Iran - Azadegan LeagueTakhti Sports ComplexData current as of 23 July 2026

Navad Urmia vs Fard Alborz: match statistics

Navad Urmia crest
Navad Urmia
0 : 6half-time 0:3
Fard Alborz crest
Fard Alborz

Navad Urmia vs Fard Alborz: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Navad Urmia play Fard Alborz in Azadegan League (Iran). The match date is 9 June 2026 at 15:30. Venue: Takhti Sports Complex. Final score: 0:6.

Current form

Navad Urmia: 0-0-5, 0.00 points/match. Fard Alborz: 3-1-1, 2.00 points/match.

Goal statistics

Navad Urmia scores 0.48 and concedes 1.30 goals per match. Fard Alborz scores 0.71 and concedes 0.44. League average: 1.59 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Navad Urmia 30%, Fard Alborz 18%. Over 2.5: Navad Urmia 21%, Fard Alborz 12%. League level: BTTS 30%, Over 2.5 22%.

xG, shots and style

Fard Alborz has higher xG: 0.85 vs 0.79. Navad Urmia: 0.9 shots per match, Fard Alborz: 2.7.

Match halves

Navad Urmia: half-time lead 12%, second-half goals 0.24. Fard Alborz: half-time lead 21%, second-half goals 0.38.

Goals by minute

Navad Urmia: 31-45+ (5 goals). Fard Alborz: 16-30 (6 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Azadegan League: 1.59 goals per match, BTTS 30%, Over 2.5 22%.

Head-to-head

1 H2H matches: 0-1-0. Average goals 0.00, BTTS 0%.

Match description

Both teams exhibit extremely low offensive efficiency: Navad Urmia has 15 goals this season versus Fard Alborz's 11, and in the last 5 matches both sides have scored just 1 goal each. Navad at home averages 0.83 goals scored and 0.50 conceded per match, holds a +4 goal differential in home fixtures and has a 50% clean sheet rate, indicating relative defensive stability. The visitors score only 0.15 goals per away match and fail to score in 85% of away games, although they average 4.67 shots and have xG 0.7 versus xG against 1.53, which shows chance creation but a lack of finishing. Both teams share an identical form over the last 5 matches (1W, 1D, 3L) and average 0.8 points in that period, while a high draw incidence (67% of Navad home matches and 62% of Fard away matches) significantly increases the probability of a point split. Considering the marginal home advantage in goals scored (0.83 vs 0.15 on the road) and the visitors' extreme inefficiency, I tip a draw as the most reliable outcome, with a possibility of a narrow Navad win.

Half-by-half

0 : 3
1st half
0 : 3
2nd half

Match statistics

-1Possession (%)-1
Navad UrmiaFard Alborz
-1Shots-1
Navad UrmiaFard Alborz
-1Shots on target-1
Navad UrmiaFard Alborz
0xG0
Navad UrmiaFard Alborz
-1Corners-1
Navad UrmiaFard Alborz
0Dangerous attacks0
Navad UrmiaFard Alborz
-1Fouls-1
Navad UrmiaFard Alborz
-1Cards-1
Navad UrmiaFard Alborz

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Navad UrmiaFard Alborz
0.48Goals scored / match0.71
Navad UrmiaFard Alborz
1.3Goals conceded / match0.44
Navad UrmiaFard Alborz
12%Average possession29%
Navad UrmiaFard Alborz
-0.15Shots on target / match0.88
Navad UrmiaFard Alborz

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

0.94Shots per match2.71
Navad UrmiaFard Alborz
-0.15Shots on target0.88
Navad UrmiaFard Alborz
51.6%Shot conversion26.1%
Navad UrmiaFard Alborz
12%Possession29%
Navad UrmiaFard Alborz
0.79xG for0.85
Navad UrmiaFard Alborz
1.3xG against1.06
Navad UrmiaFard Alborz

Shooting quality

Navad Urmia: Counter-attackingFard Alborz: Counter-attacking
Navad UrmiaFard Alborz
Accuracy (shots on target)-16%32%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.840.31
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.000.81

