Uzbekistan - Uzbekistan Super LeagueMarkaziy StadionData current as of September 07, 2026

Navbahor vs Qizilqum: match statistics

Navbahor crest
Navbahor
1 : 1half-time 1:1
Qizilqum crest
Qizilqum

Navbahor vs Qizilqum: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

Navbahor played against Qizilqum in Uzbekistan Super League (Uzbekistan). The game was played on July 23, 2026. Venue: Markaziy Stadion. Final score: 1:1.

Recent form

Navbahor has 1 win, 2 draws and 2 losses over its last five games, averaging 1.00 points per game. Qizilqum has 2 wins, 1 draw and 2 losses, with 1.40 points per game.

Scoring records

Navbahor scores 1.33 goals per game and allows 0.92. Qizilqum scores 0.75 and allows 1.42. Games in this league average 2.64 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 50% of Navbahor's games and 33% of Qizilqum's. The Over 2.5 rates are 42% and 42%, compared with league averages of 56% for BTTS and 53% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

Navbahor has the higher season xG average, 1.58 to 1.20 per game. Navbahor takes 13.5 shots per game, while Qizilqum takes 9.9.

First-half and second-half trends

Navbahor leads at halftime in 42% of its games and scores 0.42 goals per game after halftime. Qizilqum leads at halftime in 25% and scores 0.42 after halftime.

When the teams score

Navbahor's most productive scoring window is minutes 0-15 (5 goals). For Qizilqum, it is minutes 31-45+ (3 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

Uzbekistan Super League games average 2.64 goals. Both teams score in 56% of games, and 53% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

Before this game, 2 previous meetings were available. The record was 1 home win, 0 draws and 1 away win. Those games averaged 3.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Navbahor (3rd) are favorites for the three points against Qizilqum (13th): the hosts have scored 16 goals in their last 5 matches, while the visitors only 6. At home Navbahor averages 1.4 goals with 13.8 shots and 4.4 shots on target per game, with a conversion rate of 10%, whereas Qizilqum on the road only averages 0.6 goals with 9.4 shots and a 6% conversion. Navbahor produces higher expected goals — xG 1.54 versus the visitors' 1.18 — and concedes fewer expected goals (xG against 0.94 vs 1.43), indicating better quality of created chances and a more stable defense. Additionally, the hosts average 1.6 points over the last 5 matches compared to Qizilqum's 0.6; the visitors have conceded 9 goals in their last 5 fixtures versus 5 for Navbahor, and Qizilqum fail to score in 60% of away games while Navbahor fail to score at home in only 20% of matches. Considering the possession advantage (62% vs 36%), higher shots on target (4.4 vs 2.8) and superior efficiency, I tip the home win; I estimate 72% for Navbahor, 16% for a draw and 12% for a Qizilqum win.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

In my assessment BTTS - Yes is more likely. In the last 5 matches both teams have BTTS at 60% (Navbahor 60% and Qizilqum 60%), versus the league seasonal average of 55%. Both sides produce comparable xG: 1.21 for Navbahor and 1.18 for Qizilqum (combined ~2.39), and shots on target 2.57 vs 2.8 indicate realistic scoring opportunities from both teams. Recent scoring form supports this — Navbahor scored 16 goals in the last 5 matches (3.2 per match) and conceded 5 (1.0), while Qizilqum scored 6 and conceded 9 (1.2 scored and 1.8 conceded), so both teams have recently both scored and conceded. Seasonal data is mixed: Navbahor has seasonal BTTS 57% and concedes on average 1.71 goals with only 14% clean sheets, while Qizilqum shows divergent seasonal metrics (BTTS 0% but 40% clean sheets and 60% matches without conceding), yet their recent 5-match form favors a higher probability of both teams scoring. In summary, considering last 5 matches BTTS 60%/60%, xG 1.21/1.18 and recent average goals 3.2 vs 1.2 plus seasonal conceded 1.71 vs 1.0, I assess BTTS - Yes at 68% and No at 32%.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

Navbahor has averaged 3.2 goals in the last 5 matches (16 goals in 5) with xG 2.16, while Qizilqum has 1.2 goals and xG 1.23 over their last 5, giving the home side a clear offensive advantage. Over the season Navbahor at home has 71% of matches over 1.5 and 71% over 2.5, whereas Qizilqum have 60% over 1.5 away but 0% over 2.5, so the 2.5 line is less clear. Seasonary xG for the hosts is 1.21 versus xG against the visitors 1.43, and considering recent form I project the hosts for about 1.75 goals. For the visitors I forecast around 0.95 goals (xG_for_away 1.18, low shot conversion 6%), giving an expected total of 2.70 goals; this is a strong signal for Over 1.5 as the best line to play.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

