Iran - Persian Gulf Pro LeagueVatani StadiumData current as of August 31, 2026

Nassaji Mazandaran vs Shams Azar Qazvin: match statistics

Nassaji Mazandaran vs Shams Azar Qazvin: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

Nassaji Mazandaran played against Shams Azar Qazvin in Persian Gulf Pro League (Iran). The game was played on August 28, 2026. Venue: Vatani Stadium. Final score: 0:2.

Recent form

Nassaji Mazandaran has 0 wins, 1 draw and 2 losses over its last five games, averaging 0.33 points per game. Shams Azar Qazvin has 0 wins, 1 draw and 2 losses, with 0.33 points per game.

Scoring records

Nassaji Mazandaran scores 0.33 goals per game and allows 1.00. Shams Azar Qazvin scores 0.67 and allows 1.67. Games in this league average 1.93 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 33% of Nassaji Mazandaran's games and 67% of Shams Azar Qazvin's. The Over 2.5 rates are 0% and 33%, compared with league averages of 34% for BTTS and 24% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

The teams have nearly identical season xG averages at 0.00 per game. Nassaji Mazandaran takes -1.0 shots per game, while Shams Azar Qazvin takes -1.0.

First-half and second-half trends

Nassaji Mazandaran leads at halftime in 33% of its games and scores 0.00 goals per game after halftime. Shams Azar Qazvin leads at halftime in 0% and scores 0.33 after halftime.

When the teams score

Nassaji Mazandaran's most productive scoring window is minutes 16-30 (1 goals). For Shams Azar Qazvin, it is minutes 31-45+ (1 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

Persian Gulf Pro League games average 1.93 goals. Both teams score in 34% of games, and 24% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

There is not enough head-to-head history for a meaningful comparison.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Both teams remain without a league win after three rounds, but Nassaji have collected 1 point with a 1:3 goal difference, while Shams Azar have 1 point and a 2:5 record. The hosts have looked slightly more stable over their last five matches, conceding 5 goals compared with 8 for the visitors, while also averaging 0.8 points per game versus 0.4. Nassaji’s main issue, however, is their attacking efficiency at home: they failed to score in their only home match and lost 0:1. Shams Azar drew in their away fixture, averaging 1 goal per game on the road, although their defense also concedes an average of 1 goal away from home. The poor quality of the results so far and the cautious profile of both teams point to a closely contested match, with a draw the most likely outcome.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

The BTTS - No pick is not stronger, as both teams scored in only 40% of their last five matches. Nassaji averaged 0.6 goals per game during this period, exactly the same as Shams Azar, indicating limited attacking potential on both sides. The hosts failed to score in 50% of their league matches, while the league average is just 1.86 goals per game, with BTTS at 38%. Although Shams Azar have conceded 1.6 goals per game recently, Nassaji have scored only 3 goals in their last five appearances, so they are not reliable candidates to exploit this weakness. A scenario in which at least one team fails to score is more likely than a Goal/Goal outcome.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

The Iranian league has a very low average of 1.86 goals per match, with only 19% of games going over 2.5 goals. In their last five matches, Nassaji scored just 3 goals, averaging 0.6 per game, while Shams Azar also averaged only 0.6 goals. Both teams recorded just 20% of matches with at least three goals during this run, while the combined average of goals conceded was 1.0 for the home side and 1.6 for the visitors. In the available season data, neither team recorded a match with more than 3.5 goals, further reducing the risk of an open, high-scoring scenario. Therefore, the strongest selection is Under 3.5 goals, as the projected total of around 2.00 goals provides a clear safety margin against this line.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