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Navad Urmia
LLLLL
No win in the last 5 matches
Season result split
12% W36% R52% P
Season (W-D-L)
4-12-17
0.73 pts / match · goal difference -27
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-0-5
0.00 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
3-8-5
Last 5 at home
0-1-4
DLLLL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.2Goals conceded: 2.6xG: 0.00Opponent xG: 0.00BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 40%
Fard Alborz
WWWLD
Season result split
29% W47% R24% P
Season (W-D-L)
10-16-8
1.35 pts / match · goal difference +9
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-1-1
2.00 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
4-9-4
Last 5 away
3-1-1
LWWWD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.2Goals conceded: 0.4xG: 1.10Opponent xG: 1.05BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 20%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Fard Alborz is 48% better for: goals scored per match.

0.48 goals / match - Navad Urmia · 0.71 goals / match - Fard Alborz

Fard Alborz is 195% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.3 goals / match - Navad Urmia · 0.44 goals / match - Fard Alborz

Navad Urmia scoring profile: more difficult

Navad Urmia scores in 42% of matches (14 of 33 matches), while Fard Alborz keeps a clean sheet in 62% (21 of 34 matches).

Fard Alborz scoring profile: mixed

Fard Alborz scores in 41% of matches (14 of 34 matches), while Navad Urmia keeps a clean sheet in 27% (9 of 33 matches).

16Goals scored (season)24
Navad UrmiaFard Alborz
43Goals conceded (season)15
Navad UrmiaFard Alborz
1.79Average goals in match1.15
Navad UrmiaFard Alborz
1Goals scored (last 5)6
Navad UrmiaFard Alborz
13Goals conceded (last 5)2
Navad UrmiaFard Alborz

How often they score at least...

42%1 goal41%
Navad UrmiaFard Alborz
3%2 goals18%
Navad UrmiaFard Alborz
3%3 goals3%
Navad UrmiaFard Alborz
0%4 goals3%
Navad UrmiaFard Alborz

How often they concede at least...

73%1 goal38%
Navad UrmiaFard Alborz
33%2 goals6%
Navad UrmiaFard Alborz
12%3 goals0%
Navad UrmiaFard Alborz
6%4 goals0%
Navad UrmiaFard Alborz

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

30%
League average

Goal patterns

9%BTTS at half-time6%
Navad UrmiaFard Alborz
0%BTTS in both halves0%
Navad UrmiaFard Alborz
3%Scored in both halves15%
Navad UrmiaFard Alborz

BTTS and goal count

9%Min. 3 goals and BTTS9%
Navad UrmiaFard Alborz
12%Min. 3 goals without BTTS3%
Navad UrmiaFard Alborz
20%BTTS - last 520%
Navad UrmiaFard Alborz

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

52%Min. 1 goal before half-time41%
Navad UrmiaFard Alborz
21%Min. 2 goals before half-time9%
Navad UrmiaFard Alborz
6%Min. 3 goals before half-time3%
Navad UrmiaFard Alborz

2nd half

55%Min. 1 goal after half-time38%
Navad UrmiaFard Alborz
21%Min. 2 goals after half-time18%
Navad UrmiaFard Alborz
3%Min. 3 goals after half-time6%
Navad UrmiaFard Alborz

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Fard Alborz is 38% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

0.91 pts / match - Navad Urmia · 1.26 pts / match - Fard Alborz

Navad Urmia - half-time state
12% leading55% draw33% trailing
Fard Alborz - half-time state
21% leading65% draw15% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

0.91Points per match (1st half)1.26
Navad UrmiaFard Alborz
0.24Goals scored (1st half)0.32
Navad UrmiaFard Alborz
0.58Goals conceded (1st half)0.21
Navad UrmiaFard Alborz
0.82Average goals (1st half)0.53
Navad UrmiaFard Alborz
61%Clean sheet before half-time79%
Navad UrmiaFard Alborz
79%No goal before half-time74%
Navad UrmiaFard Alborz

After half-time (2nd half)

