Navbahor vs AGMK: match statistics
Navbahor vs AGMK: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Navbahor played against AGMK in Uzbekistan Super League (Uzbekistan). The game was played on July 17, 2026. Venue: Markaziy Stadion. Final score: 2:3.
Recent form
Navbahor has 2 wins, 2 draws and 1 loss over its last five games, averaging 1.60 points per game. AGMK has 3 wins, 2 draws and 0 losses, with 2.20 points per game.
Scoring records
Navbahor scores 1.27 goals per game and allows 0.73. AGMK scores 1.27 and allows 1.27. Games in this league average 2.55 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 45% of Navbahor's games and 64% of AGMK's. The Over 2.5 rates are 36% and 55%, compared with league averages of 53% for BTTS and 52% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Navbahor has the higher season xG average, 1.59 to 1.39 per game. Navbahor takes 13.6 shots per game, while AGMK takes 11.6.
First-half and second-half trends
Navbahor leads at halftime in 36% of its games and scores 0.45 goals per game after halftime. AGMK leads at halftime in 27% and scores 0.73 after halftime.
When the teams score
Navbahor's most productive scoring window is minutes 0-15 (4 goals). For AGMK, it is minutes 0-15 (3 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Uzbekistan Super League games average 2.55 goals. Both teams score in 53% of games, and 52% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, 2 previous meetings were available. The record was 1 home win, 0 draws and 1 away win. Those games averaged 3.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
I back the home win (Navbahor). At home they clearly create more chances: on average 14 shots per game, 4.25 on target, and xG 1.55, while AGMK away records 9.6 shots, 2.6 on target and xG 1.20. Navbahor’s defense looks more solid — they concede 0.75 goals at home with xG against 0.72, whereas AGMK concede 1.4 goals away with xG against 1.52, indicating greater vulnerability at the back for the visitors. Overall form slightly favors AGMK (last 5: 3 wins, 2 draws, 2.2 points per game), but Navbahor have scored 15 goals in their last 5 compared to 10 for AGMK, showing higher short-term attacking efficiency. Additionally, the hosts sit 3rd in the table versus AGMK’s 8th, have higher possession (64% vs 50%) and a better home win rate (50% vs 40% away), which gives them control of the match. Considering superior xG (1.55 vs 1.20), more shots and a lower average of goals conceded (0.75 vs 1.4), I assess the probabilities as: home 60%, draw 20%, away 20%.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Both teams show a strong BTTS signal this season: Navbahor has BTTS 67% and AGMK 60%, both above the league average of 52%. In the last 5 matches BTTS was 60% for Navbahor and 80% for AGMK, and in those five games the home side scored 15 goals (avg 3.0) versus 10 goals (2.0) for the away side. Season goal averages and concessions are 1.33 scored and 1.17 conceded for Navbahor and 1.20 scored and 1.40 conceded for AGMK, indicating both teams concede at least one goal per game on average. Additionally home xG is 1.54 versus 1.20 for the away team, with xG against of 1.50 and 1.52; the hosts average 4.17 shots on target vs 2.6 for the visitors, suggesting an exchange of goal-scoring opportunities. Low clean sheet frequency of 17% and 20% and season tallies (Navbahor 14 scored/8 conceded; AGMK 14/14) confirm that BTTS - Yes is the strongest signal.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Based on xG I expect 1.53 goals for Navbahor (xG attack 1.54 vs xG conceded to AGMK 1.52) and 1.35 goals for AGMK (xG attack 1.20 vs xG conceded to Navbahor 1.50), totalling approximately 2.88 goals. A Poisson model with lambda=2.88 yields probabilities of Over 1.5 around 78%, Over 2.5 around 55% and Over 3.5 around 33% (Under correspondingly 22%, 45%, 67%). Seasonal indicators support this bias: share of matches over 1.5 is 67% for Navbahor and 60% for AGMK, and over 2.5 is 50% and 60% respectively; BTTS rates are 67% and 60%. Additionally, in the last 5 matches Navbahor averaged 3.0 goals, AGMK 2.0 goals, and recent xG are 2.25 for the home side and 1.34 for the visitors, which reinforces the signal for a higher-scoring game. Conclusion: the strongest and most reliable option is Over 1.5 (recommended), although Over 2.5 has a moderate edge (55%) and can be considered as a more risky alternative.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
The strongest signal comes from the tendency for draws at half-time: Navbahor were level at the break in 67% of home matches and led at the break in only 17% of games. Over the full 90 minutes the hosts finish level in 50% of cases, while AGMK are in good form (last 5 matches: 3 wins and 2 draws, i.e. 60% wins), giving the visitors potential for a turnaround, but this does not negate the draw-heavy statistic. xG indicates a close contest: the hosts’ xG is 1.54 versus 1.20 for the visitors, and xG against is 1.50 (hosts) and 1.52 (visitors), pointing to a moderate number of scoring opportunities. Few goals are scored by half-time (on average 1.0 for the hosts and 1.4 for the visitors) and the hosts kept a clean sheet at the break in 67% of matches, so the most likely outcome is to maintain the half-time draw through to full-time (X/X).
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Navbahor | AGMK | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 34% | 30% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.27 | 0.37 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
AGMK is 38% better for: last-5 form.
1.6 pts / game - Navbahor · 2.2 pts / game - AGMK
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Navbahor is 74% better for: goals allowed per game.
0.73 goals / game - Navbahor · 1.27 goals / game - AGMK
Navbahor scores in 82% of games (9 of 11 meczów), while AGMK keeps a clean sheet in 18% (2 of 11 meczów).
AGMK scores in 73% of games (8 of 11 meczów), while Navbahor keeps a clean sheet in 45% (5 of 11 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Navbahor
Over / Under - AGMK
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Navbahor is 36% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.73 pts / game - Navbahor · 1.27 pts / game - AGMK
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Navbahor - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 36% of games and wins 55%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.2 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
AGMK - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 27% of games and wins 36%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.80 | 1.20 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.8 | 0.4 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.2 | 0.4 |
| Average goals per game | 1.0 | 0.8 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 60% |
| No goal | 40% | 60% |
| Goal difference | +3 | 0 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.20 | 2.00 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.8 | 1.0 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.8 | 0.4 |
| Average goals per game | 1.6 | 1.4 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 60% |
| No goal | 60% | 40% |
| Goal difference | 0 | +3 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (4 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (3 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Navbahor
AGMK
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Uzbekistan Super League).
Teams vs league
| Navbahor | Liga | AGMK | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▼ 2.00 | 2.55 | • 2.55 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 45% | 53% | ▲ 64% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 36% | 52% | ▲ 55% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 45% | 27% | ▼ 18% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 55% | 68% | ▼ 64% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 73% | 78% | ▲ 82% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Record from Navbahor's perspective: 1 win, 0 draws and 1 loss against AGMK. Games average 3.50 goals, and both teams scored in 50% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Navbahor vs AGMK?
The Uzbekistan Super League match finished Navbahor 2:3 AGMK. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Navbahor and AGMK?
In the last 2 head-to-head matches Navbahor won 1, AGMK won 1 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 3.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Navbahor vs AGMK?
Navbahor score 1.27 goals per game on average and AGMK 1.27. The Uzbekistan Super League average is 2.55 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 52% of games. Both teams score in 45% of Navbahor's matches and 64% of AGMK's.
What form are Navbahor and AGMK in?
Over the last 5 games Navbahor have a 2-2-1 record (1.60 points per game) and AGMK 3-2-0 (2.20 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Navbahor vs AGMK?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.


