Egypt - Second DivisionData current as of October 15, 2026

Nasr vs Proxy: match statistics

Nasr crest
Nasr
1 : 1half-time 1:1
Proxy crest
Proxy

Nasr vs Proxy: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

Nasr played against Proxy in Second Division (Egypt). The game was played on October 8, 2026. Final score: 1:1.

Recent form

Nasr has 3 wins, 1 draw and 1 loss over its last five games, averaging 2.00 points per game. Proxy has 1 win, 0 draws and 4 losses, with 0.60 points per game.

Scoring records

Nasr scores 1.43 goals per game and allows 0.71. Proxy scores 0.29 and allows 1.43. Games in this league average 2.21 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 57% of Nasr's games and 0% of Proxy's. The Over 2.5 rates are 29% and 29%, compared with league averages of 46% for BTTS and 39% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

Proxy has the higher season xG average, 1.23 to 1.14 per game. Nasr takes 7.4 shots per game, while Proxy takes 9.7.

First-half and second-half trends

Nasr leads at halftime in 14% of its games and scores 1.14 goals per game after halftime. Proxy leads at halftime in 14% and scores 0.14 after halftime.

When the teams score

Nasr's most productive scoring window is minutes 76-90+ (4 goals). For Proxy, it is minutes 31-45+ (1 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

Second Division games average 2.21 goals. Both teams score in 46% of games, and 39% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

There is not enough head-to-head history for a meaningful comparison.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Nasr have won 4 of their last 5 matches, scoring 14 goals in the process, while Proxy have failed to win any of their five games and have scored just 1 goal. The hosts win 67% of their home matches, while the visitors have lost all of their away games so far without scoring. Nasr also have the defensive edge: at home, they concede an average of 0.33 goals and keep a clean sheet in 67% of matches, whereas Proxy concede an average of 1.67 goals away from home. The visitors allow opponents chances worth an average of 2.24 xG, giving the hosts an opportunity to maintain their scoring form despite a modest home xG of 0.79. Proxy’s away xG of 1.00 is a reminder that a draw cannot be ruled out, although their average of just 1.33 shots on target per match limits their chances of turning things around.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

The strongest signal in favor of BTTS - No is Proxy’s away record: they average 0 goals and have failed to score in 100% of those matches. In their last 5 games, the visitors have scored just 1 goal in total, while Nasr have conceded an average of 0.8 goals per game over that period. The hosts have greater attacking potential — they scored 14 goals in their last 5 matches, while Proxy conceded 7 — which points more towards one team scoring than both. Although Nasr recorded BTTS in 60% of their last 5 matches, compared with 20% for Proxy, the visitors’ very poor scoring record makes it more likely that at least one team will fail to score.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

The strongest signal points to Under 3.5 goals: this line has not been breached in any of Nasr’s home matches or Proxy’s away matches so far. Proxy have yet to score away from home and average just 1.33 shots on target, limiting the chances of a high-scoring game from both sides. However, Nasr could exploit the visitors’ defensive weakness: they concede an average of 1.67 goals away from home and allow opponents chances worth 2.24 xG. Nasr’s form calls for caution with the lower line: the team have averaged 2.8 goals in their last five matches, with at least three goals scored in 60% of those games. Therefore, with a forecast of 2.10 total goals, Under 3.5 goals has a clearer edge than Under 2.5 goals.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

A draw at half-time is the most likely starting point: in recent matches, both teams were level at the break in 50% of cases, and Proxy did not score a single goal in the first half. Nasr also rarely scores before half-time, averaging 0.25 first-half goals this season. After the break, the hosts should have a clearer advantage: in recent matches, they averaged 1.5 goals in the second half, while Proxy conceded an average of 1.0 and scored none. Nasr’s recent form also supports a win: they have won four of their last five matches and averaged 2.8 goals scored, compared with no wins and 0.2 goals for Proxy. Therefore, a half-time draw followed by a Nasr win is slightly more likely than the hosts taking the lead at the break and going on to win.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Stats by half