The strongest scenario is a draw at half-time and a draw at full-time, as both teams were level at the break in 60% of their last five matches. During this period, Nassaji did not concede a single goal before half-time, while Shams Azar averaged just 0.2 goals in the first halves, clearly supporting a cautious start. The hosts have recently scored only 0.6 goals per match on average, exactly the same as the visitors, so neither side has the clear attacking advantage needed to secure a decisive result. Shams Azar have won none of their last five matches, with 40% ending in draws, while Nassaji have a win rate of just 20% and have lost as many as 60% of those games, which reduces the reliability of a home-win scenario. The league-wide average is 1.86 goals per match, and 81% of games end with at least one team failing to score, so a low-scoring draw remains the most logical match outcome.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Stats by half

0 : 1
First half
0 : 1
Second half

Game stats

-1Possession (%)-1
Nassaji MazandaranShams Azar Qazvin
-1Shots-1
Nassaji MazandaranShams Azar Qazvin
-1Shots on target-1
Nassaji MazandaranShams Azar Qazvin
0xG0
Nassaji MazandaranShams Azar Qazvin
-1Corners-1
Nassaji MazandaranShams Azar Qazvin
0Dangerous attacks0
Nassaji MazandaranShams Azar Qazvin
-1Fouls-1
Nassaji MazandaranShams Azar Qazvin
2Cards0
Nassaji MazandaranShams Azar Qazvin

Pre-game profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

Nassaji MazandaranShams Azar Qazvin
0.33Goals scored / game0.67
Nassaji MazandaranShams Azar Qazvin
1Goals allowed / game1.67
Nassaji MazandaranShams Azar Qazvin
-1%Average possession-1%
Nassaji MazandaranShams Azar Qazvin
-1Shots on target / game-1
Nassaji MazandaranShams Azar Qazvin
Nassaji MazandaranShams Azar Qazvin

Team statswho is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

-1Shots per game-1
Nassaji MazandaranShams Azar Qazvin
-1Shots on target-1
Nassaji MazandaranShams Azar Qazvin
-33.3%Shot conversion-66.7%
Nassaji MazandaranShams Azar Qazvin
-1%Possession-1%
Nassaji MazandaranShams Azar Qazvin
0xG for0
Nassaji MazandaranShams Azar Qazvin
0xG against0
Nassaji MazandaranShams Azar Qazvin

Shooting quality

Nassaji Mazandaran: BalancedShams Azar Qazvin: Balanced
Nassaji MazandaranShams Azar Qazvin
Accuracy (shots on target)0%0%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.000.00
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.000.00

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

Nassaji Mazandaran
LLD
No win in the last 5 games
Season result split
0% W33% R67% P
Season (W-D-L)
0-1-2
0.33 pts / game · goal difference -2
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-1-2
0.33 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
0-0-1
Last 5 at home
0-0-1
L
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 0.3Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 0.00Opponent xG: 0.00BTTS: 33%Over 2.5: 0%
Shams Azar Qazvin
LDL
No win in the last 5 games
Season result split
0% W33% R67% P
Season (W-D-L)
0-1-2
0.33 pts / game · goal difference -3
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-1-2
0.33 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
0-1-0
Last 5 away
0-1-0
D
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 0.7Goals conceded: 1.7xG: 0.00Opponent xG: 0.00BTTS: 67%Over 2.5: 33%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Shams Azar Qazvin is 103% better for: goals scored per game.

0.33 goals / game - Nassaji Mazandaran · 0.67 goals / game - Shams Azar Qazvin

Nassaji Mazandaran is 67% better for: goals allowed per game.

1 goals / game - Nassaji Mazandaran · 1.67 goals / game - Shams Azar Qazvin

Nassaji Mazandaran scoring profile: strong

Nassaji Mazandaran scores in 33% of games (1 of 3 meczów), while Shams Azar Qazvin keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 3 meczów).

Shams Azar Qazvin scoring profile: very strong

Shams Azar Qazvin scores in 67% of games (2 of 3 meczów), while Nassaji Mazandaran keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 3 meczów).

1Goals scored (season)2
Nassaji MazandaranShams Azar Qazvin
3Goals conceded (season)5
Nassaji MazandaranShams Azar Qazvin
1.33Average goals per game2.33
Nassaji MazandaranShams Azar Qazvin
1Goals scored (last 5)2
Nassaji MazandaranShams Azar Qazvin
3Goals conceded (last 5)5
Nassaji MazandaranShams Azar Qazvin

How often they score at least...

