Navbahor vs Nasaf: match statistics
Navbahor vs Nasaf: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Navbahor played against Nasaf in Uzbekistan Super League (Uzbekistan). The game was played on August 21, 2026. Venue: Markaziy Stadion. Final score: 1:0.
Recent form
Navbahor has 3 wins, 2 draws and 0 losses over its last five games, averaging 2.20 points per game. Nasaf has 2 wins, 2 draws and 1 loss, with 1.60 points per game.
Scoring records
Navbahor scores 1.65 goals per game and allows 1.00. Nasaf scores 1.18 and allows 0.94. Games in this league average 2.65 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 59% of Navbahor's games and 59% of Nasaf's. The Over 2.5 rates are 41% and 35%, compared with league averages of 55% for BTTS and 54% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Navbahor has the higher season xG average, 1.65 to 1.52 per game. Navbahor takes 14.3 shots per game, while Nasaf takes 13.4.
First-half and second-half trends
Navbahor leads at halftime in 53% of its games and scores 0.53 goals per game after halftime. Nasaf leads at halftime in 12% and scores 0.76 after halftime.
When the teams score
Navbahor's most productive scoring window is minutes 0-15 (9 goals). For Nasaf, it is minutes 76-90+ (6 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Uzbekistan Super League games average 2.65 goals. Both teams score in 55% of games, and 54% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, 3 previous meetings were available. The record was 0 home wins, 2 draws and 1 away win. Those games averaged 0.33 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Navbahor sit third in the table and are unbeaten in their last five matches, collecting 11 points from 3 wins and 2 draws, while Nasaf have earned 8 points during the same period. The hosts are clearly more clinical in terms of current form: they have scored 12 goals in five matches, compared with just 5 for Nasaf. At home, Navbahor average 2.13 goals, create chances worth 1.75 xG and register 5.5 shots on target per match, compared with Nasaf’s 1.63 goals and 1.46 xG away from home. However, the visitors are difficult to beat on the road, losing just 13% of their matches and drawing as many as 50%, so a draw remains a realistic outcome. Navbahor’s superiority in possession (61% versus 49%), the quality of chances created and their current scoring form nevertheless point to a home win.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
The BTTS - Yes pick is primarily supported by the teams’ current results: Navbahor recorded BTTS in 80% of their last five matches, while Nasaf did so in 60%. The hosts are in clearly better attacking form, averaging 2.4 goals recently with an xG of 1.71, while Nasaf keeps a clean sheet in only 13% of matches. Nasaf, in turn, has scored in every match this season, and their average of 1.63 goals per game should be enough against a Navbahor defense conceding an average of 0.78 goals. The main risk to this scenario is Navbahor’s high 56% clean-sheet rate and their season BTTS rate of just 33%, but current form and the visitors’ defensive vulnerability provide stronger support for BTTS - Yes.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
The strongest signal is the low percentage of matches with at least four goals: just 11% in Navbahor’s games and 25% in Nasaf’s matches. Navbahor concede an average of only 0.78 goals at home and have kept a clean sheet in 56% of their matches, which clearly limits the opponent’s scoring ceiling. Nasaf score an average of 1.63 goals away from home, but this advantage is offset by the hosts’ solid defense and the fact that the home side scores only 0.78 goals per match this season. The last five matches nevertheless point to greater attacking potential from Navbahor, who have scored 12 goals, while the xG figures for both teams were 1.71 and 1.75 respectively, making the 2.5 line too finely balanced. The projected total of 2.50 goals still strongly supports Under 3.5, also backed by seasonal results below this line standing at 89% and 75%.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Navbahor are in clearly better current form: they have averaged 2.4 goals over their last five matches, won 60% of those games and suffered no defeats, while Nasaf conceded an average of 0.8 goals during the same period but won only 40% of their matches. The strongest signal concerns the opening stages, as the hosts held a lead at the break in four of their last five appearances, scoring an average of 1.6 goals before half-time, whereas Nasaf were level at half-time in 60% of such matches and scored just 0.4 goals on average. Navbahor also have an advantage in terms of chance quality at home: their average xG stands at 1.55 compared with 1.46 for the visitors, while Nasaf allow opponents an xG of 1.52. Although Navbahor have drawn at half-time in as many as 89% of their home matches this season, their current attacking form and 0% defeat rate in their last five games strengthen the scenario of the hosts taking the lead and maintaining it until full-time.
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Navbahor | Nasaf | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 35% | 34% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.11 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.33 | 0.26 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Navbahor is 38% better for: last-5 form.
2.2 pts / game - Navbahor · 1.6 pts / game - Nasaf
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Navbahor is 40% better for: goals scored per game.
1.65 goals / game - Navbahor · 1.18 goals / game - Nasaf
Nasaf is 6% better for: goals allowed per game.
1 goals / game - Navbahor · 0.94 goals / game - Nasaf
Navbahor scores in 88% of games (15 of 17 meczów), while Nasaf keeps a clean sheet in 35% (6 of 17 meczów).
Nasaf scores in 82% of games (14 of 17 meczów), while Navbahor keeps a clean sheet in 35% (6 of 17 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Navbahor
Over / Under - Nasaf
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Navbahor is 94% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
2.06 pts / game - Navbahor · 1.06 pts / game - Nasaf
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Navbahor - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 53% of games and wins 53%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.2 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
Nasaf - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 12% of games and wins 35%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.1 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 2.60 | 1.20 |
| Goals scored / game | 1.6 | 0.8 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.6 | 0.6 |
| Average goals per game | 2.2 | 1.4 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 40% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 60% |
| No goal | 0% | 60% |
| Goal difference | +5 | +1 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.20 | 1.40 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.4 | 0.6 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.4 | 0.4 |
| Average goals per game | 0.8 | 1.0 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 60% |
| No goal | 60% | 40% |
| Goal difference | 0 | +1 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (9 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (6 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Navbahor
Nasaf
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Uzbekistan Super League).
Teams vs league
| Navbahor | Liga | Nasaf | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | • 2.65 | 2.65 | ▼ 2.12 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 59% | 55% | ▲ 59% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 41% | 54% | ▼ 35% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 35% | 26% | ▲ 35% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 71% | 68% | ▼ 53% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 71% | 77% | • 76% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Record from Navbahor's perspective: 0 wins, 2 draws and 1 loss against Nasaf. Games average 0.33 goals, and both teams scored in 0% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Navbahor vs Nasaf?
The Uzbekistan Super League match finished Navbahor 1:0 Nasaf. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Navbahor and Nasaf?
In the last 3 head-to-head matches Navbahor won 0, Nasaf won 1 and 2 ended level. These games averaged 0.33 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Navbahor vs Nasaf?
Navbahor score 1.65 goals per game on average and Nasaf 1.18. The Uzbekistan Super League average is 2.65 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 54% of games. Both teams score in 59% of Navbahor's matches and 59% of Nasaf's.
What form are Navbahor and Nasaf in?
Over the last 5 games Navbahor have a 3-2-0 record (2.20 points per game) and Nasaf 2-2-1 (1.60 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Navbahor vs Nasaf?
The statistical background for Navbahor vs Nasaf — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.


