has 100% of matches Over 2.5 goals, while Nashville 43%; in the last 5 matches Nashville recorded Over 2.5 in 80% and Montreal in 60%, which together favor Over 2.5. Montreal concedes on average 3.0 goals per away match with xG_against 1.65, whereas Nashville has conceded only 11 goals at home this season while scoring 32, suggesting a high likelihood of goal exchanges. Additionally both teams average 14.14 and 13.5 shots per match with conversion around ~10–11%, increasing realistic chances of goals; therefore the best pick is Over 2.5 (I rate Over 2.5 at ~72%).

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

Statistics indicate a clear advantage for Nashville at the break: the hosts led at half-time in 57% of matches, whereas Montreal led in only 25% and were trailing after the first 45 minutes in 75% of cases. Defensively the visitors perform poorly — they concede on average 3.0 goals per match versus 1.0 conceded by the hosts, and xG shows 1.59 xG for Nashville against 1.65 xG conceded by Montreal, which supports goals for the hosts. In the last 5 fixtures Nashville won 80% of matches and averaged 1.0 goals at half-time, while Montreal managed only 0.2 goals at half-time in their last 5, confirming the hosts’ form and their ability to open the scoring quickly. For these reasons I assess the scenario of the hosts leading at half-time and winning the match (1/1) as the strongest — I assign it a 40% probability, with realistic alternatives being X/1 (13%) and 1/X (11%).

View first-half and second-half statistics

Stats by half

0 : 0
First half
1 : 0
Second half

Game stats

63Possession (%)37
Nashville SCMontreal Impact
10Shots7
Nashville SCMontreal Impact
1Shots on target2
Nashville SCMontreal Impact
1.14xG0.87
Nashville SCMontreal Impact
3Corners2
Nashville SCMontreal Impact
59Dangerous attacks39
Nashville SCMontreal Impact
9Fouls12
Nashville SCMontreal Impact
1Cards1
Nashville SCMontreal Impact

Pre-game profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

Nashville SCMontreal Impact
2.13Goals scored / game1.47
Nashville SCMontreal Impact
0.73Goals allowed / game2.07
Nashville SCMontreal Impact
54%Average possession49%
Nashville SCMontreal Impact
5.13Shots on target / game4.93
Nashville SCMontreal Impact

Team statswho is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

11.53Shots per game13.8
Nashville SCMontreal Impact
5.13Shots on target4.93
Nashville SCMontreal Impact
18.5%Shot conversion10.6%
Nashville SCMontreal Impact
54%Possession49%
Nashville SCMontreal Impact
1.37xG for1.52
Nashville SCMontreal Impact
1.2xG against1.39
Nashville SCMontreal Impact

Shooting quality

Nashville SC: Efficient finishingMontreal Impact: Balanced
Nashville SCMontreal Impact
Accuracy (shots on target)44%36%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.11
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.420.30

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

Nashville SC is 117% better for: last-5 form.

2.6 pts / game - Nashville SC · 1.2 pts / game - Montreal Impact

Nashville SC
DWWWW
Unbeaten in the last 5 games
Season result split
73% W20% R7% P
Season (W-D-L)
11-3-1
2.40 pts / game · goal difference +21
Last 5 (W-D-L)
4-1-0
2.60 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
7-1-0
Last 5 at home
4-1-0
WDWWW
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 2.2Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 1.27Opponent xG: 1.44BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 80%
Montreal Impact
WDLDD
Season result split
27% W20% R53% P
Season (W-D-L)
4-3-8
1.00 pts / game · goal difference -9
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-3-1
1.20 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
1-1-6
Last 5 away
0-1-4
LLLLD
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.6Goals conceded: 1.6xG: 2.02Opponent xG: 1.29BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 40%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Nashville SC is 45% better for: goals scored per game.

2.13 goals / game - Nashville SC · 1.47 goals / game - Montreal Impact

Nashville SC is 184% better for: goals allowed per game.

0.73 goals / game - Nashville SC · 2.07 goals / game - Montreal Impact

Nashville SC scoring profile: very strong

Nashville SC scores in 80% of games (12 of 15 meczów), while Montreal Impact keeps a clean sheet in 27% (4 of 15 meczów).

Montreal Impact scoring profile: mixed

Montreal Impact scores in 67% of games (10 of 15 meczów), while Nashville SC keeps a clean sheet in 47% (7 of 15 meczów).

32Goals scored (season)22
Nashville SCMontreal Impact
11Goals conceded (season)31
Nashville SCMontreal Impact
2.87Average goals per game3.53
Nashville SCMontreal Impact
11Goals scored (last 5)8
Nashville SCMontreal Impact
5Goals conceded (last 5)8
Nashville SCMontreal Impact

How often they score at least...

80%1 goal67%
Nashville SCMontreal Impact
67%2 goals40%
Nashville SCMontreal Impact
40%3 goals27%
Nashville SCMontreal Impact
20%4 goals13%
Nashville SCMontreal Impact

How often they concede at least...