The most likely scenario is 1/1 (home team leading at half-time and winning full-time). Navbahor led at the break in 4 of their last 5 matches (80%) and averaged 1.6 first-half goals, while Qizilqum only has 0.2 goals by half-time. In the last 5 games the home side scored an average of 3.2 goals per match versus 1.2 for the visitors, and xG of 1.21 versus 1.18 plus a higher shot conversion rate (8% vs 6%) confirm Navbahor’s offensive edge. Seasonally the picture is less one-sided — Navbahor concedes on average 1.71 goals per match and 1.14 in the first half, and Qizilqum have 80% clean halves at the break, which explains some instability risk. Therefore I assign the highest probability to the home team taking the lead at the break and maintaining it until the end, but alternatives such as X/1 or X/X remain possible due to defensive vulnerabilities in both teams.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Stats by half

1 : 1
First half
0 : 0
Second half

Game stats

71Possession (%)29
NavbahorQizilqum
10Shots9
NavbahorQizilqum
5Shots on target4
NavbahorQizilqum
1.47xG1.11
NavbahorQizilqum
9Corners2
NavbahorQizilqum
67Dangerous attacks36
NavbahorQizilqum
-1Fouls-1
NavbahorQizilqum
0Cards1
NavbahorQizilqum

Pre-game profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

1.33Goals scored / game0.75
NavbahorQizilqum
0.92Goals allowed / game1.42
NavbahorQizilqum
56%Average possession42%
NavbahorQizilqum
4.67Shots on target / game2.67
NavbahorQizilqum

Team statswho is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

13.5Shots per game9.92
NavbahorQizilqum
4.67Shots on target2.67
NavbahorQizilqum
9.9%Shot conversion7.6%
NavbahorQizilqum
56%Possession42%
NavbahorQizilqum
1.58xG for1.2
NavbahorQizilqum
1.1xG against1.36
NavbahorQizilqum

Shooting quality

Navbahor: BalancedQizilqum: Balanced
NavbahorQizilqum
Accuracy (shots on target)35%27%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.280.28

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

Qizilqum is 40% better for: last-5 form.

1 pts / game - Navbahor · 1.4 pts / game - Qizilqum

Navbahor
WDLDL
Season result split
50% W17% R33% P
Season (W-D-L)
6-2-4
1.67 pts / game · goal difference +5
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-2-2
1.00 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
2-1-2
Last 5 at home
2-1-2
LWWDL
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.2Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 1.63Opponent xG: 1.32BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 40%
Qizilqum
WWDLL
Season result split
33% W8% R58% P
Season (W-D-L)
4-1-7
1.08 pts / game · goal difference -8
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-2
1.40 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
2-0-3
Last 5 away
2-0-3
LWLWL
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 0.8Goals conceded: 0.8xG: 1.19Opponent xG: 1.23BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 40%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Navbahor is 77% better for: goals scored per game.

1.33 goals / game - Navbahor · 0.75 goals / game - Qizilqum

Navbahor is 54% better for: goals allowed per game.

0.92 goals / game - Navbahor · 1.42 goals / game - Qizilqum

Navbahor scoring profile: very strong

Navbahor scores in 83% of games (10 of 12 meczów), while Qizilqum keeps a clean sheet in 25% (3 of 12 meczów).

Qizilqum scoring profile: mixed

Qizilqum scores in 50% of games (6 of 12 meczów), while Navbahor keeps a clean sheet in 42% (5 of 12 meczów).

16Goals scored (season)9
NavbahorQizilqum
11Goals conceded (season)17
NavbahorQizilqum
2.25Average goals per game2.17
NavbahorQizilqum
6Goals scored (last 5)4
NavbahorQizilqum
6Goals conceded (last 5)4
NavbahorQizilqum

How often they score at least...

83%1 goal50%
NavbahorQizilqum
50%2 goals25%
NavbahorQizilqum
0%3 goals0%
NavbahorQizilqum
0%4 goals0%
NavbahorQizilqum

How often they concede at least...

58%1 goal75%
NavbahorQizilqum
25%2 goals42%
NavbahorQizilqum
8%3 goals17%
NavbahorQizilqum
0%4 goals8%
NavbahorQizilqum

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

33%BTTS at half-time8%
NavbahorQizilqum
0%BTTS in both halves0%
NavbahorQizilqum
8%Scored in both halves17%
NavbahorQizilqum

BTTS and goal count

42%Min. 3 goals and BTTS33%
NavbahorQizilqum
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS8%
NavbahorQizilqum
60%BTTS - last 540%
NavbahorQizilqum

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

1st half

58%Min. 1 goal before half-time67%
NavbahorQizilqum
50%Min. 2 goals before half-time33%
NavbahorQizilqum
17%Min. 3 goals before half-time8%
NavbahorQizilqum

2nd half

75%Min. 1 goal after half-time75%
NavbahorQizilqum
25%Min. 2 goals after half-time33%
NavbahorQizilqum
0%Min. 3 goals after half-time0%
NavbahorQizilqum

Game halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Navbahor is 69% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.83 pts / game - Navbahor · 1.08 pts / game - Qizilqum

