Match suspended or postponed
The match time may change. Statistics remain available as match context.
Navad Urmia vs Shenavarsazi Qeshm: match statistics
Navad Urmia vs Shenavarsazi Qeshm: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Navad Urmia plays Shenavarsazi Qeshm in Azadegan League (Iran). The match time may change. Statistics remain available as match context.
Recent form
Navad Urmia has 0 wins, 1 draw and 4 losses over its last five games, averaging 0.20 points per game. Shenavarsazi Qeshm has 2 wins, 2 draws and 1 loss, with 1.60 points per game.
Scoring records
Navad Urmia scores 0.64 goals per game and allows 0.91. Shenavarsazi Qeshm scores 0.48 and allows 0.96. Games in this league average 1.54 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 41% of Navad Urmia's games and 26% of Shenavarsazi Qeshm's. The Over 2.5 rates are 18% and 22%, compared with league averages of 33% for BTTS and 22% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Navad Urmia has the higher season xG average, 1.05 to 0.90 per game. Navad Urmia takes 1.6 shots per game, while Shenavarsazi Qeshm takes 1.4.
First-half and second-half trends
Navad Urmia leads at halftime in 14% of its games and scores 0.36 goals per game after halftime. Shenavarsazi Qeshm leads at halftime in 13% and scores 0.26 after halftime.
When the teams score
Navad Urmia's most productive scoring window is minutes 31-45+ (4 goals). For Shenavarsazi Qeshm, it is minutes 31-45+ (3 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Azadegan League games average 1.54 goals. Both teams score in 33% of games, and 22% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, one previous meeting was available. The record was 0 home wins, 1 draw and 0 away wins. Those games averaged 2.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Navad Urmia | Shenavarsazi Qeshm | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 6% | 3% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.66 | 0.63 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 7.11 | 12.00 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Shenavarsazi Qeshm is 700% better for: last-5 form.
0.2 pts / game - Navad Urmia · 1.6 pts / game - Shenavarsazi Qeshm
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Navad Urmia is 33% better for: goals scored per game.
0.64 goals / game - Navad Urmia · 0.48 goals / game - Shenavarsazi Qeshm
Navad Urmia is 5% better for: goals allowed per game.
0.91 goals / game - Navad Urmia · 0.96 goals / game - Shenavarsazi Qeshm
Navad Urmia scores in 55% of games (12 of 22 meczów), while Shenavarsazi Qeshm keeps a clean sheet in 39% (9 of 23 meczów).
Shenavarsazi Qeshm scores in 43% of games (10 of 23 meczów), while Navad Urmia keeps a clean sheet in 27% (6 of 22 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Navad Urmia
Over / Under - Shenavarsazi Qeshm
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Navad Urmia - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 14% of games and wins 14%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
Shenavarsazi Qeshm - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 13% of games and wins 22%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 0.80 | 0.80 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.2 | 0.2 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.4 | 0.6 |
| Average goals per game | 0.6 | 0.8 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 0% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 40% |
| No goal | 80% | 80% |
| Goal difference | -1 | -2 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.60 | 0.80 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.6 | 0.4 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.2 | 0.6 |
| Average goals per game | 0.8 | 1.0 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 40% |
| No goal | 60% | 60% |
| Goal difference | +2 | -1 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (4 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (3 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Navad Urmia
Shenavarsazi Qeshm
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Azadegan League).
Teams vs league
| Navad Urmia | Liga | Shenavarsazi Qeshm | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | • 1.55 | 1.54 | ▼ 1.43 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 41% | 33% | ▼ 26% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 18% | 22% | • 22% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 27% | 45% | ▼ 39% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 50% | 47% | ▼ 39% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 59% | 57% | ▼ 48% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Head-to-head
Record from Navad Urmia's perspective: 0 wins, 1 draw and 0 losses against Shenavarsazi Qeshm. Games average 2.00 goals, and both teams scored in 100% of them.