53%1 goal73%
Nashville SCMontreal Impact
20%2 goals67%
Nashville SCMontreal Impact
0%3 goals40%
Nashville SCMontreal Impact
0%4 goals20%
Nashville SCMontreal Impact

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

62%
League average

Goal patterns

27%BTTS at half-time33%
Nashville SCMontreal Impact
13%BTTS in both halves13%
Nashville SCMontreal Impact
53%Scored in both halves27%
Nashville SCMontreal Impact

BTTS and goal count

47%Min. 3 goals and BTTS47%
Nashville SCMontreal Impact
13%Min. 3 goals without BTTS27%
Nashville SCMontreal Impact
60%BTTS - last 540%
Nashville SCMontreal Impact

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

1st half

67%Min. 1 goal before half-time87%
Nashville SCMontreal Impact
53%Min. 2 goals before half-time53%
Nashville SCMontreal Impact
27%Min. 3 goals before half-time33%
Nashville SCMontreal Impact

2nd half

80%Min. 1 goal after half-time80%
Nashville SCMontreal Impact
47%Min. 2 goals after half-time53%
Nashville SCMontreal Impact
13%Min. 3 goals after half-time27%
Nashville SCMontreal Impact

Game halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Nashville SC is 35% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.8 pts / game - Nashville SC · 1.33 pts / game - Montreal Impact

Nashville SC - half-time state
47% leading40% draw13% trailing
Montreal Impact - half-time state
40% leading13% draw47% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.8Points per game (1st half)1.33
Nashville SCMontreal Impact
1Goals scored (1st half)0.87
Nashville SCMontreal Impact
0.47Goals conceded (1st half)0.87
Nashville SCMontreal Impact
1.47Average goals (1st half)1.73
Nashville SCMontreal Impact
60%Clean sheet before half-time40%
Nashville SCMontreal Impact
47%No goal before half-time40%
Nashville SCMontreal Impact

After half-time (2nd half)

2.2Points per game (2nd half)1
Nashville SCMontreal Impact
1.13Goals scored (2nd half)0.6
Nashville SCMontreal Impact
0.27Goals conceded (2nd half)1.2
Nashville SCMontreal Impact
1.4Average goals (2nd half)1.8
Nashville SCMontreal Impact
73%Clean sheet after half-time33%
Nashville SCMontreal Impact
20%No goal after half-time67%
Nashville SCMontreal Impact

Nashville SC - second-half results

60% W40% R0% P
27
Half-time points
15
Half-time goals
+8
Goal difference (1st half)
33
Second-half points
+13
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.80
PPG before half-time
Lead holding155%

Leads at halftime in 47% of games and wins 73%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime-0.2

Defense stays consistent across the full game.

Montreal Impact - second-half results

27% W20% R53% P
20
Half-time points
13
Half-time goals
0
Goal difference (1st half)
15
Second-half points
-9
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.33
PPG before half-time
Lead holding68%

Leads at halftime in 40% of games and wins 27%. Sometimes gives up a halftime lead.

Defense after halftime+0.3

Allows 0.3 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

Nashville SC - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.602.60
Goals scored / game1.01.2
Goals allowed / game0.80.2
Average goals per game1.81.4
1 goal80%100%
2 goals80%40%
3 goals20%0%
Clean sheet40%80%
No goal40%0%
Goal difference+1+5
Half-time: 40% leading - 40% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 80% won - 20% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 5
Montreal Impact - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.001.40
Goals scored / game0.61.0
Goals allowed / game0.80.8
Average goals per game1.41.8
1 goal60%80%
2 goals40%40%
3 goals40%20%
Clean sheet40%40%
No goal60%60%
Goal difference-1+1
Half-time: 20% leading - 40% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 20% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 3

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

Nashville SC
ScoredConceded
4
1
0-15
7
4
16-30
4
2
31-45
6
1
46-60
5
2
61-75
6
1
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (7 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): +5 - wins late phases.

Montreal Impact
ScoredConceded
5
4
0-15
3
4
16-30
5
5
31-45
1
7
46-60
3
2
61-75
5
9
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (5 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): -4 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

3.20
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
2.1 : 1.1
Estimated goal split
home : away
97%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
47%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
54%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
7%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 14 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

Nashville SC

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.17
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+1.23
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-4.2 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.76
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.47
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
111%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
53%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
+0.20
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
19% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 13% come in the first quarter-hour.
19%

Montreal Impact

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.13
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.73
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-0.1 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.05
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
-0.68
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
106%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
108%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
+0.20
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.3
Late goals
23% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 23% come in the first quarter-hour.
23%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (MLS).

Teams vs league

Nashville SCLigaMontreal Impact
Average goals per game 2.873.31 3.53
Both teams scored 47%62% 47%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 60%63% 73%
Clean sheets 47%22% 27%
Goal before half-time 67%77% 87%
Goal after half-time 80%80% 80%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.31
Average goals per game
62%
Both teams scored
63%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
22%
Clean sheets
1.92
Home goals / game
1.39
Away goals / game
+38%
Home attack advantage
+28%
Home defensive advantage
+18%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
77%
1 goal
45%
2 goals
21%
3 goals
6%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
80%
1 goal
53%
2 goals
25%
3 goals
12%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Nashville SCSubstitutionOn: Andy Aryel Najar RodríguezOff: Josh Bauer
  2. Nashville SCGoalSamuel William Surridge
  3. Montreal ImpactSubstitutionOn: Olger EscobarOff: Noah Streit
  4. Nashville SCYellow cardSamuel William Surridge
  5. Montreal ImpactSubstitutionOn: Frankie AmayaOff: Matthew Longstaff
  6. Nashville SCSubstitutionOn: Jack MaherOff: Shakur Mohammed
  7. Nashville SCSubstitutionOn: Charles-Emile BrunetOff: Matthew Corcoran
  8. Montreal ImpactYellow cardPrince-Osei Owusu

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

FAQ

What was the result of Nashville SC vs Montreal Impact?

The MLS match finished Nashville SC 1:0 Montreal Impact. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Nashville SC vs Montreal Impact?

Nashville SC score 2.13 goals per game on average and Montreal Impact 1.47. The MLS average is 3.31 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 63% of games. Both teams score in 47% of Nashville SC's matches and 47% of Montreal Impact's.

What form are Nashville SC and Montreal Impact in?

Over the last 5 games Nashville SC have a 4-1-0 record (2.60 points per game) and Montreal Impact 1-3-1 (1.20 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Nashville SC vs Montreal Impact?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.