Navad Urmia vs Mes Kerman: match statistics
Navad Urmia vs Mes Kerman: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Navad Urmia played against Mes Kerman in Azadegan League (Iran). The game was played on December 26, 2025. Final score: 1:1.
Recent form
Navad Urmia has 1 win, 2 draws and 2 losses over its last five games, averaging 1.00 points per game. Mes Kerman has 2 wins, 3 draws and 0 losses, with 1.80 points per game.
Scoring records
Navad Urmia scores 0.73 goals per game and allows 0.67. Mes Kerman scores 0.50 and allows 0.50. Games in this league average 1.50 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 40% of Navad Urmia's games and 19% of Mes Kerman's. The Over 2.5 rates are 13% and 13%, compared with league averages of 31% for BTTS and 22% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
The teams have nearly identical season xG averages at 1.00 per game. Navad Urmia takes 2.1 shots per game, while Mes Kerman takes 4.1.
First-half and second-half trends
Navad Urmia leads at halftime in 20% of its games and scores 0.47 goals per game after halftime. Mes Kerman leads at halftime in 25% and scores 0.25 after halftime.
When the teams score
Navad Urmia's most productive scoring window is minutes 61-75 (3 goals). For Mes Kerman, it is minutes 46-60 (3 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Azadegan League games average 1.50 goals. Both teams score in 31% of games, and 22% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
There is not enough head-to-head history for a meaningful comparison.
Stats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Navad Urmia | Mes Kerman | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 13% | 34% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.48 | 0.25 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 2.70 | 0.36 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Mes Kerman is 80% better for: last-5 form.
1 pts / game - Navad Urmia · 1.8 pts / game - Mes Kerman
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Navad Urmia is 46% better for: goals scored per game.
0.73 goals / game - Navad Urmia · 0.5 goals / game - Mes Kerman
Mes Kerman is 34% better for: goals allowed per game.
0.67 goals / game - Navad Urmia · 0.5 goals / game - Mes Kerman
Navad Urmia scores in 60% of games (9 of 15 meczów), while Mes Kerman keeps a clean sheet in 56% (9 of 16 meczów).
Mes Kerman scores in 44% of games (7 of 16 meczów), while Navad Urmia keeps a clean sheet in 40% (6 of 15 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Navad Urmia
Over / Under - Mes Kerman
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Mes Kerman is 22% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.13 pts / game - Navad Urmia · 1.38 pts / game - Mes Kerman
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Navad Urmia - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 20% of games and wins 20%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.1 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
Mes Kerman - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 25% of games and wins 31%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.3 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 0.80 | 1.40 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.2 | 0.4 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.6 | 0.2 |
| Average goals per game | 0.8 | 0.6 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 40% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 80% |
| No goal | 80% | 60% |
| Goal difference | -2 | +1 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.80 | 1.20 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.4 | 0.2 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.0 | 0.2 |
| Average goals per game | 0.4 | 0.4 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 40% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 0% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 100% | 80% |
| No goal | 60% | 80% |
| Goal difference | +2 | 0 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (3 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (3 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Navad Urmia
Mes Kerman
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Azadegan League).
Teams vs league
| Navad Urmia | Liga | Mes Kerman | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▼ 1.40 | 1.50 | ▼ 1.00 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 40% | 31% | ▼ 19% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 13% | 22% | ▼ 13% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 40% | 46% | ▲ 56% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 47% | 45% | ▼ 38% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 60% | 58% | ▼ 50% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
FAQ
What was the result of Navad Urmia vs Mes Kerman?
The Azadegan League match finished Navad Urmia 1:1 Mes Kerman. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Navad Urmia vs Mes Kerman?
Navad Urmia score 0.73 goals per game on average and Mes Kerman 0.50. The Azadegan League average is 1.50 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 22% of games. Both teams score in 40% of Navad Urmia's matches and 19% of Mes Kerman's.
What form are Navad Urmia and Mes Kerman in?
Over the last 5 games Navad Urmia have a 1-2-2 record (1.00 points per game) and Mes Kerman 2-3-0 (1.80 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Navad Urmia vs Mes Kerman?
The statistical background for Navad Urmia vs Mes Kerman — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.