Navad Urmia vs Mes Shahr-e Babak: match statistics
Mes Shahr-e Babak is second in the table and is in significantly better form than Navad Urmia, who are in 15th place. The visitors have won 11 matches this season with only 2 defeats, while the hosts have recorded just 3 wins and as many as 7 losses. The form from the last five matches clearly favors the away side – 3 wins and 2 draws (PPG 2.2) compared to 0 wins and 3 defeats for the hosts (PPG 0.4). Mes Shahr-e Babak also boasts a superior goal difference and defensive efficiency, evidenced by a 60% clean sheet rate in away matches. Considering the offensive and defensive statistics of both teams, along with the hosts' tendency for draws at home (78%), an away win or a draw is most likely, with a slight edge for a Mes Shahr-e Babak victory.
Navad Urmia vs Mes Shahr-e Babak: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Navad Urmia played against Mes Shahr-e Babak in Azadegan League (Iran). The game was played on February 15, 2026. Final score: 0:1.
Recent form
Navad Urmia has 0 wins, 2 draws and 3 losses over its last five games, averaging 0.40 points per game. Mes Shahr-e Babak has 3 wins, 2 draws and 0 losses, with 2.20 points per game.
Scoring records
Navad Urmia scores 0.70 goals per game and allows 0.90. Mes Shahr-e Babak scores 1.05 and allows 0.52. Games in this league average 1.54 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 45% of Navad Urmia's games and 38% of Mes Shahr-e Babak's. The Over 2.5 rates are 20% and 19%, compared with league averages of 33% for BTTS and 22% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Mes Shahr-e Babak has the higher season xG average, 1.14 to 1.05 per game. Navad Urmia takes 1.9 shots per game, while Mes Shahr-e Babak takes 4.9.
First-half and second-half trends
Navad Urmia leads at halftime in 15% of its games and scores 0.40 goals per game after halftime. Mes Shahr-e Babak leads at halftime in 52% and scores 0.48 after halftime.
When the teams score
Navad Urmia's most productive scoring window is minutes 31-45+ (4 goals). For Mes Shahr-e Babak, it is minutes 76-90+ (5 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Azadegan League games average 1.54 goals. Both teams score in 33% of games, and 22% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, one previous meeting was available. The record was 0 home wins, 1 draw and 0 away wins. Those games averaged 2.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Mes Shahr-e Babak is second in the table and is in significantly better form than Navad Urmia, who are in 15th place. The visitors have won 11 matches this season with only 2 defeats, while the hosts have recorded just 3 wins and as many as 7 losses. The form from the last five matches clearly favors the away side – 3 wins and 2 draws (PPG 2.2) compared to 0 wins and 3 defeats for the hosts (PPG 0.4). Mes Shahr-e Babak also boasts a superior goal difference and defensive efficiency, evidenced by a 60% clean sheet rate in away matches. Considering the offensive and defensive statistics of both teams, along with the hosts' tendency for draws at home (78%), an away win or a draw is most likely, with a slight edge for a Mes Shahr-e Babak victory.
View the statistical overviewStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Navad Urmia | Mes Shahr-e Babak | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 11% | 47% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.57 | 0.23 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 3.50 | 0.46 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Mes Shahr-e Babak is 450% better for: last-5 form.
0.4 pts / game - Navad Urmia · 2.2 pts / game - Mes Shahr-e Babak
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Mes Shahr-e Babak is 50% better for: goals scored per game.
0.7 goals / game - Navad Urmia · 1.05 goals / game - Mes Shahr-e Babak
Mes Shahr-e Babak is 73% better for: goals allowed per game.
0.9 goals / game - Navad Urmia · 0.52 goals / game - Mes Shahr-e Babak
Navad Urmia scores in 60% of games (12 of 20 meczów), while Mes Shahr-e Babak keeps a clean sheet in 52% (11 of 21 meczów).
Mes Shahr-e Babak scores in 76% of games (16 of 21 meczów), while Navad Urmia keeps a clean sheet in 30% (6 of 20 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Navad Urmia
Over / Under - Mes Shahr-e Babak
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Mes Shahr-e Babak is 100% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1 pts / game - Navad Urmia · 2 pts / game - Mes Shahr-e Babak
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Navad Urmia - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 15% of games and wins 15%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
Mes Shahr-e Babak - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 52% of games and wins 52%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.4 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 0.60 | 1.20 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.4 | 0.2 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.8 | 0.2 |
| Average goals per game | 1.2 | 0.4 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 40% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 0% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 20% | 80% |
| No goal | 60% | 80% |
| Goal difference | -2 | 0 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 2.60 | 1.20 |
| Goals scored / game | 1.0 | 0.4 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.0 | 0.6 |
| Average goals per game | 1.0 | 1.0 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 100% | 60% |
| No goal | 20% | 60% |
| Goal difference | +5 | -1 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (4 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (5 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Navad Urmia
Mes Shahr-e Babak
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Azadegan League).
Teams vs league
| Navad Urmia | Liga | Mes Shahr-e Babak | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | • 1.60 | 1.54 | • 1.57 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 45% | 33% | ▲ 38% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 20% | 22% | ▼ 19% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 30% | 45% | ▲ 52% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 55% | 47% | ▲ 57% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 55% | 58% | ▲ 62% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Head-to-head
Record from Navad Urmia's perspective: 0 wins, 1 draw and 0 losses against Mes Shahr-e Babak. Games average 2.00 goals, and both teams scored in 100% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Navad Urmia vs Mes Shahr-e Babak?
The Azadegan League match finished Navad Urmia 0:1 Mes Shahr-e Babak. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Navad Urmia vs Mes Shahr-e Babak?
Navad Urmia score 0.70 goals per game on average and Mes Shahr-e Babak 1.05. The Azadegan League average is 1.54 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 22% of games. Both teams score in 45% of Navad Urmia's matches and 38% of Mes Shahr-e Babak's.
What form are Navad Urmia and Mes Shahr-e Babak in?
Over the last 5 games Navad Urmia have a 0-2-3 record (0.40 points per game) and Mes Shahr-e Babak 3-2-0 (2.20 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Navad Urmia vs Mes Shahr-e Babak?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.