33%1 goal67%
Nassaji MazandaranShams Azar Qazvin
0%2 goals0%
Nassaji MazandaranShams Azar Qazvin
0%3 goals0%
Nassaji MazandaranShams Azar Qazvin
0%4 goals0%
Nassaji MazandaranShams Azar Qazvin

How often they concede at least...

100%1 goal100%
Nassaji MazandaranShams Azar Qazvin
0%2 goals67%
Nassaji MazandaranShams Azar Qazvin
0%3 goals0%
Nassaji MazandaranShams Azar Qazvin
0%4 goals0%
Nassaji MazandaranShams Azar Qazvin

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

33%
Nassaji Mazandaran - BTTSBTTS - percentage of matches where both teams scored.1 of 3 meczów
34%
League average

Goal patterns

0%BTTS at half-time33%
Nassaji MazandaranShams Azar Qazvin
0%BTTS in both halves0%
Nassaji MazandaranShams Azar Qazvin
0%Scored in both halves0%
Nassaji MazandaranShams Azar Qazvin

BTTS and goal count

0%Min. 3 goals and BTTS33%
Nassaji MazandaranShams Azar Qazvin
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
Nassaji MazandaranShams Azar Qazvin
33%BTTS - last 567%
Nassaji MazandaranShams Azar Qazvin

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

Full game - team comparison (Over)

Nassaji MazandaranShams Azar Qazvin

1st half

33%Min. 1 goal before half-time67%
Nassaji MazandaranShams Azar Qazvin
0%Min. 2 goals before half-time67%
Nassaji MazandaranShams Azar Qazvin
0%Min. 3 goals before half-time0%
Nassaji MazandaranShams Azar Qazvin

2nd half

100%Min. 1 goal after half-time67%
Nassaji MazandaranShams Azar Qazvin
0%Min. 2 goals after half-time33%
Nassaji MazandaranShams Azar Qazvin
0%Min. 3 goals after half-time0%
Nassaji MazandaranShams Azar Qazvin

Game halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Nassaji Mazandaran is 149% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.67 pts / game - Nassaji Mazandaran · 0.67 pts / game - Shams Azar Qazvin

Nassaji Mazandaran - half-time state
33% leading67% draw0% trailing
Shams Azar Qazvin - half-time state
0% leading67% draw33% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.67Points per game (1st half)0.67
Nassaji MazandaranShams Azar Qazvin
0.33Goals scored (1st half)0.33
Nassaji MazandaranShams Azar Qazvin
0Goals conceded (1st half)1
Nassaji MazandaranShams Azar Qazvin
0.33Average goals (1st half)1.33
Nassaji MazandaranShams Azar Qazvin
100%Clean sheet before half-time33%
Nassaji MazandaranShams Azar Qazvin
67%No goal before half-time67%
Nassaji MazandaranShams Azar Qazvin

After half-time (2nd half)

0Points per game (2nd half)0.67
Nassaji MazandaranShams Azar Qazvin
0Goals scored (2nd half)0.33
Nassaji MazandaranShams Azar Qazvin
1Goals conceded (2nd half)0.67
Nassaji MazandaranShams Azar Qazvin
1Average goals (2nd half)1
Nassaji MazandaranShams Azar Qazvin
0%Clean sheet after half-time33%
Nassaji MazandaranShams Azar Qazvin
100%No goal after half-time67%
Nassaji MazandaranShams Azar Qazvin

Nassaji Mazandaran - second-half results

0% W0% R100% P
5
Half-time points
1
Half-time goals
+1
Goal difference (1st half)
0
Second-half points
-3
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.67
PPG before half-time
Lead holding0%

Leads at halftime in 33% of games and wins 0%. Sometimes gives up a halftime lead.

