Navbahor vs Xorazm: match statistics
Navbahor vs Xorazm: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Navbahor played against Xorazm in Uzbekistan Super League (Uzbekistan). The game was played on August 2, 2026. Venue: Markaziy Stadion. Final score: 5:1.
Recent form
Navbahor has 0 wins, 3 draws and 2 losses over its last five games, averaging 0.60 points per game. Xorazm has 1 win, 1 draw and 3 losses, with 0.80 points per game.
Scoring records
Navbahor scores 1.29 goals per game and allows 0.93. Xorazm scores 0.79 and allows 1.21. Games in this league average 2.60 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 57% of Navbahor's games and 43% of Xorazm's. The Over 2.5 rates are 36% and 36%, compared with league averages of 56% for BTTS and 52% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Navbahor has the higher season xG average, 1.59 to 1.01 per game. Navbahor takes 13.4 shots per game, while Xorazm takes 7.7.
First-half and second-half trends
Navbahor leads at halftime in 43% of its games and scores 0.36 goals per game after halftime. Xorazm leads at halftime in 14% and scores 0.50 after halftime.
When the teams score
Navbahor's most productive scoring window is minutes 0-15 (7 goals). For Xorazm, it is minutes 46-60 (4 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Uzbekistan Super League games average 2.60 goals. Both teams score in 56% of games, and 52% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, 2 previous meetings were available. The record was 1 home win, 1 draw and 0 away wins. Those games averaged 1.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Navbahor holds a clear advantage in chance creation and possession: at home they record on average 63% possession and 13.17 shots per match versus 47% possession and 5.71 shots for Xorazm away. The difference in chance quality is visible in xG – Navbahor averages 1.53 xG at home compared to 0.83 xG for Xorazm on the road, translating to an average of 1.33 goals for the home side versus 0.57 goals for the visitors per match. In the last 5 matches both teams have scored 9 goals, but Xorazm perform worse away and fail to score in 43% of away games, while Navbahor fail to score in only 17% of home matches. Defensively the hosts concede on average 1.17 goals at home (xG against 0.97), whereas the visitors have a higher xG against of 1.51 on the road, suggesting Navbahor will create clearer opportunities. Considering the superior possession, volume and quality of shots, and lower percentage of matches without a goal, I tip a Navbahor win and assess the probabilities as 60% for the hosts, 25% for a draw and 15% for Xorazm.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
I assess BTTS probability at 70% vs 30%, therefore I back BTTS - Yes. In the last 5 matches Navbahor had BTTS in 100% (5/5), and Xorazm in 60% (3/5), which strongly indicates both teams have recently been scoring and conceding regularly. Over the season both teams register BTTS at 43% (Navbahor 43%, Xorazm 43%), while the league shows a higher BTTS rate of 56%, which further favors both teams scoring. In the last 5 matches Navbahor has average xG 1.64 and averages 9.71 shots with 2.14 on target, while Xorazm has xG 1.04 and 5.71 shots with 2.43 on target — Navbahor creates more chances and Xorazm has relatively good on-target efficiency, so both sides have realistic scoring opportunities. Additionally, both teams concede over 1 goal on average (seasonally Navbahor 1.43, Xorazm 1.0; in the last 5 matches 1.4 and 1.6) and the clean sheet rate is only 29% for each team, therefore the both teams to score scenario is more likely.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Based on the data I calculate expected goals: Navbahor 1.48 xG and Xorazm 1.12 xG, total 2.60, which is close to the league average 2.59. Navbahor has season xG_for 1.18 and last 5 matches xG_for 1.64, while Xorazm has season xG_for 0.83 and last 5 xG_for 1.04 — this indicates stronger form from the home side. Seasonally 71% of Navbahor’s matches and 57% of Xorazm’s matches finished over 1.5 goals; additionally both teams scored 9 goals in the last 5 matches (avg 1.8), which raises the probability of at least 2 goals. A Poisson distribution with λ=2.60 yields P(>=2)=73%, P(>=3)=48% and P(>=4)=26%, so the strongest signal is Over 1.5 (73%), Over 2.5 is balanced (~48%) and Over 3.5 is unlikely (26%). For these reasons I recommend a bet on Over 1.5 as the best line.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
The strongest signal is 1/1: Navbahor has a 43% win rate this season versus 14% for Xorazm, and a season points coefficient of 1.43 versus 0.86, underscoring the home advantage. The home xG is 1.18 versus 0.83 for the visitors, and average shots 9.71 versus 5.71 show that Navbahor creates significantly more opportunities. In the last five matches the hosts led at the break in 80% of cases (4 of 5), scoring an average of 1.2 first-half goals and conceding 0.4, which suggests strong starts. Over the season the hosts average 0.43 first-half goals versus 0.14 for Xorazm, so the first half more often goes in Navbahor’s favor. Therefore I assign the highest probability to the 1/1 scenario, with alternatives X/1 or X/X if effectiveness drops.