1 : 1
First half
0 : 0
Second half

Game stats

56Possession (%)44
NasrProxy
12Shots5
NasrProxy
5Shots on target1
NasrProxy
0xG0
NasrProxy
3Corners1
NasrProxy
0Dangerous attacks0
NasrProxy
0Fouls0
NasrProxy
0Cards0
NasrProxy

Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

1.43Goals scored / game0.29
NasrProxy
0.71Goals allowed / game1.43
NasrProxy
45%Average possession51%
NasrProxy
4.29Shots on target / game2.14
NasrProxy

Team stats— who is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

7.43Shots per game9.71
NasrProxy
4.29Shots on target2.14
NasrProxy
19.2%Shot conversion2.9%
NasrProxy
45%Possession51%
NasrProxy
1.14xG for1.23
NasrProxy
0.99xG against1.35
NasrProxy

Shooting quality

Nasr: Counter-attackingProxy: Balanced
NasrProxy
Accuracy (shots on target)58%22%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.150.13
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.330.14

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team form— who is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

Nasr is 233% better for: last-5 form.

2 pts / game - Nasr · 0.6 pts / game - Proxy

Nasr
DWLWW
Season result split
43% W43% D14% L
Season (W-D-L)
3-3-1
1.71 pts / game · goal difference +5
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-1-1
2.00 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
2-1-0
Last 5 at home
2-1-0
DWW
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.8Goals conceded: 0.8xG: 0.00Opponent xG: 0.00BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 40%
Proxy
WLLLL
Season result split
14% W0% D86% L
Season (W-D-L)
1-0-6
0.43 pts / game · goal difference -8
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-0-4
0.60 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
0-0-3
Last 5 away
0-0-3
LLL
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 0.4Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 0.76Opponent xG: 0.76BTTS: 0%Over 2.5: 20%

Goals— how do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Nasr is 393% better for: goals scored per game.

1.43 goals / game - Nasr · 0.29 goals / game - Proxy

Nasr is 101% better for: goals allowed per game.

0.71 goals / game - Nasr · 1.43 goals / game - Proxy

Nasr scoring profile: very strong

Nasr scores in 71% of games (5 of 7 games), while Proxy keeps a clean sheet in 14% (1 of 7 games).

Proxy scoring profile: more difficult

Proxy scores in 14% of games (1 of 7 games), while Nasr keeps a clean sheet in 29% (2 of 7 games).

10Goals scored (season)2
NasrProxy
5Goals conceded (season)10
NasrProxy
2.14Average goals per game1.71
NasrProxy
9Goals scored (last 5)2
NasrProxy
4Goals conceded (last 5)6
NasrProxy

How often they score at least...

71%1 goal14%
NasrProxy
43%2 goals14%
NasrProxy
29%3 goals0%
NasrProxy
0%4 goals0%
NasrProxy

How often they concede at least...

71%1 goal86%
NasrProxy
0%2 goals29%
NasrProxy
0%3 goals29%
NasrProxy
0%4 goals0%
NasrProxy

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

14%BTTS at half-time0%
NasrProxy
0%BTTS in both halves0%
NasrProxy
14%Scored in both halves14%
NasrProxy

BTTS and goal count

29%Min. 3 goals and BTTS0%
NasrProxy
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS29%
NasrProxy
60%BTTS - last 50%
NasrProxy

Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

1st half

43%Min. 1 goal before half-time71%
NasrProxy
14%Min. 2 goals before half-time14%
NasrProxy
14%Min. 3 goals before half-time0%
NasrProxy

2nd half

71%Min. 1 goal after half-time71%
NasrProxy
43%Min. 2 goals after half-time14%
NasrProxy
14%Min. 3 goals after half-time0%
NasrProxy

Game halves— when do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Nasr is 41% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1 pts / game - Nasr · 0.71 pts / game - Proxy