Defense after halftime+1.0

Allows 1.0 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

Shams Azar Qazvin - second-half results

0% W67% R33% P
2
Half-time points
1
Half-time goals
-2
Goal difference (1st half)
2
Second-half points
-1
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.67
PPG before half-time
Defense after halftime-0.3

Defense stays consistent across the full game.

Nassaji Mazandaran - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.670.00
Goals scored / game0.30.0
Goals allowed / game0.01.0
Average goals per game0.31.0
1 goal33%100%
2 goals0%0%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet100%0%
No goal67%100%
Goal difference+1-3
Half-time: 33% leading - 67% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 0% draw - 100% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 1
Shams Azar Qazvin - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game0.670.67
Goals scored / game0.30.3
Goals allowed / game1.00.7
Average goals per game1.31.0
1 goal67%67%
2 goals67%33%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet33%33%
No goal67%67%
Goal difference-2-1
Half-time: 0% leading - 67% draw - 33% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 67% draw - 33% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 33% - Half-time goals total: 1

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

Nassaji Mazandaran
ScoredConceded
0
0
0-15
1
0
16-30
0
0
31-45
0
0
46-60
0
1
61-75
0
2
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (1 goal). Concedes most in 76-90 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.

Shams Azar Qazvin
ScoredConceded
0
2
0-15
0
0
16-30
1
1
31-45
0
1
46-60
0
0
61-75
1
1
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (1 goal). Concedes most in 0-15 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

1.83
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
1.0 : 0.8
Estimated goal split
home : away
95%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
50%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
22%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
22%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 5 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

Nassaji Mazandaran

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
0.00
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.67
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+0.1 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.33
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
-1.00
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
34%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
103%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.3
Late goals
0% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
0%

Shams Azar Qazvin

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
0.00
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-1.00
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-0.2 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.67
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
-1.67
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
69%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
172%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
0.0
Late goals
50% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
50%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Persian Gulf Pro League).

Teams vs league

Nassaji MazandaranLigaShams Azar Qazvin
Average goals per game 1.331.93 2.33
Both teams scored 33%34% 67%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 0%24% 33%
Clean sheets 0%41% 0%
Goal before half-time 33%52% 67%
Goal after half-time 100%66% 67%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

1.93
Average goals per game
34%
Both teams scored
24%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
41%
Clean sheets
0.97
Home goals / game
0.97
Away goals / game
+0%
Home attack advantage
+0%
Home defensive advantage
+-6%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
52%
1 goal
28%
2 goals
3%
3 goals
0%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
66%
1 goal
34%
2 goals
10%
3 goals
0%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Nassaji MazandaranYellow cardAlireza Araste
  2. Shams Azar QazvinGoalMohammadreza RezaeiAssist: Amirmohammad Mohkamkar
  3. Nassaji MazandaranYellow cardBehrouz Norouzifard
  4. Shams Azar QazvinGoalMohammadreza Rezaei
  5. Shams Azar QazvinSubstitutionOn: Ali Jelokhani NiarakiOff: Mohammad Milad Sourgi

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

FAQ

What was the result of Nassaji Mazandaran vs Shams Azar Qazvin?

The Persian Gulf Pro League match finished Nassaji Mazandaran 0:2 Shams Azar Qazvin. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Nassaji Mazandaran vs Shams Azar Qazvin?

Nassaji Mazandaran score 0.33 goals per game on average and Shams Azar Qazvin 0.67. The Persian Gulf Pro League average is 1.93 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 24% of games. Both teams score in 33% of Nassaji Mazandaran's matches and 67% of Shams Azar Qazvin's.

What form are Nassaji Mazandaran and Shams Azar Qazvin in?

Over the last 5 games Nassaji Mazandaran have a 0-1-2 record (0.33 points per game) and Shams Azar Qazvin 0-1-2 (0.33 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Nassaji Mazandaran vs Shams Azar Qazvin?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Nassaji Mazandaran vs Shams Azar Qazvin: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.