Navbahor - half-time state
42% leading58% draw0% trailing
Qizilqum - half-time state
25% leading33% draw42% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.83Points per game (1st half)1.08
NavbahorQizilqum
0.92Goals scored (1st half)0.33
NavbahorQizilqum
0.33Goals conceded (1st half)0.75
NavbahorQizilqum
1.25Average goals (1st half)1.08
NavbahorQizilqum
67%Clean sheet before half-time50%
NavbahorQizilqum
42%No goal before half-time75%
NavbahorQizilqum

After half-time (2nd half)

1.08Points per game (2nd half)1.17
NavbahorQizilqum
0.42Goals scored (2nd half)0.42
NavbahorQizilqum
0.58Goals conceded (2nd half)0.67
NavbahorQizilqum
1Average goals (2nd half)1.08
NavbahorQizilqum
50%Clean sheet after half-time50%
NavbahorQizilqum
67%No goal after half-time58%
NavbahorQizilqum

Navbahor - second-half results

25% W33% R42% P
22
Half-time points
11
Half-time goals
+7
Goal difference (1st half)
13
Second-half points
-2
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.83
PPG before half-time
Lead holding119%

Leads at halftime in 42% of games and wins 50%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime+0.2

Allows 0.2 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

Qizilqum - second-half results

25% W42% R33% P
13
Half-time points
4
Half-time goals
-5
Goal difference (1st half)
14
Second-half points
-3
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.08
PPG before half-time
Lead holding132%

Leads at halftime in 25% of games and wins 33%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime-0.1

Defense stays consistent across the full game.

Navbahor - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.800.60
Goals scored / game1.00.2
Goals allowed / game0.40.8
Average goals per game1.41.0
1 goal60%60%
2 goals60%40%
3 goals20%0%
Clean sheet60%40%
No goal40%80%
Goal difference+3-3
Half-time: 40% leading - 60% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 60% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 5
Qizilqum - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.201.60
Goals scored / game0.40.4
Goals allowed / game0.60.2
Average goals per game1.00.6
1 goal40%60%
2 goals40%0%
3 goals20%0%
Clean sheet60%80%
No goal80%60%
Goal difference-1+1
Half-time: 20% leading - 60% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 40% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 2

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

Navbahor
ScoredConceded
5
1
0-15
3
3
16-30
3
0
31-45
1
1
46-60
1
3
61-75
3
3
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (5 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

Qizilqum
ScoredConceded
0
1
0-15
1
5
16-30
3
3
31-45
1
3
46-60
1
3
61-75
3
2
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (3 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

2.21
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
1.4 : 0.8
Estimated goal split
home : away
84%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
42%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+36%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
42%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
9%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 11 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

Navbahor

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.48
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.07
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-4.4 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.25
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.18
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
99%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
72%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
-0.67
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.5
Late goals
19% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 31% come in the first quarter-hour.
19%

Qizilqum

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.16
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.51
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+5.1 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.45
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
-0.06
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
59%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
105%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
+0.32
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
33% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
33%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Uzbekistan Super League).

Teams vs league

NavbahorLigaQizilqum
Average goals per game 2.252.64 2.17
Both teams scored 50%56% 33%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 42%53% 42%
Clean sheets 42%25% 25%
Goal before half-time 58%69% 67%
Goal after half-time 75%78% 75%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.64
Average goals per game
56%
Both teams scored
53%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
25%
Clean sheets
1.35
Home goals / game
1.28
Away goals / game
+5%
Home attack advantage
+5%
Home defensive advantage
+4%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
69%
1 goal
39%
2 goals
9%
3 goals
5%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
78%
1 goal
41%
2 goals
16%
3 goals
4%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. QizilqumSubstitutionOn: Abbosbek AbdugafforovOff: Grigol Chabradze
  2. QizilqumSubstitutionOn: Bobomurod BozorovOff: Diyor Rakhmatilloyev
  3. NavbahorSubstitutionOn: Joel KojoOff: Diyor Kholmatov

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Record from Navbahor's perspective: 1 win, 0 draws and 1 loss against Qizilqum. Games average 3.00 goals, and both teams scored in 50% of them.

FK Navbahor Namangan
1 : 0
Qizilqum Zarafshon PFK
Qizilqum Zarafshon PFK
3 : 2
FK Navbahor Namangan

FAQ

What was the result of Navbahor vs Qizilqum?

The Uzbekistan Super League match finished Navbahor 1:1 Qizilqum. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Navbahor and Qizilqum?

In the last 2 head-to-head matches Navbahor won 1, Qizilqum won 1 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 3.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Navbahor vs Qizilqum?

Navbahor score 1.33 goals per game on average and Qizilqum 0.75. The Uzbekistan Super League average is 2.64 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 53% of games. Both teams score in 50% of Navbahor's matches and 33% of Qizilqum's.

What form are Navbahor and Qizilqum in?

Over the last 5 games Navbahor have a 1-2-2 record (1.00 points per game) and Qizilqum 2-1-2 (1.40 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Navbahor vs Qizilqum?

The statistical background for Navbahor vs Qizilqum — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.