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Navbahor | Xorazm | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 35% | 30% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.13 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.27 | 0.34 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Xorazm is 33% better for: last-5 form.
0.6 pts / game - Navbahor · 0.8 pts / game - Xorazm
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Navbahor is 63% better for: goals scored per game.
1.29 goals / game - Navbahor · 0.79 goals / game - Xorazm
Navbahor is 30% better for: goals allowed per game.
0.93 goals / game - Navbahor · 1.21 goals / game - Xorazm
Navbahor scores in 86% of games (12 of 14 games), while Xorazm keeps a clean sheet in 29% (4 of 14 games).
Xorazm scores in 64% of games (9 of 14 games), while Navbahor keeps a clean sheet in 36% (5 of 14 games).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Navbahor
Over / Under - Xorazm
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Navbahor is 100% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.86 pts / game - Navbahor · 0.93 pts / game - Xorazm
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Navbahor - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 43% of games and wins 43%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.2 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
Xorazm - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 14% of games and wins 29%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.80 | 0.40 |
| Goals scored / game | 1.0 | 0.0 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.6 | 0.8 |
| Average goals per game | 1.6 | 0.8 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 40% |
| No goal | 20% | 100% |
| Goal difference | +2 | -4 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.00 | 0.40 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.4 | 0.0 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.8 | 0.6 |
| Average goals per game | 1.2 | 0.6 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 0% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 40% |
| No goal | 60% | 100% |
| Goal difference | -2 | -3 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (7 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (4 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Navbahor
Xorazm
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Uzbekistan Super League).
Teams vs league
| Navbahor | Liga | Xorazm | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▼ 2.21 | 2.60 | ▼ 2.00 |
| Both teams scored | • 57% | 56% | ▼ 43% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 36% | 52% | ▼ 36% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 36% | 25% | ▲ 29% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 64% | 68% | ▼ 64% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 71% | 77% | ▲ 86% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
- XorazmGoalSultonboy Ismoilov
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Record from Navbahor's perspective: 1 win, 1 draw and 0 losses against Xorazm. Games average 1.50 goals, and both teams scored in 50% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Navbahor vs Xorazm?
The Uzbekistan Super League match finished Navbahor 5:1 Xorazm. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Navbahor and Xorazm?
In the last 2 head-to-head matches Navbahor won 1, Xorazm won 0 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 1.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Navbahor vs Xorazm?
Navbahor score 1.29 goals per game on average and Xorazm 0.79. The Uzbekistan Super League average is 2.60 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 52% of games. Both teams score in 57% of Navbahor's matches and 43% of Xorazm's.
What form are Navbahor and Xorazm in?
Over the last 5 games Navbahor have a 0-3-2 record (0.60 points per game) and Xorazm 1-1-3 (0.80 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Navbahor vs Xorazm?
The statistical background for Navbahor vs Xorazm — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.