Nasr - half-time state
14% leading57% draw29% trailing
Proxy - half-time state
14% leading29% draw57% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1Points per game (1st half)0.71
NasrProxy
0.29Goals scored (1st half)0.14
NasrProxy
0.43Goals conceded (1st half)0.71
NasrProxy
0.71Average goals (1st half)0.86
NasrProxy
57%Clean sheet before half-time43%
NasrProxy
86%No goal before half-time86%
NasrProxy

After half-time (2nd half)

2.14Points per game (2nd half)0.71
NasrProxy
1.14Goals scored (2nd half)0.14
NasrProxy
0.29Goals conceded (2nd half)0.71
NasrProxy
1.43Average goals (2nd half)0.86
NasrProxy
71%Clean sheet after half-time43%
NasrProxy
29%No goal after half-time86%
NasrProxy

Nasr - second-half results

57% W43% D0% L
7
Half-time points
2
Half-time goals
-1
Goal difference (1st half)
15
Second-half points
+6
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.00
PPG before half-time
Lead holding307%

Leads at halftime in 14% of games and wins 43%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime-0.1

Defense stays consistent across the full game.

Proxy - second-half results

14% W29% D57% L
5
Half-time points
1
Half-time goals
-4
Goal difference (1st half)
5
Second-half points
-4
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.71
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at halftime in 14% of games and wins 14%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime0.0

Defense stays consistent across the full game.

Nasr - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.002.60
Goals scored / game0.41.4
Goals allowed / game0.60.2
Average goals per game1.01.6
1 goal60%80%
2 goals20%40%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet40%80%
No goal80%20%
Goal difference-1+6
Half-time: 20% leading - 40% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 80% won - 20% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 2
Proxy - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.000.80
Goals scored / game0.20.2
Goals allowed / game0.40.8
Average goals per game0.61.0
1 goal60%80%
2 goals0%20%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet60%40%
No goal80%80%
Goal difference-1-3
Half-time: 20% leading - 40% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 20% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 1

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

Nasr
ScoredConceded
0
1
0-15
1
1
16-30
1
1
31-45
3
1
46-60
1
0
61-75
4
1
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (4 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (1). Late-goal balance (76-90): +3 - wins late phases.

Proxy
ScoredConceded
0
3
0-15
0
0
16-30
1
2
31-45
0
2
46-60
1
1
61-75
0
2
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (1 goal). Concedes most in 0-15 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

1.93
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
1.4 : 0.5
Estimated goal split
home : away
87%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
29%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
10%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
25%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 4 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

Nasr

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.15
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.57
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-4.8 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.29
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.28
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
113%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
74%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
+0.29
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.8
Late goals
40% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
40%

Proxy

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.12
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-1.02
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+2.2 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.94
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
-0.08
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
30%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
113%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
+0.17
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
0.0
Late goals
0% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
0%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League context— is this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Second Division).

Teams vs league

NasrLigaProxy
Average goals per game• 2.142.21▼ 1.71
Both teams scored▲ 57%46%▼ 0%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)▼ 29%39%▼ 29%
Clean sheets▼ 29%33%▼ 14%
Goal before half-time▼ 43%59%▲ 71%
Goal after half-time▼ 71%76%▼ 71%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.21
Average goals per game
46%
Both teams scored
39%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
33%
Clean sheets
1.26
Home goals / game
0.96
Away goals / game
+31%
Home attack advantage
+24%
Home defensive advantage
+15%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
59%
1 goal
19%
2 goals
3%
3 goals
1%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
76%
1 goal
44%
2 goals
13%
3 goals
6%
4 goals

FAQ

What was the result of Nasr vs Proxy?

The Second Division match finished Nasr 1:1 Proxy. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Nasr vs Proxy?

Nasr score 1.43 goals per game on average and Proxy 0.29. The Second Division average is 2.21 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 39% of games. Both teams score in 57% of Nasr's matches and 0% of Proxy's.

What form are Nasr and Proxy in?

Over the last 5 games Nasr have a 3-1-1 record (2.00 points per game) and Proxy 1-0-4 (0.60 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Nasr vs Proxy?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Nasr vs Proxy: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.