0.94Points per match (2nd half)1.29
Navad UrmiaFard Alborz
0.24Goals scored (2nd half)0.38
Navad UrmiaFard Alborz
0.55Goals conceded (2nd half)0.24
Navad UrmiaFard Alborz
0.79Average goals (2nd half)0.62
Navad UrmiaFard Alborz
58%Clean sheet after half-time82%
Navad UrmiaFard Alborz
76%No goal after half-time71%
Navad UrmiaFard Alborz

Navad Urmia - second-half results

12% W58% R30% P
30
Half-time points
8
Half-time goals
-11
Goal difference (1st half)
31
Second-half points
-10
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.91
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 12% of matches and wins 12%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Fard Alborz - second-half results

21% W68% R12% P
43
Half-time points
11
Half-time goals
+4
Goal difference (1st half)
44
Second-half points
+5
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.26
PPG before half-time
Lead holding138%

Leads at half-time in 21% of matches and wins 29%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Navad Urmia - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.600.20
Goals scored / match0.20.0
Goals conceded / match0.81.2
Average goals in match1.01.2
1 goal40%80%
2 goals20%40%
3 goals20%0%
Clean sheet60%20%
No goal80%100%
Goal difference-3-6
Half-time: 0% leading - 60% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 20% draw - 80% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 1
Fard Alborz - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.202.20
Goals scored / match0.40.8
Goals conceded / match0.40.0
Average goals in match0.80.8
1 goal60%60%
2 goals20%20%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet60%100%
No goal60%40%
Goal difference0+4
Half-time: 20% leading - 60% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 40% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 2

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Navad Urmia
ScoredConceded
1
9
0-15
2
6
16-30
5
10
31-45
1
3
46-60
3
6
61-75
4
9
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (5 goli). Concedes most in 31-45 (10). Late-goal balance (76-90): -5 - late phases are a weakness.

Fard Alborz
ScoredConceded
0
1
0-15
6
2
16-30
5
4
31-45
2
2
46-60
5
4
61-75
6
2
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (6 goli). Concedes most in 31-45 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): +4 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

1.46
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
0.5 : 1.0
Estimated goal split
home : away
92%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
24%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
17%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
34%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 3 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Navad Urmia

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.51
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.31
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+12.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.31
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
0.00
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
53%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
188%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.73
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
0.0
Late goals
25% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 6% come in the first quarter-hour.
25%

Fard Alborz

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.21
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.48
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-27.3 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.14
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.62
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
103%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
49%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.65
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
25% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
25%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Azadegan League).

Teams vs league

Navad UrmiaLigaFard Alborz
Average goals in match 1.791.59 1.15
Both teams scored 30%30% 18%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 21%22% 12%
Clean sheets 27%46% 62%
Goal before half-time 52%46% 41%
Goal after half-time 55%57% 38%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

1.59
Average goals per match
30%
Both teams scored
22%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
46%
Clean sheets
0.90
Home goals / match
0.69
Away goals / match
+30%
Home attack advantage
+23%
Home defence advantage
+17%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
46%
1 goal
15%
2 goals
3%
3 goals
1%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
57%
1 goal
21%
2 goals
6%
3 goals
1%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Navad Urmia 0 - 1 - 0 Fard Alborz. Average goals 0.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.

Fard Alborz
0 : 0
Navad Urmia

FAQ

What was the result of Navad Urmia vs Fard Alborz?

The Azadegan League match finished Navad Urmia 0:6 Fard Alborz. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Navad Urmia vs Fard Alborz?

Navad Urmia score 0.48 goals per game on average and Fard Alborz 0.71. The Azadegan League average is 1.59 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 22% of games. Both teams score in 30% of Navad Urmia's matches and 18% of Fard Alborz's.

What form are Navad Urmia and Fard Alborz in?

Over the last 5 games Navad Urmia have a 0-0-5 record (0.00 points per game) and Fard Alborz 3-1-1 (2.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Navad Urmia vs Fard Alborz?

The statistical background for Navad Urmia vs Fard Alborz — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.